Stability scale and atomic solvation parameters extracted from 1023 mutation experiments

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 483-492

  Zhou, Hongyi ^a   Zhou, Yaoqi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

Atomic solvation parameter; Binding free energy of protein protein complexes; Hydrophobicity scale; Packing interactions; Transfer free energy

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; BARNASE; CARBOXYPEPTIDASE; CHYMOTRYPSIN A; DEOXYHEMOGLOBIN; IMMUNOGLOBULIN; INSULIN; KALLIKREIN; LYSOZYME; PROTEIN; PROTEINASE; SUBTILISIN; THERMITASE; TRYPSIN; TRYPSINOGEN;

ARTICLE; DATA BASE; ENERGY; GENE MUTATION; GEOMETRY; HYDROPHILICITY; HYDROPHOBICITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION;

AMINO ACIDS; ANIMALS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; ENZYME STABILITY; HUMANS; HYDROPHOBICITY; MUTATION; OCTANOLS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS; SOLUBILITY; SOLVENTS; THERMODYNAMICS; WATER;

EID: 0036893044     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.10241     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Kauzmann W. Some factors in the interpretation of protein denaturations. Adv Protein Chem 1959;14:1-63.
2. Dill KA. Dominant forces in protein folding. Biochemistry 1990;29:7133-7155.
3. Tanford C. The Hydrophobic Effect: Formation of Micelles and Biological Membrances. New York: Wiley; 1980.
4. Fauchere JL, Pliska V. Hydrophobic parameters π of amino acid side chains from the partitioning of n-acetylamino-acid amides. Eur J Med Chem 1983;18:369-375.
5. DeVido DR, Doresey JG, Chan HS, Dill KA. Oil/water partitioning has a different thermodynamic signature when the oil solvent chains are aligned than when they are amorphous. J Phys Chem B 1998;102:7272-7279.
6. Wolfenden R, Andersson L, Cullis PM, Southgate CC. Affinities of amino acid side chains for solvent water. Biochemistry 1981;20:849-855.
7. Radzicka A, Wolfenden R. Comparing the polarities of the aminoacids-side-chain distribution coefficients between the vaporphase, cyclohexane, 1-octanol, and neutral aqueous-solution. Biochemistry 1988;27:1664-1670.
8. White SH, Wimley WC. Membrance protein folding and stability: Physical principles. Annu Rev Biophys Biomolec Struct 1999;28:319-365.
9. Krigbaum WR, Komoriya A. Local interactions as a structure determinant for protein molecules: II. Biochim Biophys Acta 1979;576:204-228.
10. Karplus PA. Hydrophobicity regained. Protein Sci 1997;6:1302-1307.
11. Chan HS. Amino acid side-chain hydrophobicity. In: Encyclopedia of Life Sciences. London: Nature Publishing Group; 2001. http://www.els.net.
12. Yutani K, Ogasahara K, Tsujita T, Sugino Y. Dependence of conformational stability on hydrophobicity of the amino residue in a series of variant proteins substituted at unique position of tryptophan synthase α subunit. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1987;84:4441-4444.
13. Matsumura M, Becktel WJ, Matthews BW. Hydrophobic stabilization in T4 lysozyme determined directly by multiple substitutions of Ile 3. Nature 1988;334:406-410.
14. Shortle D, Stites WE, Meeker AK. Contributions of the large hydrophobic amino acids to the stability of staphylococcal nuclease. Biochemistry 1990;29:8033-8041.
15. Funahashi J, Takano K, Yamagata Y, Yutani K. Contribution of amino acid substitutions at two different interior positions to the conformational stability of human lysozyme. Protein Eng 1999;12:841-850.
16. Takano K, Yamagata Y, Yutani K. Contribution of polar groups in the interior of a protein to to the conformational stability. Biochemistry 2001;40:4853-4858.
17. Takano K, Yutani K. A new scale for side-chain contribution to protein stability based on the empirical stability analysis of mutant proteins. Protein Eng 2001;14:525-528.
