The Language of Fictional Television: Drama and Identity

The Language of Fictional Television: Drama and Identity

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-294

  Bednarek, Monika ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85189387814     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (409)

1. Abercrombie, N. & Longhurst, B. 1998. Audiences: A Sociological Theory of Performance and Imagination. London: Sage.
2. Adolphs, S. 2006. Introducing Electronic Text Analysis: A Practical Guide for Language and Literary Studies. London: Routledge.
3. Adolphs, S. 2008. Corpus and Context. Investigating Pragmatic Functions in Spoken Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
4. Akass, K. & McCabe, J. (eds). 2004. Reading Sex and the City. London/New York: I.B. Tauris.
5. Akass, K. & McCabe, J. (eds). 2007. ‘Analyzing fictional television genres’. In Devereux, E. (ed.), Media Studies. Key Issues and Debates. Los Angeles, CA, etc.: Sage, 283–301.
6. Allen, R. C. 2004. ‘Frequently asked questions. A general introduction to the reader’. In Allen, R. C. & Hill, A. (eds), The Television Studies Reader. New York: Routledge, 1–26.
7. Allen, M. (ed.). 2007. Reading CSI. Crime TV under the Microscope. London/New York: I.B. Tauris.
8. Allen, R. C. & Hill, A. (eds). 2004. The Television Studies Reader. New York: Routledge.
9. Ameka, F. 1992. ‘Interjections: the universal yet neglected part of speech’. Journal of Pragmatics 18: 101–18.
10. American Meat Institute. 2007. ‘U.S. meat and poultry production & consumption: an overview’. American Meat Institute Fact Sheet, accessed on 1/4/2009 from www.MeatAMI.com.
11. Ang, I. 1985. Watching Dallas: Soap Operas and the Melodramatic Identification. London: Methuen.
12. Antaki, C. & Widdicombe, S. (eds). 1998. Identities in Talk. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Archer, D. 2007. ‘Computer-assisted literary stylistics: the state of the field’. In Lambrou, M. & Stockwell, P. (eds), Contemporary Stylistics. London/New York: Continuum, 244–56.
14. Arthurs, J. 2004. Television and Sexuality: Regulation and the Politics of Taste. New York: Open University Press.
15. Auer, P. (ed.). 2007a. Style and Social Identities. Alternative Approaches to Linguistic Heterogeneity. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
16. Auer, P. (ed.). 2007b. ‘Introduction’. In Auer, P. (ed.), Style and Social Identities. Alternative Approaches to Linguistic Heterogeneity. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1–21.
17. Auer, P. (ed.). 2007c. ‘Introduction to part 3’. In Auer, P. (ed.), Style and Social Identities. Alternative Approaches to Linguistic Heterogeneity. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 321–24.
18. Baker, P. 2003. ‘No effeminates please: a corpus-based analysis of masculinity via personal adverts in Gay News/Times 1973–2000’. In Benwell, B. (ed.), Masculinity and Men’s Lifestyle Magazines. Oxford: Blackwell, 243–60.
19. Baker, P. 2006. Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London/New York: Continuum.
20. Bal, M. 1997. Narratology. Introduction to the Theory of Narrative. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
21. Baldry, A. & Thibault, P. J. 2006. Multimodal Transcription and Text Analysis. A Multimedia Toolkit and Coursebook. London/Oakville: Equinox.
22. 31965. Le langage et la vie. Geneva: Librairie Droz.
23. Bamberg, M. 1991. ‘Narrative activity as perspective taking: the role of emotionals, negations and voice in the construction of the story realm’. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy 2: 275–90.
24. Bamberg, M. 2009. ‘Positioning emotion – connecting the there-and-then of the story world with the interactive here-and-now’. Paper presented at 11th International Pragmatics Conference, Melbourne, 12–17 July.
25. Barker, C. & Galasiǹksi, D. 2001. Cultural Studies and Discourse Analysis: A Dialogue on Language and Identity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Barthes, R. 1974. S/Z. New York: Hill & Wang.
27. Bavidge, J. 2004. ‘Chosen ones: reading the contemporary teen heroine’. In Davis, G. & Dickinson, K. (eds), Teen TV. Genre, Consumption and Identity. London: British Film Institute, 41–53.
28. Bednarek, M. 2006a. Evaluation in Media Discourse. Analysis of a Newspaper Corpus. London/New York: Continuum.
29. Bednarek, M. 2006b. ‘Subjectivity and cognition. Inscribing, evoking and provoking opinion’. In Pishwa, H. (ed.), Language and Memory. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 187–221.
30. Bednarek, M. 2008a. Emotion Talk Across Corpora. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
31. Bednarek, M. 2008b. ‘“What the hell is wrong with you?” A corpus perspective on evaluation and emotion in contemporary American pop culture’. In Mahboob, A. & Knight, N. (eds), Questioning Linguistics. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press, 95–126.
32. Bednarek, M. 2008c. ‘“An increasingly familiar tragedy”: evaluative collocation and conflation. Functions of Language 15/1: 7–34.
33. Bednarek, M. 2008d. ‘Teaching English literature and linguistics using corpus stylistic methods’. In Cloran, C. & Zappavigna, M. (eds), Bridging Discourses. ASFLA 2007 Online Proceedings. Available at: www.asfl a.org.au/category/asfl a2007.
34. Bednarek, M. 2008e. ‘Semantic preference and semantic prosody re-examined’. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 4/2: 119–39.
35. Bednarek, M. 2009a. ‘Corpora and discourse: a three-pronged approach to analyzing linguistic data’. In Haugh, M., Burridge, K., Mulder, J. & Peters, P. (eds), Selected Proceedings of the 2008 HCSNet Workshop on Designing the Australian National Corpus: Mustering Languages, Cascadilla Proceedings Project, Sommerville, MA, 19–24. Available at: www.lingref.com/cpp/ausnc/2008/index.html
36. Bednarek, M. 2009b. ‘Emotion-talk and emotional-talk: cognitive and discursive perspectives’. In Pishwa, H. (ed.), Language and Social Cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 395–431.
37. Bednarek, M. 2009c. ‘Polyphony in appraisal: typological and topological perspectives. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 3/2: 107–36.
38. Bednarek, M. 2009d. ‘Language patterns and attitude’. Functions of Language 16/2: 165–92.
39. Bednarek, M. 2010. ‘Corpus linguistics and systemic functional linguistics: interpersonal meaning, identity and bonding in popular culture’. In Bednarek, M. & Martin, J. R. (eds), New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity and Affiliation. London/New York: Continuum, 237–66.
40. Bednarek, M. forthcoming. ‘The stability of the televisual character: a corpus stylistic case study’. In R. Piazza, Rossi, F., & Bednarek, M. (eds), Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Fictional Language of Cinema and Television (Working title) Book proposal submitted to John Benjamins (for Pragmatics & Beyond, ed. Fetzer, A.).
41. Bednarek, M. in preparation. ‘The discourse of dramedy.’ Unpublished manuscript, University of Sydney, Australia. Available on demand.
42. Bednarek, M. & Bublitz, W. 2006. ‘Enjoy! – The (phraseological) culture of having fun’. In Skandera, P. (ed.), Phraseology and Culture in English. (Topics in English Linguistics.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 109–35.
43. Bednarek, M. & Caple H. 2010. ‘Playing with environmental stories in the news: good or bad practice?’ Discourse & Communication 4/1: 5–31.
44. Bednarek, M. & Martin, J. R. (eds). 2010. New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity and Affiliation. London/New York: Continuum.
