Online Second Language Acquisition: Conversation Analysis of Online Chat

Online Second Language Acquisition: Conversation Analysis of Online Chat

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-252

  Tudini, Vincenza ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85191513123     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (99)

1. Beauvois, M. H. (1992). Computer-assisted classroom discussion in the foreign language classroom: Conversation in slow motion. Foreign Language Annals, 25, 455–464.
2. Belz, J. A. (2003). Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning and Technology, 7, 68−117.
3. Belz, J. & Vyatkina, N. (2005). Learner corpus analysis and the development of L2 pragmatic competence in networked inter-cultural language study: The case of German modal particles. The Canadian Modern Language Review / La revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 62, 17–48.
4. Blake, C. (2009). Potential of text-based internet chats for improving oral fluency in a second language. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 227–240.
5. Brouwer, C. E, Rasmussen, G., & Wagner, J. (2004). Embedded corrections in second language talk. In R. Gardner & J. Wagner (Eds.), Second language conversations (pp. 75–92). London/New York: Continuum.
6. Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
7. Byram, M., & Fleming, M. (Eds.) (1998). Language learning in intercultural perspective: Approaches through drama and ethnography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Carroll, D. (2005). Vowel-marking as an Interactional Resource in Japanese Novice ESL Conversation. In Richards, K., & Seedhouse, P. (Eds.), Applying conversation analysis (pp. 214–234). Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
9. Chun, D. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22(1), 17–31.
10. Coniglio, M. (2008). Modal particles in Italian, Working Papers in Linguistics, University of Venice, Vol. 18. Retrieved November 4, 2009 from http://lear.unive.it/bitstream/10278/986/1/03%20Coniglio.pdf.
11. Cosenza, G. (2002). Imessaggi SMS. In C. Bazzanella (Ed.), Sul dialogo: contesti e forme di interazione verbale (pp. 253−267). Milan: Guerini.
12. Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the Internet, 1st edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the Internet, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Doughty, C. J., & Long, M. H. (2003). Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 7 (3), 1–30.
15. Dussias, P. E. (2006). Morphological development in Spanish-American telecollaboration. In J.A. Belz & S.L. Thorne (Eds.), Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language Education, (pp. 121–146). Boston, MA: Thomson Heinle.
16. Elliott, A. J. (1981). Child language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Ferguson, C. A. (1971). Absence of copula and the notion of simplicity: A study of normal speech, baby talk, foreigner talk, and pidgins. In D. Hymes (Ed.), Pidginization and creolization of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 285–300.
19. Furstenberg, G., Levet, S., English, K., & Maillet, K. (2001). Giving a voice to the silent language of culture: The Cultura project. Language Learning and Technology, 5, 55–102.
20. Garcia, A. C., & Jacobs, J. B. (1999). The eyes of the beholder: Understanding the turn-taking system in quasi-synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32 (4), 337–367.
21. Gardner, R., & Wagner, J. (Eds.). (2004). Second language conversations. London: Continuum.
22. Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. Essays in face-to-face behaviour. New York: Anchor Books.
24. Golato, A., & Taleghani-Nikazm, C. (2006). Negotiation of face in web chats. Multilingua, 25, 293–321.
25. Graham, S. L. (2008). A manual for (im)politeness?: The impact of the FAQ in an electronic community of practice. In Bousfield, D. & Locher, M.A. (Eds.), Impoliteness in language: studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
26. Grimaldi, M. (2004). Il dialetto rinasce in chat. Quaderni del Dipartimento di Linguistica, University of Florence, Vol. 14, 123–137. Retrieved May 15, 2010 from http://www.linguistica.unifi.it/upload/sub/QDLF/QDLF14/QDFL14_2004_07-grimaldi.pdf.
27. Hall, J. K. (2007). Redressing the roles of correction and repair in research on second and foreign language learning. Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 511–526.
28. Hanna, B. E., & de Nooy, J. (2003). A funny thing happened on the way to the forum: Electronic discussion and foreign language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 7, 71–85.
29. Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
30. Heritage, J. (2004). Conversation analysis and institutional talk. In K. Fitch & R.E. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 103–137). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Hosoda, Y. (2006). Repair and relevance of differential language expertise. Applied Linguistics, 27 (1), 25–50.
32. Jefferson, G. (1987). On exposed and embedded correction in conversation. In G. Button & R.E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social interaction (pp. 86–100). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
33. Jefferson, G. (1988) On the sequential organization of troubles-talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems, 35(4), 418–442.
34. Jepson, K. (2005). Conversations—and negotiated interaction—in text and voice chat rooms. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3), 79–98.
35. Joinson, A. N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 177–192.
36. Kalin, M. (1995). Coping with problems of understanding: Repair sequences between native and non-native speakers. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
37. Kasper, G. (1985). Repair in foreign language teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 200–215.
38. Kasper, G. (2004). Participant orientations in German conversation-for-learning. Modern Language Journal, 88(iv), 551–567.
39. Kasper, G., & Rose, K. (2001). Pragmatics in language teaching. In K. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 1–9). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
40. Kern, R. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. Modern Language Journal, 79, 457–476.
41. Kinginger, C. (2008). Special issue on study abroad. The Modern Language Journal, 92.
42. Kramsch, C. (1998). The privilege of the intercultural speaker. In M. Byram & M. Fleming (Eds.), Language learning in intercultural perspective: Approaches through drama and ethnography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Harlow: Longman.
44. Kurhila, S. (2005). Different orientations to grammatical correctness. In K. Richards & P. Seedhouse (Eds.), Applying conversation analysis (pp. 143–158). Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
45. Lam, W. S. E (2004). Second language socialization in a bilingual chat room. Language Learning & Technology, 8(3), 44–65.
46. Lauerbach, G. (1982). Face-work in Reparaturen—ein Charakteristikum von Learner/Native-Speaker Diskursen. L.A.U.T., Paper no. 81, (29S), Trier.
47. Liddicoat, A. J. (1997). Interaction, social structure and second language use: A response to Firth and Wagner. Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 313–317.
48. Liddicoat, A. J. (2007). An introduction to conversation analysis. London/New York: Continuum.
49. Liddicoat, A. J. (2010). Enacting participation: Hybrid modalities in on-line video conversation. In C. Develotte, R. Kern, M.N. Lamy (Eds.), Décrire la conversation en ligne. Lyon: ENS Éditions.
50. Liddicoat, A. J., & Crozet, C. (2001). Acquiring French interactional norms through instruction. In K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatic Development in instructional contexts (pp. 125–144). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: a design feature in language teaching methodology. In C. Kramsch & R. Ginsberg (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
52. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Richie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of research on language acquisition, Vol.2: Second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). New York: Academic Press.
53. Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Luke, K. K., & Pavlidou, T.-S. (Eds.) (2002). Telephone calls: Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
55. Markee, N. P. P. (2000). Conversation Analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
56. Markee, N. P. P. (2008). Toward a learning behavior tracking methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 404–427.
57. Maturi, P. (2006) I suoni delle lingue, i suoni dell’italiano. Introduzione alla fonetica, Bologna: Il Mulino, 2006.
58. Maynard, D. W., and Zimmerman, D. H. (1984). Topical talk, ritual and the social organization of relationship. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47, 301–316.
59. Mori, J. (2003). The Construction of interculturality: A study of initial encounters between Japanese and American students. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36(2), 143–184.
60. Negretti, R. (1999). Web-based activities and SLA: A conversation analysis research approach. Language Learning and Technology, 3, 75–87.
61. Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 59–86). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
62. Plough, I., & Gass, S. (1993). Interlocutor and task familiarity: Effects on interactional structure. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 35–36). Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.
63. Porter, P. (1986). How learners talk to each other: Input and interaction in taskcentered discussions. In R.R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 200–222). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
64. Richards, K., & Seedhouse, P. (Eds.) (2005) Applying conversation analysis. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
65. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics of the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.
