Findings of the 2014Workshop on statistical machine translation

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 12-58

  Bojar, Ondřej ^a   Federmann, Christian ^b   Haddow, Barry ^c   Koehn, Philipp ^d   Monz, Christof ^e   Pecina, Pavel ^a   Post, Matt ^f   Saint Amand, Herve ^c   Soricut, Radu ^g   Specia, Lucia ^h   Tamchyna, Aleš ^a  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^b MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^d DUBLIN CITY UNIVERSITY   (Ireland)

^e UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^f JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g GOOGLE INC   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; COMPUTER AIDED LANGUAGE TRANSLATION;

MACHINE TRANSLATION SYSTEMS; MACHINE TRANSLATIONS; QUALITY ESTIMATION; RUNTIMES; STATISTICAL MACHINE TRANSLATION; SUBTASK; TIME ESTIMATION; TRANSLATION QUALITY;

MACHINE TRANSLATION;

EID: 85122640794     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (94)

1. Avramidis, E. (2014). Efforts on machine learning over human-mediated translation edit rate. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
2. Beck, D., Shah, K., and Specia, L. (2014). Sheflite 2.0: Sparse multi-Task gaussian processes for translation quality estimation. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
3. Biçici, E. (2013). Referential translation machines for quality estimation. In Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Sofia, Bulgaria.
4. Biçici, E., Liu, Q., and Way, A. (2014). Parallel FDA5 for fast deployment of accurate statistical machine translation systems. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
5. Bicici, E., Liu, Q., and Way, A. (2014). Parallel fda5 for fast deployment of accurate statistical machine translation systems. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
6. Bicici, E. andWay, A. (2014). Referential translation machines for predicting translation quality. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
7. Bojar, O., Buck, C., Callison-Burch, C., Federmann, C., Haddow, B., Koehn, P., Monz, C., Post, M., Soricut, R., and Specia, L. (2013). Findings of the 2013 Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pages 1?42, Sofia, Bulgaria. Association for Computational Linguistics.
8. Bojar, O., Diatka, V., Rychĺy, P., Strańak, P., Tamchyna, A., and Zeman, D. (2014). Hindi-English and Hindi-only Corpus for Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, Reykjavik, Iceland. ELRA.
9. Bojar, O., Ercegovcevíc, M., Popel, M., and Zaidan, O. (2011). A grain of salt for the WMT manual evaluation. In Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pages 1?11, Edinburgh, Scotland. Association for Computational Linguistics.
10. Borisov, A. and Galinskaya, I. (2014). Yandex school of data analysis russian-english machine translation system for wmt14. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
11. Bouayad-Agha, N., Scott, D. R., and Power, R. (2000). Integrating content and style in documents: A case study of patient information leaflets. Information Design Journal, 9(2? 3):161?176.
12. Buckley, C. and Voorhees, E. M. (2004). Retrieval evaluation with incomplete information. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 25? 32, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
13. Buitelaar, P., Sacaleanu, B., Spela Vintar, Steffen, D., Volk, M., Dejean, H., Gaussier, E., Widdows, D., Weiser, O., and Frederking, R. (2003). Multilingual concept hierarchies for medical information organization and retrieval. Public deliverable, MuchMore project.
14. Callison-Burch, C., Fordyce, C., Koehn, P., Monz, C., and Schroeder, J. (2007). (Meta-) evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation (WMT07), Prague, Czech Republic.
15. Callison-Burch, C., Fordyce, C., Koehn, P., Monz, C., and Schroeder, J. (2008). Further metaevaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation (WMT08), Colmbus, Ohio.
16. Callison-Burch, C., Koehn, P., Monz, C., Peterson, K., Przybocki, M., and Zaidan, O. F. (2010). Findings of the 2010 joint workshop on statistical machine translation and metrics for machine translation. In Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation (WMT10), Uppsala, Sweden.
17. Callison-Burch, C., Koehn, P., Monz, C., Post, M., Soricut, R., and Specia, L. (2012). Findings of the 2012 workshop on statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pages 10? 51, Montŕeal, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics.
18. Callison-Burch, C., Koehn, P., Monz, C., and Schroeder, J. (2009). Findings of the 2009 workshop on statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation (WMT09), Athens, Greece.
19. Callison-Burch, C., Koehn, P., Monz, C., and Zaidan, O. (2011). Findings of the 2011 workshop on statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pages 22?64, Edinburgh, Scotland.
20. Camargo de Souza, J. G., Gonźalez-Rubio, J., Buck, C., Turchi, M., and Negri, M. (2014). Fbk-upv-uedin participation in the wmt14 quality estimation shared-Task. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