45. Beeman, A. K. 2007. ‘Emotional segregation: a content analysis of institutional racism in US films, 1980–2001’. Ethnic and Racial Studies 30/5: 687–712.
46. Behn, A. 2007. ‘“My Entire Authority is Gone”. Imagearbeit im Coachinggesprach’. Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of Augsburg, Germany.
47. Behn, A.2009. ‘Image-related sequence types in coaching interactions’. Paper presented at i-mean@uwe, 23–25 April 2009, Bristol, University of the West of England.
48. Bell, A. 1991. The Language of News Media. Oxford: Blackwell.
49. Bell, A. & Garrett, P. (eds). 1998. Approaches to Media Discourse. Oxford/Malden, MA: Black well.
50. Bennison, N. 1998. ‘Accessing character through conversation: Tom Stoppard’s Professional Foul’. In Culpeper, J. (ed.), Exploring the Language of Drama: From Text to Context. London: Routledge, 67–82.
51. Benoit, W. L. 1995. Accounts, Excuses and Apologies. A Theory of Image Restoration Strategies. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
52. Benwell, B. & Stokoe, E. 2006. Discourse and Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
53. Berliner, T. 1999. ‘Movie dialogue and Hollywood realism’. Film Quarterly 52: 3–16.
54. Besnier, N. 1990. ‘Language and affect’. Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 59–88.
55. Biber, D. 1988. Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP.
56. Biber, D. 2006. University Language. A Corpus-Based Study of Spoken and Written Registers. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
57. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
58. Billington, M. 2009. ‘Method in the madness’. Available at: www.guardian. co.uk/stage/2009/may/09/stanislavski-method-acting-michael-billington, last accessed 23/7/2009.
59. Birchall, C. 2004. ‘“Feels like home”: Dawson’s Creek, nostalgia and the young adult viewer’. In Davis, G. & Dickinson, K. (eds), Teen TV. Genre, Consumption and Identity. London: British Film Institute, 176–89.
60. 31995. Television and Screen Writing. From Concept to Contract. Boston, MA: Focal Press.
61. Bonfiglioli, C. M. F., Smith, B. J., King, L. A., Chapman, S. F. & Holding, S. J. 2007. ‘Obesity in the media: political hot potato or human interest story?’. Australian Journalism Review 29/1: 53–61.
62. Bordwell, D. 1985. Narration in the Fiction Film. London: Methuen.
63. 72004. Film Art. An Introduction. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
64. Brock, A. 2004. Blackadder, Monty Python und Red Dwarf – eine linguistische Untersuchung britischer Fernsehkomödien. Tubingen: Stauffenburg.
65. Brown, P. & Levinson, S. 1987. Politeness. Some Universals of Language Use. Cambridge: CUP.
66. Bruder, M., Cohn, L. M., Olnek, M., Pollack, N., Previto, R., & Zigler, S. 1986. A Practical Handbook for the Actor. New York: Vintage Books.
67. Bruzzi, S. 1997. Undressing Cinema: Clothing and Identity in the Movies. London/New York: Routledge.
68. Bubel, C. 2006. ‘The Linguistic Construction of Character Relations in TV Drama: Doing Friendship in Sex and the City’. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Universitat des Saarlandes, Saarbrucken, Germany. Available at: www.scidok.sulb. uni-saarland.de/volltexte/2006/598/.
69. Bubel, C. & Spitz, A. 2006. ‘“One of the last vestiges of gender bias”: The characterization of women through the telling of dirty jokes in Ally McBeal’. Humor 19/1: 71–104.
70. Bublitz, W. 2001. Englische Pragmatik. Eine Einführung. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.
71. 21965). Sprachtheorie. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer.
72. Burke Erickson, A. K. 2008. ‘Drats! Foiled again: A contrast in definitions’. In Calvin, R. (ed.), 63–79.
73. Burton, D. 1980. Dialogue and Discourse. London: Routledge and Kegan.
74. Burton, G. 2000. Talking Television: An Introduction to the Study of Television. London: Arnold.
75. Butler, J. 1999. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
76. Byrd-Bredbenner, C., Finckenor, M. & Grenci, A. 2004. ‘A television program affects children’s nutrition knowledge and beliefs’. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 104/2: 51.
77. Caffi, C. & Janney, R. W. 1994. ‘Toward a pragmatics of emotive communication’. Journal of Prag matics 22: 32–373.
78. Calvin, R. 2008a. ‘Introduction – “Where you lead”: Gilmore Girls and the politics of identity’. In Calvin, R. (ed.), 1–22.
79. Calvin, R. (ed.) 2008b. Gilmore Girls and the Politics of Identity: Essays on Family and Feminism in the Television Series. Jefferson/London: McFarland.
80. Cameron, D. & Kulick, D. 2005. ‘Identity crisis?’. Language & Communication 25: 107–25.
81. Cameron, D. 2005. ‘Language, gender and sexuality: current issues and new directions’. Applied Linguistics 26: 482–502.
82. Cannon, D. 2009. ‘Character building and what makes a truly great actor’. Available at: www.guardian.co.uk/stage/2009/may/09/character-building-greatactor, last accessed 23/7/2009.
83. Caple, H. 2008. ‘Intermodal relations in image-nuclear news stories’. In Unsworth, L. (ed.), Multimodal Semiotics: Functional Analysis in Contexts of Education. London: Continuum, 125–38.
84. Caple, H. 2010. ‘Doubling-up: allusion and bonding in multisemiotic news stories’. In Bednarek, M. & Martin, J. R. (eds), New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity and Affiliation. London/New York: Continuum, 111–33.
85. Caple, H. & Bednarek, M. forthcoming. ‘Double-take: unpacking the play in the multi-modal news story’. Visual Communication 9/2: 1–18.
86. Carroll, N. 1996. Theorizing the Moving Image. Cambridge: CUP.
87. Carter, R. & Adolphs, S. 2008. ‘Linking the verbal and visual: new directions for Corpus Linguistics’. Language and Computers 64: 275–91.
88. Carugati, A. 2005. ‘Interview with Jerry Bruckheimer’. Worldscreen, April.
89. Chion, M. 1999. The Voice in Cinema. New York: Columbia University Press.
90. Clark, H. H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: CUP.
91. Claudel, C. 2009. ‘Linguistic expression and semiotic translation of emotions in French and Japanese personal emails’. Paper presented at 11th International Pragmatics Conference, Melbourne, 12–17 July.
92. Cohen, J. 1999. ‘Favorite characters of teenage viewers of Israeli serials’. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 43/3: 327–45.
93. Coleman, L. 2008. ‘Food fights. Food and its consumption as a narrative device’. In Calvin, R. (ed.), 175–92.
94. Collins, B. 2002. Getting Into Character. Seven Secrets a Novelist can Learn from Actors. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
95. Cook, G. 1992. The Discourse of Advertising. London/New York: Routledge.
96. Cook, G. 2004. Genetically Modified Language. London/New York: Routledge.
97. 21985. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.
98. Coupland, J. & Gwyn, R. 2003. ‘Introduction’. In Coupland, J. & Gwyn, R. (eds), Discourse, the Body and Identity. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–16.
99. Coupland, N. 2007. Style. Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge: CUP.
100. Creeber, G. (ed.). 2001. The Television Genre Book. London/New York: Routledge.
101. Creeber, G. (ed.). 2004. Serial Television. Big Drama on the Small Screen. London: BfiPublishing.
102. Crystal, D. 1997. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge: CUP.
103. Culpeper, J. 2001. Language and Characterisation. People in Plays and Other Texts. Harlow etc: Longman.
104. Culpeper, J. 2002. ‘Computers, language and characterisation: an analysis of six characters in Romeo and Juliet’. In Melander-Marttala, U., Ostman, C. & Kyto, M. (eds), Conversation in Life and Literature: Papers from the ASLA Symposium. Association Suedoise de Linguistique Appliquee (ASLA) 15. Uppsala: Universitetstryckeriet, 11–30.
