A scoping review of 20 years of research on differentiation: investigating conceptualisation, characteristics, and methods used

Review of Education

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2021, Pages 161-198

  Graham, Linda J ^a   de Bruin, Kate ^b   Lassig, Carly ^a   Spandagou, Ilektra ^c  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

differentiation; inclusive education; student diversity; teacher practices

Indexed keywords

EID: 85140819703     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20496613     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rev3.3238     Document Type: Review

References (100)

1. *Adami, A. F. (2004) Enhancing students' learning through differentiated approaches to teaching and learning: A Maltese perspective, Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 4(2), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2004.00023.x
2. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (2017). Australian Professional Standards for Teachers. Available at: https://www.aitsl.edu.au/teach/standards
3. *Beecher, M. & Sweeny, S. M. (2008) Closing the achievement gap with curriculum enrichment and differentiation: One school's story, Journal of Advanced Academics, 19(3), 502–530. https://doi.org/10.4219/jaa-2008-815
4. Bondie, R. S., Dahnke, C. & Zusho, A. (2019) How does changing “one-size-fits-all” to differentiated instruction affect teaching?, Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 336–362. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18821130
5. *Chien, C. (2015) Analysis of Taiwanese elementary school English teachers' perceptions of, designs of, and knowledge constructed about differentiated instruction in content. Cogent Education, 2(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2015.1111040
6. Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E. & Ecclestone, K. (2004) Should we be using learning styles? What research has to say to practice. Available at: http://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv:12401
7. st century. Abingdon, Oxon.: (Routledge).79–99.
8. *deJager, T. (2017) Perspectives of teachers on differentiated teaching in multi-cultural South African secondary schools, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53, 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.08.004
9. Delisle, J. R. (2016) Differentiation doesn't work, Spotlight on Differentiated Instruction: Education Week, 7(30), 15–16. https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2015/01/07/differentiation-doesnt-work.html
10. *De Neve, D. & Devos, G. (2016) The role of environmental factors in beginning teachers' professional learning related to differentiated instruction, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 27(4), 357–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2015.1122637
11. *De Neve, D. & Devos, G. (2017) How do professional learning communities aid and hamper professional learning of beginning teachers related to differentiated instruction?, Teachers and Teaching, 23(3), 262–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1206524
12. *De Neve, D., Devos, G. & Tuytens, M. (2015) The importance of job resources and self-efficacy for beginning teachers' professional learning in differentiated instruction, Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.12.003
13. Deunk, M. I., Smale-Jacobse, A. E., de Boer, H., Doolaard, S. & Bosker, R. J. (2018) Effective differentiation practices: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on the cognitive effects of differentiation practices in primary education, Educational Research Review, 24, 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.02.002
14. Didau, D. (2015) What if everything you knew about education was wrong? (Carmarthen, Crown House Publishing).
15. Dijkstra, E. M., Walraven, A., Mooij, T. & Kirschner, P. A. (2016) Improving kindergarten teachers’ differentiation practices to better anticipate student differences, Educational Studies, 42(4), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2016.1195719
16. *Dixon, F. A., Yssel, N., McConnell, J. M. & Hardin, T. (2014) Differentiated instruction, professional development, and teacher efficacy, Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353214529042
17. *Edwards, C. J., Carr, S. & Siegel, W. (2006) Influences of experiences and training on effective teaching practices to meet the needs of diverse learners in schools. Education, 126(3), 580–592.
18. *Ernest, J. M., Thompson, S. E., Heckaman, K. A., Hull, K. & Yates, J. (2011) Effects and social validity of differentiated instruction on student outcomes for special educators. Journal of the International Association of Special Education, 12(1), 33.
19. *Eysink, T. H. S., Hulsbeek, M. & Gijlers, H. (2017) Supporting primary school teachers in differentiating in the regular classroom, Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.002
20. *Förster, N., Kawohl, E. & Souvignier, E. (2018) Short- and long-term effects of assessment-based differentiated reading instruction in general education on reading fluency and reading comprehension, Learning & Instruction, 56, 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.04.009
21. Florian, L. (2008) Inclusion: special or inclusive education: Future trends, British Journal of Special Education, 35(4), 202–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8578.2008.00402.x
22. *Gaitas, S. & Alves Martins, M. (2017) Teacher perceived difficulty in implementing differentiated instructional strategies in primary school, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(5), 544–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2016.1223180
23. Geake, J. (2008) Neuromythologies in education, Educational Research, 50(2), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880802082518
