Conversation Analysis and language learning

Language Teaching

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 165-187

  Seedhouse, Paul ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85009585733     PISSN: 02614448     EISSN: 14753049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0261444805003010     Document Type: Article

References (187)

1. Atkinson, J. & Drew, P. (1979). Order in court. London: Macmillan.
2. Auer, P. (ed.) (1998). Code-switching in conversation. London: Routledge.
3. Barnes, R. (2005). Conversation analysis: A practical resource in the health care setting. Medical Education 39, 113-115.
4. Bernsten, S. G. (2002). Using Conversation Analysis to evaluate pre-sequences in invitation, offer and request dialogues in ESL textbooks. Masters thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
5. Bloch, S. (2005). Co-constructing meaning in acquired speech disorders: Word and letter repetition in the construction of turns. In K. Richards & P. Seedhouse (eds.), Applying Conversation Analysis, 38-55. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
6. Boden, D. (1994). The business of talk: Organizations in action. Cambridge: Polity Press.
7. Bowles, H. (in press). Getting down to business in in-service telephone calls: A CA study of ‘reason-to-call’. English for Specific Purposes.
8. Bowles, H. & Pallotti, G. (2003). Conversation analysis of opening sequences of telephone calls to bookstores in English and Italian. In G. Gotti & C. Candlin (eds.), Intercultural discourse in domain-specific English, 63-88. Bern: Peter Lang.
9. Boyle, R. (2000a). Whatever happened to preference organisation? Journal of Pragmatics 32, 583-604.
10. Boyle, R. (2000b). ‘You've worked with Elizabeth Taylor!': Phatic functions and implicit compliments. Applied Linguistics 21.1, 26-46.
11. Breen, M. (1989). The evaluation cycle for language learning tasks. In R. K. Johnson (ed.), The second language curriculum, 187-206. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. British Council (1985). Teaching and learning in focus: Edited lessons (4 vols.). London: British Council.
13. Brouwer, C. (1999). A conversation analytic view on listening comprehension: Implications for the classroom. In T. Cadierno (ed.), L2 listening comprehension (Odense Working Papers in Language and Communication), 37-49. Odense University, Denmark.
14. Brouwer, C. (2003). Word searches in NNS-NS interaction: Opportunities for language learning? The Modern Language Journal 87.4, 534-545.
15. Brouwer, C. (2004). Doing pronunciation: A specific type of repair sequence. In R. Gardner & J. Wagner (eds.), Second language talk, 148-178. London: Continuum.
16. Brouwer, C. & Wagner, J. (2004). Developmental issues in second language conversation. Journal of Applied Linguistics 1.1, 30-47.
17. Brown, A. (2003). Interviewer variation and the coconstruction of speaking proficiency. Language Testing 20.1, 1-25.
18. Bryman, A. (2001). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Buckwalter, P. (2001). Repair sequences in Spanish L2 dyadic discourse: A descriptive study. Modern Language Journal 85.3, 380-397.
20. Cameron, D. (2001). Working with spoken discourse. London: Sage.
21. Carroll, D. (2000). Precision timing in novice-to-novice L2 conversations. Issues in Applied Linguistics 11.1, 67-110.
22. Carroll, D. (2004). Restarts in novice turn-beginnings: Dis-fluencies or interactional achievements? In R. Gardner & J. Wagner (eds.), Second language talk, 318-345. London: Continuum.
23. Carroll, D. (2005). Vowel-marking as an interactional resource in Japanese novice ESL conversation. In K. Richards & P. Seedhouse (eds.), Applying Conversation Analysis, 214-234. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
24. Clift, R. (2001). Meaning in interaction: The case of 'actually'. Language 77.2, 245-291.
25. Coughlan, P. & Duff, P. (1994). Same task, different activities: Analysis of a second language acquisition task from an activity theory perspective. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research, 173-194. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Press.
26. Donato, R. (2000). Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language classroom. In J. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 27-50. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Drew, P. (1994). Conversation Analysis. In R. E. Asher (ed.), The encyclopedia oflanguage and linguistics, 749-754. Oxford: Pergamon.
28. Drew, P. (1995). Conversation Analysis. InJ. Smith, R. Harre, L. van Langenhove & P. Stearns (eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology, 64-79. London: Sage.
