Conversation analysis and institutional talk

Handbook of Language and Social Interaction

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 103-147

  Heritage, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85079474391     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (141)

1. Albert, E. (1964). "Rhetoric," "logic," and "poetics" in Burundi: Culture patterning of speech behavior. American Anthropologist, 66(6, pt. 2), 35-54.
2. Atkinson, J. M. (1982). Understanding formality: Notes on the categorisation and production of "formal" interaction. British Journal of Sociology, 33, 86-117.
3. Atkinson, J. M. (1992). Displaying neutrality: Formal aspects of informal court proceedings. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 199-211). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4. Atkinson, J. M., & Drew, P. (1979). Order in court: The organisation of verbal interaction injudicial settings. London: Macmillan.
5. Atkinson, J. M.,&Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. Beach, W A. (1993). Transitional regularities for casual "okay" usages-JoMnw! of Pragmatics, 19, 325-352.
7. Beach, W. A. (1995). Preserving and constraining options: "Okays" and 'official' priorities in medical interviews. In B. Morris & R. Chenail (Eds.), Talk of the clinic. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Bergmann, J. R. (1993). Alarmiertes verstehen: Kommunikation in feuerwehrnotrufen. In T. Jung & S. Mueller-Doohm (Eds.), Wirklichkeit im Deutungsprozess: Verstehen und Methoden in den Kultur- und Sozial-wissenschaften (pp. 283-328). Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
9. Boyd, E., & Heritage, J. (forthcoming). Taking the patient's medical history: Questioning during comprehensive history taking. In J. Heritage & D. Maynard (Eds.), Practising medicine: Structure and process in primary care encounters. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10. Button, G. (1987). Moving out of closings. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organisation (pp. 101-151). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
11. Button, G., & Casey, N. (1984). Generating topic: The use of topic initial elicitors. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 167-190). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12. Button, G., & Casey, N. (1985). Topic nomination and topic pursuit. Human Sttidies, 8, 3-55.
13. Byrne, P. S., & Long, B. (1976). Doctors talking to patients: A study of the verbal behaviours of doctors in the consultation. London: Her Majesty's Stationary Office.
14. Clayman, S. E. (1988). Displaying neutrality in television news interviews. Social Problems, 35, 474-492.
15. Clayman, S. E. (1989). The production of punctuality: Social interaction, temporal organisation and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 659-691.
16. Clayman, S. E. (1991). News interview openings: Aspects of sequential organisation. In P. Scannell (Ed.), Broadcast talk: A reader (pp. 48-75). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17. Clayman, S. E. (1992). Footing in the achievement of neutrality: The case of news interview discourse. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 163-198). Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press.
18. Clayman, S. E., & Heritage, J. (2002a). The news interview: Journalists and public figures on the air. Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press.
19. Clayman, S. E., &Heritage, J. (2002b). Questioning presidents Journalistic deference and adversarialness in the press conferences of Eisenhower and Reagan. Journal of Communication, 52, 749-775.
20. Cuff, E., & Sharrock, W. W. (1985). Meeting talk. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis: Vol. 3. Discourse and dialogue (pp. 149-160). New York: Academic Press.
21. Dingwall, R. (1980). Orchestrated encounters. Sociology of Health and Illness 2, 151-173.
22. Drew, P. (1991). Asymmetries of knowledge in conversational interactions. In I. Markova & K Foppa (Eds.), Asymmetries in dialogue (pp. 29-48). Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester/Wheatsheaf.
23. Drew, P. (1992). Contested evidence in a courtroom cross-examination: The case of a trial for rape. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 470-520). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24. Drew, P. (1997). 'Open' class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of trouble in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 28, 69-101.
25. Drew, P., &Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 3-65). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26. Drew, P.,&Sorjonen, M.-L. (1997). Institutional dialogue. In T. v. Dijk (Ed.), Discourse studies: Amultidisciplinary introduction; Vol. 2. Discourse as social interaction in society (pp. 92-118). London: Sage.
