Effective differentiation Practices:A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on the cognitive effects of differentiation practices in primary education

Educational Research Review

Volumn 24, Issue , 2018, Pages 31-54

  Deunk, Marjolein I ^a   Smale Jacobse, Annemieke E ^a   de Boer, Hester ^a   Doolaard, Simone ^a   Bosker, Roel J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Ability grouping; Differentiation practices; Meta Analysis; Primary education; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

EID: 85043389637     PISSN: 1747938X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2018.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. References included in the systematic review are marked with an asterisk.
2. Anderson, K.M., Algozzine, B., Tips for teaching: Differentiating instruction to include all students. Preventing School Failure 51:3 (2007), 49–54, 10.3200/PSFL.51.3.49-54.
3. Bosker, R.J., De grenzen van gedifferentieerd onderwijs [The boundaries of differentiated education], 2005, inaugural lecture. 2005, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11370/630067dc-ef3f-479a-a17b-33e826e2ad8a.
4. Deunk, M.I., Doolaard, S., Smale-Jacobse, A.E., Bosker, R.J., Differentiation within and across classrooms: A systematic review of studies into the cognitive effects of differentiation practices. 2015, GION, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands http://hdl.handle.net/11370/32b91640-ff59-4800-abf5-5aabd3ee7719.
5. Belfi, B., Goos, M., De Fraine, B., Van Damme, J., The effect of class composition by gender and ability on secondary school students’ school well-being and academic self-concept: A literature review. Educational Research Review 7 (2012), 62–74, 10.1016/j.edurev.2011.09.002.
6. Blok, H., Adaptief onderwijs: Betekenis en effectiviteit [Adaptive education: Meaning and effectivity]. Pedagogische Studiën 81 (2004), 5–27.
7. Bloom, B.S., Learning for mastery. Bloom, B.S., Hastings, J.T., Madaus, G.F., (eds.) Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning, 1971, McGraw-Hill, New York.
8. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L.V., Higgins, J.P.T., Rothstein, H.R., Introduction to meta-analysis. 2009, Wiley, Chichester, UK, 10.1002/9780470743386.
9. Borman, G.D., Slavin, R.E., Cheung, A.C.K., Chamberlain, A.M., Madden, N.A., Chambers, B., The national randomized field trial of Success for All: Second-year outcomes. American Educational Research Journal 42 (2005), 673–696, 10.3102/00028312042004673.
10. (∗)Borman, G.D., Slavin, R.E., Cheung, A.C.K., Chamberlain, A.M., Madden, N.A., Chambers, B., Final reading outcomes of the national randomized field trial of success for all. American Educational Research Journal 44 (2007), 701–731, 10.3102/0002831207306743.
11. Burris, C.C., Heubert, J.P., Levin, H.M., Accelerating mathematics achievement using heterogeneous grouping. American Educational Research Journal 43 (2006), 105–136, 10.3102/00028312043001105.
12. Chorzempa, B.F., Graham, S., Primary-grade teachers’ use of within-class ability grouping in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology 98 (2006), 529–541, 10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.529.
13. (∗)Condron, D.J., An early start: Skill grouping and unequal reading gains in the elementary years. The Sociological Quarterly 49 (2008), 363–394, 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2008.00119.x.
14. (∗)Connor, C.M., Morrison, F.J., Fishman, B., Giuliani, S., Luck, M., Underwood, P.S., Schatschneider, C., Testing the impact of child characteristics x instruction interactions on third graders’ reading comprehension by differentiating literacy instruction. Reading Research Quarterly 46 (2011), 189–221, 10.1598/RRQ.46.3.1.
15. (∗)Connor, C.M., Morrison, F.J., Fishman, B.J., Schatschneider, C., Underwood, P., Algorithm-guided individualized reading instruction. Science 315 (2007), 464–465, 10.1126/science.1134513.
16. (∗)Connor, C.M., Morrison, F.J., Schatschneider, C., Toste, J.R., Lundblom, E., Crowe, E.C., et al. Effective classroom instruction: Implications of child characteristics by reading instruction interactions on first graders’ word reading achievement. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness 4 (2011), 173–207, 10.1080/19345747.2010.510179.
