3D-1D threading methods for protein fold recognition

Pharmacogenomics

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 445-455

  David, Robert ^a   Korenberg, Michael J ^a,b   Hunter, Ian W ^a  

^a USA   (United States)

^b QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Hydrophobicity; Remote homologues; Sequence structure alignment; Structure prediction

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; HUMANS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS;

EID: 0034328688     PISSN: 14622416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1517/14622416.1.4.445     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. LO CONTE L, AILEY B, HUBBARD TJP, BRENNER SE, MURZIN AG, CHOTHIA C: SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database. Nucleic Acids Res. (2000) 28:257-259.
2. RUSSELL RB, SAQI MA, BATES PA, SAYLE RA, STERNBERG MJ: Recognition of analogous and homologous protein folds - assessment of prediction success and associated alignment accuracy using empirical substitution matrices. Protein Eng. (1998) 11:1-9.
3. PARK J, KARPLUS K, BARRETT C et al.: Sequence comparisons using multiple sequences detect three times as many remote homologues as pairwise methods. J. Mol. Biol. (1998) 284:1201-1210. Comparison of three iterative methods for remote homologue detection (ISS, PSI-BLAST and SAM-T98) and two traditional methods (FASTA, BLAST).
4. HARGBO J, ELOFSSON A: Hidden Markov models that use predicted secondary structures for fold recognition. Proteins (1999) 36(1):68-76.
5. GRIGORIEV IV, KIM S-H: Detection of protein fold similarity based on correlation of amino acid properties. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1999) 96:14318-14323. Proximity correlation matrices detect structural similarity based on conservation of local amino acid properties.
6. MÜLLER A, MACCALLUM RM, STERNBERG MJE: Benchmarking PSI-BLAST in genome annotation. J. Mol. Biol. (1999) 293:1257-1271.
7. RYCHLEWSKI L, JAROSZEWSKI L, LI W, GODZIK A: Comparison of sequence profiles. Strategies for structural predictions using sequence information. Protein Sci. (2000) 9:232-241.
8. LINDAHL E, ELOFSSON A: Identification of related proteins on family, superfamily and fold level. J. Mol. Biol. (2000) 295:613-625.
9. KELLEY LA, MACCALLUM RM, STERNBERG MJE: Enhanced genome annotation using structural profiles in the program 3D-PSSM. J. Mol. Biol. (2000) 299(2):523-544.
10. BERNSTEIN FC, KOETZLE TF, WILLIAMS GJB et al.: The protein data bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Biol. (1977) 112:535-542.
11. JAROSZEWSKI L, RYCHLEWSKI L, ZHANG B, GODZIK A: Fold prediction by a hierarchy of sequence, threading and modeling methods. Protein Sci. (1998) 7:1431-1440. Combining sequence and structure information improves fold recognition.
12. JONES DT: GenTHREADER: an efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences. J. Mol. Biol. (1999) 287:797-815.
13. HENDLICH M, LACKNER P, WEITCKUS S et al.: Identification of native protein folds amongst a large number of incorrect models - the calculation of low-energy conformations from potentials of mean force. J. Mol. Biol. (1990) 216(1):167-180.
14. WILMANNS M, EISENBERG D: Three-dimensional profiles from residue-pair preferences: identification of sequences with β/α-barrel fold. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1993) 90:1379-1383.
15. XU Y, XU D: Protein threading using PROSPECT: design and evaluation. Proteins (2000) 40:343-354.
16. DE LA CRUZ X, THORNTON JM: Factors limiting the performance of prediction-based fold recognition methods. Protein Sci. (1999) 8:750-759. Loss of information in the reduction from three dimensions to one is the limiting factor in the accuracy of 3D-1D threaders.