105. Daneš, F. 1994. ‘Involvement with language and in language’. Journal of Pragmatics 22: 251–64.
106. Darwin, C. 1965. The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals; with a preface by Konrad Lorenz. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
107. Davis, G. & Dickinson, K. (eds). 2004. Teen TV. Genre, Consumption and Identity. London: British Film Institute.
108. Day, D. 1998. ‘Being ascribed, and resisting, membership of an ethnic group’. In Antaki, C. & Widdicombe, S. (eds), Identities in Talk. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 151–70.
109. Decker, J. M. 2004. Ideology. Houndmills/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
110. De Fina, A., Schiffrin, D. & Bamberg, M. 2006. ‘Introduction’. In DeFina, A., Schiffrin, D. & Bamberg, M. (eds), Discourse and Identity. Cambridge: CUP, 1–23.
111. De Kloet, J. & Van Zoonen, L. 2007. ‘Fan culture – performing difference’. In Devereux, E. (ed.), Media Studies. Key Issues and Debates. Los Angeles, CA, etc.: Sage, 322–41.
112. Diaz-Cintas, J. (ed.). 2009. New Trends in Audiovisual Translation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
113. Diffrient, D. S. & Lavery, D. (eds) forthcoming. Screwball Television: Critical Perspectives on Gilmore Girls. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
114. Dunn, A. 2005. ‘The genres of television’. In Fulton et al., 125–39.
115. Durham, K. 2002. ‘Methodology and praxis of the actor within the television production process: facing the camera in EastEnders and Morse’. Studies in Theatre and Performance 22/2: 82–94.
116. D’Vary, M. 2005. Creating Characters. Let Them Whisper Their Secrets. Studio City: Michael Wiese Productions.
117. Eagleton, T. 1991. Ideology. An Introduction. London/New York: Verso.
118. Eckert, P. 2008. ‘Variation and the indexical field’. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12/4: 453–76.
119. Edmondson, W. 1981. ‘On saying you’re sorry’. In Coulmas, F. (ed.), Conversational Routine: Explorations in Standardised Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech. The Hague: Mouton, 273–87.
120. Edwards, D. 2007. ‘Managing subjectivity in talk’. In Hepburn, A. & Wiggins, S. (eds), Discursive Research in Practice. New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction. Cambridge: CUP, 31–49.
121. Eggins, S. & Slade, D. 1997. Analysing Casual Conversation. London/Washington: Cassell.
122. Eisenstein, J. 2008. Gesture in Automatic Discourse Processing. MIT-CSAIL-TR-2008-027. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Available at: www. people.csail.mit.edu/jacobe/papers/diss.pdf.
123. Ekman, P. 1997. ‘Should we call it expression or communication?’ Innovations in Social Science Research 10/4: 333–44.
124. Ekman, P. 1999. ‘Facial expressions’. In Dalgleish, T. & Power, M. (eds), Handbook of Cognition and Emotion. New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 301–20.
125. Ekman, P. & Friesen, W. V. 1975. Unmasking the Face. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
126. Elliot, T. 2005. ‘Storytellers’. The Age Magazine, 21 August.
127. Ellis, J. 2004. ‘Television production’. In Allen, R. & Hill, A. (eds), The Television Studies Reader. London/New York: Routledge, 275–92.
128. Ellsworth, P. C. 1994. ‘Sense, culture, and sensibility’. In Kitayama, S. & Markus, H. R. (eds), Emotion and Culture. Empirical Studies of Mutual Infl uences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association American Psychological Association, Boston, MA, 23–50.
129. Englebretson, R. (ed.) 2007. Stancetaking in Discourse Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
130. Enkvist, N. E. 1964. ‘On defining style’. In Enkvist, N. E., Spencer, J. & Gregory, M. (eds), Linguistics and Style. Oxford: OUP, 1–56.
131. Enkvist, N. E. 1973. Linguistic Stylistics. Berlin: Mouton.
132. Entman, R. 1993. ‘Framing: towards clarification of a fractured paradigm’. Journal of Communication 43/4: 51–8.
133. Esslin, M. 22002. The Age of Television. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. [Originally published in 1982, San Francisco, CA: Freeman.]
134. Fairclough, N. 2000. New Labour, New Language? London: Routledge.
135. Fairclough, N. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
136. Fairclough, N. 2004. ‘Critical discourse analysis in researching language in the new capitalism: overdetermination, transdisciplinarity and textual analysis’. In Young, L. & Harrison, C. (eds), Systemic Functional Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis: Studies in Social Change. London: Continuum, 103–22.
137. Feuer, J. 2001a. ‘The unruly woman sitcom’. (I love Lucy, Roseanne, Absolutely Fabulous). In Creeber, G. (ed.), 68–9.
138. Feuer, J. 2001b. ‘Situation comedy, part 2’. In Creeber, G. (ed.), 67–70.
139. Feuer, J. 2001c. ‘Will and grace’. In Creeber, G. (ed.), 72.
140. Feuer, J. 2001d. ‘The “gay” and “queer” sitcom’. In Creeber, G. (ed.), 70–2.
141. Fiehler, R. 1990. Kommunikation und Emotion. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
142. Field, S. 1984. The Screenwriter’s Workbook. New York: Dell.
143. Fill, A. & Muhlhausler, P. 2001. The Ecolinguistics Reader. Language, Ecology and Environment. London/New York: Continuum.
144. Fine, M. G. 1981. ‘Soap opera conversations: the talk that binds’. Journal of Communication Summer 1981. 97–107.
145. Fischer-Starcke, B. 2007. ‘Korpusstilistik: Korpuslinguistische Analysen literarischer Werke am Beispiel Jane Austens’. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Universitat Trier (Germany).
146. Fiske, J. 1987. Television Culture. London: Routledge. — 1994. ‘Television pleasures’. In Graddol, D. & Boyd-Barrett, O. (eds), Media Texts: Authors and Readers. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters in association with The Open University, 239–55.
147. Fleegal, S. 2008. ‘Like mother–daughter, like daughter–mother. Constructs of motherhood in three generations’. In Calvin, R. (ed.), 143–58.
148. Foolen, A. 1997. ‘The expressive function of language: towards a cognitive semantic approach’. In Niemeier, S. & Dirven, R. (eds), The Language of Emotions. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 15–23.
149. Forster, E. M. 1987. Aspects of the Novel. London: Methuen.
150. Fowler, R. 1986. Linguistic Criticism. Oxford: OUP.
151. Frye, N. 1957. Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
152. Fulton, H. 2005a. ‘Introduction: the power of narrative’. In Fulton et al., 1–7.
153. Fulton, H. 2005b. ‘Film narrative and visual cohesion’. In Fulton et al., 108–22.
154. Fulton, H., Huisman, R., Murphet, J. & Dunn, A. 2005. Narrative and Media. Cambridge: CUP.
155. Galasiński, D. 2004. Men and the Language of Emotions. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
156. Galtung, J. & Ruge, M. H. 1965. ‘The structure of foreign news’. Journal of Peace Research 2/1: 64–91.
157. Garrett, P. & Bell, A. 1998. ‘Media and discourse: a critical overview’. In Bell, A. & Garrett, P. (eds), Approaches to Media Discourse. Oxford/Malden, MA: Black well, 1–20.
158. Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Berkeley/Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
159. Giles, D. 2002. ‘Parasocial interaction: a review of the literature and a model for future research’. Media Psychology 4/3: 279–304.
160. Gillespie, M. 1995. Television, Ethnicity and Cultural Change. New York: Routledge.
161. Goatley, A. 2007. Washing the Brain – Metaphor and Hidden Ideology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
162. Goddard, A. 1998. The Language of Advertising: Written Texts. New York: Routledge.
163. Goffman, E. 1967. Interaction Ritual. Essays on Face-to-Face Behaviour. New York: Pantheon.
164. Goffman, E. 1971. Relations in Public: Micro-Studies of the Public Order. New York: Basic Books.
165. Goffman, E. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
166. Goffman, E. 1976. ‘Replies and responses’. Language in Society 5: 257–313.
167. Goffman, E. 1979. ‘Footing’. Semiotica 25: 1–29.
168. Goffman, E. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
169. Goodwin, M. H. & Goodwin, C. 2000. ‘Emotion within situated activity’. Available at: www.sscnet.ucla.edu/clic/cgoodwin/00emot_act.pdf, last accessed 19/5/2009. (Originally published as pp. 33–54 in Communication: An Arena for Development, edited by Nanci Budwig, Ina C. Uzgris & James V. Wertsch, Stamford, CT: Ablex, 2000).
170. Graves, D. A. 1999. ‘Computer analysis of word usage in Emma’. Persuasions 21: 203–11.
171. Greimas, A. J. 1966. Sémantique Structurale. Paris: Larousse.
172. Gumperz, J. J. & Cook-Gumperz, J. 2007. ‘A postscript: style and identity in interactional sociolinguistics’. In Auer, P. (ed.), Style and Social Identities. Alternative Approaches to Linguistic Heterogeneity. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 477–501.
173. Haddrick, G. 2001. Top Shelf 1. Reading and Writing the Best in Australian TV Drama. Strawberry Hills, Australia: Currency Press.
174. Hanlein, H. 1999. Studies in Authorship Recognition – a Corpus-based Approach. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
175. Hall, S. 1994. ‘Encoding/decoding’. In Graddol, D. & Boyd-Barrett, O. (eds), Media Texts: Authors and Readers. Clevedon: Multilin gual Matters, 200–11.
176. Halliday, M. A. K. 2004. ‘The spoken language corpus: a foundation for grammatical theory’. In Aijmer, K. & Altenberg, B. (eds), Advances in Corpus Linguistics. Papers from the 23rd International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi, 11–39.
177. Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold [Third edition].
178. Hancil, S. 2009 (ed.). The Role of Prosody in Affective Speech. Bern: Peter Lang.
179. Hartley, J. 1999. Uses of Television. London/New York: Routledge.
180. Hartley, J. 2001. ‘Situation comedy, part 1’. In Creeber, G. (ed.), 65–67.
181. Haupt, M. 2008. ‘Wheat balls, gravlax, pop tarts. Mothering and power’. In Calvin, R. (ed.), 114–26.
182. Hayman, R. 1969. Techniques of Acting. London: Methuen.
183. Hermes, J. 2005. Re-reading Popular Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.
184. Hoey, M. 2005. Lexical Priming. London/New York: Routledge.
185. Holly, W. 1979. Imagearbeit in Gesprächen. Zur linguistischen Beschreibung des Beziehungsaspekts. Tuebingen: Niemeyer.
186. Holmes, J. 1984. ‘Modifying illocutionary force’. Journal of Pragmatics 8: 345–65.
187. Holmes, J. 1997. ‘Women, language and identity’. Journal of Sociolinguistics 1/2: 195–223.
188. Holmes, J. 2009. ‘How do you air a bad joke?’ Media Watch (ABC television, Australia) Episode 18, 8 June 2009. Transcript available at: www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/s2592383.htm, last accessed 11/6/2009.
189. Hood, S. forthcoming. ‘Body language in face-to-face teaching: a focus on textual and interpersonal meaning’. In Dreyfus, S., Hood S. & Stenglin M. (eds), Semiotic Margins: Meaning in Multimodalities. London: Continuum.
190. Hornby, N. 2006. The Complete Polysyllabic Spree. London: Penguin.
191. Horton, D. & Wohl, R. R. 1956. ‘Mass communication and para-social interaction’. Psychiatry 19: 215–29.
192. Hubbard, E. H. 2002. ‘Conversation, characterisation and corpus linguistics: dialogue in Jane Austen’s Sense and Sensibility’. Literator 23/2: 67–85.
193. Hubler, A. 1998. The Expressivity of Grammar: Grammatical Devices Expressing Emotion Across Time. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
194. Huisman, R. 2005a. ‘Soap operas and sitcoms’. In Fulton et al., 172–87.
195. Huisman, R. 2005b. ‘Aspects of narrative in series and serials’. In Fulton et al., 153–71.
196. Hunston, S. 2002. Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP.
197. Hunston, S. 2003. ‘Frame, phrase or function: a comparison of frame semantics and local grammars’. In Archer, D., Rayson, P. Wilson, A. & McEnery, T. (eds), Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2003 Conference. UCREL Technical Papers 16. Lancaster: UCREL: 342–58.
198. Hunston, S. 2004. ‘Counting the uncountable: problems of identifying evaluation in a text and in a corpus’. In Partington, A., Morley J. & Haarman, L. (eds), Corpora and Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang: 157–88.
199. Hunston, S. & Thompson, G. (eds). 2000. Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: OUP.
200. Hunter, K. 2009. ‘The body tells a story in itself’. Available at: www.guardian.co.uk/stage/2009/may/09/kathryn-hunter-physical-theatre, last accessed 23/7/2009.
201. Idato, M. 2009. ‘TV facing its own strict diet’. The Sydney Morning Herald, News Review, 2–3 May, p. 3.
202. Iedema, R. 2001. ‘Analysing film and television: a social semiotic account of Hospital: an Unhealthy Business’. In van Leeuwen, T. & Jewitt, C. (eds), Handbook of Visual Analysis. London/Thousand Oaks, CA/New Delhi: Sage, 183–204.
203. Jagger, G. 2008. Judith Butler. Sexual Politics, Social Change and the Power of the Performative. London/New York: Routledge.
204. Jakobson, R. 1960. ‘Closing statement: linguistics and poetics’. In Sebeok, T. (ed.), Style in Language. Cambridge: MIT Press, 350–77.
205. Johns, E. K. & Smith, K. L. 2008. ‘Welcome to Stars Hollow. Gilmore Girls, utopia, and the hyperreal’. In Calvin, R. (ed.), 23–34.
206. Johnson, S. & Ensslin, A. (eds). 2007. Language in the Media. Representations, Identities, Ideologies. London/New York: Continuum.
207. Johnstone, B. & Bean, J. M. 1997. ‘Self-expression and linguistic variation’. Language in Society 26: 221–46.
208. Karkkainen, E. 2003. Epistemic Stance in English Conversation. A Description of its Interactional Functions, with a Focus on I think. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
209. Kay, P. & Fillmore, C. J. 1999. ‘Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: the what’s X doing Y? construction’. Language 75/1: 1–33.
210. Kendon, A. 1967. ‘Some functions of gaze direction in social interaction’ Acta Psychologica 26: 22–63.
211. Kendon, A. 2004. Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: CUP.
212. Kitayama, S. & Markus, H. R. 1994. ‘Introduction to cultural psychology and emotion research’. In Kitayama, S. (ed.), Emotion and Culture. Empirical Studies of Mutual Infl uences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1–19.