27. Drummund, K, & Hopper, R. (1993). Backchannels revisited: Acknowledgment tokens and speakership incipiency. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26, 157-177.
28. Duranti, A. (1994). From grammar to politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
29. Fisher, S., & Todd, A. (Eds.). (1993). The social organization of doctor-patient communication. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
30. Garcia, A. (1991). Dispute resolution without disputing: How the interactional organization of mediation hearings minimizes argumentative talk. American Sociological Review, 56, 818-835.
31. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodohgy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
32. Gill, V. (1998). Doing attributions in medical interaction: Patients' explanations for illness and doctors' responses. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 342-360.
33. Goffman, E. (1955). On face work. Psychiatry, 18, 213-231.
34. Goffman, E. (1983). The interaction order. American Sociological Review, 48, 1-17.
35. Greatbatch, D. (1988). A turn-taking system for British news interviews. Language in Society, 17, 401-430.
36. Greatbatch, D. (1992). The management of disagreement between news interviewees. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 268-301). Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press.
37. Greatbatch, D., & Dingwall, R. (1989). Selective facilitation: Some preliminary observations on a strategy used by divorce mediators. Law and Society Review, 23, 613-641.
38. Guthrie, A. (1997). On the systematic deployment of okay and mmhmm in academic advising sessions. Pragmatics, 7, 397-415.
39. Halkowski, T. (forthcoming). Realizing the illness: Patients' narratives of symptom discovery. In J. Heritage & D. Maynard (Eds.), Practicing medicine: Structure andprocess inprimary care consultations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40. Heath, C. (1992). The delivery and reception of diagnosis and assessment in the general practice consultation. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 235-267). Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press.
41. Heath, C, & Luff, P. (2000). Technology in action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42. Heritage, J. (1984a). Garfinkelandethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
43. Heritage, J. (1984b). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 299-345). Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press.
44. Heritage, J. (1985). Analyzing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. In T. A. Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis. Vol. 3 (pp. 95-119). New York: Academic Press.
45. Heritage, J. (1987). Ethnomethodology. In A. Giddens & J. Turner (Eds.), Social theory today (pp. 224-272). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
46. Heritage, J. (1997). Conversation analysis and institutional talk: Analyzing data. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative analysis: Issues of theory and method (pp. 161-182). London: Sage.
47. Heritage, J. (1998). Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry. Language in Society, 27, 291-334.
48. Heritage, J. (2002). Ad hoc inquiries: Two preferences in the design of'routine' questions in an open context. In D. Maynard, H. Houtkoop-Steenstra, N. K Schaeffer, & H. van der Zouwen (Eds.), Standardization and tacit knowledge: Interaction and practice in the survey interview (pp. 313-333). New York: Wiley Interscience.
49. Heritage, J., & Greatbatch, D. (1991). On the institutional character of institutional talk: The case of news interviews. In D. Boden & D. H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure (pp. 93-137). Berkeley: University of California Press.
50. Heritage, J., & Lindstrom, A. (1998). Motherhood, medicine and morality: Scenes from a medical encounter. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31, 397-438.
51. Heritage, J., & Maynard, D. (Eds.), (forthcoming). Practicing medicine: Structure and process in primary care encounters. Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press.
52. Heritage, J., & Robinson, J. (forthcoming). Accounting for the visit: Giving reasons for seeking medical care. In J. Heritage &D. Maynard (Eds.), Practicing medicine: Structure and process in primary care consultations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
53. Heritage, J., & Sefi, S. (1992). Dilemmas of advice: Aspects of the delivery and reception of advice in interactions between health visitors and first time mothers. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 359-417). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54. Heritage, J., & Sorjonen, M.-L. (1994). Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: And- prefacing as a feature of question design. Language in Society, 23, 1-29.
55. Heritage, J., & Stivers, T. (1999). Online commentary in acute medical visits: A method of shaping patient expectations." Social Science and Medicine, 49, 1501-1517.
56. Hopper, R., & LeBaron, C. (1998). How gender creeps into talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31, 59-74.
