Intersemiotic Relations as Logogenetic Patterns: Towards the Restoration of the Time Dimension in Hypertext Description

New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 195-218

  Zhao, Sumin ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84955664872     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (64)

1. Bateman, J. A. (1989), ‘Dynamic systemic-functional grammar: a new frontier’. Word, 40, (1-2), 263-87.
2. Bateman, J. A. (2008a), ‘Systemic linguistics and the notion of linguistic structure: unanswered questions and new possibilities’, in J. Webster (ed.), Meaning in Context:Implementing Intelligent Applications of Language Studies. London/New York:Continuum, 24-58.
3. Bateman, J. A. (2008b), Multimodality and Genre: A Foundation for the Systematic Analysis of Multimodal Documents. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
4. Berry, M. (1981), ‘Systemic linguistics and discourse analysis: a multi-layered approach to exchange structure’, in M. Coulthard, and M. Montgomery (eds), Studies in Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 120-46.
5. Butt, D. (2008), ‘The robustness of realizational systems’, in J. Webster (ed.), Meaning in Context: Implementing Intelligent Applications of Language Studies. London/New York: Continuum, 59-83.
6. Caple, H. (2008), ‘Intermodal relations in image-nuclear news stories’, in L. Unsworth (ed.), New Literacies and the English Curriculum: Perspectives. London:Continuum, 125-38.
7. Chiew, A. K. K. (2004), ‘Multisemiotic mediation in hypertext’, in K. O’Halloran (ed.) Multimodal Discourse Analysis: Systemic Functional Perspectives. London:Continuum (Open Linguistics Series), 131-59.
8. Djonov, E. (2005), Analyzing the Organization of Information in Websites: From Hypermedia Design to Systemic Functional Hypermedia Discourse Analysis. Unpublished doctoral thesis, School of English and School of Modern Language Studies, University of New South Wales, Sydney.
9. Djonov, E. (2007), ‘Website hierarchy and the interaction between content organization, webpage and navigation design - a systemic functional hypermedia analysis perspective’. Information Design Journal, 15, (2), 144-62.
10. Eggins, S. and Slade, D. (2005), Analysing Casual Conversation (second edition). London: Equinox.
11. Gregory, M. J. (2005), ‘Phasal analysis within communication linguistics: two contrastive discourses’, in M. Cummings, P. H. Fries and D. Lockwood (eds), Relations and Functions within and around Language. London/New York:Continuum, 13-31.
12. Halliday, M. A. K. (2002[1966]), ‘The concept of rank: a reply’, in J. Webster (ed.), On Grammar, Volume 1 in the Collected works of M. A. K. Halliday. London:Continuum, 118-26.
13. Halliday, M. A. K. (2002[1992]), ‘Systemic grammar and the concept of a ‘science of language’, in J. Webster (ed.), Language and Linguistics, Volume 2 in the Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday. London: Continuum, 199-212.
14. Halliday, M. A. K. (2009), The Essential Halliday (edited by J. Webster). London: Continuum.
15. Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1976), Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
16. Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1999), Construing Experience through Meaning: a Language-based Approach to Cognition. London: Cassell.
17. Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004), An Introduction to Functional Grammar (third edition). London:Arnold.
18. Huang, R. (1988), China, a Macro History. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
19. Jordens, C. (2002), Reading Spoken Stories for Values: A Discursive Study of Cancer Survivors and Their Professional Carers. Unpublished PhD Thesis (Medicine). University of Sydney.
20. Knox, J. S. (2007), ‘Visual-verbal communication on online newspaper home pages’. Visual Communication, 6, (1), 19-53.
21. Knox, J. S. (forthcoming), ‘Designing the news in an online newspaper: A systemic description’, in A. Baldry and E. Montagna (eds), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Multimodality: Theory and Practice. Campobasso: Palladino.
22. Kolman, B. and Beck, R. E. (1995), Elementary Linear Programming with Applications (second edition). San Diego: Academic Press.
23. Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (2006), Reading Images: the Grammar of Visual Design (second edition). London: Routledge.
24. Lemke, J. (1998), ‘Multiplying meaning: visual and verbal semiotics in scientiB c text’, in J. R. Martin and R. Veel (eds), Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science. London: Routledge, 87-113.
25. Lemke, J. (1999), ‘Typological and topological meaning in diagnostic discourse’, Discourse Processes, 27, (2), 173-85.
26. Lemke, J. (2002), ‘Travels in hypermodality’. Visual Communication, 1, (3), 299-325.
27. Lemke, J. (n.d.), Towards a theory of traversals. Online at [http://www-personal.umich. edu/~jaylemke/papers/traversals/traversal-theory.htm].
28. Macken-Horarik, M. (2004), ‘Interacting with the multimodal text: reA ections on image and verbiage in ArtExpress’. Visual Communication, 3, (1), 5-26.
29. Martin, J. R. (1985), ‘Process and text: two aspects of human semiosis’, in J. D. Benson and W. S. Greaves (eds), Systemic Perspectives on Discourse: Selected Theoretical Papers from the 9th International Systemic Workshop. Norwood, NJ: Ablex (Advances in Discourse processes 15), 248-74.
30. Martin, J. R. (1991), ‘Intrinsic functionality: implications for contextual theory’. Social Semiotics, 1, (1), 99-162.
31. Martin, J. R. (1992), English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
32. Martin, J. R. (1995), ‘Text and clause: fractal resonance’. Text, 15, (1), 5-42.
33. Martin, J. R. (1996), ‘Types of structure: deconstructing notions of constituency in clause and text’, in. E. H. Hovy and D. R. Scott (eds), Computational and Conversational Discourse:Burning Issues - An Interdisciplinary Account. Heidelberg: Springer, 39-66.
