Factors limiting the performance of prediction-based fold recognition methods

Protein Science

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 750-759

  De La Cruz, Xavier ^a   Thornton, Janet M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Fold recognition; Protein function identification; Protein structure prediction; Remote homologues; Secondary structure and accessibility predictions; Sequence annotation; Threading

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; GENOME; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

EID: 0032942294     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1110/ps.8.4.750     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aurora R, Rose G. 1998. Seeking an ancient enzyme in Methanococcus jannaschii using ORF, a program based on predicted secondary structure comparisons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:2818-2823.
2. Bernstein F, Koetzle T, Williams G, Meyer E, Brice M. Rodgers J, Kennard O, Shimanoushi T, Tasumi M. 1977. The Protein Data Bank: A computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol 112:535-542.
3. Bowie JU, Luthy R, Eisenberg D. 1991. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known 3-dimensional structure. Science 253:164-170.
4. Bryant SH. 1996. Evaluation of threading specificity and accuracy. Proteins Struct Fund Genet 26:172-185.
5. Bryant SH, Altschul SF. 1995. Statistics of sequence-structure threading. Curr Opin Struct Biol 5:236-244.
6. Bryant SH, Lawrence CE. 1993. An empirical energy function for threading protein sequence through folding motif. Proteins Struct Fund Genet 5:92-112.
7. Dayhoff M, Schwartz RM, Orcutt BC. 1978. A model of evolutionary change in proteins. In: Dayhoff M, ed. Atlas of protein sequence and structure, vol 5 (suppl 3). Silver Spring, Maryland: National Biomedical Research Foundation, pp 345-352.
8. Fischel-Ghodsian F, Mathiowitz G, Smith T. 1990. Alignment of protein sequences using secondary structure: A modified dynamic programming method. Protein Eng 3:517-581.
9. Fischer D, Eisenberg D. 1996. Protein fold recognition using sequence-derived predictions. Protein Sci 5:947-955.
10. GCG. 1994. Program manual for the Wisconsin package, version 8. Madison, Wisconsin: Genetics Computer Group.
11. Godzik A. 1996. The structural alignment between two proteins - Is there a unique answer? Protein Sci 5:1325-1338.
12. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. 1992. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature 358:86-89.
13. Kabsch W, Sander C. 1983. A dictionary of protein secondary structure. Biopolymers 22:2577-2637.
14. Kocher J-P, Rooman MJ, Wodak SJ. 1994. Factors influencing the ability of knowledge-based potentials to identify native sequence-structure matches. J Mol Biol 235:1598-1613.
15. Lander ES. 1996. The new genomics - Global views of biology. Science 274:536-539.
16. Lemer CM-R, Rooman MJ, Wodak SJ. 1995. Protein structure prediction by threading methods: Evaluation of current techniques. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 25:337-355.
17. Marchler-Bauer A, Bryant SH. 1997. A measure of success in fold recognition. TIBS 22:236-240.
18. Marchler-Bauer A, Levitt M, Bryant S. 1997. A retrospective analysis of CASP2 threading predictions. Proteins Struct Funct Genet (Suppl. 1):83-91.
19. Martin ACR, MacArthur MW, Thornton JM. 1997. Assessment of comparative modeling in CASP2. Proteins Struct Funct Genet (Suppl. 1):14-28.
20. Milburn D, Laskowski R, Thornton JM. 1998. Sequences annotated by structure: A tool to facilitate the use of structural information sequence analysis. Protein Eng 11:855-859.
21. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C. 1995. SCOP - A structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 247:536-540.
22. Needleman SB, Wunsch CD. 1970. A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequences of two proteins. J Mol Biol 43:443-453.
23. Ouzounis C, Sander C, Scharf M, Schneider R. 1993. Prediction of protein-structure by evaluation of sequence-structure fitness - Aligning sequences to contact profiles derived from 3D structures. J Mol Biol 232:805-825.
24. Rice D, Eisenberg D. 1997. A 3D-1D substitution matrix for protein fold recognition that includes predicted secondary structure of the sequence. J Mol Biol 267:1026-1038.
25. Rice D, Fischer D, Weiss R, Eisenberg D. 1997. Fold assignments for amino acid sequences of the CASP2 experiment. Proteins Struct Funct Genet (Suppl 1): 113-122.
26. Rost B. 1996. Protein fold recognition by merging 1D structure and sequence alignments. EMBL Heidelberg, Germany, WWW document (http:// www.embl-heidelberg.de/~rost/Papers/96PreTopits.html).
27. Rost B, Sander C. 1993. Prediction of secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy. J Mol Biol 232:584-599.
28. Rost B, Schneider R, Sander C. 1997. Protein fold recognition by prediction-based threading. J Mol Biol 270:471-480.
29. Russell RB, Barton G. 1992. Multiple protein sequence alignment from tertiary structure comparison: Assignment of global and residue confidence levels. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 14:309-323.
30. Russell RB, Copley RR, Barton GJ. 1996. Protein fold recognition by mapping predicted secondary structures. J Mol Biol 259:349-365.
31. Russell RB, Saqi MAS, Bates P, Sayle RA, Stemberg MJE. 1998. Recognition of analogous and homologous protein folds - Assessment of prediction success and associated alignment accuracy using empirical substitution matrices. Protein Eng 11:1-9.
32. Russell RB, Saqi MAS, Sayle RA, Bates PA, Stemberg MJE. 1997. Recognition of analogous and homologous protein folds: Analysis of sequence and structure conservation. J Mol Biol 269:423-439.
33. Sali A, Potterton L, Yuan F, van Vlijmen H, Karplus M. 1995. Evaluation of comparative protein modeling by MODELER. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 23:318-326.
34. Samudrala R, Pedersen JT, Zhou H-B, Luo R, Fidelis K, Moult J. 1995. Confronting the problem of interconnected structural changes in the comparative modeling of proteins. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 25:327-336.
35. Sheridan RP, Dixon JS, Venkataraghavan R. 1985. Generating plausible protein folds by secondary structure similarity. Int J Pept Protein Res 25:132-143.
36. Sippl MJ, Weitckus S. 1992. Detection of native-like models for amino-acid-sequences of unknown 3-dimensional structure in a data-base of known protein conformations. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 13:258-271.
37. Smith TF, Waterman MS. 1981. Identification of common molecular subsequences. J Mol Biol 147:195-197.
38. Swindells MB, MacArthur MW, Thornton JM. 1995. Intrinsic φ,ψ propensities of amino acids, derived from the coil regions of known structures. Nature Struct Biol 2:596-603.
39. Taylor WR, Orengo CA. 1989. Protein structure alignment. J Mol Biol 208: 1-22.
40. Westhead DR, Collura VP, Eldridge MD, Firth MA, Li J, Murray CW. 1995. Protein fold recognition by threading - Comparison of algorithms and analysis of results. Protein Eng 8:1197-1204.
41. Zu-Kang F, Sippl MJ. 1996. Optimum superimposition of protein structures: Ambiguities and implications. Folding Design 1:123-132.