213. Knight, N. 2010. ‘Wrinkling complexity: concepts of identity and affiliation in humour’. In Bednarek, M. & Martin, J. R. (eds), New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity and Affiliation. London/New York: Continuum, 35–58.
214. Knight, N. in preparation. ‘Sociality through laughter: the pragmatics of Affiliation in conversational humour’. Unpublished manuscript, University of Sydney, Australia.
215. Konstantinidou, M. 1997. Sprache und Gefühl. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.
216. Kozloff, S. 2000. Overhearing Film Dialogue. Ewing, NJ: University of California Press.
217. 22006. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London/New York: Routledge.
218. Krishnamurthy, R. 1995. ‘The macrocosm and the microcosm: the corpus and the text’. In Payne, J. (ed.), Linguistic Approaches to Literature. University of Birmingham: ELR, 1–16.
219. Kubey, R. W. 2003. ‘Why U.S. Media Education lags behind the rest of the Englishspeaking world’. Television and New Media 4/4: 351–70.
220. Labov, W. 1984. ‘Intensity’. In Schiffrin, D. (ed.), Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications. Washington: Georgetown University Press, 43–70.
221. Lacey, N. 1998. Image and Representation. Key Concepts in Media Studies. Houndmills/New York: Palgrave.
222. Lakoff, R. T. 2006. ‘Identitiy a la carte: you are what you eat’. In De Fina, A., Schiffrin, D. & Bamberg, M. (eds), Discourse and Identity. Cambridge: CUP, 142–65.
223. Lambrou, M. & Stockwell, P. (eds). 2007. Contemporary Stylistics. London/New York: Continuum.
224. Lancioni, J. 2006. ‘Murder and mayhem on Wisteria Lane: a study of genre and cultural context in Desperate Housewives’. In McCabe, J. & Akass, K. (eds), Reading Desperate Housewives. Beyond the White Picket Fence. London/New York: I.B. Tauris, 129–43.
225. Lee, D. 2001. ‘Genres, registers, text types, domains, and styles: clarifying the concepts and navigating a path through the BNC jungle’. Language Learning & Technology 5: 37–72. Available at: www.llt.msu.edu/vol5num3/lee/, last accessed 20/10/2005.
226. Leech, G. 1974. Semantics. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Ltd.
227. Leech, G. & Short, M. 1981. Style in Fiction. A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose. London/New York: Longman.
228. Lemke, J. 1998. ‘Resources for attitudinal meaning: evaluative orientations in text semantics’. Functions of Language 5/1: 33–56.
229. Levinson, S. C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: CUP.
230. Lippi-Green, R. 1997. English with an Accent: Language, Ideology and Discrimination in the United States. London/New York: Routledge.
231. 21998. Making Sense of Television. The Psychology of Audience Interpretation. London/New York: Routledge.
232. Livsey, A. J. 2004. ‘A further graying of network televison’. Media Life Magazine 15 January. Available at: www.medialifemagazine.com/news2004/jan04/jan12/4_thurs/news3thursday.html, last accessed 17/9/2008.
233. Lorenzo-Dus, M. 2009. Television Discourse. Analysing Language in the Media. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
234. Lothe, J. 2000. Narrative in Fiction and Film. An Introduction. Oxford: OUP.
235. Louw, B. 1993. ‘Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer?’ In Baker, M., Francis, G. & Tognini-Bonelli, E. (eds). Text and Technology. In Honour of John Sinclair. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 157–76.
236. Lury, K. 2005. Interpreting Television. London: Hodder Arnold.
237. Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics. Vol. 1, 2. Cambridge: CUP.
238. Machin, D. & van Leeuwen, T. 2007. Global Media Discourse. A Critical Introduction. London/New York: Routledge.
239. Mahlberg, M. 2007. ‘A corpus stylistic perspective on Dickens’ Great Expectations’. In Lambrou, M. & Stockwell, P. (eds), Contemporary Stylistics. London/New York: Continuum, 19–31.
240. Mandala, S. 2007. ‘Solidarity and the Scoobies: an analysis of the –y suffix in the television series Buffy the Vampire Slayer’. Language and Literature 16/1: 53–73.
241. Marshall, J. & Werndly, A. 2002. The Language of Television. London/New York: Routledge.
242. Marten-Cleef, S. 1991. Gefühle ausdrücken. Die expressiven Sprechakte. Goppingen: Kummerle Verlag.
243. Martin, J. R. 2004. ‘Positive discourse analysis: solidarity and change’. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 49: 179–200.
244. Martin, J. R. 2007. ‘Genre, ideology and intertextuality: a systemic functional perspective’. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 2/2: 275–98.
245. Martin, J. R. 2008a. ‘Intermodal reconciliation: mates in arms’. In Unsworth, L. (ed.), New Literacies and the English Curriculum: Multimodal Perspectives. London: Continuum, 112–48.
246. Martin, J. R. 2008b. ‘Innocence: realization, instantiation and individuation in a Botswanan town’. In Mahboob, A. & Knight, N. (eds), Questioning Linguistics. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 32–76.
247. Martin, J. R. 2010. ‘Semantic variation – modelling realisation, instantiation and individuation in social semiosis’. In Bednarek, M. & Martin, J. R. (eds), New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity and Affiliation. London/New York: Continuum, 1–34.
248. Martin, J. R. & Rose, D. 2007a. Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. London: Equinox.
249. Martin, J. R. & Rose, D. 2007b. Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause. Second revised and updated edition. London/New York: Continuum.
250. Martin, J. R. & White, P. R. R. 2005. The Language of Evaluation. Appraisal in English. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
251. Martinec, R. 2001. ‘Interpersonal resources in action’. Semiotica 135 1/4: 117–45.
252. Martinec, R. & Salway, A. 2005. ‘A system for image-text relations in new (and old) media’, Visual Communication 4/3: 337–71.
253. Marty, A. 1908/1976. Untersuchungen zur Grundlegung der allgemeinen Grammatik und Sprachphilosophie. Tubingen: Niemeyer. [Published originally in 1908, Halle: Niemeyer.]
254. Matheson, D. 2005. Media Discourses: Analysing Media Texts. Maidenhead/New York: Open University Press.
255. Mautner, G. 2000. Der britische Europa-Diskurs: Methodenrefl exion und Fallstudien zur Berichterstattung in der Tagespresse. Wien: Passagen.
256. Mautner, G. 2008. ‘Analyzing newspapers, magazines and other print media’. In Wodak, R. & Krzyz. anowski, M. (eds), Qualitative Discourse Analysis for the Social Sciences Basingstoke: Palgrave, 30–53.
257. Mayell, H. 2005. ‘“Evolving to eat mush”: How meat changed our bodies’. National Geographic News. Available at: www.news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/02/0218_050218_human_diet.html, last accessed 19/5/2009.
258. Maynard, D. W. 2003. Bad News, Good News: Conversational Order in Everyday Talk and Clinical Settings. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
259. McCabe, J. & Akass, K. (eds). 2006. Reading Desperate Housewives. Beyond the White Picket Fence. London/New York: I.B. Tauris.
260. McCaffrey, M. 2008. ‘Rory Gilmore and Faux Feminism. An Ivy League education and intellectual banter does not a feminist make’. In Calvin, R. (ed.), 35–49.
261. McIntyre, D. 2008. ‘Integrating multimodal analysis and the stylistics of drama: a multimodal perspective on Ian McKellen’s Richard III’. Language and Literature 17/4: 309–34.