17. (∗)Crijnen, A.A.M., Feehan, M., Kellam, S.G., The course and malleability of reading achievement in elementary school: The application of growth curve modeling in the evaluation of a mastery learning intervention. Learning and Individual Differences 10 (1998), 137–157, 10.1016/S1041-6080(99)80138-1.
18. Denessen, E.J.P.G., Verantwoord omgaan met verschillen: social-culturele achtergronden en differentiatie in het onderwijs [Soundly dealing with differences: Social-cultural background and differentiation in education]. 2017 Inaugural lecture, Leiden University; Leiden, the Netherlands, Retrieved from https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/handle/1887/51574.
19. Gamoran, A., Weinstein, M., Differentiation and opportunity in restructured schools. American Journal of Education 106 (1998), 385–415, 10.1086/444189.
20. George, P.S., A rationale for differentiating instruction in the regular classroom. Theory Into Practice 44 (2005), 185–193, 10.1207/s15430421tip4403_2.
21. Hamre, B.K., Pianta, R.C., Can instructional and emotional support in the first-grade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure?. Child Development 76 (2005), 949–967, 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00889.x.
22. Heitink, M.C., Van der Kleij, F.M., Veldkamp, B.P., Schildkamp, K., Kippers, W.B., A systematic review of prerequisites for implementing assessment for learning in classroom practice. Educational Research Review 17 (2016), 50–62, 10.1016/j.edurev.2015.12.002.
23. Hong, G., Corter, C., Hong, Y., Pelletier, J., Differential effects of literacy instruction time and homogeneous ability grouping in kindergarten classrooms: Who will benefit? Who will suffer?. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 34 (2012), 69–88, 10.3102/0162373711424206.
24. Hong, G., Hong, Y., Reading instruction time and homogeneous grouping in kindergarten: An application of marginal mean weighting through stratification. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 31 (2009), 54–81, 10.3102/0162373708328259.
25. (∗)Houtveen, T., van de Grift, W., Improving reading achievements of struggling learners. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 23 (2012), 71–93, 10.1080/09243453.2011.600534.
26. Hubbard, L., Datnow, A., Pruyn, L., Multiple initiatives, multiple challenges: The promise and pitfalls of implementing data. Studies In Educational Evaluation 42 (2014), 54–62, 10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.003.
27. (∗)Hunt, B., The effect on mathematics achievement and attitude of homogeneous and heterogeneous grouping of gifted sixth-grade students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education 8 (1996), 65–73.
28. Ireson, J., Hallam, S., Ability grouping in education. 2001, Paul Chapman Publishing, London, UK.
29. Janssen, F., Westbroek, H., Doyle, W., Practicality Studies: How to move from what works in principle to what works in practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 24:1 (2015), 176–186, 10.1080/10508406.2014.954751.
30. de Koning, P., Interne differentiatie [Internal differentiation]. 1973, APS/RITP, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
31. Kulik, J.A., An analysis of the research on ability grouping: Historical and contemporary perspectives. 1992, National research center on the gifted and talented, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
32. Kulik, C.C., Kulik, J.A., Effects of ability grouping on elementary school pupils: A meta-analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the american psychological association, Toronto, Canada, 1984 August.
33. Kulik, J.A., Kulik, C.C., Bangert-Drowns, R.L., Is there better evidence on Mastery Learning? A response to Slavin. Review of Educational Research 60:2 (1990), 303–307.
34. Lee, J.S., Ginsburg, H.P., Preschool teachers’ beliefs about appropriate early literacy and mathematics education for low-and middle-socioeconomic status children. Early Education & Development 18 (2007), 111–143, 10.1080/10409280701274758.
35. (∗)Lefgren, L., Educational peer effects and the Chicago public schools. Journal of Urban Economics 56 (2004), 169–191, 10.1016/j.jue.2004.03.010.
