'An increasingly familiar tragedy': Evaluative collocation and conflation

Functions of Language

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 7-34

  Bednarek, Monika ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUGSBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57749131409     PISSN: 0929998X     EISSN: 15699765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/fol.15.1.03bed     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (54)

1. Bednarek, M. (2006a) Subjectivity and cognition. Inscribing, evoking and provoking opinion. In H. Pishwa (ed.). Language and memory. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 187-221
2. Bednarek, M. (2006b) Evaluation in media discourse: Analysis of a newspaper corpus. (Research in corpus and discourse.) London: Continuum
3. Bednarek, M. (2006c) Epistemological positioning and evidentiality in English news discourse - a text-driven approach. Text and talk 26/6: 635-660
4. Biber, D. and E. Finegan (1988) Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse processes 11: 1-34
5. Biber, D. and E. Finegan (1989) Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text 9: 93-124
6. Biber, D., S. Johansson, G. Leech, S. Conrad and E. Finegan (1999) Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman
7. Bondi, M. and A. Mauranen (eds.) (2003) Special issue of Journal of English for academic purposes 2 on evaluation in academic discourse
8. Carroll, L. (1998) Alice's adventures in wonderland and Through the looking-glass. London: Penguin
9. Chafe, W.L. (1986) Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In W. Chafe and J. Nichols (eds.) Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. (Advances in discourse processes, 20.) Norwood: Ablex. 261-272
10. Chafe, W.L. and J. Nichols (eds.) (1986) Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. (Advances in discourse processes, 20.) Norwood: Ablex
11. Channell, J. (2000) Corpus-based analysis of evaluative lexis. In S. Hunston and G. Thompson (eds.). 38-55
12. Charles, M. (2003) 'This mystery...': A corpus-based study of the use of nouns to construct stance in theses from two contrasting disciplines. Journal of English for academic purposes 2: 313-326
13. Coates, J. (1983) The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm
14. Conrad, S. and D. Biber (2000) Adverbial marking of stance in speech and writing. In S. Hunston and G. Thompson (eds.). 56-73
15. Dixon, R.M.W (1991) A new approach to English grammar, on semantic principles. Oxford: Clarendon
16. Downes, W. (2000) The language of felt experience: Emotional, evaluative and intuitive. Language and literature 9: 99-121
17. Ellsworth, P. C. and K. Scherer (2003) Appraisal processes in emotion. In R.J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer and H. Hill Goldsmith (eds.) Handbook of affective sciences. Oxford: OUP 572-595
18. Francis, G. (1995) Corpus-driven grammar and its relevance to the learning of English in a cross-cultural situation. Unpublished manuscript
19. Graham, P. (2003) Critical discourse analysis and evaluative meaning: Interdisciplinarity as a critical turn. In G. Weiss and R. Wodak (eds.) Critical discourse analysis: Theory and interdisciplinarity. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. 110-129
20. Greenbaum, S. (1969) Studies in English adverbial usage. London: Longman
21. Halliday, M.A.K. (1994) An introduction to functional grammar. 2nd ed. London: Edward Arnold
22. Halliday, M.A.K. and M.I.M Matthiessen (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. 3rd revised ed. London: Arnold
23. Hermerén, L. (1978) On modality in English: A study of the semantics of the modals. (Lund studies in English, 53.) Lund: CWK Gleerup
24. Hunston, S. (1993) Professional conflict: Disagreement in academic discourse. In M. Baker, G. Francio and E. Tognini-Bonelli (eds.) Text and technology: In honour of John Sinclair. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 115-134
25. Hunston, S. (1994) Evaluation and organization in a sample of written academic discourse. In M. Coulthard (ed.) Advances in written text analysis. London: Routledge. 191-218
26. Hunston, S. (2000) Evaluation and the planes of discourse: Status and value in persuasive texts. In S. Hunston and G. Thompson (eds.). 176-207
27. Hunston, S. and G. Thompson (eds.) (2000) Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: OUP
28. Hyland, K. (1999) Disciplinary discourses: Writer stance in research articles. In N. Candlin and K. Hyland (eds.) Writing: Texts, processes and practices. London: Longman. 99-121
29. Lemke, J.L. (1992) Interpersonal meaning in discourse: Value orientations. In M. Davies and L. Ravelli (eds.) Advances in systemic linguistics: Recent theory and practice. London: Pinter. 82-194
30. Lemke, J.L. (1998) Resources for attitudinal meaning: Evaluative orientations in text semantics. Functions of language 5.1: 33-56
31. Macken-Horarik, M. (2003) Envoi: Intractable issues in appraisal analysis? Text 23: 313-319
32. Macken-Horarik, M. and J.R. Martin (eds.) (2003) Special issue of Text 23/2 on appraisal
33. Malrieu, J.P. (1999) Evaluative semantics: Cognition, language and ideology. (Routledge frontiers of cognitive science, 3.) London: Routledge
34. Marino, M. (1994) Irony. In R.E. Asher (ed.) The encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon. 1776-1778
35. Martin, J.R. (2000) Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In S. Hunston and G. Thompson (eds.). 142-175
36. Martin, J.R. (2004) Mourning: How we get aligned. Discourse & society 15/2-3: 321-344
37. Martin, J.R. and D. Rose (2003) Working with discourse. Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum
38. Martin, J.R. and P.R.R. White (2005) The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave/Macmillan
39. Mittmann, B. (2005) A big deal or not too bad? Evaluation in spoken British and American conversation. Paper presented at the international conference on evaluation and text types, July 2005, Augsburg (Germany)
40. Palmer, F.R. (1995) Modality and the English modals. 3rd ed. London: Longman
41. Palmer, F.R. (2001) Mood and modality. 2nd ed. London: Longman
42. Partington, A. (2004) 'Utterly content in each other's company'. Semantic prosody and semantic preference. International journal of corpus linguistics 9: 131-156
43. Precht, K. (2003) Stance moods in spoken English: Evidentiality and affect in British and American conversation. Text 23: 239-257
44. Rooryck, J. (2001) State-of-the-article: Evidentiality (part 1). Glot international 5/4: 125-133
45. Scheibman, J. (2002) Point of view and grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins
46. Sinclair, J.M. (1991) Corpus concordance collocation. Oxford: OUP
47. Sinclair, J.M. (1998) The lexical item. In E. Weigand (ed.) Contrastive lexical semantics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 1-24
48. Sperber, D. and D. Wilson (1981) Irony and the use-mention distinction. In P. Cole (ed.). Radical pragmatics. New York: Academic Press. 295-318
49. Thetela, P. (1997) Evaluated entities and parameters of value in academic research articles. English for specific purposes 16: 101-118
50. Thompson, G. and S. Hunston (2000) Evaluation: An introduction. In S. Hunston and G. Thompson (eds.). 1-27
51. Vestergaard, T. (2000) From genre to sentence: The leading article and its linguistic realization. In F. Ungerer (ed.) English media texts past and present: Language and textual structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 151-176
52. White, P.R.R. (1998) Telling media tales: The news story as rhetoric. Unpublished PhD thesis. Sydney: University of Sydney
53. White, P.R.R. (2001) Appraisal outline. Unpublished manuscript, http://www.grammatics.com/ appraisal (word document). Accessed 1 July 2004
54. White, P.R.R. (2002) Appraisal. In J. Verschueren, J.-O. Östman, J. Blommaert and C. Bulcaen (eds.) Handbook of pragmatics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 1-27