24. Gibb, N. (2016) Getting the basics right in mathematics, Speech delivered at Elmhurst Primary School by England’s Schools Minister. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/getting-the-basics-right-in-mathematics
25. *Goddard, Y., Goddard, R. & Kim, M. (2015) School instructional climate and student achievement: An examination of group norms for differentiated instruction, American Journal of Education, 122(1), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1086/683293
26. *Goddard, Y. L. & Kim, M. (2018) Examining connections between teacher perceptions of collaboration, differentiated instruction, and teacher efficacy. Teachers College Record, 120(1), 90–103.
27. Graham, L. J., Medhurst, M., Malaquias, C., Tancredi, H., de Bruin, K., Gillett-Swan, J. K. et al (2020) Beyond Salamanca: A citation analysis of the CRPD/GC4 relative to the Salamanca Statement in inclusive and special education research, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1831627
28. Graham, L. J., Tancredi, H. A., Willis, J. E. & McGraw, K. A. (2018) Designing out barriers to student access and participation in secondary school assessment, Australian Educational Researcher, 45(1), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0266-y
29. Goddard, R. D. & Goddard, Y. L. (2001) A multilevel analysis of the relationship between teacher and collective efficacy in urban schools, Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 807–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00032-4
30. Hasbrouck, J. E. & Tindal, G. (1992) Curriculum-based oral reading fluency norms for students in grades 2 through 5, Teaching Exceptional Children, 24(3), 41–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005999202400310
31. Hasbrouck, J. E., & Tindal, G. (2005). Oral reading fluency: 90 years of measurement. (Technical Report #33). Eugene: University of Oregon.
32. *Hertberg-Davis, H. L. & Brighton, C. M. (2006) Support and sabotage: Principals’ influence on middle school teachers’ responses to differentiation, The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(2), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2006-685
33. Howard-Jones, P. A. (2014) Neuroscience and education: Myths and messages, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15, 817–824. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3817
34. Hulpia, H., Devos, G. & Rosseel, Y. (2009) Development and Validation of Scores on the Distributed Leadership Inventory, Educational and Psychological Measurement., 69(6), 1013–1034. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409344490
35. *Jarvis, J. M., Bell, M. & Sharp, K. (2016) Leadership for differentiation: An appreciative inquiry of how educational leadership shapes pedagogical change, Leading and Managing, 22(1), 75–91.
36. Jacob, R., Goddard, R., Kim, M., Miller, R. & Goddard, Y. (2015) Exploring the Causal Impact of the McREL Balanced Leadership Program on Leadership, Principal Efficacy, Instructional Climate, Educator Turnover, and Student Achievement, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(3), 314–332. https://doi.org/10.3102/016237371454962010
37. Jindal-Snape, D., Hannah, E. F., Cantali, D., Barlow, W. & MacGillivray, S. (2020) Systematic literature review of primary-secondary transitions: International research, Review of Education, 8(2), 526–566.
38. *Kaur, A., Noman, M. & Awang-Hashim, R. (2019) Exploring and evaluating differentiated assessment practices of in-service teachers for components of differentiation, Teaching Education, 30(2), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2018.1455084
39. Klitmøller, J. (2015) Review of the methods and findings in the Dunn and Dunn learning styles model research on perceptual preferences, Nordic Psychology, 67(1), 2–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/19012276.2014.997783
40. Landrum, T. J. & McDuffie, K. A. (2010) Learning styles in the age of differentiated instruction, Exceptionality, 18(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362830903462441
41. Leahy, W. & Sweller, J. (2016) Cognitive load theory and the effects of transient information on the modality effect, Instructional Science, 44(1), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-015-9362-9
42. Lehmann, R. H., Peek, R., & Poerschke, J. (2006). Hamburger Lesetest für 3. und 4. Klassen (HAMLET 3–4) [Hamburger Reading Test for grade 3 and 4]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
43. Liem, G. A. D., Marsh, H. W., Martin, A. J., McInerney, D. M. & Yeung, A. S. (2013) The big-fish-little-pond effect and a national policy of within-school ability streaming: Alternative frames of reference, American Educational Research Journal, 50(2), 326–370. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212464511
44. Little, C. A., Fogarty, E. A., & Reis, S. M. (2005). SEM-R observation scale. Storrs, CT: Schoolwide Enrichment Model-Reading project, Neag Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development, University of Connecticut.
45. Louis, K., Dretzke, B., & Wahlstrom, K. (2010) How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national US survey, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21:3, 315–336, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2010.486586
46. Maulana, R., Helms-Lorenz, M. & van de Grift, W. (2015) Pupils’ perceptions of teaching behaviour: Evaluation of an instrument and importance for academic motivation in Indonesian secondary education, International Journal of Educational Research, 69, 98–112.
47. Mayringer, H., & Wimmer, H. (2003). SLS –. Salzburger Lese-Screening für die Klassenstufen 1–4. [Salzburger Reading-Screening for grade 1–4]. Bern: Huber.
48. *Little, C. A., McCoach, D. B. & Reis, S. M. (2014) Effects of differentiated reading instruction on student achievement in middle school, Journal of Advanced Academics, 25(4), 384–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X14549250