21. Cap, F., Weller, M., Ramm, A., and Fraser, A. (2014). Cims ? the cis and ims joint submission to wmt 2014 translating from english into german. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
22. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurment, 20(1):37?46.
23. Cohn, T. and Specia, L. (2013). Modelling annotator bias with multi-Task gaussian processes: An application to machine translation quality estimation. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL-2013, pages 32?42, Sofia, Bulgaria.
24. Collins, M. (2002). Discriminative training methods for hidden markov models: Theory and experiments with perceptron algorithms. In Proceedings of the ACL-02 conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing-Volume 10, EMNLP ?02, pages 1?8, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
25. Costa-jussa, M. R., Gupta, P., Rosso, P., and Banchs, R. E. (2014). English-To-hindi system description for wmt 2014: Deep sourcecontext features for moses. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
26. Do, Q. K., Herrmann, T., Niehues, J., Allauzen, A., Yvon, F., and Waibel, A. (2014). The kit-limsi translation system for wmt 2014. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
27. Dungarwal, P., Chatterjee, R., Mishra, A., Kunchukuttan, A., Shah, R., and Bhattacharyya, P. (2014). The iit bombay hindi-english translation system at wmt 2014. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
28. Durrani, N., Haddow, B., Koehn, P., and Heafield, K. (2014a). Edinburgh?s phrase-based machine translation systems for wmt-14. In Proceedings of the ACL 2014 Ninth Workshop of Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, USA.
29. Durrani, N., Haddow, B., Koehn, P., and Heafield, K. (2014b). Edinburghs phrase-based machine translation systems for wmt-14. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
30. Dusek, O., Hajic, J., Hlavacova, J., Novak, M., Pecina, P., Rosa, R., Tamchyna, A., Uresova, Z., and Zeman, D. (2014). Machine translation of medical texts in the khresmoi project. In Proceedings of the ACL 2014 Ninth Workshop of Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, USA.
31. Federmann, C. (2012). Appraise: An Open-Source Toolkit for Manual Evaluation of Machine Translation Output. The Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics (PBML), 98:25? 35.
32. Foster, J. (2007). Treebanks gone bad: Parser evaluation and retraining using a treebank of ungrammatical sentences. International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition, 10(3-4):129?145.
33. Freitag, M., Peitz, S., Wuebker, J., Ney, H., Huck, M., Sennrich, R., Durrani, N., Nadejde, M., Williams, P., Koehn, P., Herrmann, T., Cho, E., and Waibel, A. (2014). Eu-bridge mt: Combined machine translation. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
34. Gamon, M., Aue, A., and Smets, M. (2005). Sentence-level MT evaluation without reference translations: beyond language modeling. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation, Budapest.
35. Geurts, P., Ernst, D., andWehenkel, L. (2006). Extremely randomized trees. Machine Learning, 63(1):3?42.
36. Green, S., Cer, D., and Manning, C. (2014). Phrasal: A toolkit for new directions in statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
37. Hardmeier, C., Stymne, S., Tiedemann, J., Smith, A., and Nivre, J. (2014). Anaphora models and reordering for phrase-based smt. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
38. Herbrich, R., Minka, T., and Graepel, T. (2006). TrueSkillTM: A Bayesian Skill Rating System. In Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 569?576, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. MIT Press.
39. Herrmann, T., Mediani, M., Cho, E., Ha, T.-L., Niehues, J., Slawik, I., Zhang, Y., and Waibel, A. (2014). The karlsruhe institute of technology translation systems for the wmt 2014. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
40. Hokamp, C., Calixto, I., Wagner, J., and Zhang, J. (2014). Target-centric features for translation quality estimation. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
41. Hopkins, M. and May, J. (2013). Models of translation competitions. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 1416?1424, Sofia, Bulgaria.
42. Järvelin, K. and Kekäläinen, J. (2002). Cumulated gain-based evaluation of ir techniques. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 20(4):422?446.
43. Kim, J.-D., Ohta, T., Tateisi, Y., and Tsujii, J. (2003). GENIA corpus ? a semantically annotated corpus for bio-Textmining. Bioinformatics, 19(suppl 1):i180?i182.
44. Knox, C., Law, V., Jewison, T., Liu, P., Ly, S., Frolkis, A., Pon, A., Banco, K., Mak, C., Neveu, V., Djoumbou, Y., Eisner, R., Guo, A. C., andWishart, D. S. (2011). DrugBank 3.0: A comprehensive resource for Omics research on drugs. Nucleic acids research, 39(suppl 1):D1035?D1041.
45. Koehn, P. (2012a). Simulating human judgment in machine translation evaluation campaigns. In International Workshop on Spoken Language Translation (IWSLT).
