In vitro and in vivo hydrolysis of legume starches by α-amylase and resistant starch formation in legumes - A review

Carbohydrate Polymers

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 401-417

  Hoover, R ^a   Zhou, Y ^a  

^a MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

Author keywords

Amylolysis; Digestibility; Legume starches; Resistant starch

Indexed keywords

FERMENTATION; HYDROLYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; STARCH;

DIGESTIBILITY;

SEED;

EID: 0242366130     PISSN: 01448617     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0144-8617(03)00180-2     Document Type: Review

References (148)

1. Abbas I.R., Scheerens J.C., Berry J.W. Tepary bean starch. Part III. In vitro digestibility. Starch. 38:1987;280-284.
2. 14C retrograded bean starch in the rat. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 44:1996;2316-2323.
3. Agunbiade S.O. The chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of yam bean starch. Food Chemistry. 61:1998;173-176.
4. Allen O.N., Allen E.K. The leguminosae, a source book of characteristics, uses and modulation. 1981;The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI, USA.
5. Alonso A., Aguirre A., Marzo F. Effects of extrusion and traditional processing methods on antinutrients and in vitro digestibility of protein and starch in faba and kidney beans. Food Chemistry. 68:2000;159-165.
6. Andreev N.R., Kalistratova E.N., Wasserman L.A., Yuryev V.P. The influence of heating rate and annealing on the melting thermodynamic parameters of some cereal starches in excess water. Starch. 51:1999;422-429.
7. Annison G., Topping D.L. Nutritional role of resistant starch: Chemical structure vs. physiological function. Annual Reviews in Nutrition. 14:1994;297-320.
8. Aparna K., Khatoon N., Prakash J. Cooking quality and in vitro digestibility of legumes cooked in different media. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 37:2000;169-173.
9. Asp N.G., Van Amelsvoort J.M.M., Hautvast J.G.A.J. Nutritonal implications of resistant starch. Nutritional Research Review. 9:1996;1-31.
10. Bednar G.E., Patil A.R., Murray S.M., Grieshop M., Merchen N.R., Fahey G.C. Starch and fiber fractions in selected food and feed ingredients affect their small intestinal digestibility and fermentability and their large bowel fermentability in vitro in a canine model. Journal of Nutrition. 131:2001;276-286.
11. Berry C.S. Resistant starch: Formation and measurement of starch that survives exhaustive digestion with amylolytic enzymes during determination of dietary fibre. Journal of Cereal Science. 4:1986;301-314.
12. Berry C.S., Anson I., Miles K., Morris V.J., Russel P.L. Physical and chemical characterization of resistant starch from wheat. Journal of Cereal Science. 8:1988;203-206.
13. Bertoft E., Manelius R. A method for the study of the enzymic hydrolysis of starch granules. Carbohydrate Research. 227:1992;269-283.
14. Bertoft E., Manelius R., Qin Z. Studies on the structure of pea starches. Part I. Initial stages in α amylolysis of granular smooth pea starch. Starch. 45:1993;215-220.
15. Bertoft E., Manelius R., Qin Z. Studies on the structure of pea starches. Part 2. α Amylolysis of granular wrinkled pea starch. Starch. 45:1993;258-263.
16. Bishnoi S., Khetarpaul N. Effect of domestic processing and cooking methods on in vitro starch digestibility of different pea cultivars (Pisum sativum). Food Chemistry. 47:1993;177-182.
17. Björck I.M., Granfeldt Y., Liljeberg H., Tovar J., Asp N.G. Food properties affecting the digestion and absorption of carbohydrates. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 59:1994;699S-705S.
18. Björck I.M., Nyman M., Pedersen B., Siljestrom M., Asp N.-G., Eggum B.O. On the digestibility of starch in wheat bread. Studies in vitro and in vivo. Journal of Cereal Science. 41:1986;301-314.