49. McKenna, M. C. & Kear, D. J. (1990) Measuring attitude toward reading: A new tool for teachers, Reading Teacher, 43(9), 626–639. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20200500
50. *Maeng, J. L. (2017) Using technology to facilitate differentiated high school science instruction, Research in Science Education, 47(5), 1075–1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9546-6
51. MacGinitie, W. H., MacGinitie, R. K., Maria, K. & Dreyer, L. G. (2000) Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests, 4th edn (Itasca, IL, Riverside).
52. Marshall, K. (2016) Rethinking differentiation—Using teachers’ time most effectively, Phi Delta Kappan, 98(1), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721716666046
53. *Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Norland, J. J., Berkeley, S., McDuffie, K., Tornquist, E. H. & et al (2006) Differentiated curriculum enhancement in inclusive middle school science: Effects on classroom and high-stakes tests, The Journal of Special Education, 40(3), 130–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669060400030101
54. *Mills, M., Monk, S., Keddie, A., Renshaw, P., Christie, P., Geelan, D.et al (2014) Differentiated learning: From policy to classroom, Oxford Review of Education, 40(3), 331–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2014.911725
55. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J. & Altman, D. (2009) Reprint–preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement, Physical Therapy, 89(9), 873–880. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/89.9.873
56. Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A. & Aromataris, E. (2018) Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach, BMC medical research methodology, 18(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
57. Ok, M. W., Rao, K., Bryant, B. R. & McDougall, D. (2017) Universal design for learning in pre-k to grade 12 classrooms: A systematic review of research, Exceptionality, 25(2), 116–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2016.1196450
58. *Park, V. & Datnow, A. (2017) Ability grouping and differentiated instruction in an era of data-driven decision making, American Journal of Education, 123(2), 281–306. https://doi.org/10.1086/689930
59. Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D. & Bjork, R. (2009) Learning styles: Concepts and evidence, Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x
60. Pearson, L. C. & Moomaw, W. (2006) Continuing validation of the teaching autonomy scale, Journal of Educational Research, 100(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.3200/joer.100.1.44-51
61. Pham, M. T., Rajić, A., Greig, J. D., Sargeant, J. M., Papadopoulos, A. & McEwen, S. A. (2014) A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency, Research Synthesis Methods, 5(4), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1123
62. Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M. et al. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: A product from the ESRC methods programme. Lancaster, UK.: Lancaster University, 1–92. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1018.4643
63. *Puzio, K., Newcomer, S. N. & Goff, P. (2015) Supporting literacy differentiation: The principal’s role in a community of practice, Literacy Research and Instruction, 54(2), 135–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2014.997944
64. Rao, K. & Meo, G. (2016) Using universal design for learning to design standards-based lessons, Sage Open, 6(4), 215824401668068. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016680688
65. *Raveaud, M. (2005) Hares, tortoises and the social construction of the pupil: Differentiated learning in French and English primary schools, British Educational Research Journal, 31(4), 459–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920500148697
66. *Reis, S. M., Eckert, R. D., McCoach, D. B., Jacobs, J. K. & Coyne, M. (2008) Using enrichment reading practices to increase reading fluency, comprehension, and attitudes, The Journal of Educational Research, 101(5), 299–314. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.101.5.299-315
67. *Reis, S., McCoach, D. B., Coyne, M., Schreiber, F., Eckert, R. & Gubbins, E. (2007) Using planned enrichment strategies with direct instruction to improve reading fluency, comprehension, and attitude toward reading: An Evidence-Based study, The Elementary School Journal, 108(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1086/522383
68. *Reis, S. M., McCoach, D. B., Little, C. A., Muller, L. M. & Kaniskan, R. B. (2011) The effects of differentiated instruction and enrichment pedagogy on reading achievement in five elementary schools, American Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 462–501. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210382891
69. *Roiha, A. (2014) Teachers' views on differentiation in content and language integrated learning (CLIL): Perceptions, practices and challenges, Language and Education, 28(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2012.748061
70. Rose, P. (2015) Three lessons for educational quality in post-2015 goals and targets: Clarity, measurability and equity, International Journal of Educational Development, 40, 289–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2014.11.006
71. Rose, D. H. & Meyer, A. (2002) Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Alexandria, Virginia: (Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development).
72. *Scott, W. & Spencer, F. (2006) Professional development for inclusive differentiated teaching practice, Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404150609546806
73. *Shaunessy-Dedrick, E., Evans, L., Ferron, J. & Lindo, M. (2015) Effects of differentiated reading on elementary students’ reading comprehension and attitudes toward reading, Gifted Child Quarterly, 59(2), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214568718