46. Koehn, P. (2012b). Simulating Human Judgment in Machine Translation Evaluation Campaigns. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Spoken Language Translation, pages 179?184, Hong Kong, China.
47. Koehn, P. and Monz, C. (2006). Manual and automatic evaluation of machine translation between European languages. In Proceedings of NAACL 2006 Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, New York, New York.
48. Koppel, M. and Ordan, N. (2011). Translationese and its dialects. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Techologies, pages 1318?1326, Portland, Oregon.
49. Landis, J. R. and Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33:159?174.
50. Leusch, G., Ueffing, N., and Ney, H. (2006). Cder: Efficient mt evaluation using block movements. In Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 241?248, Trento, Italy.
51. Li, J., Kim, S.-J., Na, H., and Lee, J.-H. (2014a). Postech?s system description for medical text translation task. In Proceedings of the ACL 2014 Ninth Workshop of Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, USA.
52. Li, L., Wu, X., Vaillo, S. C., Xie, J., Way, A., and Liu, Q. (2014b). The dcu-ictcas mt system at wmt 2014 on german-english translation task. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
53. Lopez, A. (2012). Putting Human Assessments of Machine Translation Systems in Order. In Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pages 1?9, Montŕeal, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics.
54. Lu, Y., Wang, L., Wong, D. F., Chao, L. S., Wang, Y., and Oliveira, F. (2014). Domain adaptation for medical text translation using web resources. In Proceedings of the ACL 2014 Ninth Workshop of Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, USA.
55. Luong, N. Q., Besacier, L., and Lecouteux, B. (2014). Lig system for word level qe task at wmt14. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
56. Luong, N. Q., Lecouteux, B., and Besacier, L. (2013). LIG system for WMT13 QE task: Investigating the usefulness of features in word confidence estimation for MT. In Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pages 384?389, Sofia, Bulgaria. Association for Computational Linguistics.
57. Machacek, M. and Bojar, O. (2014). Results of the wmt14 metrics shared task. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
58. Matthews, A., Ammar, W., Bhatia, A., Feely, W., Hanneman, G., Schlinger, E., Swayamdipta, S., Tsvetkov, Y., Lavie, A., and Dyer, C. (2014).
59. The cmu machine translation systems at wmt 2014. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
60. Neidert, J., Schuster, S., Green, S., Heafield, K., and Manning, C. (2014). Stanford universitys submissions to the wmt 2014 translation task. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
61. Okita, T., Vahid, A. H., Way, A., and Liu, Q. (2014). Dcu terminology translation system for medical query subtask at wmt14. In Proceedings of the ACL 2014 Ninth Workshop of Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, USA.
62. Papineni, K., Roukos, S., Ward, T., and Zhu, W.-J. (2002). BLEU: A method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 311?318, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
63. Ṕecheux, N., Gong, L., Do, Q. K., Marie, B., Ivanishcheva, Y., Allauzen, A., Lavergne, T., Niehues, J., Max, A., and Yvon, Y. (2014). LIMSI @ WMT?14 Medical Translation Task. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, USA.
64. Pecina, P., Dusek, O., Goeuriot, L., Hajic, J., Hlavacova, J., Jones, G., Kelly, L., Leveling, J., Marecek, D., Novak, M., Popel, M., Rosa, R., Tamchyna, A., and Uresova, Z. (2014). Adaptation of machine translation for multilingual information retrieval in the medical domain. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, (0):?.
65. Peitz, S., Wuebker, J., Freitag, M., and Ney, H. (2014). The rwth aachen german-english machine translation system for wmt 2014. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
66. Pouliquen, B. and Mazenc, C. (2011). COPPA, CLIR and TAPTA: Three tools to assist in overcoming the patent barrier at WIPO. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Machine Translation Summit, pages 24?30, Xiamen, China. Asia-Pacific Association for Machine Translation.
67. Powers, D. M. W. (2011). Evaluation: from precision, recall and f-measure to roc, informedness, markedness & correlation. Journal of Machine Learning Technologies.
68. Quernheim, D. and Cap, F. (2014). Large-scale exact decoding: The ims-Ttt submission to wmt14. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
69. Rosse, C. and Mejino Jr., J. L. V. (2008). The foundational model of anatomy ontology. In Burger, A., Davidson, D., and Baldock, R., editors, Anatomy Ontologies for Bioinformatics, volume 6 of Computational Biology, pages 59? 117. Springer London.
70. Rubino, R., Toral, A., Śanchez-Cartagena, V. M., Ferŕandez-Tordera, J., Ortiz Rojas, S., Raḿ?rez-Śanchez, G., Śanchez-Mart?nez, F., and Way, A. (2014). Abu-matran at wmt 2014 translation task: Two-step data selection and rbmtstyle synthetic rules. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