19. Björck I.M., Nyman M., Pedersen B., Siljestrom M., Asp N.G., Eggum B.O. Formation of enzyme resistant starch during autoclaving of wheat starch: Studies in vitro and in vivo. Journal of Cereal Science. 6:1987;159.
20. Blanshard J.M.V. Starch granule structure and function - a physicochemical approach. Galliard T. Starch properties and potential. 1987;16-54 Wiley, New York.
21. Bornet F.R.J., Fontvieille A.M., Rizkalla S., Colonna P., Blayo A., Mercier C., Slama G. Insulin and glycemic responses in healthy humans to native starches processed in different ways: Correlation with in vitro alpha amylase hydrolysis. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 50:1989;315-323.
22. Botham R.L., Cairns P., Morris V.J., Ring S.G., Englyst H.N., Cummings J.H. A physicochemical characterization of chick pea starch resistant to digestion in the human small intestine. Carbohydrate Polymers. 26:1995;85-90.
23. Bravo L., Siddhuraju P., Saura-Calixto F. Effect of various processing methods on the in vitro starch digestibility and resistant starch content of Indian pulses. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 46:1998;4667-4674.
24. Brown I. Complex carbohydrates and resistant starch. Nutrition Reviews. 54:1996;5115-5119.
25. Cairns P., Bogracheva T.Y., Ring S.G., Hedley C.L., Morris V.J. Determination of the polymorphic composition of smooth pea starch. Carbohydrate Polymers. 32:1997;275-282.
26. Cairns P., Leloup V.M., Miles M.J., Ring S.G., Morris V.J. Resistant starch: An X-ray diffraction study into the effect of enzymatic hydrolysis on amylose gels in vitro. Journal of Cereal Science. 12:1990;203-206.
27. Cairns P., Morris V.J., Botham R.L., Ring S.G. Physicochemical studies on resistant starch in vitro and in vivo. Journal of Cereal Science. 23:1996;265-275.
28. Champ M. Determination of resistant starch in foods and food products: Interlaboratory study. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 46:1992;S51-S62.
29. Chau C.F., Cheung P.C.K. Effect of various processing methods on antinutrients and in vitro digestibility of protein and starch of two Chinese indigenous legume seeds. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 45:1997;4773-4776.
30. Chavan U.D., Shahidi F., Hoover R., Perera C. Characterization of beach pea (Lathyrus maritimus L.) starch. Food Chemistry. 65:1999;61-70.
31. Chung K.M., Moon T.W., Chun J.K. Influence of annealing on gel properties of mung bean starch. Cereal Chemistry. 77:2000;567-571.
32. Colonna P., Buleon A., Lemane F. Action of Bacillus subtilis α-amylase on native wheat starch. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 31:1988;895-904.
33. Cooke D., Gidley M.J. Loss of crystalline and molecular order during starch gelatinization and origin of the enthalpic transition. Carbohydrate Research. 227:1992;103-112.
34. Davydova N.I., Leontev S.P., Genin Y.V., Sasov A.Y., Bogracheva T.Y. Some physicochemical properties of smooth pea starches. Carbohydrate Polymers. 27:1995;109-115.
35. Deshpande S.S., Cheryan M. Effects of phytic acid, divalent cations and their interactions on α-amylase activity. Journal of Food Science. 49:1984;516-519.
36. Dreher M.L., Berry J.W., Dreher C.J. Starch digestibility of foods - a nutritional perspective. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 20:1984;47-71.
37. Eerlingen R.C., Crombez M., Delcour J.A. Enzyme resistant starch. I. Quantitative and qualitative influence of incubation time and temperature of autoclaved starch on resistant starch formation. Cereal Chemistry. 70:1993;339-344.
38. Eerlingen R.C., Deceuninck M., Delcour J.A. Enzyme resistant starch II. Influence of amylose chain length on resistant starch formation. Cereal Chemistry. 70:1993;345-350.
39. Eerlingen R.C., Delcour J.A. Formation, analysis, structure and properties of type 111 enzyme resistant starch. Journal of Cereal Science. 22:1995;129-138.