18. Liu R, Baase WA, Mattthews B. The introduction of strain and its effects on the structure and stability of T4 lysozyme. J Mol Biol 2000;298:937-953.
19. Gromiha MM, An J, Kono H, Oobatake M, Uedaira H, Prabakaran P, Sarai A, ProTherm, Version 2.0: Thermodynamic database for proteins and mutants. Nucl Acids Res 2000;28:283-285.
20. Xu D, Lin SL, Nussinov R. Protein binding versus protein folding: The role of hydrophilic bridges in protein associations. J Mol Biol 1997;265:68-84.
21. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BR. Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 1989.
22. Lee B. Estimation of the maximum change in stability of globular proteins upon mutation of a hydrophobic residue to another of smaller size. Protein Sci 1993;2:733-738.
23. Chakravarty S, Varadarajan R. Residue depth: A novel parameter for the analysis of protein structure and stability. Structure 1999;7:723-732.
24. Ratnaparkhi GS, Varadarajan R. Thermodynamic and structural studies of cavity formation in proteins suggest that loss of packing interactions rather than the hydrophobic effect dominates the observed energetics. Biochemistry 2000;39:12365-12374.
25. Hobohm U, Scharf M, Schneider R, Sander C. Selection of representive protein data sets. Protein Sci 1992;1:409-417.
26. Zhang C, Vasmatzis G, Cornette J. Determination of atomic desolvation energies from the structures of crystallized proteins. J Mol Biol 1997;267:707-726.
27. Colonna-Cesari F, Sander C. Excluded volume approximation to protein-solvent interaction: The solvent contact model. Biophys J 1990;57:1103-1107.
28. Eisenberg D, McLachlan AD. Solvation energy in protein folding and binding. Nature 1986;319:199-203.
29. Shrake A, Rupley JA. Environment and exposure to solvent of protein atoms. Lysozyme and insulin. J Mol Biol 1973;79:351-371.
30. Eisenberg D, Wesson M, Yamashita M. Interpretation of protein folding and binding with atomic solvation parameters. Chem Scripta A 1989;29:217-221.
31. Horton N, Lewis M. Calculation of the free energy of association for protein complexes. Protein Sci 1992;1:169-181.
32. Lee B, Richards FM. The interpretation of protein structures: Estimation of static accesibility. J Mol Biol 1971;55:379-400.
33. Efremov RG, Nolde DE, Vergoten G, Aseniev AS. A solvent model for simulations of peptides in bilayers. I. Membrane-promoting α-helix formation. Biophys J 1999;76:2448-2459.
34. Eriksson AE, Baase WA, Zhang XJ, Heinz DW, Blaber M, Baldwin EP, Matthews BW. Response of a protein structure to cavity-creating mutations and its relation to the hydrophobic effect. Science 1992;255:178-183.
35. Sharp KA, Nicholls A, Friedman R, Honig B. Extracting hydrophobic free energies from experimental data: Relationship to protein folding and theoretical models. Biochemistry 1991;30:9686-9697.
36. Chan HS, Dill KA. Solvation: How to obtain microscopic energies from partitioning and solvation experiments. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 1997;26:425-459.
37. Jayasinghe S, Hristova K, White SH. Energetics, stability, and prediction of transmembrane helices. J Mol Biol 2001;312:927-934.
38. Harpaz Y, Gerstein M, Chothia C. Volume changes on protein folding. Structure 1994;2:641-649.
39. Chothia C. The nature of the accessible and buried surfaces in proteins. J Mol Biol 1976;105:1-14.
40. Rose GD, Geselowitz AR, Lesser GJ, Lee RH, Zehfus MH. Hydrophobicity of amino acid residues in globular protein. Science 1985;229:834-838.
41. Zhou H, Zhou Y. Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction. Prot Sci 2002. Forthcoming.
42. Vajda S, Weng Z, Rosenfeld R, Delisi C. Effect of conformational flexibility and solvation on receptor-ligand binding free energies. Biochemistry 1994;33:13977-13988.
