Protein fold recognition using sequence-derived predictions

Protein Science

Volumn 5, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 947-955

  Fischer, Daniel ^a   Eisenberg, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

fold recognition performance assessment benchmark; protein fold recognition; secondary structure prediction

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; MOLECULAR PROBE; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

EID: 0029874551     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560050516     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Altschul SF. 1991 Amino acid substitution matrices from an information theoretic perspective. J Mol Biol 219:555-565.
2. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment tool. J Mol Biol 215:403-410.
3. Bairoch A, Boeckmann B. 1992. The SWISSPROT protein sequence data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 20:2019-2022.
4. Bernstein FC, Koetzle TF, Williams GJB, Meyer EF Jr, Brice MD, Rodgers JR, Kennard O, Shimanouchi T, Tasumi M. 1977. The Protein Data Bank: A computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol 112:535-542.
5. Bowie JU, Eisenberg D. 1993. Inverted protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 3:437-444.
6. Bowie JU, Luthy R, Eisenberg D. 1991. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science 253:164-170.
7. Bryant SH, Lawrence CE. 1993. An empirical energy function for threading protein sequence through folding motif. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 16:92-112.
8. Dayhoff MD, Schwartz RM, Orcutt BC. 1978. A model of evolutionary change in proteins. In: Dayhoff MO, ed. Atlas of protein sequence and structure, vol 5, suppl 3. Washington, DC: National Biomedical Research Foundation, pp 345.
9. Fischer D, Elofsson A, Rice DW, Eisenberg D. 1996a. Assessing the performance of inverted protein folding methods by means of an extensive benchmark. Proc 1st Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. pp 300-318. http://www.pharm.ucsf.edu/psb/psb96/proceedings/eproceedings.html.
10. Fischer D, Rice DW, Bowie JU, Eisenberg D. 1996b. Assigning amino acid sequences to 3D protein folds. FASEB J 10:126-136.
11. Fischer D, Tsai CJ, Nussinov R, Wolfson H. 1995. A 3-D sequence-independent representation of the Protein Data Bank. Protein Eng 8:981-997.
12. Godzik A, Kolinski A, Skolnick J. 1992. Topology fingerprint approach to the inverse folding problem. J Mol Biol 227:227-238.
13. Gonnet GH, Cohen MA, Benner SA. 1992. Exhaustive matching of the entire protein sequence database. Science 256:1433-1445.
14. Henikoff S, Henikoff JG. 1992. Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:10915-10919.
15. Jones D, Thornton J. 1993. Protein fold recognition. J Comput Aided Mol Design 7:439-456.
16. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. 1992. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature 358:86-89.
17. Kocher JPA, Rooman MJ, Wodak SJ. 1994. Factors influencing the ability of knowledge-based potential to identify native sequence-structure matches. J Mol Biol 235:1598-1613.
18. Lemer CMR, Rooman MJ, Wodak SJ. 1995. Protein structure prediction by threading methods: Evaluation of current techniques. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 23:337-355.
19. Matsuo Y, Nishikawa K. 1994. Protein structural similarities predicted by a sequence-structure compatibility method. Protein Sci 3:2055-2063.
20. Needleman SB, Wunsch CD. 1970. A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J Mol Biol 48:443-453.
21. Ouzounis C, Sander C, Scharf M, Schneider R. 1993. Prediction of protein structure by evaluation of sequence-structure fitness. Aligning sequences to contact profiles derived from 3D structures. J Mol Biol 232:805-825.
22. Pearl LH, O'Hara B, Drew RE, Wilson SA. 1994. Crystal structure of AmiC: The controller of transcription antitermination in the amidase operon of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. EMBO J 13:5810-5817.
23. Pearson WR, Lipman DJ. 1988. Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:2444-2448.
24. Rice DW, Eisenberg. 1996. In preparation.
25. Rost B. 1995. Topits: Threading one-dimensional predictions into three-dimensional structures. Proc Conf Intelligent Systems in Molecular Biology, ISMB-95. pp 314-321.
26. Rost B, Sander C. 1993. Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy. J Mol Biol 232:584-599.
27. Russell RB, Copley RR, Borton GJ. 1995. Protein fold recognition from secondary structure assignments. Proc 28th Annual Hawan Int Conf on System Sciences, pp 302-311.
28. Sippl MJ. 1995. Knowledge-based potentials for proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 5:229-235.
29. Sippl MJ, Weitckus S. 1992. Detection of native like models for amino acid sequences of unknown three dimensional structure in a data base of known protein conformations. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 13:258-271.
30. Smith TF, Waterman MS. 1981. Identification of common molecular sub-sequences. J Mol Biol 147:195-197.
31. Wilmanns M, Eisenberg D. 1993. Three-dimensional profiles from residuepair preferences: Identification of sequences with β/α-barrel fold. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:1379-1383.
32. Wilmanns M, Eisenberg D. 1995. Inverted protein folding by the residue pair preference profile method. Protein Eng 8:627-639.
33. Wodak SJ, Rooman MJ. 1993. Generating and testing protein folds. Curr Opin Struct Biol 3:247-259.
34. Yi TM, Lander ES. 1994. Recognition of related proteins by iterative template refinement (ITR). Protein Sci 3:1315-1328.