40. El-Faki H.A., Desikachar H.S.R., Tareen J.A.K., Tharanathan R.N. Scanning electron microscopy of in vivo and in vitro digested starch granules of chick pea, cowpea and horse gram. Lebensmittel Wissenschaft und Technologie. 17:1983;276-281.
41. Elmstahl H.L. Resistant starch content in a selection of starch foods on the Swedish market. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 56:2002;500-505.
42. Englyst H.N., Cummings J.H. Resistant starch, a new food component. A classification of starch for nutritional purpose. Morton I.D. Cereals in a European Context. First European Conference on Food Science and Technology. 1987;221-233 Ellis Horwood Ltd/VCH, Chichester, UK/Weinheim Federal Republic of Germany.
43. Englyst H.N., Kingman S.M., Cummings J.H. Classification and measurement of nutritionally important starch fractions. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 46:1992;S30-S50.
44. Englyst H.N., MacFarlane G.T. Breakdown of resistant and readily digestible starch by human gut bacteria. Journal of Science and Food Agriculture. 37:1986;699-702.
45. Faulks R.M., Bailey A.L. Digestion of cooked starches from different food sources by porcine α-amylase. Food Chemistry. 36:1990;191-203.
46. Fleming S.E. Influence of cooking method on digestibility of legume and cereal starches. Journal of Food Science. 47:1982;1-3.
47. Fleming S.E., Vose J.R. Digestibility of raw and cooked starches from legume seeds using the laboratory rat. Journal of Nutrition. 109:1979;2067-2075.
48. Foster-Powell K., Miller B. International tables of glycemic index. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 62:1995;871S-893S.
49. Frins J., Fornal J., Ring S.G., Vidal-Valverde C. Effect of germination on physicochemical properties of lentil starch and its components. Lebensmittel Wissenschaft Und Technologie. 31:1998;228-236.
50. Gallant D.J., Bouchet B., Baldwin P.M. Microscopy of starch: Evidence of a new level of granule organization. Carbohydrate Polymers. 32:1997;177-191.
51. Garcia-Alonso A., Goni I., Saura-Calixto F. Resistant starch and potential glycemic index of raw and cooked legumes (lentils, chickpeas and beans). Zeitschrift Fur Lebensmittel-Untersuchung und-Forschung A. 206:1998;284-287.
52. Gerard C., Colonna P., Buleon A., Planchot V. Amylolysis of maize mutant starches. Journal of Science and Food Agriculture. 81:2001;1281-1287.
53. Gernat C., Radosta S., Damaschun G., Schierbaum F. Supramolecular structure of legume starches revealed by X-ray scattering. Starch. 42:1990;175-178.
54. Goni I., Gracia-Diz L., Manas E., Saura-Calixto F.A. Analysis of resistant starch. A method for foods and food products. Food Chemistry. 56:1996;445-449.
55. Gordon D.T., Topp K., Shi Y.C., Zallie J., Jeffcoat R. Resistant starch: Physical and physiological properties. Yalpani M. New technologies for healthy foods and nutraceuticals. 1997;157-178 ATL Press, Madison, USA.
56. Grelda A., Farias Y., Moreona-Valencia J.G., del Refugio Falcon-Villa M., Barron-Hoyes J.M. Isolation and partial characterization of starches from dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) and chick peas (Cicer arietinum) grown in Sonora, Mexico. Starch. 49:1997;341-345.
57. Guraya H.S., Kadan R.S., Champagne E.T. Effect of rice-starch lipid complexes on in vitro digestibility complexing index and viscosity. Cereal Chemistry. 74:1997;561-565.
58. Haralampu S.G. Resistant starch - a review of the physical properties and biological impact of RS3. Carbohydrate Polymers. 41:2000;285-292.
59. Hildebrandt L.A., Marlett J.A. Starch bioavailability in the upper gastrointestinal tract of colectomized rats. Journal of Nutrition. 121:1991;67-686.
60. Holm J., Björck I., Ostrowska S., Eliasson A.C., Asp N.G., Larsson K., Lundquist I. Digestibility of amylose-lipid complexes in vitro and in vivo. Starch. 35:1983;294-297.
61. Hoover R., Hannouz D., Sosulski F.W. Effects of hydroxypropylation on thermal properties, starch digestibility and freeze-thaw stability of field pea (Pisum sativum cv Trapper). Starch. 40:1988;383-387.