74. *Smit, R. & Humpert, W. (2012) Differentiated instruction in small schools, Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(8), 1152–1162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.07.003
75. Sparks, S. D. (2016) Differentiated instruction: A primer, Spotlight on Differentiated Instruction: Education Week, 7(30), 7–8.
76. Steenbergen-Hu, S., Makel, M. C. & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2016) What one hundred years of research says about the effects of ability grouping and acceleration on K–12 students’ academic achievement: Findings of two second-order meta-analyses, Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 849–899. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316675417
77. Strauss, V. (2013) Howard Gardner: ‘Multiple intelligences’ are not ‘learning styles’. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2013/10/16/howard-gardner-multiple-intelligences-are-not-learning-styles/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.dd7aa69b530a
78. Tomlinson, C. A. (1995) How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development).
79. Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd edn) (Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development).
80. Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd edn) (Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development).
81. Tomlinson, C. A. (2017) How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms (3rd edn) (Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development).
82. Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Brimijoin, K. et al (2003) Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature, Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(2–3), 119–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320302700203
83. Tomlinson, C. A. & Moon, T. R. (2013) Assessment and student success in a differentiated classroom (Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development).
84. Tomlinson, C. A., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Tomchin, E. M., Landrum, M. & Imbeau, M., …Eiss, N. (1995) Preservice teacher preparation in meeting the needs of gifted and other academically diverse students (Charlottesville, Virginia, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented) https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED429392
85. Tomlinson, C. A. (1999) The Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the Needs of All Learners (Alexandria, Virginia, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development).
86. Tschannen-Moran, M. & Hoy, A. W. (2001) Teacher efficacy: capturing an elusive construct, Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0742-051x(01)00036-1
87. UNESCO (1994) The Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education [Program and meeting document]. World Conference on Special Needs Education (Salamanca, Spain, Access and Quality). Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000098427
88. United Nations Committee (2016) United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, September 2, 2016, General comment No. 4 on Article 24: Right to inclusive education (CRPD/C/GC/4). Available at: https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CRPD/C/GC/4&Lang=en
89. United Nations (2008) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) Retrieved from: https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities/convention-on-the-rightsof-persons-with-disabilities-2.html
90. *VanTassel-Baska, J., Xuemei Feng, A., Brown, E., Bracken, B., Stambaugh, T., French, H.et al (2008) A study of differentiated instructional change over 3 years, Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986208321809
91. VanTassel-Baska, J., Avery, L., Struck, J., Feng, A., Drummond, D. & Stambaugh, T. (2003) The William and Mary Classroom Observation Scales-Revised (COS-R) (Williamsburg, VA, Center for Gifted Education).
92. Varlas, L. (2010) Carol Ann tomlinson on learning styles (ASCD Newsletters and Publications). Available at: http://inservice.ascd.org/carol-ann-tomlinson-on-learning-styles/
93. Wahlstrom, K. & Louis, K. (2008) How Teachers Experience Principal Leadership: The Roles of Professional Community, Trust, Efficacy, and Shared Responsibility, Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 458–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321502
94. Waterhouse, L. (2006) Multiple intelligences, the Mozart Effect, and emotional intelligence: A critical review, Educational Psychologist, 41(4), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4104_1
95. White, M. E., Makkonen, R. & Stewart, K. B. (2009) A multistate review of professional teaching standards (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2009–No. 075) (U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory West). Available at: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs
96. *Whipp, P., Taggart, A. & Jackson, B. (2014) Differentiation in outcome-focused physical education: Pedagogical rhetoric and reality, Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 19(4), 370–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2012.754001
97. Whipple, K. A. (2012). Differentiated instruction: A survey study of teacher understanding and implementation in a southeast Massachusetts school district (Doctoral dissertation, Northeastern University).
98. Woolfolk, A. E. & Hoy, W. K. (1990) Prospective teachers sense of efficacy and beliefs about control, Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 81–91. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ442297.
99. Wormeli, R. (2005) Busting myths about differentiated instruction, Principal Leadership, 5(7), 28–33. http://teachingss.pbworks.com/f/BustingMythsaboutDI.pdf
100. Wu, E. H. (2013) The path leading to differentiation: An interview with Carol Tomlinson, Journal of Advanced Academics, 24(2), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X13483472