66. Satar, H. M., & Özdener, N. (2008). The effects of synchronous CMC on speaking proficiency and anxiety: Text versus voice chat. The Modern Language Journal, 92 (iv), 595–613.
67. Schegloff, E. A. (1979). The relevance of repair in a syntax-for-conversation. In T. Givon (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax. (pp. 261–286). New York: Academic Press.
68. Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97(5), 1295–1345.
69. Schegloff, E. A. (2000). When ‘others’ initiate repair. Applied Linguistics, 21 (2), 205–243.
70. Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327.
71. Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53 (2), 361–382.
72. Schena, L., Prandi, M., & Mazzoleni, M. (Eds.) (2002). Intorno al congiuntivo. Bologna: CLUEB.
73. Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158.
74. Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. W. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1–63). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
75. Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction, (pp.3–32). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
76. Schönfeldt, J., & Golato, A. (2003). Repair in chats: A conversation analytic approach. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36(3), 241–284.
77. Schwienhorst, K. (2004). Native-speaker/non-native-speaker discourse in the MOO: Topic negotiation and initiation in a synchronous text-based environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(1), 35–50.
78. Seedhouse, P. (1999). The relationship between context and organisation of repair in the L2 classroom. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 37(1), 59–80.
79. Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.
80. Seedhouse, P. (2005). Conversation Analysis and language learning. Language Teaching, 38, 165–87.
81. Shekary, M., & Tahririan, M. H. (2006). Negotiation of meaning and noticing in text-based online chat. The Modern Language Journal, 90 (iv), 557–573.
82. Smith, B. (2003). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. Modern Language Journal, 87, 38–57.
83. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). New York: Newsbury House.
84. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H.G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
85. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 371–391.
86. ten Have, P. (2000). Computer-mediated chat: Ways of finding chat partners. M/C: A Journal of Media and Culture 3(4). http://www.api-network.com/mc/0008/partners.php [October 3, 2007].
87. ten Have, P. (2002). Comparing telephone call openings: Theoretical and methodological refl ections. In K. K. Luke & T.-S. Pavlidou (Eds.), Telephone calls: Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures (pp. 233–248). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
88. Tudini, V. (2002). The role of online chatting in the development of competence in oral interaction. In the proceedings of the Innovations in Italian Workshop, Griffith University, http://www.gu.edu.au/centre/italian/ Keynote address.
89. Tudini, V. (2003). Using native speakers in chat. Language Learning and Technology, 7, 141–159. Reprinted in Hubbard, P. (2009). Computer-assisted language learning: Critical concepts in Linguistics, Volume III: Computer mediated communication in language learning (Chapter 49, pp. 292–316). New York/London: Routledge.
90. Tudini, V. (2004). Virtual immersion: Native speaker chats as a bridge to conversational Italian. [Special issue on Using and Learning Italian in Australia] In A. Rubino, (Ed.), Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, Series S, 18, 63–80.
91. Tudini, V. (2005). Chatlines for beginners: Negotiating conversation at a distance. In B. Holmberg, M. Shelley, & C. White (Eds.), Distance education and languages: Evolution and change (pp. 212–229). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
92. Tudini, V. (2007). Negotiation and intercultural learning in Italian native speaker chat rooms. Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 577–601.
93. Van, Lier, L. (1988). The classroom and the language learner. London: Longman.
94. Varonis, E., & Gass, S. (1985). Non-native/non-native conversations: A model for negotiation. Applied Linguistics, 6, 71–90.
95. Ware, P. D., & Kramsch, C. (2005). Toward an intercultural stance: Teaching German and English through telecollaboration. Modern Language Journal, 89, 190–205.
96. Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic communication in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13, 7–26
97. Warschauer. (1998). Interaction, negotiation, and computer-mediated learning. In M. Clay (Ed.), Practical applications of educational technology in language learning. Lyon, France: National Institute of Applied Sciences.
98. Yamada, M. (2009). The role of social presence in learner-centered language learning using synchronous computer-mediated communication: Experimental study. Computers & Education, 52, 820–833.
99. Yule, G. (2006). The Study of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.