43. Janin J. Elusive affinities. Proteins 1995;21:30-39.
44. Erickson HP, Pantaloni D. The role of subunit entropy in cooperative assembly - Nucleation of microtubules and other two dimensional polymers. Biophys J 1981;34:293-309.
45. Erickson HP. Co-operativity in protein-protein association, the structure and stability of the actin filament. J Mol Biol 1989;206:465-474.
46. Palliser CC, Parry DAD. Quantitative comparison of the ability of hydropathy scales to recognize surface β-strands in proteins. Proteins 2001;42:243-255.
47. Chothia C. Hydrophobic bonding and accessible surface area in protein. Nature 1974;248:338-339.
48. Pace CN. Polar group burial contributes more to protein stability than nonpolar group burial. Biochemistry 2001;40:310-313.
49. Richards FM, Lim WA. An analysis of packing in the protein folding problem. Q Rev Biophys 1993;26:423-498.
50. Baldwin EP, Matthews BW. Core-packing constraints, hydrophobicity and protein design. Curr Opin Biotech 1994;6:396-402.
51. Lazar GA, Handel TM. Hydrophobic core packing and protein design. Curr Opin Chem Biol 1998;2:675-679.
52. Chen J, Stites WE. Packing is a key selection factor in the evolution of protein hydrophobic cores. Biochemistry 2001;40:15280-15289.
53. Zhou Y, Karplus M. Folding thermodynamics of a model threehelix-bundle protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:14429-14432.
54. Zhou Y, Vitkup D, Karplus M. Native proteins are surface-molten solids: Use of a dynamic criterion for the solid versus liquid state. J Mol Biol 1999;285:1371-1377.
55. Zhou Y, Linhananta A. Thermodynamics of an all-atom off-lattice model of the fragment B of staphylococcal protein A: Implication for the origin of the cooperativity of protein folding. J Phys Chem B 2002;106:1481-1485.
56. Shimizu S, Chan H. Anti-cooperativity in hydrophobic interactions: A simulation study of spatial dependence of three-body effects and beyond. J Chem Phys 2001;115:1414-1421.
57. Plaxco KW, Simons KT, Baker D. Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins. J Mol Biol 1998;277:985-994.
58. Zhou H, Zhou Y. Folding rate prediction using total contact distance. Biophys J 2002;82:458-463.
59. Galzitskaya OV, Finkelstein AV. A theoretical search for folding/unfolding nuclei in three-dimensional protein structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:11299-11304.
60. Alm E, Baker D. Prediction of protein-folding mechanisms from free-energy landscapes derived from native structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:11305-11310.
61. Muñoz V, Eaton WA. A simple model for calculating the kinetics of protein folding from three-dimensional structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:11311-11316.
62. Taketomi H, Ueda Y, Go N. Studies on protein folding, unfolding and fluctuations by computer simulations. Int J Peptide Protein Res 1975;7:445-459.
63. Clementi C, Nymeyer H, Onuchic JN. Topological and energetic factors: What determines the structural details of the transition state ensemble and "en-route" intermediates for protein folding? An investigation for small globular proteins. J Mol Biol 2000;298:937-953.
64. Green SM, Meeker AK, Shortle D. Contributions of the polar, uncharged amino acids to the stability of staphylococcal nuclease: Evidence for mutational effects on the free energy of the denatured state. Biochemistry 1992;31:5717-5728.
65. O'Neil KT, DeGrado WF. A thermodynamic scale for the helixforming tendencies of the commonly occurring amino acids. Science 1990;250:646-650.
66. Blaber M, Zang X, Matthews BW. Structural basis of amino acid α helix propensity. Science 1993;260:1637-1640.
67. Kim DE, Fisher C, Baker D. A breakdown of symmetry in the folding transition state of protein L. J Mol Biol 2000;298:971-984.