57. Inui, T, & Carter, W B. (1985). Problems and prospects for health service research on provider-patient communication. Medical Care, 23, 521-38.
58. Jefferson, G. (1974). Error correction as an interactional resource. Language in Society, 2, 181-199.
59. Kitzinger, C. (forthcoming). Kinship in action: Reproducing the normative heterosexual nuclear family in 'after hours' medical calls. American Sociological Review.
60. Levinson, S. C. (1988). Putting linguistics on a proper footing: Explorations in Goffman's concepts of participation. In P. Drew & A. J. Wootton (Eds.), Goffman: An interdisciplinary appreciation (pp. 161-227). Oxford, UK Polity Ptess.
61. Linell, P. (1990). The power of dialogue dynamics. In I. Markova & K. Foppa (Eds.), The dynamics of dialogue (pp. 147-177). Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
62. Linell, P., Gustavsson, L., &Juvonen, P. (1988). Interactional dominance in dyadic communication: A presentation of initiative-response analysis. Linguistics, 26, 415-442.
63. Linell, P., & Luckmann, T. (1991). Asymmetries in dialogue: Some conceptual preliminaries. In I. Markova & K. Foppa (Eds.), Asymmetries in dialogue (pp. 1-20). Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
64. Mangione-Smith, R., McGlynn, E., Elliott, M., Krogstad, P., & Brook, R. H. (1999). The relationship between perceived parental expectations and pediatrician antimicrobial prescribing behavior. Pediatrics, 103, 711-718.
65. Mangione-Smith, R., Stivers, T, Elliott, M., McDonald, L., Heritage, J. (2003). Online commentary on physical exam findings: A communication tool for avoiding inappropriate antibiotic prescribing? Social Science and Medicine, 56, 313-320.
66. Maynard, D. W. (1991a). On the interactional and institutional bases of assymetry in clinical discourse. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 448-495.
67. Maynard, D. W. (1991b). Interaction and asymmetry in clinical discourse. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 448-495.
68. Maynard, D. W. (1991c). The perspective display series and the delivery and receipt of diagnostic news. In D. Boden & D. H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure (pp. 164-192). Berkeley, University of California Press.
69. Maynard, D. W. (1992). On clinicians co-implicating recipients' perspective in the delivery of diagnostic news. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Social interaction in institutional settings (pp. 331-358). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
70. Maynard, D. W. (1996), On "realization" in everyday life. American Sociological Review. 60, 109-132.
71. Maynard, D. (2003). Bad news, good news: Conversational order in everyday talk and clinical settings. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
72. McHoul, A. (1978). The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society, 7, 183-213.
73. McHoul, A., & Rapley, M. (Eds.). (2001). How to analyse talk in institutional settings: A casebook of methods. London: Continuum International.
74. Meehan, A. J. (1989). Assessing the police-worthiness of citizen's complaints to the police: Accountability and the negotiation of "facts." In D. Helm, A. J. M.WT. Anderson, & A. Rawls (Eds.), The interactional order: New directions in the study of social order (pp. 116-140). New York: Irvington.
75. Mehan, H. (1985). The structure of classroom discourse. In T. A. Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis Vol. 3 (pp. 120-131). New York: Academic Press.
76. Mishler, E. (1984). The discourse of medicine: Dialectics of medical interviews. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
77. Perakyla, A. (1995). AIDS counselling; Institutional interaction and clinical practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
78. Perakyla, A. (1998). Authority and accountability: The delivery of diagnosis in primary health care. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 301-320.
79. Perakyla, A. (2002). Agency and authority: Extended responses to diagnostic statements in primary care encounters. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35, 219-247.
80. Pomerantz, A. (1988). Offering a candidate answer: An information seeking strategy. Communication Monographs, 55, 360-373.
81. Pomerantz, A. M. (forthcoming). Investigative Information seeking. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Action at the intersection of turn and sequence. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
82. Raymond, G., & Heritage, J. (forthcoming). The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren. Research on Language and Social Interaction.