29. Drew, P.(2005). Foreword: Applied Linguistics and Conversation Analysis. In K. Richards & P. Seedhouse (eds.), Applying Conversation Analysis, xiv-xx. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
30. Drew, P. & Heritage, J. (eds.) (1992a). Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Drew, P. & Heritage, J. (1992b). Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, 3-65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Egbert, M. (1996). Context-sensitivity in conversation: Eye gaze and the German repair initiator bitte ?Language in Society 25, 587-612.
33. Egbert, M. (1998). Miscommunication in language proficiency interviews of first-year German students: Comparison with natural conversation. In R. Young & A. He (eds.), Talking and testing: Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency, 147-169. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
34. Egbert, M. (2005). Discrimination due to non-native speech production? In K. Richards & P. Seedhouse (eds.), Applying Conversation Analysis, 174-196. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
35. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36. Firth, A. (1996). The discursive accomplishment of normality: On ‘lingua franca’ English and Conversation Analysis. Journal of Pragmatics 26, 237-259.
37. Firth, A. & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal 81, 285-300.
38. Firth, A. & Wagner, J. (1998). SLA property: No trespassing The Modern Language Journal 82, 91-94.
39. Ford, C. (1993). Grammar in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Ford, C. (1999). Collaborative construction of task activity: Coordinating multiple resources in a high school physics lab. Research on Language and Social Interaction 32.4, 369-408.
41. Ford, C., Fox, B. & Thompson, S. (2002). Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In C. Ford, B. Fox & S. Thompson (eds.), The language of turn and sequence, 1438. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Ford, C. & Mori, M. (1994). Causal markers in Japanese and English conversations: A cross-linguistic study of interactional grammar. Pragmatics 4.1, 31-61.
43. Ford, C. & Mori, M. (2004). CA as applied linguistics: Crossing boundaries of discipline and practice. Paper presented at the American Association of Applied Linguistics Conference, Portland, OR, May.
44. Ford, C. & Thompson, S. (1996). Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In A. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff & S. A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar, 134-184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Foster, P. (1998). A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics 19, 1-23.
46. Gafaranga, J. (2000). Medium repair vs. other-language repair: Telling the medium of a bilingual conversation. International Journal of Bilingualism 4.3, 327-350.
47. Gafaranga, J. (2001). Linguistic identities in talk-in-interaction: Order in bilingual conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 33.12, 1901-1925.
48. Gafaranga, J. & Torras, M. C. (2001). Language versus medium in the study of bilingual conversation. International Journal of Bilingualism 5.2, 195-219.
49. Gafaranga, J. & Torras, M. C. (2002). Interactional otherness: Towards a redefinition of code-switching. International Journal of Bilingualism 6.1, 1-22.
50. Gardner, R. (1997). The listener and minimal responses in conversational interaction. Prospect 12.2, 12-32.
51. Gardner, R. (1998). Between listening and speaking: The vocalisation of understandings. Applied Linguistics 19.2, 204-224.
52. Gardner, R. (2000). Resources for delicate manoeuvres: Learning to disagree. In E. Alcón (ed.), Discourse and language teaching. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics Series S.
53. Gardner, R. & Wagner, J. (eds.). (2004). Second language conversations. London: Continuum.
54. Gass, S. M. (1998). Apples and oranges: Or, why apples are not oranges and don't need to be. A response to Firth and Wagner. The Modern Language Journal 82, 83-90.
55. Gass, S. M. (2004). Conversation analysis and inputinteraction. Modern Language Journal 88, 597-602.
56. Golato, A. (2000). Und ich so/und er so: An innovative German quotative for reporting on embodied actions. Journal of Pragmatics 32.1, 29-54.
57. Goodwin, C. (1984). Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action, 225-246. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58. Goodwin, C. (1996). Transparent vision. In A. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff & S. A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar, 370-404. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. Goodwin, C. (ed.) (2003). Conversation and brain damage. New York: Oxford University Press.
60. Goodwin, C., Goodwin, M. H. & Olsher, D. (2002). Producing sense with nonsense syllables: Turn and sequence in conversations with a man with severe aphasia. In C. Ford, B. Fox & S. Thompson (eds.), The language of turn and sequence, 56-80. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
61. Hall, J. K. (2004). Language learning as an interactional achievement. Modern Language Journal, 88, 607-612.
62. Hall, J. K. & Verplaetse, L. S. (eds.) (2000). Second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
63. Have, P. Ten (1999). Doing Conversation Analysis: A practical guide. London: Sage Publications.
64. Have, P. Ten (2001). Applied Conversation Analysis. In A. McHoul & M. Rapley (eds.), How to analyse talk in institutional settings: A casebook of methods, 3-11. London: Continuum.