68. Hamill SJ, Steward A, Clarke J. The folding of an immunoglobulin-like greek key protein is defined by a common-core nucleus and regions constrained by topology. J Mol Biol 2000;297:165-178.
69. Fulton KF, Main ERG, Daggett V, Jackson SE. Mapping the interactions present in the transition state for unfolding/folding of FKBP12. J Mol Biol 1999;291:445-461.
70. Kragelund BB, Osmark P, Neergaard TB, Schidt J, Kristiansen K, Knudsen J, Poulsen FM. The formation of a native-like structure containing eight conserved hydrophobic residues is rate limiting in two-state protein folding of ACBP. Nature Struct Biol 1999;6:594-601.
71. Ternström T, Mayor U, Akke M, Oliveberg M. From snapshot to movie: Φ analysis of protein folding transition states taken one step further. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:14854-14859.
72. Lorch M, Mason JM, Clarke AR, Parker MJ. Effects of core mutations on the folding of a β-sheet protein: Implications for backbone organization in the I-state. Biochemistry 1999;38:1377-1385.
73. Julenius K, Thulin E, Linse S, Finn BE. Hydrophobic core substitutions in calbindin D9k: Effects on stability and structure. Biochemistry 1998;37:8915-8925.
74. Bigler TL, Lu W, Park SJ, Tashiro M, Wieczorek M, Wynn R, Laskowski MJ. Binding of amino acid side chains to preformed cavities: Interaction of serine proteinases with turkey ovomucoid third domains with coded and noncoded P1 residues. Protein Sci 1993;2:786-799.
75. Hass GM, Ryan CA. Carboxypeptidase inhibitor from potatoes. Meth Enzymol 1981;80:779-790.
76. Seemüller U, Fritz H, Euliz M. Eglin elastase-cathepsing inhibitor from leeches. Meth Enzymol 1981;80:804-816.
77. Svendsen I, Jonassen I, Hejgaard J, Boisen S. Amino acid sequence homology between a serine protease inhibitor from barely hordeum vulgare cultivar hiproly and potato inhibitor I. Carsberg Res Commun 1980;45:389-395.
78. Vincent JP, Lazdunski M. Trypsin-pancreatic inhibitor association. Dynamic of the interaction and role of disulfide bridges. Biochemistry; 1972;11:2967-2977.
79. Bode W. The transition of bovine trypsinogen to a trypsin-like state upon strong ligand binding. II. The binding of the pancreatic trypsin inhibitor and of isoleucine-valine and of sequentially related peptides to trypsinogen and to p-guanidinobenzoatetrypsinogen. J Mol Biol 1979;127:357-374.
80. Dietl T, Huber C, Geiger R, Iwanaga S, Fritz H. Inhibition of porcine glandular kallikreins by structurally homologous proteinase inhibitor of the kunitz type. Hoppe-Seyler's Z Physiol Chem 1979;360:67-71.
81. Hartley RW. Directed mutagenesis and barase-barstar recognition. Biochemistry 1993;32:5978-5984.
82. Verhoeyen M, Milstein C, Winter G. Reshaping human antibodies: Grafting an antilysozyme activity. Science 1988;239:1534-1536.
83. -10 m for the subtilisin BPN′-protein proteinase inhibitor (streptomyces subtilisin inhibitor) complex by a single photon counting technique. J Biochem 1978;84:1195-1202.
84. Wallqvist A, Jernigan RL, Covell DG. A preference-based free energy parameterization of enzyme-inhibitor binding applications to HIV-1 protease inhibitor design. Protein Sci 1995;4:1881-1903.
85. Ross PD, Hofrichter J, Eaton WA. Thermodynamics of gelation of sickle cell deoxyhemoglobin. J Mol Biol 1977;115:111-134.
86. Akasaka K, Fujii S, Hayashi F, Rokushika S, Hatano H. A novel technique for the detection of dissociation-association equilibrium in highly associable macromolecular systems. Biochem Int 1982;5:637-642.
87. Pekar AH, Frank BH. Conformation of proinsulin, a comparison of insulin and proinsulin self-association at neutral pH. Biochemistry 1972;11:4013-4016.
88. Lomize AL, Reibarkh MY, Pogozheva ID. Interatomic potentials and solvation parameters from protein engineering data for buried residues. Protein Sci 2002;11:1984-2000.