83. Rist, R. (1970). Student social class and teacher expectations: The self-fulfilling prophecy in ghetto education. Harvard Educational Review, 40, 411-451.
84. Robinson, J. D. (1998). Getting down to business: Talk, gaze and body orientation during openings of doctor-patient consultations. Human Communication Research, 25, 97-123.
85. Robinson, J. D. (2001). Asymmetry in action: Sequential resources in the negotiation of a prescription request. Text, 21, 19-54.
86. Robinson, J. D. (2003). An interactional structure of medical activities during acute visits and its implications for patients' participation. Health Communication, 15, 27-59.
87. Robinson, J. D. (forthcoming). Soliciting patients' presenting concerns. In J. Heritage & D. Maynard (Eds.), Practicing medicine: Structure and process in primary care encounters. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
88. Robinson, J. D., & Heritage, J. (2003). Patients presenting concerns 2: Negotiating completion. Unpublished paper, Pennsylvania State University.
89. Robinson, J. D., & Stivers, T. (2001). Achieving activity transitions in primary-care consultations: From history taking to physicial examination. Human Communication Research, 27, 253-298.
90. Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmailion in the classroom: Teacher expectation and pupils' intellectual development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
91. Ruusuvuori, J. (2000). Control in the medical consultation: Practices of giving and receiving the reason for the visit in primary health care. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Tampere, Finland.
92. Sacks, H. (1972). On the analyzability of stories by children. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 325-345). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
93. Sacks, H. (1979). Hotrodder: A revolutionary category. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 7-14). New York: Irvington.
94. Sacks, H. (1987). On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organisation (pp. 54-69). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
95. Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (2 Vols.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Original lectures published 1964-1972.
96. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
97. Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70, 1075-1095.
98. Schegloff, E. A. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 75-119). New York: Free Press.
99. Schegloff, E. A. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of 'uh huh' and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing discourse Georgetown University Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics, 1981, (pp. 71-93). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
100. Schegloff, E. A. (1984). On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 28-52). Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press.
101. Schegloff, E. A. (1986). The routine as achievement. Human Studies, 9, 111-151.
102. Schegloff, E. A. (1991). Reflections on talk and social structure. In D. Boden & D. H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure (pp. 44-70). Berkeley, University of California Press.
103. Schegloff, E. A. (1992a). Introduction. In G. Jefferson (Ed.), Harvey Sacks, lectures on conversation (Vol. 1. Fall 1964-Spring 1968, pp. ix-brii). Oxford, UK Blackwell.
104. Schegloff, E. A. (1992b). Introduction. In G.Jefferson (Ed.), Harvey Sacks, lectures on conversation (Vol. 2. Fall 1968-Spring 1972, pp. ix-lii). Oxford, UK Blackwell.
105. Schegloff, E. A. (1992c). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided for place for the defence of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1295-1345.
106. Schegloff, E. A. (1992d). On talk and its institutional occasions. In P. Drew & CJ. Heritage (Eds.), Talfe at work: Social interaction in institutional settings (pp. 101-134). Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press.
107. Schegloff, E. A. (1993). Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26, 99-128.
108. Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Some practices for referring to persons in talk-in interaction: A partial sketch of a systematics. In B. Fox (Ed.), Studies in anaphora (pp. 437-485). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
109. Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Whose text? Whose context? Discourse and Society, 8, 165-187.
110. Schegloff, E. A. (1999). Discourse, pragmatics, conversation, analysis. Discourse Studies, 1, 405-435.
111. Schegloff, E. A. (2001, August). Conversation analysis and the study of ethnicity and nationalism: Prospects and resources. Annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Anaheim, CA.
112. Schegloff, E. A. (2002). Accounts of conduct in interaction: Interruption, overlap and turn-taking. In J. H. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 287-321). New York: Plenum.
113. Schegloff, E. A. (2003a). On conversation analysis: An interview with Emanuel A. Schegloff. In S. Cmejrkova & C. L. Prevignano (Eds.), Discussing conversation analysis: The work of Emanuel A Schegloff (pp. 11-55). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
114. Schegloff, E. A. (2003b, May). Oncomplainability. Annual Conference of the Center for Language, Interaction and Culture (UCLA) and the Concentration on Language, Interaction and Social Organization (UCSB), Santa Barabara, CA.