65. Hayashi, M. (1999). Where grammar and interaction meet: A study of co-participant completion in Japanese conversation. Human Studies 22, 475-499.
66. Hayashi, M., Mori, J. & Takagi, T. (2002). Contingent achievement of co-tellership in a Japanese conversation: an analysis of talk, gaze and gesture. In C. Ford, B. Fox & S. Thompson (eds.), The language of turn and sequence, 81122. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
67. He, A. (1998). Answering questions in language proficiency interviews: A case study. In R. Young & A. He (eds.), Talking and testing: Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency, 101-115. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
68. He, A. (2004). CA for SLA: Arguments from the Chinese language classroom. Modern Language Journal 88, 568-582.
69. Heath, C. (1986). Body movement and speech in medical interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70. Hellermann, J. (forthcoming). Classroom interactive practices for literacy: A microethnographic study of two beginning adult learners of English. Applied Linguistics.
71. Hellermann, J. (2005). The sequential and prosodic coconstruction of a ‘quiz game’ activity in classroom talk. Journal of Pragmatics 37.6, 919-944.
72. Hellermann, J. (2005). Syntactic and prosodic practices for cohesion in series of three-part sequences in classroom talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction 38.1, 105-130.
73. Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
74. Heritage, J. (1988). Explanations as accounts: A conversation analytic perspective. In C. Antaki (ed.), Analyzing everyday explanation: A case-book of methods, 127-144. London: Sage.
75. Heritage, J. (1995). Conversation Analysis: Methodological aspects. In U. M. Quasthoff (ed.), Aspects of oral communication, 391-418. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.
76. Heritage, J. (1999). Conversation Analysis at century's end: Practices oftalk-in-interaction, their distributions and their outcomes. Research on Language and Social Interaction 31, 69-76.
77. Heritage, J. & Maynard, D. W. (2005). Communication in medical care: Interaction between primary care physicians and patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
78. Heritage, J. & Roth, A. L. (1995). Grammar and institution: Questions and questioning in the broadcast news interview. Research on Language and Social Interaction 28.1, 1-60.
79. Heritage, J. & Sefi, S. (1992). Dilemmas of advice: aspects of the delivery and reception ofadvice in interactions between Health Visitors and first-time mothers. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, 359-417. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
80. Hester, S. & Francis, D. (2001). Is institutional talk a phenomenon? Reflections on ethnomethodology and applied conversation analysis. In A. McHoul & M. Rapley (eds.), How to analyse talk in institutional settings: A casebook of methods, 206-217. London: Continuum.
81. Hopper, P. & Chen, C.-H. (1996). Languages, cultures, relationships: Telephone openings in Taiwan. Research on Language and Social Interaction 29.4, 291-313.
82. Hosoda, Y. (2000). Other-repair in Japanese conversations between nonnative and native speakers. Issues in Applied Linguistics 11.1, 39-65.
83. Hutchby, I. & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
84. Jacoby, S. (1998a). How can ESP practitioners tap into situated discourse research: And why should we? (Part 1). English for Specific Purposes News 7.1, 1-10.
85. Jacoby, S. (1998b). How can ESP practitioners tap into situated discourse research: And why should we? (Part 2). English for Specific Purposes News 7.2, 4-10.
86. Jacoby, S. & Gonzales, P. (2002). Saying what wasn't said: Negative observation as a linguistic resource for the interactional construction of performance feedback. In C. Ford, B. Fox & S. Thompson (eds.), The language of turn and sequence, 123-164. New York: Oxford University Press.
87. Jacoby, S. & McNamara, T. F. (1999). Locating competence. English for Specific Purposes Journal 18.3, 213-241.
88. Johnson, K. (1995). Understanding communication in second language classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
89. Jung, E. H. (1999). The organisation of second language classroom repair. Issues in Applied Linguistics 10.2, 153-171.
90. Kasper, G. (1997). ‘A’ stands for acquisition: A response to Firth and Wagner. The Modern Language Journal 81, 307-312.
91. Kasper, G. (2002). Conversation Analysis as an approach to second language acquisition: Old wine in new bottles? Invited talk, SLATE speaker series, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
92. Kasper, G. (2004). Participant orientations in German conversation-for-learning. Modern Language Journal 88, 551-567.
