Identification impossible? A corpus approach to realisations of evaluative meaning in academic writing

Functions of Language

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 115-130

  Römer, Ute ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85047696848     PISSN: 0929998X     EISSN: 15699765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/fol.15.1.07rom     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Aijmer, K. (2005) Evaluation and pragmatic markers. In E. Tognini Bonelli and G. Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds.) Strategies in academic discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 83-96
2. Bamford, J. (2005) Subjective or objective evaluation? Prediction in academic lectures. In E. Tognini Bonelli and G. Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds.) Strategies in academic discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 17-29
3. Barlow, M. (2004) Collocate 1.0: Locating collocations and terminology. Houston, TX: Athelstan
4. Brazil, D. (1995) A grammar of speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press
5. Burnard, L. (2003) Reference guide for BNC-baby. Oxford: Oxford University Computing Services
6. Conrad, S. and D. Biber (2000) Adverbial marking of stance in speech and writing. In S. Hunston and G. Thompson (eds.) Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 56-73
7. Del Lungo Camiciotti, G. and E. Tognini Bonelli (eds.) (2004) Academic discourse: New insights into evaluation. Bern: Peter Lang
8. Diani, G. (2004) Evaluation in academic review articles. In A. Partington, J. Morley, and L. Haarman (eds.) Corpora and discourse. Bern: Peter Lang. 189-203
9. Fortanet Gómez, I. (2004) Verbal stance in spoken academic discourse. In G. Del Lungo Camiciotti and E. Tognini Bonelli (eds.) Academic discourse: New insights into evaluation. Bern: Peter Lang. 99-119
10. Freddi, M. (2005) From corpus to register: The construction of evaluation and argumentation in linguistics textbooks. In E. Tognini Bonelli and G. Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds.) Strategies in academic discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 133-151
11. Hunston, S. (1993) Evaluation and ideology in scientific writing. In M. Ghadessy (ed.). Register analysis: Theory and practice. London: Pinter. 57-73
12. Hunston, S. (2004) Counting the uncountable: Problems of identifying evaluation in a text and in a corpus. In A. Partington, J. Morley, and L. Haarman (eds.) Corpora and discourse. Bern: Peter Lang. 157-188
13. Hunston, S. (2005) Conflict and consensus: Construing opposition in applied linguistics. In E. Tognini Bonelli and G. Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds.) Strategies in academic discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 1-15
14. Hunston, S. and J. McH. Sinclair (2000) A local grammar of evaluation. In S. Hunston and G. Thompson (eds.). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 74-101
15. Hyland, K. (1999) Disciplinary discourses: Writer stance in research articles. In C. Candlin and K. Hyland (eds.). Writing: Texts, processes and practices. London: Longman. 99-121
16. Hyland, K. (2000) Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Harlow: Longman
17. Martin, J. R. (2000) Beyond exchange: APPRAISAL systems in English. In S. Hunston and G. Thompson (eds.) Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 142-175
18. Mauranen, A. (2004) Where next? A summary of the round table discussion. In G. Del Lungo Camiciotti and E. Tognini Bonelli (eds.) Academic discourse: New insights into evaluation. Bern: Peter Lang. 203-215
19. Oakey, D. (2005) Academic vocabulary in academic discourse: The phraseological behaviour of EVALUATION in economics research articles. In E. Tognini Bonelli and G. Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds.) Strategies in academic discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 169-183
20. Römer, U. (2005) "This seems somewhat counterintuitive, though...": Negative evaluation in linguistic book reviews by male and female authors. In E. Tognini Bonelli and G. Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds.) Strategies in academic discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 97-115
21. Scott, M. (1999) WordSmith tools (Version 3.0). Oxford: Oxford University Press
22. Shaw, P. (2004) How do we recognise implicit evaluation in academic book reviews? In G. Del Lungo Camiciotti and E. Tognini Bonelli (eds.) Academic discourse: New insights into evaluation. Bern: Peter Lang. 121-140
23. Stubbs, M. (2001) Words and phrases: Corpus studies of lexical semantics. Oxford: Blackwell
24. Suárez Tejerina, L. (2005) Is evaluation structure-bound? An English-Spanish contrastive study of book reviews. In E. Tognini Bonelli and G. Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds.) Strategies in academic discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 117-132
25. Swales, J. (2004) Evaluation in academic speech: First forays. In G. Del Lungo Camiciotti and E. Tognini Bonelli (eds.) Academic discourse: New insights into evaluation. Bern: Peter Lang. 31-53
26. Thompson, G. and S. Hunston (2000) Evaluation: An introduction. In S. Hunston and G. Thompson (eds.) Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1-27
27. Tognini Bonelli, E. and G. Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds.) (2005) Strategies in academic discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins