Protein fold recognition by prediction-based threading

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 270, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 471-480

  Rost, Burkhard ^a,b   Schneider, Reinhard ^a   Sander, Chris ^a,b  

^a EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

^b EUROPEAN BIOINFORMATICS INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Fold recognition; Protein structure prediction; Remote homology detection; Secondary structure; Threading

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

EID: 0031577260     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1101     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abagyan R., Frishman D., Argos P. Recognition of distantly related proteins through energy calculations. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 19:1994;132-140.
2. Bairoch A., Apweiler R. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence data bank and its new supplement TREMBL. Nucl. Acids Res. 24:1996;21-25.
3. Bairoch A., Boeckmann B. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence data bank: current status. Nucl. Acids Res. 22:1994;3578-3580.
4. Bernstein F. C., Koetzle T. F., Williams G. J. B., Meyer E. F., Brice M. D., et al. The Protein Data Bank: a computer based archival file for macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Biol. 112:1977;535-542.
5. Bowie J. U., Clarke N. D., Pabo C. O., Sauer R. T. Identification of protein folds: matching hydrophobicity patterns of sequence sets with solvent accessibility patterns of known structures. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 7:1990;257-264.
6. Bowie J. U., Lüthy R., Eisenberg D. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science. 253:1991;164-169.
7. Bryant S. H., Altschul S. F. Statistics of sequence-structure threading. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 5:1995;236-244.
8. Chothia C. One thousand protein families for the molecular biologist. Nature. 357:1992;543-544.
9. Chothia C., Lesk A. M. The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. EMBO J. 5:1986;823-826.
10. Doolittle R. F. Of URFs and ORFs: a Primer on How to Analyze Derived Amino Acid Sequences. 1986;University Science Books, Mill Valley.
11. Dujon B. The yeast genome project: what did we learn? Trends Genet. 12:1996;263-270.
12. Fischer D., Eisenberg D. Protein fold recognition using sequence-derived predictions. Protein Sci. 5:1996;947-955.
13. Fischer D., Elofsson A., Rice D., Eisenberg D. Assessing the performance of fold recognition methods by means of a comprehensive benchmark. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, Hawaii, 1996. 1996;World Scientific Publishing, Singapore.
14. Fleischmann R. D., Adams M. D., White O., Clayton R. A., Kirkness E. F., et al. Whole-genome random sequencing and assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd. Science. 269:1995;496-512.
15. Flöckner H., Braxenthaler M., Lackner P., Jaritz M., Ortner M., et al. Progress in fold recognition. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 23:1995;376-386.
16. Greer J. Comparative modeling of homologous proteins. Methods Enzymol. 202:1991;239-252.
17. Henikoff S., Henikoff J. G. Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 89:1992;10915-10919.
18. Holm L., Sander C. The FSSP database of structurally aligned protein fold families. Nucl. Acids Res. 22:1994;3600-3609.
19. Holm L., Ouzounis C., Sander C., Tuparev G., Vriend G. A database of protein structure families with common folding motifs. Protein Sci. 1:1993;1691-1698.
20. Johnston M. Towards a complete understanding of how a simple eukaryotic cell works. Trends Genet. 12:1996;242-243.
21. Jones D. T., Taylor W. R., Thornton J. M. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature. 358:1992;86-89.
22. Jones D. T., Miller R. T., Thornton J. M. Successful protein fold recognition by optimal sequence threading validated by rigorous blind testing. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 23:1995;387-397.
23. Kabsch W., Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers. 22:1983;2577-2637.
24. Lattman E. E. Protein crystallography for all. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 18:1994;103-106.
25. Lemer C. M.-R., Rooman M. J., Wodak S. J. Protein structure prediction by threading methods: evaluation of current techniques. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 23:1995;337-355.
26. Lesk A. M., Boswell R. D. Homology modelling: inferences from tables of aligned sequences. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2:1992;242-247.
27. Lüthy R., McLachlan A. D., Eisenberg D. Secondary structure-based profiles: use of structure-conserving scoring tables in searching protein sequence databases for structural similarities. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 10:1991;229-239.
28. Lüthy R., Bowie J. U., Eisenberg D. Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Nature. 356:1992;83-85.
29. May A. C. W., Blundell T. L. Automated comparative modelling of protein structures. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 5:1994;355-360.
30. McLachlan A. D., Staden R., Boswell D. R. A method for measuring the non-random bias of a codon usage table. Nucl. Acids Res. 12:1984;9567-9575.
31. Moult J., Pedersen J. T., Judson R., Fidelis K. A large-scale experiment to assess protein structure prediction methods. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 23:1995;2-4.
32. Oliver S., van der Aart Q. J. M., Agostioni-Carbone M. L., Aigle M., Alberghina L., et al. The complete DNA sequence of yeast chromosome III. Nature. 357:1992;38-46.
33. Rost B. Fitting 1-D predictions into 3-D structures. Bohr H., Brunak S. Protein Folds: a Distance Based Approach. 1995a;CRC Press, Boca Raton.
34. Rost, B. 1995b, TOPITS: threading one-dimensional predictions into three-dimensional structures, Third International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology, Rawlings, C.Clark, D.Altman, R.Hunter, L.Lengauer, T, et al. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press, Cambridge, England.
35. Rost, B. 1996a, Appendix to "Protein fold recognition by prediction-based threading". EMBL Heidelberg, Germany WWW document (http://www.embl-heidelberg.de/~rost/Papers/JMB96-threading.html).
36. Rost, B. 1996b, Average conservation of 1D structure between remote homologues. EMBL Heidelberg, Germany, WWW document (http://www.embl-heidelberg.de/~rost/Res/96E-ConservationOf1D.html).
37. Rost, B. 1996c, Protein fold recognition by merging 1D structure and sequence alignments. EMBL Heidelberg, Germany, WWW document (http://www.embl-heidelberg.de/~rost/Papers/96PreTopits.html).
38. Rost B., Sander C. Combining evolutionary information and neural networks to predict protein secondary structure. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 19:1994a;55-72.
39. Rost B., Sander C. Conservation and prediction of solvent accessibility in protein families. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 20:1994b;216-226.
40. Russell R. B., Copley R. R., Barton G. J. Protein fold recognition by mapping predicted secondary structures. J. Mol. Biol. 259:1996;349-365.
41. Sander C., Schneider R. Database of homology-derived structures and the structural meaning of sequence alignment. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 9:1991;56-68.
42. Schneider, R. 1994, Sequenz und sequenz-struktur vergleiche und deren anwendung für die struktur- und funktionsvorhersage von proteinen. PhD thesis, University of Heidelberg.
43. Shortle D. Protein fold recognition. Nature Struct. Biol. 2:1995;91-92.
44. Sippl M. J. On the problem of comparing protein structures. J. Mol. Biol. 156:1982;359-388.
45. Sippl M. J. Knowledge-based potentials for proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 5:1995;229-235.
46. Smith T. F., Waterman M. S. Identification of common molecular subsequences. J. Mol. Biol. 147:1981;195-197.
47. Vingron M., Waterman M. S. Sequence alignment and penalty choice. J. Mol. Biol. 235:1994;1-12.
48. Zu-Kang F., Sippl M. J. Optimum superimposition of protein structures: ambiguities and implications. Folding Design. 1:1996;123-132.