62. Hoover R., Li Y.X., Hynes G., Senanayake N. Physicochemical characterization of mung bean starch. Food Hydrocolloids. 11:1997;401-408.
63. Hoover R., Manuel H. A comparative study of the physicochemical properties of starches from two lentil cultivars. Food Chemistry. 53:1995;275-284.
64. Hoover R., Manuel H. The effect of annealing on the physicochemical properties of legume starches. Fenwick G.R., Hedley C., Richards R.L., Khokhar S. Agri-food quality: An interdisciplinary approach. 1996;157-161 Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge.
65. Hoover R., Rorke S.C., Martin A.M. Isolation and characterization of lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus) starch. Journal of Food Biochemistry. 15:1991;117-136.
66. Hoover R., Sosulski F.W. Studies on the functional characteristics and digestibility of starches from Phaseolus vulgaris biotypes. Starch. 37:1985;181-191.
67. Hoover R., Sosulski F.W. A comparative study of the effect of acetylation on starches of Phaseolus vulgaris biotypes. Starch. 37:1986;397-403.
68. Hoover R., Sosulski F.W. Effect of cross-linking on functional properties of legume starches. Starch. 38:1986;149-155.
69. Hoover R., Sosulski F.W. Composition, structure, functionality and chemical modification of legume starches - a review. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology. 69:1991;79-92.
70. Hoover R., Swamidas G., Vasanthan T. Studies on the physicochemical properties of native, defatted and heat-moisture treated pigeon pea (Cajanus Cajan L.) starch. Carbohydrate Research. 246:1993;185-203.
71. Hoover R., Vasanthan T. Effect of annealing on the physicochemical properties of wheat, oat, potato and lentil starches. Journal of Food Biochemistry. 17:1994;302-325.
72. Hoover R., Vasanthan T. Effect of heat-moisture treatment on the structure and physicochemical properties of cereal, legume and tuber starches. Carbohydrate Research. 252:1994;33-53.
73. Jacobs H., Eerlingen R.C., Spaepen H., Grobet P.J., Delcour J.A. Impact of annealing on the susceptibility of wheat, potato and pea starches to hydrolysis with pancreatin. Carbohydrate Research. 305:1998;193-207.
74. Jane J.L., Wong K.S., McPherson A.E. Branch structure differences in starches of A and B types X-ray patterns revealed by their Naegli dextrins. Carbohydrate Research. 300:1997;219-227.
75. Jaya T.V., Venkataraman L.V. Influence of germination on the carbohydrate digestibility (in vitro) of chick pea (Cicer arientinum) and green gram (Phaseolus aureus). Indian Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics. 18:1980;62-68.
76. Jenkins P.J., Donald A.M. The influence of amylose on starch granule structure. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 17:1995;315-321.
77. Jenkins D.J.A., Thorne M.J., Camelon K., Jenkins A.L., Rao A.V., Taylor R.H., Thompson L.U., Kalmusky J., Reichert R., Francis T. Effect of processing on digestibility and the blood glucose response of lentils. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 36:1982;1093-1101.
78. Jenkins D.J.A., Wolever T.M.S., Collier G.R., Ocano A., Rao A.V., Buckley G., Lam Y., Mayer A., Thompson L.U. Metabolic effect of a low glycemic-index diet. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 46:1987;968-975.
79. Jenkins D.J.A., Wolever T.M.S., Taylor R.H., Barker H.M., Fielder H. Exceptionally low blood glucose response to dried beans: Comparison with other carbohydrate foods. British Medical Journal. 281:1980;575-585.
80. Jood S., Chauhan B.M., Kapoor A.C. Contents and digestibility of carbohydrates of chick pea and black gram as affected by domestic processing and cooking. Food Chemistry. 30:1988;113-127.
81. Jyothi E., Reddy P.R. The effect of germination and cooking on the in vitro digestibility of starch in some legumes - an in vitro study. Nahrung. 38:1981;38-46.