71. Sakaguchi, K., Post, M., and Van Durme, B. (2014). Efficient elicitation of annotations for human evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, Maryland.
72. Śanchez-Cartagena, V. M., Ṕerez-Ortiz, J. A., and Śanchez-Mart?nez, F. (2014). The ua-prompsit hybrid machine translation system for the 2014 workshop on statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
73. Scarton, C. and Specia, L. (2014). Exploring consensus in machine translation for quality estimation. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
74. Schwartz, L., Anderson, T., Gwinnup, J., and Young, K. (2014). Machine translation and monolingual postediting: The afrl wmt-14 system. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
75. Seginer, Y. (2007). Learning Syntactic Structure. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam.
76. Shah, K., Cohn, T., and Specia, L. (2013). An investigation on the effectiveness of features for translation quality estimation. In Proceedings of the Machine Translation Summit XIV, pages 167?174, Nice, France.
77. Shah, K. and Specia, L. (2014). Quality estimation for translation selection. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
78. Snover, M., Dorr, B., Schwartz, R., Micciulla, L., and Makhoul, J. (2006). A study of translation edit rate with targeted human annotation. In Proceedings of the 7th Biennial Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas (AMTA-2006), Cambridge, Massachusetts.
79. Souza, J. G. C. d., Espl-Gomis, M., Turchi, M., and Negri, M. (2013). Exploiting qualitative information from automatic word alignment for cross-lingual nlp tasks. In The 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics-Short Papers (ACL Short Papers 2013).
80. Specia, L., Shah, K., de Souza, J. G. C., and Cohn, T. (2013). QuEst-A Translation Quality Estimation Framework. In Proceedings of the 51th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), Demo Session, Sofia, Bulgaria.
81. Tamchyna, A., Popel, M., Rosa, R., and Bojar, O. (2014). Cuni in wmt14: Chimera still awaits bellerophon. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
82. Tan, L. and Pal, S. (2014). Manawi: Using multi-word expressions and named entities to improve machine translation. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
83. Thompson, P., Iqbal, S., McNaught, J., and Ananiadou, S. (2009). Construction of an annotated corpus to support biomedical information extraction. BMC bioinformatics, 10(1):349.
84. Tiedemann, J. (2009). News from OPUS ? a collection of multilingual parallel corpora with tools and interfaces. In Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, volume 5, pages 237?248, Borovets, Bulgaria. John Benjamins.
85. Tillmann, C., Vogel, S., Ney, H., Zubiaga, A., and Sawaf, H. (1997). Accelerated DP based search for statistical translation. In Kokkinakis, G., Fakotakis, N., and Dermatas, E., editors, Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, pages 2667?2670, Rhodes, Greece. International Speech Communication Association.
86. U.S. National Library of Medicine (2009). UMLS reference manual. Metathesaurus. Bethesda, MD, USA.
87. Voorhees, E. M. and Harman, D. K., editors (2005). TREC: Experiment and evaluation in information retrieval, volume 63 of Digital libraries and electronic publishing series. MIT press Cambridge, Cambridge, MA, USA.
88. Wang, L., Lu, Y., Wong, D. F., Chao, L. S., Wang, Y., and Oliveira., F. (2014). Combining domain adaptation approaches for medical text translation. In Proceedings of the ACL 2014 Ninth Workshop of Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, USA.
89. Wäschle, K. and Riezler, S. (2012). Analyzing parallelism and domain similarities in the MAREC patent corpus. In Salampasis, M. and Larsen, B., editors, Multidisciplinary Information Retrieval, volume 7356 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 12?27. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
90. Williams, P., Sennrich, R., Nadejde, M., Huck, M., Hasler, E., and Koehn, P. (2014). Edinburghs syntax-based systems at wmt 2014. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
91. Wisniewski, G., Ṕecheux, N., Allauzen, A., and Yvon, F. (2014). Limsi submission for wmt?14 qe task. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
92. wu, x., Haque, R., Okita, T., Arora, P., Way, A., and Liu, Q. (2014). Dcu-lingo24 participation in wmt 2014 hindi-english translation task. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
93. Zdenka Uresova, Ondrej Dusek, J. H. and Pecina, P. (2014). Multilingual test sets for machine translation of search queries for cross-lingual information retrieval in the medical domain. In To appear in Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Reykjavik, Iceland.
94. Zhang, J., Wu, X., Calixto, I., Vahid, A. H., Zhang, X., Way, A., and Liu, Q. (2014). Experiments in medical translation shared task at wmt 2014. In Proceedings of the ACL 2014 Ninth Workshop of Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, USA.