262. McKee, R. 1998. Story: Substance, Structure and Style and the Principles of Screenwriting. London: Methuen.
263. 31999. News and Journalism in the UK. London/New York: Routledge.
264. McNeill, D. 2005. Gesture and Thought. Chicago, IL/London: University of Chicaco Press.
265. Mehl, M. R., Vazire, S., Ramirez-Esparza, N., Slatcher, R. B., & Pennebaker, J. W. 2007. ‘Are women really more talkative than men?’. Science 6 July, 317/5834: 82.
266. Mepham, J. 1990. ‘The ethics of quality in television’. In Mulgan, G. (ed.), The Question of Quality. London: BFI, 56–72.
267. Merriman, G. 2003. ‘Lessons from Liverpool. The Jimmy McGovern workshops’. Storyline 3: 13–16
268. Metz, C. 1974. Film Language. A Semiotics of the Cinema. New York: OUP.
269. Meyer, C. 2002. English Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP.
270. Miller, T. (ed.). 2009. Special issue of Television and New Media on ‘My Media Studies’.
271. Millman, J. 2000. ‘The parent trap’. Salon.com. 15 November. Available at: www.archive.salon.com/ent/col/mill/2000/11/14/gilmore_girls/index.html, last accessed 17/9/2008.
272. Mills, B. 2005. Television Sitcom. London: British Film Institute.
273. Mittell, J. 2004. ‘A cultural approach to television genre theory’. In Allen, R. & Hill, A. (eds), The Television Studies Reader. London/New York: Routledge, 171–81.
274. Mittmann, B. 2004. Mehrwort-Cluster in der englischen Alltagskonversation. Unterschiede zwischen britischem und amerikanischem gesprochenen Englisch als Indikatoren für den präfabrizierten Charakter der Sprache. Tubingen: Gunter Narr.
275. Mittmann, B. 2006. ‘With a little help from Friends (and others): Lexico-pragmatic characteristics of original and dubbed film dialogue’. In Houswitschka, C., Knappe, G. & Muller, A. (eds), Anglistentag 2005, Bamberg – Proceedings. Trier: WVT, 573–85.
276. Moores, S. 1994. ‘Texts, readers and contexts of reading: development in the study of media audiences’. In Graddol, D. & Boyd-Barrett, O. (eds), Media Texts: Authors and Readers. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 256–72.
277. Morris, D. 1977. Manwatching: A Field Guide to Human Behavior. London: Grafton Books.
278. Mushin, I. 2001. Evidentiality and Epistemological Stance. Narrative Retelling. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
279. Myers, G. 1994. Words in Ads. London: Edward Arnold.
280. National Association of Broadcasters. 1990. Statement of Principles Of Radio and Television Broadcasters. Issued by the Board of Directors of the National Association of Broadcasters.
281. National Hispanic Media Coalition. 2008. Presentation to Susan Crawford and Kevin Werbach on the Need for Enhanced FCC Commitment to Diversity December 16, 2008. Available at: www.nhmc.org/documents/MediaPolicy/Mtg_with_S_Crawford_K_Werbach_120608.pdf, accessed 8/4/2009.
282. Neale, S. 1990. ‘Questions of genre’. Screen 31/1: 45–66.
283. Neale, S. 2001. ‘Studying genre’. In Creeber, G. (ed.), 1–3.
284. Norrick, N. R. 1978. ‘Expressive illocutionary acts’. Journal of Pragmatics 2: 277–91.
285. Norrick, N. R. 1993. Conversational Joking: Humor in Everyday Talk. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
286. Norrick, N. R. 2008. ‘Using large corpora of conversation to investigate narrative. The case of interjections in conversational storytelling performance’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13/4: 438–64.
287. Norris, S. 2002. ‘The implication of visual research in discourse analysis: transcription beyond language’. Visual Communication 1/1: 97–121.
288. Norval, A. J. 2000. ‘Review article: the things we do with words – contemporary approaches to the analysis of ideology’. British Journal of Political Science 30: 313–46.
289. Oatley, K. 2003. ‘Creative expression and communication of emotions in the visual and narrative arts’. In Davidson, R. J., Scherer, K. R. & Goldsmith, H. H. (eds), Handbook of Affective Sciences. Oxford: OUP, 481–502.
290. 22006. Understanding Emotions. Oxford: Blackwell.
291. Ochs, E. 1979. ‘Transcription as theory’. In Ochs, E. & Schiefflien, B. B. (eds), Developmental Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 43–72.
292. Ochs, E. & Schieffelin, B. 1989. ‘Language has a heart’. Text 9: 7–25.
293. O’Halloran, K. L. 2008. ‘Systemic functional-multimodal discourse analysis (SF-MDA): constructing ideational meaning using language and visual imagery’. Visual Communication 7/4: 443–75.
294. O’Keeffe, A. 2006. Investigating Media Discourse. London/New York: Routledge.
295. O’Keeffe, A., McCarthy, M. & Carter, R. 2007. From Corpus to Classroom: Language Use and Language Teaching. Cambridge: CUP.
296. Olson, S. R. 2004. ‘Hollywood planet. Global media and the competitive advantage of narrative transparency’. In Allen, R. & Hill, A. (eds), The Television Studies Reader. London/New York: Routledge, 111–29.
297. Ortony, A., Clore, G. L. & Collins, A. 1988. The Cognitive Structure of Emotions. Cambridge: CUP.
298. 32005. Media and Society. An Introduction. Oxford: OUP.
299. Paltridge, B. 2006. Discourse Analysis. An Introduction. London/New York: Continuum.
300. Paltridge, B. 2007. ‘Genre, identity and Sex and the City’. Paper presented at Discourses and Cultural Practices 29, 30 November & 1 December 2007, Faculty of Education, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia.
301. Partington, A., Morley, J. & Haarman, L. (eds). 2004. Corpora and Discourse: A Most Congruous Beast. Bern: Peter Lang.
302. Pavlenko, A. 2005. Emotions and Multilingualism. Cambridge: CUP.
303. Pearson, R. 2007. ‘Anatomising Gilbert Grissom. The structure and function of the televisual character’. In Allen, M. (ed.), Reading CSI. Crime TV under the Microscope. London/New York: I.B. Tauris, 39–56.
304. Pennycook, A. 2004. ‘Performativity and language studies’. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies: An International Journal 1/1: 1–19.
305. Pennycook, A. 2007. Global Englishes and Transcultural Flows. London/New York: Routledge.
306. Pfister, M. 1988. The Theory and Analysis of Drama. Cambridge: CUP.
307. Planalp, S. 1999. Communicating Emotion. Social, Moral and Cultural Processes. Cambridge: CUP.
308. Pomerantz, A. 1984. ‘Agreeing and disagreeing with assessment: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes’. In Atkins, J. M. & Heritage, J. (eds), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: CUP, 57–101.
309. Precht, K. 2006. ‘Gender differences and similarities in stance in informal American conversation’. Unpublished manuscript Available at: www.kprecht.net/MyWork/Precht%20Gender%202006.pdf
310. 21968. The Morphology of the Folktale. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. [Translated by L. Scott.]
311. Quaglio, P. 2008. ‘Television dialogue and natural conversation: linguistic similarities and functional differences’ In Adel, A. & Reppen, R. (eds), Corpora and Discourse. The Challenges of Different Settings. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 189–210.
312. Quaglio, P. 2009. Television Dialogue. The Sitcom Friends vs. Natural Conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
313. Rey, J. M. 2001. ‘Changing gender roles in popular culture: dialogue in Star Trek episodes from 1966 to 1993’. In D. Biber & Conrad, S. (eds), Variation in English: Multi-dimensional Studies. London: Longman, 138–56.