82. Kataria A., Chauhan B.M. Contents and digestibility of carbohydrates of mung beans (Vigna radiate L.) as affected by domestic processing and cooking. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition. 38:1988;51-59.
83. Kayisu K., Hood L.F. Effects of dehydration and storage conditions on the pancreatic α-amylase susceptibility of various starches. Journal of Food Science. 44:1979;1728-1731.
84. Khokhar S., Chauhan B.M. Antinutritional factors in moth bean (Vigna acontifolia). Varietal differences and effects of methods of domestic processing and cooking. Journal of Food Science. 51:1986;591-594.
85. Knutson C.A. Annealing of maize starches at elevated temperatures. Cereal Chemistry. 67:1990;376-384.
86. Kritchevsky D. Epidemiology of fibre, resistant starch and colorectal cancer. European Journal of Cancer Preview. 4:1995;345-352.
87. Krueger E.R., Walker C.R., Knutson C.A., Inglett G.E. Differential scanning calorimetry of raw and annealed starch isolated from normal and mutant maize genotypes. Cereal Chemistry. 64:1987;187-190.
88. Kumar K.G., Venkataraman L.V. Studies on in vitro digestibility of starch in some legumes before and after germination. Nutrition Reports International. 13:1976;115-124.
89. Kuriki T., Imanaka T. The concept of the α-amylase family: Structural similarity and common catalytic mechanisms. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 87:1999;557-565.
90. Kutos T., Golob T., Kač M., Plestenjak A. Dietary fiber content of dry and processed beans. Food Chemistry. 80:2003;231-235.
91. Lajolo F.M., Finardi-Filho F., Menezes E.W. Amylase inhibitors in Phaseolus vulgaris beans. Food Technology. 45:1991;119-121.
92. Larsson I., Eliasson A.C. Annealing of starch at an intermediate water content. Starch. 43:1991;227-231.
93. Lauro M., Forssell P.M.P., Suortti M.T., Hulleman S.H.D., Poutanen K.S. α-Amylolysis of large barley starch granules. Cereal Chemistry. 76:1999;925-930.
94. Leach H.W., Schoch T.J. Structure of the starch granule II. Action of various amylases on granular starches. Cereal Chemistry. 38:1961;34-46.
95. Lehmann U., Rössler C., Schmiedl D., Jacobasch G. Production and physicochemical characterization of resistant starch type III derived from pea starch. Nahrung. 47:2003;60-63.
96. Lintas C., Cappelloni M. Effect of processing on legume resistant starch. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 16:1992;S103-S104.
97. Marlett J.A., Longacre M.J. Comparison of in vitro measures of resistant starch in selected food products. Cereal Chemistry. 73:1996;63-68.
98. McCleary B.V., Monaghan D.A. Measurement of resistant starch. Journal of Association of Analytical Communities International. 85:2002;665-675.
99. Muir J.G., Young G.P., O'Dea K. Resistant starch-implications for health. Proceedings of the Nutritional Society of Australia. 18:1994;23-32.
100. Nebensy E., Rosicka J., Tkaczyk M. Effect of enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat starch on amylose-lipid complexes stability. Starch. 54:2002;603-608.
101. Negi A., Boora P., Khetarpaul N. Starch and protein digestibility of newly released moth bean cultivars: Effect of soaking, dehulling, germination and pressure cooking. Nahrung. 45:2001;251-254.
102. Osorio-Diaz P., Bello-Perez L.A., Agama-Acevedo E., Vargas-Torres A., Tovar J., Paredes-Lopez O. In vitro digestibility and resistant starch content of some industrialized commercial beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Food Chemistry. 78:2002;333-337.
103. Periago M.J., Ros G., Casas J.L. Non-starch polysaccharides and in vitro starch digestibility of raw and cooked chick peas. Journal of Food Science. 62:1997;93-96.
104. Phillips J., Muir J.G., Birkett A., Lu Z.X., Jones G.P., O'Dea K.O., Young G.P. Effect of resistant starch on fecal bulk and fermentation-dependent events in humans. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 62:1995;121-130.