93. Kasper, G. & Ross, S. (2001). ‘Is drinking a hobby, I wonder’: Other-initiated repair in language proficiency interviews. Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics (AAAL) Annual Conference, St. Louis, MS.
94. Kasper, G. & Ross, S. (2003). Repetition as a source of miscommunication in oral proficiency interviews. In J. House, G. Kasper & S. Ross (eds.), Misunderstanding in social life. Discourse approaches to problematic talk, 82-106. Harlow, UK: Longman/Pearson Education.
95. Kim, K. H. (1999). Other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation: Types and functions. Discourse and Cognition 6.2, 141-168.
96. Kormos, J. (1999). Simulating conversations in oral-proficiency assessment: A Conversation Analysis of role plays and non-scripted interviews in language exams. Language Testing 16.2, 163-188.
97. Koshik, I. (2000). Conversation analytic research on institutional talk: Implications for TESOL teachers and researchers. TESOL Research Interest Section Newsletter 7.2, 8-11.
98. Koshik, I. (2002). Designedly incomplete utterances: A pedagogical practice for eliciting knowledge displays in error correction sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction 35.3, 277-309.
99. Kurhila, S. (2001). Correction in talk between native and non-native speaker. Journal of Pragmatics 33, 1083-1110.
100. Kurhila, S. (2005). Different orientations to grammatical correctness. In K. Richards & P. Seedhouse (eds.), Applying Conversation Analysis, 143-158. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
101. Lantolf, J. P. (ed.) (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
102. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Second language acquisition and applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 20, 165-181.
103. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2004). CA for SLA? It all depends. Modern Language Journal 88, 603-607.
104. Lazaraton, A. (1997). Preference organization in oral proficiency interviews: The case of language ability assessments. Research on Language and Social Interaction 30.1, 53-72.
105. Lazaraton, A. (2002). A qualitative approach to the validation of oral language tests. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
106. Lazaraton, A. (2004). Gesture and speech in the vocabulary explanations of one ESL Teacher: A microanalytic inquiry. Language Learning 54.1, 79-117.
107. Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
108. Liebscher, G. & Dailey-O'Cain, J. (2003). Conversational repair as a role-defining mechanism in classroom interaction. Modern Language Journal 87, 374-390.
109. Lindstrom, A. B. (1994). Identification and recognition in Swedish telephone conversation openings. Language in Society 23.2, 231-252.
110. Long, M. (1997). Construct validity in SLA research: A response to Firth and Wagner. The Modern Language Journal 81.3, 318-323.
111. Long, M., Inagaki, S. & Ortega, L. (1998). The role ofimplicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. The Modern Language Journal 82.3, 357-371.
112. Lubelska, D. & Matthews, M. (1997). Looking at language classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
113. Lynch, M. (2000). The ethnomethodological foundations of conversation analysis. Text 20.4, 517-532.
114. Markee, N. (1995). Teachers' answers to students' questions: Problematizing the issue of making meaning. Issues in Applied Linguistics 6, 63-92.
115. Markee, N. (2000). Conversation Analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
116. Markee, N. (2002). A Conversation Analytic perspective on quantification and generalizability in applied linguistics and SLA. Paper presented to the International Language Testing Association (ILTA) & American Association for Applied Linguistics (AAAL). Plenary Panel.
117. Markee, N. (2004). Zones of interactional transition in ESL classes. Modern Language Journal 88, 583-596.
118. Markee, N. (2005). The organization of off-task classroom talk in second language classrooms. In K. Richards & P Seedhouse (eds.), Applying Conversation Analysis, 197-213. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
119. Markee, N. (in press). Conversation analysis for second language acquisition. In E. Hinkel (ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. Mahwah: NJ: Erlbaum.
120. Markee, N. & Kasper, G. (2004). Classroom talks: An introduction. Modern Language Journal 88, 491-500.
121. Mazeland, M. & Zaman-Zadeh, M. (2004). The logic of clarification: Some observations about word-clarification repairs in Finnish-as-a-lingua-franca interactions. In R. Gardner & J. Wagner (eds.), Second language talk, 208-246. London: Continuum.
122. McHoul, A. & Rapley, M. (eds.) (2001). How to analyse talk in institutional settings: A casebook of methods. London: Continuum.
123. Moerman, M. (1988). Talking culture: Ethnography and Conversational Analysis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
124. Mondada, L. (2004). Ways of ‘doing being plurilingual’ in international work meetings. In R. Gardner & J. Wagner (eds.), Second language talk, 27-60. London: Continuum.
125. Mondada, L. & Pekarek Doehler, S. (2004). Second language acquisition as situated practice: Task accomplishment in the French second language classroom. Modern Language Journal 88, 501-518.
126. Mori, J. (2002). Task design, plan and development of talk-in-interaction: An analysis of a small group activity in a Japanese language classroom. Applied Linguistics 23.3, 323-347.
127. Mori, J. (2003). Construction of interculturality: A study of initial encounters between Japanese and American students. Research on Language and Social Interaction 36.2, 143-184.
128. Mori, J. (2004). Negotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities: A case from a Japanese language classroom. Modern Language Journal 88, 536-550.
129. Negretti, R. (1999). Web-based Activities and SLA: A Conversation Analysis research approach. Language Learning and Technology 3.1, 75-87.
130. Ochs, A., Schegloff, E. A. & Thompson, S. A. (eds.) (1996). Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
131. Ohta, A. S. (2000a). Rethinking interaction in SLA: Developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of grammar. In J. P. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 51-78. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
132. Ohta, A. S. (2000b). Re-thinking recasts: A learner-centered examination of corrective feedback in the Japanese language classroom. In J. K. Hall & L. Verplaeste (eds.), The construction of second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction, 47-71. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
133. Ohta, A. S. (2000a). Second language acquisition processes in the classroom. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
134. Ohta, A. S. (2000b). From acknowledgment to alignment: A longitudinal study of the development of expression of alignment by classroom learners of Japanese. In G. Kasper & K. Rose (eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching, 103-120. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
135. Ohta, A. S. & Nakaone, T. (2004). When students ask questions: Teacher and peer answers in the foreign language classroom. International Review of Applied Linguistics 42.3, 217-237.
136. Olsher, D. (2004). Talk and gesture: The embodied completion of sequential actions in spoken interaction. In R. Gardner & J. Wagner (eds.), Second language talk, 346380. London: Continuum.
137. Packett, A. (2005). Teaching patterns of interaction in English for Specific Purposes. In K. Richards & P Seedhouse (eds.), Applying Conversation Analysis, 235-250. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
138. Park, Y. Y. (1999). The Korean connective nuntey in conversational discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 31, 191-218.
139. Peräkylä, A. (1995). AIDS counselling: Institutional interaction and clinical practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
140. Peräkylä, A. (1997). Reliability and validity in research based on transcripts. In D. Silverman (ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice, 201-220. London: Sage.
141. Pike, K. (1967). Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behaviour. The Hague: Mouton.
142. Psathas, G. (1995). Conversation Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
143. Richards, K. (2005). Introduction. In K. Richards & P. Seedhouse (eds.), Applying Conversation Analysis, 1-18. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
144. Richards, K. (in press). ‘Being the teacher’: Identity and classroom conversation. Applied Linguistics.
145. Richards, K. & Seedhouse, P (eds.) (2005). Applying Conversation Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
146. Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation volumes one and two. Oxford: Blackwell.
147. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking in conversation. Language 50, 696-735.
148. Sarangi, S. & Roberts, C. (eds.) (1999). Talk, work and institutional order. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
149. Schegloff, E. A. (1979). The relevance of repair in a syntax-for-conversation. In T. Givon. (ed.), Discourse and syntax (Syntax and Semantics 12), 261-286. New York: Academic Press.
150. Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Between micro and macro: Contexts and other connections. In J. Alexander (ed.), The micromacro link. Berkeley: University of California Press.
151. Schegloff, E. A. (1991). Conversation Analysis and socially shared cognition. In L. Resnick, J. Levine & S. Teasley (eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition, 150-171. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
152. Schegloff, E. A. (1993). Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 26.1, 99-128.
153. Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Turn organization: one intersection of grammar and interaction. In A. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff & S. A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar, 52-133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
154. Schegloff, E. A. (2000a). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society 29, 1-63.
155. Schegloff, E. A. (2000b). When ‘others’ initiate repair. Applied Linguistics 21, 205-243.
156. Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G. & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53, 361-382.
157. Schegloff, E. A., Koshik, I., Jacoby, S. & Olsher, D. (2002). Conversation Analysis and applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 22, 3-31.
