Corpus Linguistics and Systemic Functional Linguistics: Interpersonal Meaning, Identity and Bonding in Popular Culture*

New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 237-266

  Bednarek, Monika ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85203995668     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (98)

1. Ameka, F. (1992), ‘Interjections: the universal yet neglected part of speech’. Journal of Pragmatics, 18, 101-18.
2. Anderson, B. (1983), Imagined Communities. London: Verso.
3. Baker, P. (2006), Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London/New York: Continuum.
4. Baldry, A. and Thibault, P. (2006), ‘Multimodal corpus linguistics’, in G. Thompson and S. Hunston (eds), System and Corpus. Exploring Connections. London: Equinox, 164-83.
5. Bartsch, S., Eckart, R., Holtz, M. and Teich, E. (2005), ‘Corpus-based register profiling of texts from mechanical engineering’, in Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference CL 2005 (ISSN 1747-9398), University of Birmingham, UK 14-17 July 2005, http://www.corpus.bham.ac.uk/PCLC/, last accessed 10/12/08.
6. Bartsch, S. (2007), ‘Intermodal relations in multimodal text’, in M. Davies, P. Rayson, S. Hunston and P. Danielsson (eds), Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference CL 2007, University of Birmingham, UK 27-30 July 2007. http://www. corpus.bham.ac.uk/corplingproceedings07/, last accessed 22/9/08.
7. Bateman, J. and O’Donnell, M. (2007), ‘SFL in computational contexts: a contemporary history’, in R. Hasan, C. Matthiessen and J. Webster (eds), Continuing Discourse on Language. A Functional Perspective. London: Equinox, 343-82.
8. Bednarek, M. (2006), Evaluation in Media Discourse. London/New York:Continuum.
9. Bednarek, M. (2007), ‘Corpus, cognition and SFL: re, ections on individuation, instantiation and bonding’. Paper presented at the University of Sydney postgraduate research seminar, 15 May 2007.
10. Bednarek, M. (2008a), '“An increasingly familiar tragedy” evaluative collocation and con, ation’. Functions of Language, 15/1, 7-34.
11. Bednarek, M. (2008b), ‘Semantic preference and semantic prosody re-examined’. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 4/2, 119-39.
12. Bednarek, M. (2008c), '“What the hell is wrong with you?" A corpus perspective on evaluation and emotion in contemporary American pop culture’, in A. Mahboob and N. Knight (eds), Questioning Linguistics. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 95-126.
13. Bednarek, M. (2008d), Emotion Talk Across Corpora. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
14. Bednarek, M. (forthcoming), The Language of Fictional Television: Drama and Identity. London/New York: Continuum.
15. Bednarek, M., Caple, H. and Hood, S. (2008), ‘Communicating a sustainable Australia: discourses of persuasion’, unpublished ms, University of Technology, Sydney.
16. Benwell, B. and Stokoe, E. (2006), Discourse and Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
17. Bloom, K., Garg, N. and Argamon, S. (2007), ‘Extracting appraisal expressions’. Proceedings of HLT/NAACL 2007, April 2007, Rochester, NY: http://lingcog.iit. edu/doc/bloom_naacl2007.pdf.
18. Bubel, C. (2006), The Linguistic Construction of Character Relations in TV Drama: Doing Friendship in Sex and the City. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Saarbrücken, Germany: Universität des Saarlandes.
19. Butler, J. (1999), Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York/New York: Routledge.
20. Butler, C. (2004), ‘Corpus studies and functional linguistic theories’. Functions of Language, 11, 147-86.
21. Butt, D. (forthcoming), ‘Some basic tools in a linguistic approach to personality’, in D. Butt and C. M. I. M. Matthiessen, The Meaning Potential of Language: Mapping Meaning Systematically.
22. Calvin, R. (2008) (ed.), Gilmore Girls and the Politics of Identity: Essays on Family and Feminism in the Television Series. Jefferson: McFarland and Company.
23. Caple, H. (2008), ‘Intermodal relations in image-nuclear news stories’, in L. Unsworth (ed.), Multimodal Semiotics: Functional Analysis in Contexts of Education. London: Continuum, 125-38.
24. Caple, H. and Bednarek, M. (forthcoming), ‘Double-take: unpacking the play in the multimodal news story’. Visual Communication.
25. Coffin, C. and O’Halloran, K. (2006), ‘The role of appraisal and corpora in detecting covert evaluation’. Functions of Language, 13/1, 77-110.