17. BRAXENTHALER M, SIPPL MJ: Screening genome sequences for known folds. In: Protein Folds. Bohr H, Brunak S (Eds.), CRC, Boca Raton, FL, USA (1995):80-84.
18. FISCHER D, EISENBERG D: Protein fold recognition using sequence-derived predictions. Protein Sci. (1996) 5:947-955.
19. TEICHMANN SA, PARK J, CHOTHIA C: Structural assignments to the Mycoplasma genitalium proteins show extensive gene duplications and domain rearrangements. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1998) 95(25):14658-14663.
20. RYCHLEWSKI L, ZHANG B, GODZIK A: Fold and function predictions for Mycoplasma genitalium proteins. Folding Des. (1998) 3:229-238.
21. FISCHER D: Rational structural genomics: affirmative action for ORFans and the growth in our structural knowledge. Protein Eng. (1999) 12:1029-1030.
22. ALTSCHUL SF, GISH W, MILLER W, MYERS EW, LIPMAN DJ: Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. (1990) 215(3):403-410.
23. EDDY SR: Hidden Markov models. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. (1996) 6:361-365.
24. DI FRANCESCO V, GARNIER J, MUNSON PJ: Protein topology recognition from secondary structure sequences: application of the hidden Markov models to the alpha class proteins. J. Mol. Biol. (1997) 267:446-463.
25. BIENKOWSKA JR, YU L, ZARAKHOVICH S, ROGERS JR RG, SMITH TF: Protein fold recognition by total alignment probability. Proteins (2000) 40:451-462.
26. PARK J, TEICHMANN SA, HUBBARD T, CHOTHIA C: Intermediate sequences increase the detection of homology between sequences. J. Mol. Biol. (1997) 273:349-354
27. GERSTEIN M: Measurement of the effectiveness of transitive sequence comparison, through a third 'intermediate' sequence. Bioinformatics (1998) 14:707-714.
28. ALTSCHUL SF, MADDEN TL, SCHAFFER AA et al.: Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. (1997) 25(17):3389-3402. PSI-BLAST, an iterated form of BLAST, is a popular and accurate standard for remote homologue detection.
29. KARPLUS K, BARRETT C, HUGHEY R: Hidden Markov models for detecting remote protein homologies. Bioinformatics (1998) 14:846-856.
30. KROGH A, BROWN M, MIAN IS, SJÖLANDER K, HAUSSLER D: Hidden Markov models in computational biology: applications to protein modeling. J. Mol. Biol. (1994) 235:1501-1531.
31. JONES DT, TAYLOR WR, THORNTON JM: A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature (1992) 358:86-89.
32. ALEXANDROV NN, NUSSINOV R, ZIMMER RM: Fast protein fold recognition via sequence to structure alignment and contact capacity potentials. Biocomputing: Proceedings of the 1996 Pacific Symposium. Hawaii, USA (1996).
33. HOFMANN K, BUCHER P, FALQUET L, BAIROCH A: The PROSITE database, its status in 1999. Nucleic Acids Res. (1999) 27:215-219.
34. TATUSOV RL, EUGENE VK, DAVID JL: A genomic perspective on protein families. Science (1997) 278:631-637.
35. PELLEGRINI M, MARCOTTE EM, THOMPSON MJ, EISENBERG D, YEATES TO: Assigning protein functions by comparative genome analysis: Protein phylogenetic profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1999) 96:4285-4288.
36. MARCOTTE EM, PELLEGRINI M, NG H-L, RICE DW, YEATES TO, EISENBERG D: Detecting protein function and protein-protein interactions from genome sequences. Science (1999) 285:751-753.
37. MARCOTTE EM, PELLEGRINI M, THOMPSON MJ, YEATES TO, EISENBERG D: A combined algorithm for genome-wide prediction of protein function. Nature (1999) 402:83-86.
38. TEICHMANN SA, MITCHISON G: Computing protein function. Nature Biotechnol. (2000) 18(1):27.
39. HENIKOFF S, HENIKOFF JG: Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1992) 89:10915-10919.
40. FISCHER D, RICE D, BONVIE JU, EISENBERG D: Assigning amino acid sequences to 3-dimensional protein folds. FASEB J. (1996) 10:126-136.
