Mathematics-assisted mapping in analysis of medical disease

Annals of Medicine

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 291-298

  Sillanpää, Mikko J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Complex diseases; Gene mapping; Statistical analysis

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENE MAPPING; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; HUMAN; HUMAN GENOME; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

CHROMOSOME MAPPING; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; GENETICS, MEDICAL; GENETICS, POPULATION; MODELS, ANIMAL; PHENOTYPE;

EID: 0036376882     PISSN: 07853890     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/078538902320322556     Document Type: Article

References (137)

1. Lander ES, Schork NJ. Genetic dissection of complex traits. Science 1994; 265: 2037-48.
2. Terwilliger JD, Göring HH. Gene mapping in the 20th and 21st centuries: statistical methods, data analysis, and experimental design. Hum Biol 2000; 72: 63-132.
3. Risch NJ. Searching for genetic determinants in the new millenium. Nature 2000; 405: 847-56.
4. Thomas DC. Generic epidemiology with a capital "E". Genet Epidemiol 2000; 19: 289-300.
5. Khoury MJ, Beaty TH, Cohen BH. Fundamentals of genetic epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993.
6. Pawlowitzki I-W, Edwards JH, Thompson EA, eds. Genetic mapping of disease genes. San Diego: Academic Press Ltd; 1997.
7. Ott J. Analysis of human genetic linkage. 3rd edition. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press; 1999.
8. Bishop T, Sham P, eds. Analysis of multifactorial disease. Oxford: BIOS Scientific Publishers Ltd; 2000.
9. Spector TD, Snieder H, MacGregor AJ, eds. Advances in twin and sib-pair analysis. London: Greenwich Medical Media Ltd; 2000.
10. Rao DC, Province MA, eds. Genetic dissection of complex traits (Advances in Genetics, vol 42). San Diego: Academic Press; 2001.
11. Templeton AR. Uses of evolutionary theory in the human genome project. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1999; 30: 23-49.
12. Ewens WJ, Spielman RS. The transmission/disequilibrium test: history, subdivision, and admixture. Am J Hum Genet 1995; 57: 455-64.
13. Hauser L, Boehnke M, Guo S, and Risch N. Affected-sib pair interval mapping and exclusion for complex genetic traits: sampling considerations. Genet Epidemiol 1996; 13: 117-37.
14. Leal SM, Ott J. Effects of stratification in the analysis of affected-sib-pair data: benefits and costs. Am J Hum Genet 2000; 66: 567-75.
15. Spielman RS, McGinnis RE, Ewens WJ. Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Am J Hum Genet 1993; 52: 506-16.
16. Falk CT, Rubinstein P. Haplotype relative risks: an easy reliable way to construct a proper control sample for risk calculations. Ann Hum Genet 1987; 51: 227-33.
17. Terwilliger JD, Ott J. A haplotype-based "haplotype relative risk" approach to detecting allelic associations. Hum Hered 1992; 42: 337-46.
18. Pritchard JK, Rosenberg NA. Use of unlinked genetic markers to detect population stratification in assosiation studies. Am J Hum Genet 1999; 65: 220-8.
19. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donneally P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 2000; 155: 945-59.
20. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Rosenberg NA, Donneally P. Association mapping in structured populations. Am J Hum Genet 2000; 67: 170-81.
21. Satten GA, Flanders WD, Yang Q. Accounting for unmeasured population substructure in case-control studies of genetic association using a novel latent-class model. Am J Hum Genet 2000; 68: 466-77.
22. Sillanpää MJ, Kilpikari R, Ripatti S, Onkamo P, Uimari P. Bayesian association mapping for quantitative traits in a mixture of two populations. Genet Epidemiol 2001; 21 Suppl 1: S692-9.
23. Ripatti S, Pitkäniemi J, Sillanpää MJ. Joint modeling of generic association and population stratification using latent class models. Genet Epidemiol 2001; 21 Suppl 1: S409-14.
24. Spielman SR, Ewens WJ. A sibship test for linkage in presence of association: the sib transmission/disequilibrium test. Am J Hum Genet 1998; 62: 450-8.
25. Fulker DW, Cherny SS, Sham PC, Hewitt JK. Combined linkage and association sib-pair analysis for quantitative traits. Am J Hum Genet 1999; 64: 259-67.
26. Abecasis GR, Cardon LR, Cookson WO. A general test of association for quantitative traits in nuclear families. Am J Hum Genet 2000; 66: 279-92.
27. Carey G, Williamson J. Linkage analysis of quantitative traits: increased power by using selected samples. Am J Hum Genet 1991; 49: 786-96.
28. Eaves LJ. Effect of genetic architecture on the power of human linkage studies to resolve the contribution of quantitative trait loci. Heredity 1994; 72: 175-92.
29. Risch N, Zhang H. Extreme discordant sib pairs for mapping quantitative trait loci in humans. Science 1995; 268: 1584-9.
30. Gu C, Todorov AA, Rao DC. Genome screening using extremely discordant and extremely concordant sib pairs. Genet Epidemiol 1997; 14: 791-6.
31. Guo S-W. Inflation of sibling recurrence-risk ratio, due to ascertainment bias and/or overreporting. Am J Hum Genet 1998; 63: 252-8.
32. Olson JM, Cordell HJ. Ascertainment bias in the estimation of sibling genetic risk parameters. Genet Epidemiol 2000; 18: 217-35.
33. Bruun TG, Ewald H. Selection bias of susceptibility genes possible when using parent-offspring trios in genetic association studies. Mol Psychiatry 1999; 4: 414-6.
34. Ewens WJ. Ascertainment biases and their resolution in biological surveys. In: Rao CR, Chakraborty R, eds. Handbook of statistics. Vol 8. New York: Elsevier Sience; 1991: 29-61.
35. Thompson EA. Sampling and ascertainment in genetic epidemiology; a tutorial review. Technical report No. 243, Department of Statistics, University of Washington; 1993.
36. Elston RC. Twixt cup and lip: how intractable is the ascertainment problem? Am J Hum Genet 1995; 56: 15-7.
37. Hodge SE. Ascertainment. In: Armitage P, Colton T, eds. Encyclopedia of biostatistics. New York: Wiley; 1998: 197-201.
38. Bonney GE. Ascertainment corrections based on smaller family units. Am J Hum Genet 1998; 63: 1202-15.
39. Cordell HJ, Olson JM. Correcting for ascertainment bias of relative risk estimates obtained using affected-sib-pair linkage data. Genet Epidemiol 2000; 18: 307-211.
40. Burton PR, Palmer LJ, Jacobs K, Keen KJ, Olson JM, Elston RC. Ascertainment adjustment: where does it take us? Am J Hum Genet 2001; 67: 1505-14.
41. McCarthy MI, Kruglyak L, Lander ES. Sib-pair collection strategies for complex diseases. Genet Epidemiol 1998; 15: 317-40.
42. Lander ES, Botstein D. Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 1989; 121: 185-99.
43. Tanksley SD. Mapping polygenes. Annu Rev Genet 1993; 27: 205-33.
44. Darvasi A, Soller M. Selective genotyping for determination of linkage between a marker locus and a quantitative trait locus. Theor Appl Genet 1992; 85: 353-9.
45. Henshall JM, Goddard ME. Multiple-trait mapping of quantitative trait loci after selective genotyping using logistic regression. Genetics 1999; 151: 885-94.
46. Boehnke M, Cox NJ. Accurate inference of relationships in sib-pair linkage studies. Am J Hum Genet 1997; 61: 423-9.
47. Göring HH, Ott J. Relationship estimation in affected sib pair analysis of late-onset diseases. Eur J Hum Genet 1997; 5: 69-77.
48. Ehm MG, Wagner M. A test statistic to detect errors in sibpair relationships. Am J Hum Genet 1998; 62: 181-8.
49. Broman KW, Weber JL. Estimation of pairwise relationships in the precence of genotyping errors. Am J Hum Genet 1998; 63: 1563-4.
50. Epstein MP, Duren WL, Boehnke M. Improved Inference of relationship for pairs of individuals. Am J Hum Genet 2000; 67: 1219-31
51. McPeek MS, Sun L. Statistical tests for detection of misspecified relationships by use of genome-screen data. Am J Hum Genet 2000; 66: 1076-94.
52. Douglas JA, Boehnke M, Lange K. A multipoint method for detecting genotyping errors and mutations in sibling-pair linkage data. Am J Hum Genet 2000; 66: 1287-97.
53. Lantrop GM, Hooper AB, Huntsman JW, Ward RH. Evaluating pedigree data. I. Estimation of pedigree error in the presence of marker mistyping. Am J Hum Genet 1983; 35: 241-62.
54. Ott J. Detecting marker inconsistencies in human gene mapping. Hum Hered 1993; 43: 25-30.
55. Stringham HM, Boehnke M. Identifying marker typing incompatibilities in linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet 1996; 59: 946-50.