314. Ridinger-Dotterman, A. 2008. ‘Reinventing the bitch: the dynamicism of Paris Geller’. In Calvin, R. (ed.), 50–62.
315. 22002. Narrative Fiction: Contemporary Poetics. London: Methuen.
316. Robinson, J. 2005. Deeper than Reason: Emotion and its Role in Literature, Music, and Art. Oxford: OUP.
317. Robinson, J. D. 2004. ‘The sequential organization of “explicit” apologies in naturally occurring English’. Research on Language and Social Interaction 37/3: 291–330.
318. Romer, U. 2008. ‘Identification impossible? A corpus approach to realisations of evaluative meaning in academic writing’. Functions of Language 15/1: 115–30.
319. Roman, J. 2005. From Daytime to PrimeTime. The History of American Television Programs. Westport, CT/London: Greenwood Press.
320. Romano, A. 2006. ‘Dawn of a new network’. Broadcasting and Cable. www.broadcastingcable. com/article/CA6364196.html, last accessed 17/9/2008.
321. Ross, S. 2004. ‘Dormant dormitory friendships: race and gender in Felicity’. In Davis, G. & Dickinson, K. (eds), Teen TV. Genre, Consumption and Identity. London: British Film Institute, 141–50.
322. Sacks, H. 1992. Lectures on Conversation. Jefferson, G. (ed.), Oxford: Blackwell.
323. Salih, S. 2006. ‘On Judith Butler and performativity’. In Lovass, K. F. & Jenkins, M. M. (eds), Sexualities and Communication in Everyday Life. A Reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 55–68.
324. Sanger, K. 2001. The Language of Drama. London/New York: Routledge.
325. Schegloff, E. 2006. ‘A tutorial on membership categorization’. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 462–82.
326. Schegloff, E. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction. A Primer in Conversation Analysis I. Cambridge: CUP.
327. Schwarz-Friesel, M. 2007. Sprache und Emotion. Tuebingen/Basel: A. Francke Verlag.
328. Scollon, R. & Scollon, S. W. 2001. Intercultural Communciation. A Discourse Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
329. Scott, M. 1997. ‘PC analysis of key words – and key key words’. System 25/2: 233–45.
330. Scott, M. 1999. Wordsmith Tools. Version 3. Oxford: OUP.
331. Scott, M. 2004. Wordsmith Tools. Version 4. Oxford: OUP.
332. Scott, M. & Tribble, C. 2006. Textual Patterns. Key Words and Corpus Analysis in Language Education. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
333. 21994. Making a Good Script Great. Second revised and expanded edition. Hollywood/New York: Samuel French.
334. Selby, K. & Cowdery, R. 1995. How to Study Television. Basingstoke/London: Macmillan.
335. Selting, M. 1994. ‘Emphatic speech style – with special focus on the prosodic signalling of heightened emotive involvement in conversation’. Journal of Pragmatics 22: 375–408.
336. Sherman-Palladino, A. 2005. Interview with Amy Sherman-Palladino, interviewed by Scott Tobias for The Onion A.V. Club, 9 February 2005. Available at: www.avclub.com/content/node/23372/print/2, last accessed 14/8/2008.
337. Sherman-Palladino, A. & Palladino, D. 2006. ‘Team Palladino: the interview’. Interviewed by Michael Ausiello for TV Guide, 24 April 2006. Available at: www. community.tvguide.com/blog-entry/TVGuide-Editors-Blog/Ausiello-Report/Team-Palladino-Interview/700000966, last accessed 28/8/2008.
338. Sherrill, C. 2008. ‘Vegetarians on TV’. Blog entry posted Friday, 28 March 2008. Available at: www.journalnow.net/index.php/vegginout/2008/03/, last accessed 31/3/2009.
339. Short, M. H. 1981. ‘Discourse analysis and the analysis of drama’. Applied Linguistics 2: 180–201.
340. Short, M. 1998. ‘From dramatic text to dramatic performance’. In Culpeper, J. (ed.), Exploring the Language of Drama: From Text to Context. London: Routledge, 6–18.
341. Shugart, H. A. 2003. ‘Reinventing privilege: the new (gay) man in contemporary popular media’. Critical Studies in Media Communication 20/1: 67–91.
342. Singer, P. & Mason, J. 2007. The Ethics of What We Eat: Why Our Food Choices Matter. New York: Rodale.
343. Smith, R. D. 2008. ‘Still more Gilmore. How online fan communities remediate Gilmore Girls’. In Calvin, R. (ed.), 193–204.
344. Spencer-Oatey, H. 2007. ‘Theories of identity and the analysis of face’. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 639–56.
345. Spitz, A. 2005. ‘Power Plays: the Representation of Mother–Daughter Disputes in Contemporary Plays by Women. A Study in Discourse Analysis’. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Universitat des Saarlandes (Germany). Available at: www. scidok.sulb.uni-saarland.de/volltexte/2006/595/.
346. Stankiewicz, E. 1989. ‘The emotive function of language: an overview’. In Koch, W. (ed.), For a Semiotics of Emotion. Bochum: Bochumer Universitatsverlag, 73–85.
347. Stivers, T. 2006. ‘Stance, alignment and affiliation during story telling: nodding as a token of preliminary affiliation’. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Available at: www.allacademic.com/meta/p103670_index.html, last accessed 20/7/2009.
348. Stokoe, E. 2008. ‘Dispreferred actions and other interactional breaches as devices for occasioning audience laughter in television “sitcoms”’. Social Semiotics (Special volume: Analysing media discourses) 18/3: 289–307.
349. Stubbs, M. 2005. ‘Conrad in the computer: examples of quantitative stylistic methods’. Language and Literature 14/1: 5–24.
350. Stubbs, M. 2008. ‘Three concepts of keywords’. Revised version of paper presented to the conference on Keyness in Text at the Certosa di Pontignano, University of Siena, June 2007. Available at: www.uni-trier.de/fileadmin/fb2/ANG/Linguistik/Stubbs/stubbs-2008-keywords.pdf, last accessed 7/8/2008.
351. Stubbs, M. & Barth, I. 2003. ‘Using recurrent phrases as text-type discriminators: a quantitative method and some findings’. Functions of Language 10/1: 61–104.
352. Taavitsainen, I. 1999. ‘Personality and styles of affect in the Canterbury Tales’. In Lester, G. (ed.), Chaucer in Perspective: Middle English Essays in Honour of Norman Blake. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 218–34.
353. Tagliamonte, S. & Roberts, C. 2005. ‘So weird; so cool; so innovative: the use of intensifiers in the television series Friends’. American Speech 80/3: 280–300.
354. Talbot, M. 2007. Media Discourse. Representation and Interaction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
355. Tallman, J. 1979. ‘Ways of Speaking: Styles in Conversation’. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.
356. Tannen, D. 1984. Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk Among Friends. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
357. Thompson, G. & Hunston, S. 2000. ‘Evaluation: an introduction’. In Hunston, S. & Thompson, G. (eds), Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: OUP, 1–27.
358. Thomson, E. & White, P. R. R. (eds). 2008. Communicating Conflict. Multilingual Case Studies of the News Media. London/New York: Continuum.
359. Thornham, S. & Purvis, T. 2005. Television Drama: Theories and Identities. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
360. Tognini-Bonelli, E. 2001. Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
361. 22001. Narrative. A Critical Linguistic Introduction. London/New York: Routledge.
362. Totaro, P. 2009. ‘Doors open at a creative age’. Interview with Nick Hornby. Spectrum, 17–18 October, Sydney: The Sydney Morning Herald, pp. 26–27.