26. Cohen, A. P. (1985), The Symbolic Construction of Community. London: Tavistock.
27. Culpeper, J. (2001), Language and Characterisation. People in Plays and Other Texts. Harlow etc.: Longman.
28. Eggins, S. and Slade, D. (1997), Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Cassell.
29. Fries, P. (2008), ‘Charles C. Fries, linguistics and corpus linguistics’, Proceedings from the Nineteenth European Systemic Functional Linguistics Conference and Workshop, 1-22. http://scidok.sulb.uni-saarland.de/volltexte/2008/1687/, last accessed 23/9/08.
30. Giddens, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.
31. Giddens, A. (1993), Sociology (second, revised edition). Oxford: Polity Press in association with Blackwell.
32. Halliday, M. A. K. (2005a), ‘Corpus studies and probabilistic grammar’, in M. A. K. Halliday, Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday, Volume 6: Computational and Quantitative Studies. Edited by J. Webster. London: Continuum, 63-75 [originally published in 1991].
33. Halliday, M. A. K. (2005b), ‘Quantitative studies and probabilities in grammar’, in M. A. K. Halliday, Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday, Volume 6: Computational and Quantitative Studies. Edited by J. Webster. London: Continuum, 130-56.
34. Halliday, M. A. K. (2005c), Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday, Volume 6: Computational and Quantitative Studies. London: Continuum.
35. Halliday, M. A. K. and James, Z. L. (2005), ‘A quantitative study of polarity and primary tense in the English finite clause’, in M. A. K. Halliday, Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday, Volume 6: Computational and Quantitative Studies. Edited by J. Webster. London: Continuum, 93-129.
36. Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1999), Construing Experience through Meaning: a Language-based Approach to Cognition. London: Cassell.
37. Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004), An Introduction to Functional Grammar (third edition). London: Arnold.
38. Hansen-Schirra, S., Neumann, S. and Steiner, E. (2007), ‘Cohesive explicitness and explicitation in an English-German translation corpus’. Languages in Contrast, 7/2, 241-65.
39. Hasan, R. (2002), ‘Ways of meaning, ways of learning: code as an explanatory concept’. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23/4, 537-48.
40. Hood, S. (forthcoming), ‘Gestures and making meaning in face-to-face teaching’, in S. Dreyfus, S. Hood and M. Stenglin (eds), Semiotic Margins. London: Equinox.
41. Hoey, M. (2005), Lexical Priming. London/New York: Routledge.
42. Holmes, J. and Schnurr, S. (2005), ‘Politeness, humor and gender in the workplace:Negotiating norms and identifying contestation’. Journal of Politeness Research, 1, 121-49.
43. Holtz, M. (2007), ‘Corpus-based analysis of verb/noun collocations in interdisciplinary registers’, in M. Davies, P. Rayson, S. Hunston and P. Danielsson (eds), Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference CL 2007, University of Birmingham, UK 27-30 July 2007. http://corpus.bham.ac.uk/corplingproceedings07/paper/14_Paper.pdf, last accessed 22/9/08.
44. Hunston, S. (2002), Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Hunston, S. (2006), ‘Phraseology and system: a contribution to the debate’, in G. Thompson, and S. Hunston (eds), System and Corpus. Exploring Connections. London: Equinox, 55-80.
46. Hunston, S. (2007), ‘Semantic prosody revisited’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 12/2, 249-68.
47. Jagger, G. (2008), Judith Butler. Sexual Politics, Social Change and the Power of the Performative. London/New York: Routledge.
48. Kaltenbacher, M. (2007), ‘Systemic functional linguistics and corpus analysis: the language of exaggeration in web-sites of tourism’, in H. Gruber, M. Kaltenbacher and P. Muntigl (eds), Empirical Approaches to Discourse - Empirieorientierte Ansätze in der Diskursanalyse. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 89-117.
49. Kitis, E. and Milapides, M. (1996), ‘Read it and believe it: how metaphor constructs ideology in news discourse. A case study’. Journal of Pragmatics, 28, 557-90.
50. Knight, N. K. (2008), '“Still cool… and American too!": an SFL analysis of deferred bonds in internet messaging humour’, in N. Nørgaard (ed.), Systemic Functional Linguistics in Use. Odense: Odense Working Papers in Language and Communication, vol. 29, 481-502.
51. Lee, D. (2001), ‘Genres, registers, text types, domains, and styles: clarifying the concepts and navigating a path through the BNC jungle’. Language Learning and Technology, 5, 37-72. (Available to download at http://llt.msu.edu/vol5num3/lee/, last accessed 20 October 2005.)