56. O'Connell JR, Weeks DE. PedCheck: A program for identifying genotype incompatibilities in linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet 1998; 63: 259-66.
57. Fuller WA. Measurement error models. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1987.
58. Biemer PP, Groves RM, Lyberg LE, Mathiowetz NA, Sudman S. Measurement errors in surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1991.
59. Carroll RJ, Ruppert D, Stefanski LA. Non-linear measurement error models. London: Chapman & Hall; 1995.
60. Lincoln SE, Lander ES. Systematic detection of errors in genetic linkage data. Genomics 1992; 14: 604-10.
61. Broman KW. Cleaning genotype data. Genet Epidemiol 1999; 17 Suppl 1: S79-S83.
62. Göring HH, Terwilliger JD. Linkage analysis in the presence of errors I: complex-valued recombination fractions and complex phenotypes. Am J Hum Genet 2000; 66: 1095-106.
63. Göring HH, Terwilliger JD. Linkage analysis in the presence of errors II: marker-locus genotyping errors modeled with hypercomplex recombination fractions. Am J Hum Genet 2000; 66: 1107-18.
64. Göring HH, Terwilliger JD. Linkage analysis in the presence of errors II: marker loci and their map as nuisance parameters. Am J Hum Genet 2000; 66: 1298-309.
65. Göring HH, Terwilliger JD. Linkage analysis in the presence of errors IV: Joint pseudomarker analysis of linkage and/or linkage disequilibrium on a mixture of pedigrees and singletons when the mode of inheritance cannot be accurately specified. Am J Hum Genet 2000; 66: 1310-27.
66. Akey JM, Zhang K, Xiong M, Doris P, Jin L. The effect that genotyping errors have on the robustness of common linkage-disequilibrium measures. Am J Hum Genet 2001; 68: 1447-56.
67. Gordon D, Heath SC, Liu S, Ott J. A transmission/disequilibrium test that allows for genotyping errors in the analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphism data. Am J Hum Genet 2001; 69: 371-80.
68. Stringham HM, Boehnke M. Lod scores for gene mapping in the presence of marker map uncertainty. Genet Epidemiol 2001; 21: 31-9.
69. Little RJ, Rubin DB. Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1987.
70. Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB. Models for missing data. In: Bayesian data analysis. London: Chapman & Hall; 1995: 439-66.
71. Rubin DB. Multiple imputation after 18+ years (with discussion). J Am Stat Assoc 1996; 91: 473-519.
72. Schafer JL. Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman & Hall; 1997.
73. van Dyk DA, Meng X-L. The art of data augmentation (with discussion). J Comput Graph Stat 2001; 10: 1-111.
74. Baron M. Genetics of Schizophrenia and the new millenium: progress and pitfalls. Am J Hum Genet 2001; 68: 299-312.
75. Rice JP, Saccone NL, Rasmussen E. Definition of the phenotype. In: Rao DC, Province MA, eds. Genetic dissection of complex traits (Advances in Genetics, vol 42). San Diego: Academic Press; 2001: 69-75.
76. Eaves LJ, Neale MC, Maes H. Multivariate multipoint linkage analysis of quantitative trait loci. Behav Genet 1996; 26: 519-25.
77. Allison DB, Bonniw T, St. Jean P, Elston RC, Infante MC, Schork NJ. Multiple phenotype modeling in gene-mapping studies of quantitative traits: power advantages. Am J Hum Genet 1998; 63: 1190-201.
78. Williams JT, Van Eerdewegh P, Almasy L, Blangero J. Joint multipoint linkage analysis of multivariate qualitative and quantitative traits. I. Likelihood formulation and simulation results. Am J Hum Genet 1999; 65: 1134-47.
79. Haley CS, Knott SA. A simple regression method for mapping quantitative trait loci in line crosses using flanking markers. Heredity 1992; 69: 315-24.
80. Martínez O, Curnow RN. Estimating the locations and the sizes of the effects of quantitative trait loci using flanking markers. Theor Appl Genet 1992; 85: 480-8.
81. Wright FA, Kong A. Linkage mapping in experimental crosses: the robustness of single-gene models. Genetics 1997; 146: 417-25.
82. Dizier M-H, Bonaïti-Pellié C, Clerget-Darpoux F. Conclusions of segregation analysis for family data generated under two-locus models. Am J Hum Genet 1993; 53: 1338-46.
83. Zeng Z-B. Theoretical basis for separation of multiple linked gene effects in mapping quantitative trait loci. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993; 90: 10972-6.
84. Jansen RC. Controlling the type 1 and Type II errors in mapping quantitative trait loci. Genetics 1994; 138: 871-81.
85. Schork NJ, Boehnke M, Terwilliger JD, Ott J. Two trait locus linkage analysis: a powerful strategy for mapping complex genetic traits. Am J Hum Genet 1993; 53: 1127-36.
86. Heath SC. Markov chain Monte Carlo segregation and linkage analysis for oligogenic models. Am J Hum Genet 1997; 61: 748-60.
87. Sillanpää MJ, Corander J. Model choice in gene mapping: what and why. Trends Genet 2002; 18: 301-7.
88. Lee JK, Thomas DC. Performance of Markov Chain-Monte Carlo approaches for mapping genes in oligogenetic models with an unknown number of loci. Am J Hum Genet 2000; 67: 1232-50.
89. Uimari P, Sillanpää MJ. Bayesian oligogenic analysis of quantitative and qualitative traits in general pedigrees. Genet Epidemiol 2001; 21: 224-42.
90. Uimari P, Hoeschele I. Mapping linked quantitative trait loci using Bayesian analysis and Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms. Genetics 1997; 146: 735-43.
91. Sillanpää MJ, Arjas E. Bayesian mapping of multiple quantitative trait loci from incomplete inbred line cross data. Genetics 1998; 148: 1373-88.
92. Sillanpää MJ, Arjas E. Bayesian mapping of multiple quantitative trait loci from incomplete outbred offspring data. Genetics 1999; 151: 1605-19.
93. Carlborg Ö, Andersson L, Kinghorn B. The use of genetic algorithm for simultaneous mapping of multiple interacting quantitative trait loci. Genetics 2000; 155: 2003-10.
94. Peltonen L. Positional cloning of disease genes: advantages of genetic isolates. Hum Hered 2000; 50: 66-75.
95. Jorde LB, Watkins WS, Kere J, Nyman D, Eriksson AW. Gene mapping in isolated populations: new roles for old friends? Hum Hered 2000; 50: 57-65.
96. Chakraborty R, Weiss KM. Admixture as a tool for finding linked genes and detecting that difference from allelic association between loci. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988; 85: 9119-23.
97. McKeigue PM. Mapping genes underlying ethnic differences in disease risk by linkage disequilibrium in recently admixed populations. Am J Hum Genet 1997; 60: 188-96.
98. McKeigue PM. Mapping genes that underlie ethnic differences in disease risk: methods for detecting linkage in admixed populations, by conditioning on parental admixture. Am J Hum Genet 1998; 63: 241-51.
99. Gelehrter TD, Collins FS. Principles of medical genetics. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1990.
100. Leal SM. Tests for detecting linkage and linkage heterogeneity. In: Pawlowitzki IH, Edwards JH, Thompson EA, eds. Genetic mapping of disease genes. San Diego: Academic Press Ltd; 1997: 97-112.
101. Nei M. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 1978; 89: 583-90.
102. Guldbrandtsen B, Tokiuk J, Loeschcke V. POPDIST, version 1.1.1: a program to calculate population genetic distance and identity measures. J Hered 2000; 91: 178-9.
103. Risch N, Merikangas K. The future of genetic studies of complex human diseases. Science 1996; 273: 1516-7.
104. Schaid DJ, McDonnell SK, Thibodeau SN. Regression models for linkage heterogeneity applied to familial prostate cancer. Am J Hum Genet 2001; 68: 1189-96.
105. Schork NJ, Fallin D, Thiel B, Xu X, Broeckel U, Jacob HJ, et al. The future of genetic case/control studies. In: Rao DC, Province MA, eds. Genetic dissection of complex traits (Advances in Genetics, vol 42). San Diego: Academic Press; 2001: 191-211.
106. Grigull J, Alexandrova R, Paterson AD. Clustering of pedigrees using marker allele frequencies: impact on linkage analysis. Genet Epidemiol 2001; 21 Suppl 1: S61-6.
107. Shannon WD, Province MA, Rao DC. Tree-based recursive partitioning methods for subdividing sibpairs into relatively more homogeneous subgroups. Genet Epidemiol 2001; 20: 293-306.
108. Falk CT. Effect of genetic heterogeneity and assortative mating on linkage analysis: a simulation study. Am J Hum Genet 1997; 61: 1169-78.
109. Whittemore AS, Halpern J. Problems in the definition, interpretation, and evaluation of genetic heterogeneity. Am J Hum Genet 2001; 68: 457-65.