36. Leithwood, K., Harris, A., Hopkins, D., Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership & Management 28:1 (2008), 27–42, 10.1080/13632430701800060.
37. (∗)Leonard, J., How group composition influenced the achievement of sixth-grade mathematics students. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 3 (2001), 175–200, 10.1080/10986065.2001.9679972.
38. Lou, Y., Abrami, P.C., Spence, J.C., Poulsen, C., Chambers, B., d'Appolonia, S., Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 66 (1996), 423–458, 10.3102/00346543066004423.
39. Machts, N., Kaiser, J., Schmidt, F.T.C., Möller, J., Accuracy of teachers’ judgments of students’ cognitive abilities: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review 19 (2016), 85–103, 10.1016/j.edurev.2016.06.003.
40. (∗)Macqueen, S., Academic outcomes from between-class achievement grouping: The Australian primary context. Australian Educational Researcher 39 (2012), 59–73, 10.1007/s13384-011-0047-3.
41. Maulana, R., Helms-Lorenz, M., van de Grift, W., Development and evaluation of a questionnaire measuring pre-service teachers’ teaching behaviour: A Rasch modelling approach. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 26 (2015), 169–194, 10.1080/09243453.2014.939198.
42. (∗)Nomi, T., The effects of within-class ability grouping on academic achievement in early elementary years. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness 3 (2010), 56–92, 10.1080/19345740903277601.
43. Nunnery, J.A., Ross, S.M., McDonald, A., A randomized experimental evaluation of the impact of accelerated reader/reading renaissance implementation on reading achievement in grades 3 to 6. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk 11:1 (2006), 1–18, 10.1207/s15327671espr1101_1.
44. Peters, J.L., Sutton, A.J., Jones, D.R., Abrams, K.R., Rushton, L., Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 61 (2008), 991–996, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.010.
45. Prast, E.J., van de Weijer-Bergsma, E., Kroesbergen, E.H., van Luit, J.E.H., Readiness-based differentiation in primary school mathematics: Expert recommendations and teacher self-assessment. Frontline Learning Research 3:2 (2015), 90–116, 10.14786/flr.v3i2.163.
46. Raudenbush, S.W., Bryk, A.S., Cheong, Y.F., Congdon, R., Du Toit, M., HLM 7: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. 2011, Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood, IL.
47. Ready, D.D., Wright, D.L., Accuracy and inaccuracy in teachers’ perceptions of young children's cognitive abilities: The role of child background and classroom context. American Educational Research Journal 48 (2011), 335–360, 10.3102/0002831210374874.
48. Reezigt, G.J., Effecten van differentiatie op de basisschool [Effects of differentiation in primary school]. 1993, RION, Groningen, the Netherlands.
49. (∗)Reis, S.M., McCoach, D.B., Coyne, M., Schreiber, F.J., Eckert, R.D., Gubbins, E.J., Using planned enrichment strategies with direct instruction to improve reading fluency, comprehension, and attitude toward reading: An evidence-based study. The Elementary School Journal 108 (2007), 3–24, 10.1086/522383.
50. (∗)Reis, S.M., McCoach, D.B., Little, C.A., Muller, L.M., Kaniskan, R.B., The effects of differentiated instruction and enrichment pedagogy on reading achievement in five elementary schools. American Educational Research Journal 48 (2011), 462–501, 10.3102/0002831210382891.
51. Roy, A., Guay, F., Valois, P., Teaching to address diverse learning needs: Development and validation of a differentiated instruction scale. International Journal of Inclusive Education 17:11 (2012), 1186–1204, 10.1080/13603116.2012.743604.
52. Slavin, R.E., Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research 57 (1987), 293–336, 10.3102/00346543057003293.
53. Slavin, R.E., Mastery learning reconsidered. Review of Educational Research 57 (1987), 175–213, 10.3102/00346543057002175.
54. Slavin, R.E., Mastery learning re-reconsidered. Review of Educational Research 60:2 (1990), 300–302, 10.3102/00346543060002300.
55. Slavin, R.E., Achievement effects of ability grouping in secondary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research 60 (1990), 471–499, 10.3102/00346543060003471.