52. Lemke, J. L. (1993), ‘Discourse, dynamics, and social change’. Cultural Dynamics, 6(1), 243-75.
53. Louw, B. (1993), ‘Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer?', in M. Baker, G. Francis and E. Tognini-Bonelli (eds), Text and Technology. In Honour of John Sinclair. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 157-76.
54. Lukin, A. and Webster, J. (2005), ‘Stylistics in the Systemic Functional Linguistics tradition’, in R. Hasan, C. M. I. M. Matthiessen and J. Webster (eds), Continuing Discourse on Language, Volume 1. London: Equinox, 413-556.
55. Martin, J. R. (2000), ‘Beyond exchange: appraisal systems in English’, in S. Hunston and G. Thompson (eds), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 142-75.
56. Martin, J. R. (2007), ‘Genre, ideology and intertextuality: a systemic functional perspective’. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 2/2, 275-98.
57. Martin, J. R. (2008), ‘Innocence: realization, instantiation and individuation in a Botswanan town’, in A. Mahboob and N. Knight (eds), Questioning Linguistics. Newcastle:Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 32-76.
58. Martin, J. R. and White, P. R. R. (2005), The Language of Evaluation. Appraisal in English. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
59. Martinec, R. (2001), ‘Interpersonal resources in action’. Semiotica, 135/1 (4), 117-45.
60. Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1993), ‘Instantial systems and logogenesis’. Paper presented at the Third Chinese Systemic-Functional symposium, Hangzhou, 17-20 June 1993. Unpublished ms, draft 15/ix/93.
61. Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1998), ‘Lexicogrammar and collocation: a systemic functional exploration’, ms, Macquarie University, Sydney, draft ii/98, submitted to Issues in English Grammar. Hyderabad: Central Institute of English and Foreign Languages.
62. Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2002), ‘Lexicogrammar in discourse development: logogenetic patterns of wording’, in G. Huang and Z. Wang (eds), Discourse and Language Functions. Shanghai: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2-25.
63. Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2006), ‘Frequency profiles of some basic grammatical systems: an interim report’, in S. Hunston and G. Thompson (eds), System and Corpus: Exploring Connections. London: Equinox, 103-42.
64. Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2007), ‘The “architecture” of language according to systemic functional theory: developments since the 1970s’, in R. Hasan, C. M. I. M. Matthiessen and J. Webster (eds), Continuing Discourse on Language. A Functional Perspective. London: Equinox, 505-62.
65. Nesbitt, C. and Plum, G. (1988), ‘Probabilities in a systemic-functional grammar’, in R. P. Fawcett and D. J. Young (eds), New Developments in Systemic Linguistics, Vol. 2. London: Pinter, 6-38.
66. Neumann, S. (2008), Contrastive Register Variation. A Quantitative Approach to the Comparison of English and German. Habilitationsschrift. Saarbrücken: Universität des Saarlandes.
67. Neumann, S. (forthcoming), ‘Quantitative register analysis across languages’, in E. Swain (ed.), Thresholds and Potentialities of Systemic Functional Linguistics: Applications to Other Disciplines, Specialised Discourses and Languages Other than English. Trieste:Edizioni Universitarie.
68. Partington, A. (2004), '“Utterly content in each other’s company”. Semantic prosody and semantic preference’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9, 131-56.
69. Plum, G. and Cowling, A. (1987), ‘Social constraints on grammatical variables: tense choice in English’, in R. Steele and T. Threadgold (eds), Language Topics. Essays in Honour of Michael Halliday, Vol II. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 281-305.
70. Precht, K. (2006), ‘Gender differences and similarities in stance in informal American conversation’. Unpublished ms, Kent State University. Available at http://kprecht.net/MyWork/Precht%20Gender%202006.pdf, last accessed 23/9/08.
71. Ridinger-Dotterman, A. (2008), ‘Reinventing the bitch: the dynamicism of Paris Geller’, in R. Calvin (ed.), Gilmore Girls and the Politics of Identity: Essays on Family and Feminism in the Television Series. Jefferson: McFarland and Company, 50-62.
72. Salih, S. (2006), ‘On Judith Butler and performativity’, in K. F. Lovass and M. M. Jenkins (eds), Sexualities and Communication in Everyday Life. A Reader. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 55-68.
73. Scott, M. (1998), Wordsmith Tools. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
74. Scott, M. and Tribble, C. (2006), Textual Patterns. Key Words and Corpus Analysis in Language Education. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
75. Sinclair, J. (2004a), Design and Management of Corpora. Workshop, University of Birmingham, UK, May 2004.
76. Sinclair, J. (2004b), Trust the Text. Language, Corpus and Discourse. London/New York:Routledge.
77. Sinclair, J. (2005), ‘Corpus and text - basic principles’, in M. Wynne (ed.), Developing Linguistic Corpora. A Guide to Good Practice. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 1-16.