110. Province MA, Shannon WD, Rao DC. Classification methods for confronting heterogeneity. In: Rao DC, Province MA, eds. Genetic dissection of complex traits (Advances in Genetics, vol 42). San Diego: Academic Press; 2001: 273-86.
111. Frankel WN. Taking stock of complex trait genetics in mice. Trends Genet 1995; 11: 471-7.
112. Cordell HJ, Todd JA. Multifactorial inheritance in type 1 diabetes. Trends Genet 1995; 11: 499-504.
113. Jacob HJ. Functional genomics and rat models. Genome Res 1999; 9: 1013-6.
114. Moore KJ, Nagle DL. Complex trait analysis in mouse: the strengths, the limitations and the promise yet to come. Annu Rev Genet 2000; 34: 653-86.
115. Darvasi A. Experimental strategies for the genetic dissection of complex traits in animal models. Nat Genet 1998; 18: 19-24.
116. Taylor BA. Recombinant inbred strains. In: Lyon ML, Searle AG, eds. Genetic variants and strains of the laboratory mouse, 2nd Ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1989: 773-96.
117. Williams RW, Gu J, Qi S, Lu L. The genetic structure of recombinant inbred mice: high-resolution consensus maps for complex trait analysis. Genome Biology 2001; 2(11): http://www.genomebiology.com/2001/2/11/research/0046/.
118. Flint J, Mott R. Finding the molecular basis of quantitative traits: successes and pitfalls. Nat Rev Genet 2001; 2: 437-45.
119. Paterson AH, ed. Molecular dissection of complex traits. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1998.
120. Lynch M, Walsh B. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.; 1998.
121. Yi N, Xu S. Bayesian mapping of quantitative trait loci for complex binary traits. Genetics 2000; 155: 1391-403.
122. Mott R, Talbot CJ, Turri MG, Collins AC, Flint J. A method for fine mapping quantitative trait loci in outbred animal stocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97: 12649-54.
123. Manly KF, Olson JM. Overview of QTL mapping software and introduction to Map Manager QT. Mamm Genome 1999; 10: 327-34.
124. Cockerham CC, Zeng Z-B. Design III with marker loci. Genetics 1996; 143: 1437-56.
125. Jannink J-L, Jansen RC. Mapping epistatic quantitative trait loci with one-dimensional genome searches. Genetics 2001; 157: 445-54.
126. Lander ES, Linton LM, Birren B, Nusbaum C, Zody M, Baldwin J, et al. Initial sequence and analysis of human genome. Nature 2001; 409: 860-921.
127. Rannala B, Reeve JP. High-resolution multipoint linkage-disequilibrium mapping in the context of a human genome sequence. Am J Hum Genet 2001; 69: 159-78.
128. Shoemaker JS, Painter I, Weir BS. Bayesian statistics in genetics, a guide for the uninitiated. Trends Genet 1999; 15: 354-8.
129. Malakoff D. Bayes offers a 'new' way to make sense of numbers. Science 1999; 286: 1460-4.
130. Matthews RAJ. Why should clinicians care about Bayesian methods? (with discussion). J Stat Plan Infer 2001; 94: 43-71.
131. Pajukanta P, Cargill M, Viitanen L, Nuotio I, Kareinen A, Perola M, et al. Two loci on chromosomes 2 and X for premature coronary heart disease identified in early- and late-settlement populations of Finland. Am J Hum Genet 2000; 67: 1481-93.
132. Perola M, Öhman M, Hiekkalinna T, Leppävuori J, Pajukanta P, Wessman M, et al. Quantitative-trait-locus analysis of body-mass index and of stature, by combined analysis of genome scans of five Finnish study groups. Am J Hum Genet 2001; 69: 117-23.
133. Rice JP. The role of meta-analysis in linkage studies of complex traits. Am J Med Genet 1997; 81: 207-15.
134. Xu J, Meyers DA. Approaches to meta-analysis in genetic disorders. Clin Exp Allergy 1998; 28 Suppl 1: 106-10.
135. Allison DB, Heo M. Meta-analysis of linkage data under worst-case conditions: a demonstration using the human OB region. Genetics 1998; 148: 859-66.
136. Province MA. The significance of not finding a gene. Am J Hum Genet 2001; 69: 660-3.
137. Gu C, Province MA, Rao DC. Meta-analysis for model-free methods. In: Rao DC, Province MA, eds. Genetic dissection of complex traits (Advances in Genetics, vol 42). San Diego: Academic Press; 2001: 255-72.