105. Planchot V., Colonna P., Gallant D.J., Bouchet B. Extensive degradation of native starch granules by α-amylase from Aspergillus fumigatus. Journal of Cereal Science. 21:1994;163-171.
106. Puls W., Keup U. Influence of an α-amylase inhibitor on blood glucose serum insulin and NEFA in starch loading tests in rats, dogs and man. Diabetologia. 9:1973;97-101.
107. Rao S.P. Studies on the digestibility of carbohydrates in pulses. Indian Journal of Medical Research. 57:1969;2151-2157.
108. Rao P.U., Deosthale Y.G. Tannin content of pulses. Varietal differences and effects of cooking and germination. Journal of Science and Food Agriculture. 33:1982;1013-1016.
109. Ratnayake W.S., Hoover R., Shahidi F., Perera C., Jane J. Composition, molecular structure and physicochemical properties of starches from four field pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars. Food Chemistry. 74:2001;189-202.
110. Rehman Z.-U., Salariya A.M., Zafar S.I. Effect of processing on available carbohydrate content and starch digestibility of kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Food Chemistry. 73:2001;351-355.
111. Ring S.G., Gee J.M., Whittam M.A., Orford P.D., Johnson I.T. Resistant starch: Its chemical form in food stuffs and effects on digestibility in vitro. Food Chemistry. 28:1988;97-109.
112. Robyt J.F. Enzymes in the hydrolysis and synthesis of starch. Whistler R.L., BeMiller J.N., Paschall E.L. Starch chemistry and technology. 1984;87-124 Academic Press, New York.
113. Robyt J.F., French D. Multiple attack hypothesis of α-amylase action: Action of porcine pancreatic, human, salivary and Aspergillus oryzae α-amylases. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 122:1967;8-16.
114. Robyt J.F., French D. The action patterns of porcine pancreatic α-amylase in relationship to the substrate binding site of the enzyme. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 245:1970;1917-1927.
115. Rosenthal F.R.T., Nakamura T. Studies on the structure of leguminosae starches. Solubility in dimethyl sulfoxide and by enzymatic action. Starch. 24:1972;152-158.
116. Rosin P.M., Lajolo F.M., Menezes E.W. Measurement and characterization of dietary starches. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis. 15:2002;367-377.
117. Schweizer T.P., Anderson H., Langkilde A.M., Reimann S., Torsdottir I. Nutrients excreted in ileostomy effluents after consumption of mixed diets with beans or potatoes. II. Starch, dietary fibre and sugars. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 44:1990;567-575.
118. Seigner C., Prodanov E., Marchis-Mouren G. The determination of subsite binding energies of porcine pancreatic α-amylase by comparing hydrolytic activity towards substrates. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 913:1987;200-209.
119. Seneviratne H.D., Biliaderis C.G. Action of α-amylases on amylose-lipid complex superstructures. Journal of Cereal Science. 13:1991;129-141.
120. Seow C.C., Teo C.H. Annealing of granular rice starches - interpretation of the effect on phase transitions associated with gelatinization. Starch. 451:1993;345-351.
121. Siddhuraju P., Becker K. Effect of various domestic processing methods on antinutrients and in vitro protein and starch digestibility of two indigenous varieties of Indian tribal pulse, Mucana pruriens Var. utilis. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry. 49:2001;3058-3067.
122. Skrabanja V., Liljeberg H.G.M., Hedley C.L., Kreft I., Björck I.M.E. Influence of genotype and processing on the in vitro rate of starch hydrolysis and resistant starch hydrolysis in peas (Pisum sativum L.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 47:1999;2033-2039.
123. Slade L., Levine H. Non-equilibrium melting of native granular starch. Part I. Temperature location of the glass transition associated with gelatinization of A-type cereal starches. Carbohydrate Polymers. 8:1988;183-208.
124. Snow P., O'Dea K. Factors affecting the rate of hydrolysis of starch in foods. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 34:1981;2721-2727.
125. Socorro M., Levy-Benshimol A., Tovar J. In vitro digestibility of cereals and legumes (Phaseolus vulgaris) starches by bovine pancreas and human pancreatic α-amylase. Starch. 41:1989;69-71.
126. Stute R. Hydrothermal modification of starches. The difference between annealing and heat-moisture treatment. Starch. 44:1992;205-214.
127. Szczodrak J., Pomeranz Y. Starch-lipid interactions and formation of resistant starch in high amylase barley. Cereal Chemistry. 69:1992;626-632.
128. 13C nuclear magnetic resonance. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 995:1989;214-220.
129. Tester R.F., Debon S.J.J. Annealing of starch - a review. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 27:2000;1-12.
130. Tester R.F., Debon S.J.J., Karkalas J. Annealing of wheat starch. Journal of Cereal Science. 28:1998;259-272.
131. Thompson L.U., Gabon J.E. Effects of lectins on salivary and pancreatic amylase activities and the rate of starch digestion. Journal of Food Science. 52:1987;1050-1053.
132. Tovar J., Björck I.M., Asp N.G. Incomplete digestion of legume starches in rats: A study of precooked flours containing retrograded and physically inaccessible starch fractions. Journal of Nutrition. 122:1992;1500-1507.
133. Tovar J., de Francisco A., Björck I., Asp N.G. Relationship between microstructure and in vitro digestibility of starch in precooked leguminous seed flours. Food Structure. 10:1991;19-26.
134. Tovar J., Granfeldt Y., Björck I.M. Effect of processing on blood glucose and insulin response to starch in legumes. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 40:1992;1846-1851.
135. Tovar J., Melito C. Steam cooking and dry heating produce resistant starch in legumes. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 441:1996;2642-2645.
136. Truswell A.S. Glycaemic index of foods. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 46:1992;S91-S101.
137. Tufvesson F., Skarabanja V., Björck I., Elmstahl H.L., Eliasson A.C. Digestibility of starch systems containing amylose-glycerol monopalmitin complexes. Lebensmittel Wissenschaft und Technologie. 34:2001;131-139.
138. Unlu E., Faller J.F. Formation of resistant starch by a twin-screw extruder. Cereal Chemistry. 75:1998;346-350.
139. Urooj A., Puttaraj S. Effect of processing on starch digestibility in some legumes - an in vitro study. Nahrung. 38:1994;38-46.
140. Vasanthan T., Bhatty R.S. Enhancement of resistant starch (RS3) in amylomaize, barley, field pea and lentil starches. Starch. 50:1998;286-291.
141. Velasco Z.I., Rascon A., Tovar J. Enzymic availability of starch in cooked black beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and cowpeas (Vigna spp.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 45:1997;1548-1551.
142. Wankhede D.B., Ramteke R.S. Studies on isolation and physicochemical properties of starch from moth bean (Phaseolus acontifolius). Starch. 34:1982;189-192.
143. Wu H.C.H., Sarko A. The double-helical molecular structure of crystalline A-amylose. Carbohydrate Research. 61:1978;27-40.
144. Wu H.C.H., Sarko A. The double helical molecular structure of crystalline B-amylose. Carbohydrate Research. 61:1978;7-26.
145. Wursch P., Dal Vedovo S., Koellreuter B. Cell structure and starch nature as key determinants of the digestion rate of starch in legume. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 43:1986;25-29.
146. Yook C., Robyt J.F. Reactions of α amylases with starch granules in aqueous suspension giving products in solution and in a minimum amount of water giving products inside the granule. Carbohydrate Research. 337:2002;1113-1117.
147. Yost D.A., Hoseney R.C. Annealing and glass transition of starch. Starch. 38:1986;289-292.
148. Younes H., Levrat M.A., Demigné C., Rémésy C. Resistant starch is more effective than cholestyramine as a lipid lowering agent in the rat. Lipids. 30:1995;847-853.