56. Slavin, R.E., Lake, C., Effective programs in elementary mathematics: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research 78 (2008), 427–515, 10.3102/0034654308317473.
57. Slavin, R.E., Best evidence synthesis: an intelligent alternative to meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 48 (1995), 9–18 https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(94)00097-A.
58. Slavin, R.E., Lake, C., Chambers, B., Cheung, A., Davis, S., Effective beginning reading programs: A best-evidence synthesis. 2009, Best Evidence Encyclopedia, Baltimore, MD.
59. Snow, R.E., Aptitude-Treatment Interaction as a framework for research on individual differences in learning. Ackerman, P.L., Sternberg, R.J., Glaser, R., (eds.) Learning and individual Differences: Advances in theory and research, 1989, W. H. Freeman and Company, New York, 13–59.
60. Steenbergen-Hu, S., Makel, M.C., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., What one hundred years of research says about the effects of ability grouping and acceleration on K-12 students’ academic achievement: Findings of two second-order meta-analyses. Review of Educational Research 86:4 (2016), 849–899, 10.3102/0034654316675417.
61. (∗)Sterbinsky, A., Ross, S.M., Redfield, D., Effects of comprehensive school reform on student achievement and school change: A longitudinal multi-site study. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 17 (2006), 367–397, 10.1080/09243450600797661.
62. (∗)Stevens, R.J., Slavin, R.E., The cooperative elementary-school - effects on students achievement, attitudes, and social-relations. American Educational Research Journal 32 (1995), 321–351, 10.3102/00028312032002321.
63. (∗)Tach, L.M., Farkas, G., Learning-related behaviors, cognitive skills, and ability grouping when schooling begins. Social Science Research 35 (2006), 1048–1079, 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.08.001.
64. Timperley, H.S., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., Fung, I., Teacher professional learning and development. Best evidence synthesis [BES]. 2007, Ministry of Education, Wellington, New Zealand.
65. nd ed., 2014 Retrieved from https://ebookcentral.proquest.com.
66. Tomlinson, C.A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C.M., Moon, T.R., Brimijoin, K., Reynolds, T., Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted 27 (2003), 119–145, 10.1177/016235320302700203.
67. Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., Kyndt, E., Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review 15 (2015), 17–40, 10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.002.
68. Van de Grift, W., Quality of teaching in four european countries: A review of the literature and application of an assessment instrument. Educational Research 49 (2007), 127–152, 10.1080/00131880701369651.
69. Van de Grift, W.J.C.M., Van der Wal, M., Torenbeek, M., Ontwikkeling in de pedagogische didactische vaardigheid van leraren in het basisonderwijs [Development of the pedagogical didactical competences of teachers in primary education]. Pedagogische Studiën 88 (2011), 416–432.
70. Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., Oort, F., Beishuizen, J., The effects of scaffolding in the classroom: Support contingency and student independent working time in relation to student achievement, task effort and appreciation of support. Instructional Science 44:5 (2015), 615–641, 10.1007/s11251-015-9351-z.
71. Vygotsky, L.S., Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. 1978, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
72. (∗)Whitburn, J., Effective classroom organisation in primary schools: Mathematics. Oxford Review of Education 27 (2001), 411–428, 10.1080/3054980120067438.
73. (∗)Ysseldyke, J., Bolt, D.M., Effect of technology-enhanced continuous progress monitoring on math achievement. School Psychology Review 36 (2007), 453–467.
74. (∗)Ysseldyke, J., Spicuzza, R., Kosciolek, S., Teelucksingh, E., Boys, C., Lemkuil, A., Using a curriculum-based instructional management system to enhance math achievement in urban schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk 8 (2003), 247–265, 10.1207/S15327671ESPR0802_4.
75. (∗)Ysseldyke, J., Tardrew, S.P., Betts, J., Thill, T.L., Hannigan, E., Use of an instructional management system to enhance math instruction of gifted and talented students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted 27 (2004), 293–310, 10.4219/jeg-2004-319.