Repair in Chats: A Conversation Analytic Approach

Research on Language and Social Interaction

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 241-284

  Schönfeldt, Juliane ^a   Golato, Andrea ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0142230925     PISSN: 08351813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3603_02     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Aoki, K. (1995). Synchronous multi-user textual communication in international tele-collaboration. Electronic Journal of Communication, 5(4). Available at http://www.cios.org/www/ejcmain.html
2. Bahl, A. (1997). Zwischen On- und Offline. Identität und Selbstdarstellung im Internet [Between on- and offline. Identity and self-representation on the Internet]. München: KoPäd.
3. Baym, N. K. (1996). Agreements and disagreements in a computer-mediated discussion. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 29, 315-345.
4. Baym, N. K. (1997). Identity, body, and community in on-line life. Journal of Communication, 47(4), 142-148.
5. Beißwenger, M. (Ed.). (2001). Chat-Kommunikation. Sprache, Interaktion, Sozialität & Identität in synchroner computervermittelter Kommunikation. Perspektiven auf ein interdisziplinäres Forschungsfeld [Chat-communication. Language, interaction, sociality & identity in synchronous computer-mediated communication. Perspectives on an interdisciplinary research field]. Stuttgart: ibidem-Verlag.
6. Campbell, C., & Wickman, S. A. (2000). Familiars in a strange land: A case study of friends chatting online. M/C: A Journal of Media and Culture, 3(4). Retrieved January 24, 2002, from http://www.api-network.com/mc/0008/friends.html
7. Cerratto, T., & Wærn, Y. (2000). Chatting to learn and learning to chat in collaborative virtual environments. M/C: A Journal of Media and Culture, 3(4). Retrieved January 24, 2002, from http://www/api-network.com/mc/0008/learning.html
8. Drew, P. (1997). "Open" class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 28, 69-101.
9. Egbert, M. M. (1996). Context-sensitivity in conversation: Eye gaze and the German repair initiator "bitte"? Language in Society, 25, 587-612.
10. Egbert, M. M. (1997a). Schisming: The collaborative transformation from a single conversation to multiple conversations. Research in Language and Social Interaction, 30, 1-51.
11. Egbert, M. M. (1997b). Some interactional achievements of other-initiated repair in multi-person conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 27, 611-634.
12. Garcia, A. C., & Jacobs, J. B. (1998). The interactional organization of computer mediated communication in the college classroom. Qualitative Sociology, 21, 299-317.
13. Garcia, A. C., & Jacobs, J. B. (1999). The eyes of the beholder: Understanding the turn-taking system in quasi-synchronous computer-mediated communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32, 227-367.
14. Geers, R. (1999). Der Faktor Sprache im unendlichen Daten(t)raum. Eine linguistische Betrachtung von Dialogen im Internet Relay Chat [The factor language in the never-ending data stream/dream. A linguistic analysis of dialogues in Internet Relay Chat]. In B. Naumann (Ed.), Dialogue analysis and the mass media. Proceedings of the International Conference in Erlangen, April 2-3, 1998 (Vol. 2, pp. 83-100). Tübingen, Germany: Max Nimeyer Verlag.
15. Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places. Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
16. Goodwin, C. (1979). The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 97-121). New York: Irvington.
17. Goodwin, C. (1984). Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 225-246). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
18. Goodwin, C. (1989). Turn construction in conversational organization. In B. Dervin, L. Grossberg, B. J. O'Keefe, & E. Wartella (Eds.), Rethinking communication: Vol. 2. Paradigm exemplars (pp. 88-102). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19. Grosch, Y. (1999). Turn-Verteilung in synchroner computervermittelter Kommunikation: eine Frage der medialen Rahmenbedingungen oder der sozialen Regulierung [Turn-distribution in synchronous computer-mediated communication: A question of media conditions or of social regulation]? In B. Naumann (Ed.), Dialogue analysis and the mass media. Proceedings of the International Conference in Erlangen, April 2-3, 1998 (pp. 101-112). Tübingen, Germany: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
20. Harasim, L. M. (Ed.). (1990). Online education. Perspectives on a new environment. New York: Praeger.
21. Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299-345). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
22. Herring, S. (Ed.). (1996). Computer-mediated communication - Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
23. Hinrichs, G. (1998). Gesprächsanalyse Chatten Conversation Analysis Chat. Networx2. PDF-document: http://www.websprache.uni-hannover.de/networx/docs/networx2.pdf
24. Hirst, G. (1991). Does conversation analysis have a role in computational linguistics? Computational Linguistics, 17, 211-227.
25. Hutchby, I. (2001). Conversation and technology. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
26. Jefferson, G. (1987). On exposed and embedded correction in conversation. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organization (pp. 86-100). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
27. Jones, S. G. (Ed). (1995). CyberSociety: Computer-mediated communication and community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Jones, S. G. (Ed.). (1997). Virtual culture: Identity and communication in cybersociety. London: Sage.
29. Koch, P., & Oesterreicher, W. (1994). Schriftlichkeit und Sprache. In H. Günther & O. Ludwig (Eds.), Handbuch Schrift und Schriftlichkett. (Vol. I., pp. 587-604). Berlin: de Gruyter.
30. Korenman, J., & Wyatt, N. (1996). Group dynamics in an e-mail forum. In S. C. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication. Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 225-242). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
31. Lenke, N., & Schmitz, P. (1995). Geschwätz im, Globalen Dorf'. Kommunikation im Internet. Osnabrücker Beiträge zur Sprachtheorie (OBST) 50, 117-141.
32. Lerner, G. H. (1993). Collectivities in action: Establishing the relevance of conjoined participation in conversation. Text, 13, 213-245.
33. Lerner, G. H. (1996). On the "semi-permeable" character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In E. Ochs, S. Thompson, & E. A. Schegloff (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 238-276). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
34. Meise-Kuhn, K. (1998). Zwischen Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit: Sprachliche und konversationelle Verfahren in der Computerkommunikation. In A. Brock & M. Hartung (Eds.), Neuere Entwicklungen in der Gesprächsforschung (pp. 213-335). Tübingen, Germany: Gunter Narr Verlag.
35. Murray, D. F. (1989). When the medium determines turns: Turn-taking in computer conversation. In H. Coleman (Ed.), Working with language. A multidisciplinary consideration of language use in work contexts (pp. 317-337). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
36. Nöth, W. (Ed.). (1997). Semiotics of the media. State of the art, projects, and perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
37. Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 225-246). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
38. Reed, D., & Ashmore, M. (2000). The naturally-occurring chat machine. M/C: A Journal of Media and Culture 3(4). Retrieved January 24, 2002, from http://www.api-network.com/mc/0008/machine.html
39. Reid, E. M. (1991). Electropolis: Communication and community on Internet relay chat. Unpublished honors thesis, University of Melbourne, Australia. ftp://ftp.lambda.moo.mud.org/pub/MOO/papers/electropolis.tx
40. Rintel, E. S., & Pittnam, J. (1997, May). Communicative and non-communicative silence on internet relay chat: Management and function. Paper presented at the 47th annual conference of the International Communication Association, Montreal. http://www.uq.edu.au/̃enrinte/work/papers/silence-on-irc/ rintel-es-sielence-on-irc-1997.html
41. Runkehl, J., Schlobinski, P., & Siever, T. (1998). Sprache und Kommunikation im Internet. Überblick und Analysen. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
42. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematic for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
43. Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Recycled turn beginnings: A precise repair mechanism in conversation's turn-taking organisation. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organization (pp. 70-85). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
44. Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1295-1345.
45. Schegloff, E. A. (1993). Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26, 99-128.
46. Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Third turn repair. In G. R. Guy, C. Feagin, D. Schiffrin, & J. Baugh (Eds.), Toward a social science of language. Papers in honor of William Labov, Vol. 2. Social interaction and discourse structures (pp. 31-40). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
47. Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361-382.
48. Schönfeldt, J. (2001). Die Gesprächsorganisation in freien Webchats. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
49. Shields, R. (Ed.). (1996). Cultures of Internet: Virtual spaces, real histories, living bodies. London: Sage.
50. Soldo, M. (2001). Das Internet aus kommunikationstheoretischer Perspektive. Mutterprache, 1, 46-59.
51. ten Have, P. (2000). Computer-mediated chat: Ways of finding chat partners. M/C: A Journal of Media and Culture, 3(4). Retrieved January 24, 2002, from http://www.api-network.com/mc/0008/partners.html
52. Thiedeke, U. (Ed.). (2000). Virtuelle Gruppen, Charakteristika und Problemdimensionen. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
53. Thimm, C. (Ed.). (2000). Soziales im Netz. Sprache, soziale Beziehungen und Kommunikationskulturen im Internet. Opladen, Wiesbaden, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
54. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43.
55. Werry, C. C. (1996). Linguistic and interactional features of Internet Relay Chat. In S. C. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication. Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 47-63). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
56. Ziv, O. (1996). Writing to work: How using e-mail can reflect technological and organizational change. In S. C. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication. Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 243-263). Amsterdam: Benjamins.