41. BOWIE JU, LÜTHY R, EISENBERG D: A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science (1991) 253:164-170.
42. OUZOUNIS C, SANDER C, SCHARF M, SCHNEIDER R: Prediction of protein structure by evaluation of sequence-structure fitness. J. Mol. Biol. (1993) 232:805-825.
43. YI T-M, LANDER ES: Recognition of related proteins by iterative template refinement (ITR). Protein Sci. (1994) 3:1315-1328.
44. DEFAY TR, COHEN FE: Multiple sequence information for threading algorithms. J. Mol. Biol. (1996) 262:314-323.
45. JUNG J, LEE B: Use of residue pairs in protein sequence-sequence and sequence-structure alignments. Protein Sci. (2000) 9(8):1576-1588.
46. RUSSELL RB, COPLEY RR, BARTON GJ: Protein fold recognition by mapping predicted secondary structures. J. Mol. Biol. (1996) 259:349-365.
47. FISCHER D, BARRET C, BRYSON K et al.: CAFASP-1: critical assessment of fully automated structure prediction methods. Proteins (1999) 37(S3):209-217. Evaluation of fold prediction servers available on the Internet.
48. RICE DW, EISENBERG D: A 3D-1D substitution matrix for protein fold recognition that includes predicted secondary structure of the sequence. J. Mol. Biol. (1997) 267:1026-1038.
49. ROST B, SCHNEIDER R, SANDER C: Protein fold recognition by prediction-based threading. J. Mol. Biol. (1997) 270:1-10.
50. FISCHER D: Hybrid fold recognition: combining sequence derived properties with evolutionary information. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Hawaii, USA (2000) 119-130.
51. ELOFSSON A, FISCHER D, RICE DW, LE GRAND S, EISENBERG D: A study of combined structure-sequence profiles. Folding Design (1996) 1:451-461.
52. BOWIE JU, CLARKE ND, PABO CO, SAUER RT: Identification of protein folds: matching hydrophobicity patterns of sequence sets with solvent accessibility patterns of known structures. Proteins (1990) 7:257-264.
53. KORENBERG MJ: Parallel cascade identification and kernel estimation for nonlinear systems. Ann. Biomed. Eng. (1991) 19:429-455.
54. KORENBERG MJ, SOLOMON JE, REGELSON ME: Parallel cascade identification as a means for automatically classifying protein sequences into structure/function groups. Biol. Cybern. (2000) 82(1):15-21.
55. KORENBERG MJ, DAVID R, HUNTER IW, SOLOMON JE: Automatic classification of protein sequences into structure/function groups via parallel cascade identification: a feasibility study. Ann. Biomed. Eng. (2000) 28:803-811. Classification via non-linear model building using local sequences of hydrophobicity values or amino acid codes.
56. DAVID R: Applications of nonlinear system identification to protein structural prediction. SM Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2000).
57. MARCHLER-BAUER A, BRYANT SH: A measure of progress in fold recognition? Proteins (1997) 37(S3):218-225.
58. MURZIN AG, BATEMAN A: Distant homology recognition using structural classification of proteins. Proteins (1997) 29(S1):105-112.
59. JONES DT, TRESS M, BRYSON K, HADLEY C: Successful recognition of protein folds using threading methods biased by sequence similarity and predicted secondary structure. Proteins (1999) 37(S3):104-111.
60. http://bioinfo.pl/LiveBench/ Polish Bioinformatics Site: LiveBench. (2000).
61. http://hmmer.wustl.edu Washington University in St. Louis: HMMER - profile hidden Markov models for sequence analysis. (2000).
62. http://www.cs.bgu.ac.il/~dfischer/cafasp1/cafasp1.html Ben Gurion University Department Of Computer Science: CAFASP1. (1999).
63. http://cafasp.bioinfo.pl/ CAFASP Meta Server. (2000).
64. http://cubic.bioc.columbia.edu/eva/index.html Columbia University Bioinformatics Centre: EVA: evaluation of automatic structure prediction servers. (2000).
65. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ National Centre For Biotechnology Information: NCBI homepage (2000).