363. Tracy, K. 2002. Everyday Talk. Building and Refl ecting Identities. New York/London: The Guilford Press.
364. Turner, G. 1994. ‘Film languages’. In Graddol, D. & Boyd-Barrett, O. (eds), Media Texts: Authors and Readers. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters in association with The Open University, 119–35.
365. Turner, G. 2001a. ‘The uses and limitations of genre’. In Creeber, G. (ed.), 4–5.
366. Turner, G. 2001b. ‘Genre, hybridity and mutation’. In Creeber, G. (ed.), 6.
367. Turner, J. & Stets, J. E. 2005. The Sociology of Emotions. Cambridge: CUP. van Dijk, T.A. 1998a. ‘Opinions and ideologies in the press’. In Bell, A. & Garrett, P. (eds), Approaches to Media Discourse. Oxford/Malden, MA: Black well, 21–63.
368. Turner, J. & Stets, J. E. 1998b. Ideology. A Multidisciplinary Approach. London/Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
369. van Leeuwen, T. 1996. ‘Moving English: the visual language of film’. In Goodman, S. & Graddol, D. (eds), Redesigning English. New Texts, New Identities. London/New York: Routledge, 81–105.
370. van Leeuwen, T. 1999. Speech, Music, Sound. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
371. van Leeuwen, T. 2008. Discourse and Practice. New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: OUP.
372. van Meel, J. M. 1994. ‘Representing emotions in literature and paintings: a comparative analysis’. Poetics 23: 159–76.
373. Vestergaard, T. 2000. ‘From genre to sentence: the leading article and its linguistic realiza tion’. In Ungerer, F. (ed.), English Media Texts Past and Present. Language and Textual Structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 151–76.
374. Volek, B. 1987. Emotive Signs in Language and Semantic Functioning of Derived Nouns in Russian. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
375. Vorhaus, J. 1994. The Comic Toolbox: How to be Funny Even if You’re Not. Los Angeles, CA: Silman-James Press.
376. Walters, S. D. 1992. Lives Together, Worlds Apart: Mothers and Daughters in Popular Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
377. Weatherall, A. & Stubbe, M. 2009. ‘Affiliation during complaint calls in institutional talk’. Paper presented at 11th International Pragmatics Conference, Melbourne 12–17 July 2009.
378. Webber, A. 2005. ‘Mortified outline’. Unpublished manuscript, Australian Children’s Television Foundation (Melbourne) and Enjoy! Entertainment (Sydney).
379. Weerakkody, N. 2008. Research Methods for Media and Communication. Oxford: OUP.
380. Wenger, E. c2007. ‘Communities of Practice. A brief introduction’. Available at: www.ewenger.com/theory/, accessed 28/7/2009.
381. Werth, P. 1998. ‘On the semantics and pragmatics of emotion verb complementation’. In Athanasiadou, A. & Tabakowska, E. (eds), Speaking of Emotions. Conceptualisation and Expression. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 409–40.
382. Westman, K. E. 2007. ‘Beauty and the geek: changing gender stereotypes in the Gilmore Girls’. In Inness, S. A. (ed.). Geek Chic: Smart Women in Popular Culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–10.
383. White, P. R. R. 2004. ‘Subjectivity, evaluation and point of view in media discourse’. In Coffin, C. (ed.), Applying English Grammar: Functional and Corpus Approaches, London: Arnold, 229–46.
384. Widdowson, H. G. 2008. ‘The novel features of text. Corpus analysis and stylistics’. In Gerbig, A. & Mason, O. (eds), Language, People, Numbers. Corpus Linguistics and Society. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi, 293–304.
385. Wiebe, J., Wilson, T. & Cardie, C. 2005. ‘Annotating expressions of opinions and emotions in language’. Language Resources and Evaluation (formerly Computers and the Humanities) 39/2–3: 165–210.
386. Wierzbicka, A. 2003. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics. The Semantics of Human Interaction. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
387. Wiggins, S. & Potter, J. 2003. ‘Attitudes and evaluative practices: Category vs. item and subjective vs. objective constructions in everyday food assessments’. British Journal of Social Psychology 42: 513–31.
388. Wilce, J. M. 2009. Language and Emotion. Cambridge: CUP.
389. Williams, R. 1977. ‘A lecture on realism’. Screen 18/1: 61–74.
390. 21983. Keywords. A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. Second revised and expanded edition. London: Fontana.
391. Wilson, T. A. 2008. ‘Fine-grained Subjectivity and Sentiment Analysis: Recognizing the Intensity, Polarity, and Attitudes of Private Sates’. PhD Thesis, University of Pittsburgh. Chapter 7 available at: www.cs.pitt.edu/mpqa/databaserelease, last accessed 5/3/2009.
392. Wodak, R. 2009. The Discourse of Politics in Action. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
393. Woods, F. 2008. ‘Generation gap? Mothers, daughters and music’. In Calvin, R. (ed.), 127–42.
394. Wray, A. 2002. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: CUP.
395. Wynne, M. 2006. ‘Stylistics: corpus approaches’. In Brown, K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, Second Edition, volume 12. Oxford: Elsevier, 223–26.
396. Zappavigna, M., Cleirigh, C., Dwyer, P., & Martin, J. forthcoming. ‘Visualising appraisal prosody’. In A. Mahboob & Knight, N. (eds), Appliable Linguistics: Texts, Contexts and Meanings. London/New York: Continuum.
397. Zappavigna, M., Cleirigh, C., Dwyer, P., & Martin, J. 2010. ‘The coupling of gesture and phonology’. In Bednarek, M. & Martin, J. R. (eds), New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity and Affiliation. London/New York: Continuum, 219–36.
398. Zhao, S. 2010. ‘Intersemiotic relations as logogenetic patterns: towards the restoration of the time dimension in hypertext description’. In Bednarek, M. & Martin, J. R. (eds), New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity and Affiliation. London/New York: Continuum, 195–218.
399. Zimmerman, D. H. 1998. ‘Identity, context and interaction’. In Antaki, C. & Widdicombe, S. (eds), Identities in Talk. London/Thousand Oaks: Sage, 87–106.
400. ‘A Best Friend’s Peek Inside the Gilmore Girls’ 2007, supplementary feature, Gilmore Girls. The Complete Seventh Season. DVD. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
401. ‘Gilmore Fashionistas’ 2007, supplementary feature, Gilmore Girls. The Complete Seventh Season. DVD. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
402. ‘Gilmore Girls Goodies and Gossip for “Rory’s Dance”’ 2000, supplementary feature, Gilmore Girls. The Complete First Season. DVD. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
403. ‘Gilmore-isms’ 2000, supplementary feature, Gilmore Girls. The Complete First Season. DVD. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
404. ‘International Success’ 2004, supplementary feature, Gilmore Girls. The Complete Second Series. DVD. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
405. ‘My So-called Life Story’ 2007, supplementary feature, My So-Called Life. The Complete Series. DVD. A.k.a Productions.
406. ‘The Gilmore Girls Turn 100’ 2005, supplementary feature, Gilmore Girls. The Complete Fifth Season. DVD. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
407. ‘Welcome to “The Gilmore Girls”’ 2003, supplementary feature, Gilmore Girls. The Complete First Season. DVD. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
408. ‘Who Wants to Argue’ 2001/02, supplementary feature, Gilmore Girls. The Complete Second Season. DVD. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
409. ‘Who Wants to Talk Gilmore’ 2005, supplementary feature, Gilmore Girls. The Complete Fifth Season. DVD. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.