78. Smith-Rowsey, D. (2008), ‘Still more Gilmore: How internet fan communities remediate Gilmore Girls’, in R. Calvin (ed.), Gilmore Girls and the Politics of Identity. Jefferson: McFarland, 193-204.
79. Steiner, E. (2001), ‘Translations English-German: investigating the relative importance of systemic contrasts and of the text-type “translation”'. SPRIKreports, 7, http://www.hf.uio.no/german/sprik, last accessed 19 September 2008.
80. Steiner, E. (2004), Translated Texts: Properties, Variants, Evaluations. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
81. Steiner, E. (2008), ‘Empirical studies of translations as a mode of language contact. “Explicitness” of lexicogrammatical encoding as a relevant dimension’, in P. Siemund and N. Kintana (eds), Language Contact and Contact Languages. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 317-41.
82. Stenglin, M. (2004), Packaging Curiosities: Towards a Grammar of Three-dimensional Space. Unpublished PhD thesis. Sydney: University of Sydney.
83. Taboada, M. and Grieve, J. (2004), ‘Analyzing appraisal automatically’, in Exploring Attitude and Affect in Text: Theories and Applications. Papers from 2004 AAAI Spring Symposium. Stanford: Stanford AAAI (American Association for Artificial Intelligence) Technical Reports, http://www.aaai.org/Press/Reports/Symposia/Spring/ss-04-07.html.
84. Teich, E. (1999), Systemic Functional Grammar in Natural Language Generation: Linguistic Description and Computational Representation. London/Washington: Cassell.
85. Teich, E. (2009), ‘Linguistic computing’, in M. A. K. Halliday and J. Webster (eds), Companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Equinox, 113-27.
86. Teich, E. and Fankhauser, P. (2005), ‘Exploring lexical patterns in text: lexical cohesion analysis with WordNet’, in S. Dipper, M. Götze and M. Stede (eds), Heterogeneity in Focus: Creating and Using Linguistic Databases. Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure Vol. 2. Potsdam: Universität Potsdam, 129-45.
87. Teich, E., Bateman, J. A. and Eckart, R. (2006a), ‘Corpus annotation by generation’, in Proceedings of the Workshop on Frontiers in Linguistically Annotated Corpora 2006, Sydney, July 2006. Association for Computational Linguistics, 86-93.
88. Teich, E., Eckart, R. and Holtz, M. (2006b), ‘Systemic functional corpus resources:issues in development and deployment’, in Proceedings of the Fifth International Treebanks and Linguistic Theories Conference (TLT 06). Prague, December 2006, 247-58.
89. Teich, E., Fankhauser, P., Eckart, R., Bartsch, S. and Holtz, M. (2005), ‘Representing SFL-annotated corpus resources’, in Proceedings of the First Computational Systemic Functional Workshop. Sydney, 2005.
90. Thompson, G. and Hunston, S. (2000), ‘Evaluation: an introduction’, in S. Hunston and G. Thompson (eds), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1-27.
91. Thompson, G. and Hunston, S. (2006) (eds), System and Corpus. Exploring Connections. London: Equinox.
92. Tracy, K. (2002), Everyday Talk. Building and ReF ecting Identities. New York/London:The Guilford Press.
93. Tucker, G. (2006), ‘Systemic incorporation: on the relationship between corpus and systemic functional grammar’, in G. Thompson and S. Hunston 2006 (eds), System and Corpus. Exploring Connections. London: Equinox, 1-14.
94. Westman, K. E. (2007), ‘Beauty and the geek: Changing gender stereotypes in the Gilmore Girls’, in S. A. Inness (ed.), Geek Chic: Smart Women in Popular Culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1-10.
95. Wu, C. (2009). ‘Corpus-based research’, in M. A. K. Halliday and J. Webster (eds), Continuum Companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London/New York:Continuum, 128-42.
96. Wynne, M. (ed.) (2005), Developing Linguistic Corpora. A Guide to Good Practice. Oxford: Oxbow Books.
97. Wynne, M. (ed.) (2006), ‘Stylistics: corpus approaches’, in K. Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (second edition) Volume 12. Oxford: Elsevier, 223-6.
98. Zappavigna, M., Dwyer, P. and Martin, J. R. (2008), ‘Syndromes of meaning:exploring patterned coupling in a NSW Youth Justice Conference’, in A. Mahboob and N. Knight (eds), Questioning Linguistics. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 164-85.