115. Schegloff, E. A. (2003c, May). Conversation analysis, thenandnow. Meeting of the International Communication Association, San Diego, CA.
116. Schegloff, E. A. (forthcoming). A primer of conversation analysis: Sequence organization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
117. Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289-327.
118. Silverman, D. (1987). Communication and medical practice. London: Sage.
119. Simmel, G. (1971). How is society possible? In D. N. Levine (Ed.), Georg Simmel: On individuality and social forms (pp. 6-22). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Original work published 1908.
120. Stivers, T. (1998). Pre-diagnostic commentary in veterinarian-client interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31, 241-277.
121. Stivers, T. (2000). Negotiating antibiotic treatment in pediatric care: The communication of preferences in physician-parent interaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Applied Linguistics, University of California, Los Angeles.
122. Stivers, T. (2002a). 'Symptoms only' and 'candidate diagnoses': Presenting the problem in pediatric encounters. Health Communication, 14, 299-338.
123. Stivers, T. (2002b). Participating in decisions about treatment: Overt parent pressure for antibiotic medication in pediatric encounters. Social Science and Medicine, 54, 1111-1130.
124. Stivers, T., & Heritage, J. (2001). Breaking the sequential mold: Answering "more than the question" during medical history taking. Text, 21, 151-185.
125. Stivers, T., Mangione-Smith, R., Elliott, M., McDonald, L., & Heritage, J. (2003). What leads physicians to believe that parents expect antibiotics? A study of parent communication behaviors and physicians' perceptions. Journal of Family Practice, 52, 140-148.
126. Sudnow, D. (1965). Normal crimes. Social Problems, 12, 255-276.
127. Tracy, K. (1997). Interactional trouble in emergency service requests. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 30, 315-343.
128. Waitzkin, H. (1991). The politics of medical encounters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
129. Wakin, M., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1999). Reduction and specialization in emergency and directory assistance calls. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32, 409-437.
130. West, C. (1984). Routine complications: Troubles with talk between doctors andpatients. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
131. Whalen, J., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1998). Observations on the display and management of emotions in naturally occurring activities: The case of "hysteria" in calls to 9-1-1. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 141-159.
132. Whalen, J., Zimmerman, D. H., & Whalen, M. R. (1988). When words fail: A single case analysis. Social Problems, 35, 335-362.
133. Whalen, M., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). "Sequential and institutional contexts in calls for help." Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 172-185.
134. Whalen, M., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1990). Describing trouble: Practical epistemology in citizen calls to the police. Language in society, 19, 465-492.
135. Wilson, T. P. (1991). Social structure and the sequential organization of interaction. In D. Boden & D. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure (pp. 22-43). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
136. Zimmerman, D. (1969a). Record keeping and the intake process in a public welfare agency. In S. Wheeler, (Ed.), On record: Files and dossiers in American life (pp. 319-354). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
137. Zimmerman, D. (1969b). Tasks and troubles: The practical bases of work activities in a public assistance agency. In D. H. Hansen (Ed.), Explorations in sociology and counseling (pp. 23 7-266). New York: Houghton Mifflin.
138. Zimmerman, D. H. (1984). Talk and its occasion: The case of calling the police. In D. Schiffrin (Ed.), Meaning, form and use in context: Linguistic applications Georgetown Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics (pp. 210-228). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
139. Zimmerman, D. H. (1992a). The interactional organization of calls for emergency assistance. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Social interaction in institutional settings (pp. 418-469). Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press.
140. Zimmerman, D. H. (1992b). Achieving context: Openings in emergency calls. In G. Watson & R. M. Seiler (Eds.), Text in context: Contributions to ethnomethodology (pp. 35-51). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
141. Zimmerman, D. H. (1993). Acknowledgment tokens and speakership incipiency revisited. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26, 179-194.