158. Schegloff, E. A. & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica 7, 89-327.
159. Sebba, M. & Wootton, T. (1998). We, they and identity: Sequential versus identity-related explanation in codeswitching. In P. Auer (ed.), Code-switching in conversation, 262-286. London: Routledge.
160. Seedhouse, P (1994). Linking pedagogical purposes to linguistic patterns of interaction: The analysis of communication in the language classroom. International Review ofApplied Linguistics 32.4, 303-320.
161. Seedhouse, P (1996). Learning talk: A study of the interactional organisation of the L2 classroom from a CA institutional discourse perspective. Ph.D. thesis, University of York, UK.
162. Seedhouse, P (1997). The case of the missing ‘no’: The relationship between pedagogy and interaction. Language Learning 47.3, 547-583.
163. Seedhouse, P (1998). CA and the analysis of foreign language interaction: A reply to Wagner. Journal of Pragmatics 30, 85-102.
164. Seedhouse, P. (1999). The relationship between context and the organisation of repair in the L2 classroom. International Review ofApplied Linguistics 37.1, 59-80.
165. Seedhouse, P (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
166. Seedhouse, P. (2005a). Conversation analysis as research methodology. In K. Richards & P. Seedhouse (eds.), Applying Conversation Analysis, 251-266. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
167. Seedhouse, P (2005b). ‘Task’ as research construct. Language Learning 55.3, 533-570.
168. Sorjonen, M. (1996). On repeats and responses in Finnish conversations. In A. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff & S. A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar, 277-327. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
169. Stroud, C. (1998). Perspectives on cultural variability of discourse and some implications for code-switching. In P. Auer (ed.), Code-switching in conversation, 321-348. London: Routledge.
170. Tanaka, H. (1999). Turn-taking in Japanese conversation: A study in grammar and interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
171. Torras, M. C. (2002). Language choice, social identity and the order of service talk-in-interaction: A study of trilingual service encounters in Barcelona. Ph.D. thesis, Lancaster University.
172. Torras, M. C. (2005). Social identity and language choice in bilingual service talk. In K. Richards & P. Seedhouse (eds.), Applying Conversation Analysis, 107-123. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
173. Torras, M. C. & Gafaranga, J. (2002). Social identities and language alternation in non-formal institutional bilingual talk: Trilingual service encounters in Barcelona. Language in Society 31.4, 527-548.
174. Üstünel, E. & Seedhouse, P (2005). Why that, in that language, right now? Code-switching and pedagogical focus. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 15.3, 302-325.
175. Van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 245-260. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
176. Wagner, J. (1996). Foreign language acquisition through interaction - a critical review of research on conversational adjustments. Journal of Pragmatics 26, 215-236.
177. Wagner, J. (2004). The classroom and beyond. Modern Language Journal 88, 612-616.
178. Wei, L. (2002). ‘What do you want me to say?’ On the conversation analysis approach to bilingual interaction. Language in Society 31, 159-180.
179. Wong, J. (2000a). Delayed next turn repair initiation in native/nonnative speaker English conversation. Applied Linguistics 21, 244-267.
180. Wong, J. (2000b). The token ‘yeah’ in nonnative speaker English conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 33.1, 39-67.
181. Wong, J. (2002). ‘Applying’ conversation analysis in applied linguistics: Evaluating dialogue in English as a second language textbooks. International Review of Applied Linguistics 40.1, 37-60.
182. Wong, J. (2005). Sidestepping grammar. In K. Richards & P. Seedhouse (eds.), Applying Conversation Analysis, 159-173. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
183. Wong, J. & Olsher, D. (2000). Reflections on conversation analysis and nonnative speaker talk: an interview with Emanuel A. Schegloff. Issues in Applied Linguistics 11.1, 111-128.
184. Wooffitt, R. (2005). Conversation analysis and discourse analysis: A comparative and critical introduction. London: Sage.
185. Young, R. F. & He, A. (eds.) (1998). Talking and testing: Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
186. Young, R. F. & Miller, E. R. (2004). Learning as changing participation: Discourse roles in ESL writing conferences. Modern Language Journal 88, 519-535.
187. Zuengler, J., Ford, C. & Fassnacht, C. (1998). Analyst eyes and camera eyes: Theoretical and technological considerations in ‘seeing’ the details of classroom interaction. Technical Report. The National Research Center on English Learning and Achievement, The University at Albany, State University of New York.