34. Martin, J. R. (2000a), ‘Factoring out exchange: types of structure’, in M. Coulthard, J. Cotterill and F. Rock (eds), Working With Dialogue. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 19-40.
35. Martin, J. R. (2000b), ‘Beyond exchange: appraisal systems in English’, in S. Hunston and G. Thompson (eds), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 142-75.
36. Martin, J. R. (2008), ‘Intermodal reconciliation: mates in arms’, in L. Unsworth (ed.), New Literacies and the English Curriculum: Multimodal Perspectives. London: Continuum. 112-48.
37. Martin, J. R and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1991), ‘System typology and topology’, in F. Christie (ed.) Literacy in Social Processes: Papers from the Inaugural Australian Systemic Functional Linguistics Conference. Dekin University, January 1990. Darwin:Centres for Studies of Language in Education, Northern Territory University, 345-84.
38. Martin, J. R. and Rose, D. (2008), Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. London/Oakville, CT: Equinox.
39. Martin, J. R. and White, P. (2005), The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
40. Martinec, R. (2000), ‘Types of process in action’. Semiotica, 130, (3/4), 243-68.
41. Martinec, R. (2005), ‘Topics in multimodality’, in R. Hasan, C. M. I. M. Matthiessen and J. Webster (eds), Continuing Discourse on Language: a Functional Perspective. London: Equinox, 157-81.
42. Martinec, R. and Salway, A. (2005), ‘A system for image-text relations in new (and old) media’. Visual Communication, 4, (3), 337-71.
43. Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1993), ‘Instantial systems and logogenesis’. Paper presented at the Third Chinese Systemic-Functional symposium, Hangzhou, 17-20 June 1993. Unpublished ms, draft 15/ix/93.
44. Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2007), ‘The multimodal page: a systemic functional exploration’, in T. Royce and W. Bowcher (eds), New Directions in the Analysis of Multimodal Discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1-62.
45. Mayer, R. E. (ed.) (2005), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge/New York: University of Cambridge.
46. New London Group (2000), Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures. London: Routledge.
47. O’Halloran, K. (2005), Mathematical Discourse: Language, Symbolism and Visual Images. London and New York: Continuum.
48. O’Halloran, K. (2008), ‘Systemic functional-multimodal discourse analysis (SF-MDA):constructing ideational meaning using language and visual imagery’. Visual Communication, 7, (4), 443-75.
49. O’Donnell, M. (1990), ‘A dynamic model of exchange’. Word, 41, (3), 293-327.
50. Painter, C. (2008), ‘The role of colour in children’s picture books: choices in Ambience’, in L. Unsworth (ed.), New Literacies and the English Curriculum:Perspectives. London: Continuum, 89-98.
51. Painter, C. (forthcoming), Reading Visual Narratives: Inter-image Analysis of Children’s Picture Books. London: Equinox.
52. Ravelli, L. (1995), ‘A dynamic perspective: Implications for metafunction interaction and an understanding of theme’, in R. Hasan and P. Fries (eds), On Subject and Theme: A Discourse Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 187-234
53. Rieber, L. P. (2005), ‘Multimedia learning in games, simulations and microworlds’, in R. E. Mayer (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge, UK; New York: University of Cambridge.
54. Royce, T. (1998), ‘Synergy on the page: exploring intersemiotic complementarity in page-based multimodal text’. Japan Association Systemic Functional Linguistics Occasional Papers, 1, (1), 25-50.
55. Royce, T. (2007), ‘Intersemiotic complementarity: a framework for multimodal discourse analysis’, in T. Royce and W. Bowcher (eds), New Directions in the Analysis of Multimodal Discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 63-109.
56. Stenglin, M. (2004), Packaging curiosities: towards a grammar of three-dimensional space. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Sydney.
57. Unsworth, L. (2007), Multiliteracies and multimodal text analysis in classroom work with children’s literature’, in T. Royce and W. Bowcher (eds), New Directions in the Analysis of Multimodal Discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 331-59.
58. Unsworth, L. and Cléirigh, C. (2009), ‘Multimodality and reading: The construction of meaning through image-text interaction’, in C. Jewitt, (ed.). Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. London: Routledge.
59. Ventola, E. (1987), The Structure of Social Interaction: A Systemic Approach to the Semiotics of Service Encounters. London: Frances Pinter.
60. Zappavigna, M. (forthcoming), ‘Visualising logogenesis’, in S. Dreyfus, S. Hood and M. Stenglin (eds), Proceedings of the Semiotic Margins Conference, University of Sydney, 2007. Australian Systemic Functional Linguistics Association. http.www. as? a.org.au.
61. Zappavigna, M., Cléirigh, C., Dwyer, P. and Martin, J. (forthcoming), ‘Visualising appraisal prosody’, in A. Mahboob and N. Knight (eds), Appliable Linguistics:Texts, Contexts and Meanings. London/New York: Continuum.
62. Zeng, L. C. (1996), Planning Text in an Integrated Multilingual Meaning Space: Theory and Implementation. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Sydney, Sydney.
63. Zhao, S. M. (2008), ‘Ideational InA ation and Ideational Recession: intersemiotic relations as logogenetic patterns’. Paper presented at the Sydney Systemic Functional Linguistic Semniar Series, August 2008, University of Sydney, Sydney.
64. Zhao, S. M. (forthcoming), ‘Rank in visual grammar: some implications for multimodal discourse analysis’, in A. Mahboob and N. K. Knight (eds), Appliable Linguistics:Texts, Contexts and Meanings. London: Continuum.