Fold prediction by a hierarchy of sequence, threading, and modeling methods

Protein Science

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 1431-1440

  Jaroszewski, ŁUkasz ^a   Rychlewski, Leszek ^b   Zhang, Baohong ^b   Godzik, Adam ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

^b SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Distant homology; Fold prediction; Structure similarity

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; SCORING SYSTEM; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

EID: 0031746105     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560070620     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403-410.
2. Babbitt PC, Mrachko GT, Hasson MS, Hiusman GW, Kolter R, Ringe D, Petsko GA, Kenyon GL, Gerlt JA. 1995. Functionally diverse enzyme superfamily that abstracts the a proton of carboxylic acids. Science 267:1159-1161.
3. Bairoch A. 1994. SwissProt. Protein sequence database. Available at http:// expasy.hcuge.ch/sprot/sprot-top.html.
4. Bowie JU, Clarke ND, Pabo CO, Sauer RT. 1990. Identification of protein folds: Matching hydrophobicity patterns of sequence sets with solvent accessibility patterns of known structures. Proteins 7:257-264.
5. Bowie JU, Luethy R, Eisenberg D. 1991. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three dimensional structure. Science 253:164-170.
6. Bryant SH, Altschul SF. 1995. Statistics of sequence-structure threading. Curr Opin Struct Biol 5:236-244.
7. Bryant SH, Lawrence CE. 1993. An empirical energy function for threading protein sequence through folding motif. Proteins 16:92-112.
8. Chothia C. 1992. Proteins. One thousand families for the molecular biologist. Nature 357:543-544.
9. Finkelslein AV, Ptitsyn OB. 1987. Why do globular proteins fit the limited set of folding patterns? Prog Biophys Mol Biol 50:171-190.
10. Finkelstein AV, Reva BA. 1990. Determination of globular protein chain fold by the method of self-consistent field (in Russian). Biofizika 35:402-406.
11. Fischer D, Eisenberg D. 1996. Fold recognition using sequence derived properties. Protein Sci 5:947-955.
12. Godzik A, Kolinski A, Skolnick J. 1995. Are proteins ideal mixtures of amino acids? Analysis of energy parameter sets. Protein Sci 4:2107-2117.
13. Godzik A, Kolinski A, Skolnick J, Jaroszewski Ł. 1998. Dominant effects in-amino acid interactions. Analysis of energy parameter sets. Proteins. Forthcoming.
14. Godzik A, Skolnick J, Kolinski A. 1992. A topology fingerprint approach to the inverse folding problem. J Mol Biol 227:227-238.
15. Gribskov M, McLachlan M, Eisenberg D. 1987. Profile analysis: Detection of distantly related proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:4355-4358.
16. Holm L, Sander C. 1993. Structural alignment of globins, phycocyanins and colicin A. FEBS Lett 315:301-306.
17. Jaroszewski Ł, Pawlowski K, Godzik A. 1998. Multiple model approach: Exploring the limits of comparative modeling. J Mol Model. Forthcoming.
18. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. 1992. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature 358:86-89.
19. Karlin S, Altschul SF. 1990. Methods for assessing the statistical significance of molecular sequence features by using general scoring schemes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:2264-2268.
20. Kolinski A, Skolnick J. 1996. Lattice models of protein folding, dynamics and thermodynamics. Austin, TX: R.G. Landes Company.
21. Luethy R, McLachlan AD, Eisenberg D. 1991. Secondary structure based profiles: Use of structure conserving scoring tables in searching protein sequence databases for structural similarities. Proteins 10:229-239.
22. Maiorov VN, Crippen GM. 1992. Contact potential that recognizes the correct folding of globular proteins. J Mol Biol 277:876-888.
23. Orengo CA, Flores TP, Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. 1993. Recurring structural motifs in proteins with different functions. Curr Biol 3:131-139.
24. Ouzounis C, Sander C, Scharf M, Schneider R. 1993. Prediction of protein structure by evaluation of sequence-structure fitness: Aligning sequences to contact profiles derived from 3D structures. J Mol Biol 232:805-825.
25. Pascarella S, Argos P. 1992. A data bank merging related protein structures and sequences. Protein Eng 5:121-137.
26. Pawlowski K, Jaroszewski Ł, Bierzynski A, Godzik A. 1997. Multiple model approach: Dealing with alignment ambiguities in comparative protein modeling.In: Altman RB, Dunker AK, Hunter L, Klein TE, eds. Biocomputing, 97. Singapore: World Scientific. pp 328-339.
27. Pearson WR. 1996. Effective protein sequence comparison. In: Doolittle RF, ed. Methods in enzymology. Computer methods for macromolecular sequence analysis, vol 266. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. pp 227-258.
28. Rice D, Eisenberg D. 1997. A 3D-1D substitution matrix for protein fold recognition that incudes predicted secondary structure of the sequence. J Mol Biol 267:1026-1038.
29. Rychlewski L, Godzik A. 1997. Secondary structure prediction using segment similarity. Protein Eng 10:1143-1153.
30. Rychlewski L, Godzik A. 1998. Searching for optimal parameters of a sequence structure mapping function. Protein Eng. Forthcoming.
31. Rychlewski L, Jaroszewski Ł, Zhang B, Godzik A. 1998. Fold prediction: Recognition or elimination? Folding Design. Forthcoming.
32. Sali A. 1994. Modeller. A program for protein structure modeling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. Available at http://guitar.rockefeller.edu/modeller/ modeller.html.
33. Sippl MJ, Weitckus S. 1992. Detection of native-like models for amino acid sequences of unknown three-dimensional structure in a database of known protein conformations. Proteins 13:258-271.
34. Tomii K, Kanehisa M. 1996. Analysis of amino acid indices and mutation matrices for sequence comparison and structure prediction of proteins. Protein Eng 9:27-36.
35. UCLA. 1996. The UCLA-DOE benchmark to assess the performance of fold recognition methods. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
36. Vogt G, Etzold T, Argos P. 1995. An assessment of amino acid exchange matrices in aligning protein sequences: The twilight zone revisited. J Mol Biol 249:816-831.
37. Waterman MS. 1995. Introduction to computational biology: Maps, sequences and genomes (Interdisciplinary Statistics). New York: Chapman & Hall.
38. Waterman MS, Vingron M. 1994. Rapid and accurate estimates of statistical significance for sequence data base searches. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:4625-4628.
39. Yi TM, Lander ES. 1994. Recognition of related proteins by iterative template refinements. Protein Sci 3:1315-1328.
40. Zhang B, Jaroszewski Ł, Rychlewski L, Godzik A. 1997. Similarities and differences between non-homologous proteins with similar folds. Evaluation of threading strategies. Folding Design 12:307-317.