Inhibitory control, working memory and L2 interaction

Second Language Learning and Teaching

Volumn 7, Issue , 2013, Pages 91-114

  Gass, Susan M ^a   Behney, Jennifer N ^b   Uzum, Baburhan ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b YOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84984984874     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21937648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23547-4_6     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Baddeley, A. D. 1992. Working memory. Science 255: 556-559.
2. Baddeley, A. D. 2000. The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Science 4: 417-423.
3. Baddeley, A. D. and G. J. Hitch. 1974. Working memory (Vol. 8). New York: Academic Press.
4. Bates, E., A. Devescovi, A. Hernandez and L. Pizzamiglio. 1996. Gender priming in Italian. Perception & Psychophysics 58: 992-1004.
5. Brauer, M. 1998. Stroop interference in bilinguals: The role of similarity between the two languages. In Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention, eds. A. Healy and L. E. J. Bourne, 317-337. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Caplan, D., G. Waters and G. Dede. 2007. Specialized verbal working memory for language comprehension. In Variation in working memory, eds. A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. Kane, A. Miyake and J. Towse, 272-302. New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Chen, H. and C. Ho. 1986. Development of Stroop interference in Chinese–English bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 12: 397-401.
8. Chiappe, D. and P. Chiappe. 2007. The role of working memory in metaphor production and comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 5: 172-188.
9. Conway, A., N. Cowan and M. Bunting. 2001. The cocktail party phenomenon revisted: The importance of working memory capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 8: 331-335.
10. Conway, A., M. Kane, M. Bunting, D. Hambrick, O. Wilhelm and R. Engle. 2005. Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12: 769-786.
11. Daneman, M. and P. A. Carpenter. 1980. Individual-differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19: 450-466.
12. De Bot, K. 1996. The psycholinguistics of the output hypothesis. Language Learning 46: 529-555.
13. Dörnyei, Z. 2005. The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Ellis, N. 2001. Memory for language. In Cognition and second language instruction, ed. P. Robinson, 33-68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Ellis, N. 2005. At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27: 305-352.
16. Ellis, N. and R. Schmidt. 1997. Morphology and longer distance dependencies: Laboratory research illuminating the A in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19: 145-171.
17. Ellis, R., S. Loewen and R. Erlam. 2006. Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28: 339-368.
18. Gass, S. 1997. Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Gass, S. 2003. Input and interaction. In The handbook of second language acquisition, eds. C. Doughty and M. H. Long, 224-255. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
20. Gass, S. and J. Lee. 2011. Working memory capacity, inhibitory control, and proficiency in a second language. In Modeling bilingualism: From structure to chaos, eds. M. Schmid and W. Lowie, 59-84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
21. Gass, S. and A. Mackey. 2006. Input, interaction and output: An overview. In AILA Review, eds. K. Bardovi-Harlig and Z. Dornyei, 3-17. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
22. Gass, S. and A. Mackey. 2007. Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In Theories in second language acquisition, eds. B. VanPatten and J. Williams, 175-199. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. Gass, S. and E. Varonis. 1994. Input, interaction, and second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16: 283-302.
24. Goldfarb, L. and J. Tzelgov. 2007. The cause of the within-language Stroop superiority effect and its implications. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 60: 179-185.
25. Juffs, A. 2004. Representation, processing, and working memory in a second language. Transactions of the Philological Society 102: 199-225.
26. Kane, M. and R. Engle. 2003. Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 132: 47-70.
27. Kane, M., D. Hambrick, S. Tuholski, O. Wilhelm, T. Payne and R. Engle. 2004. The generality of working memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General 133: 189-217.
28. La Heij, W., E. de Bruyn, E. Elens, R. Hartsuiker, D. Helaha and L. van Schelven. 1990. Orthographic facilitation and categorical interference in a word translation variant of the Stroop task. Canadian Journal of Psychology 44: 76-83.
29. La Pointe, L. and R. Engle. 1990. Simple and complex word spans as measures of working memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 15: 1118-1133.
30. Leeman, J. 2003. Recasts and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25: 37-63.
31. Leeser, M. and G. Sunderman. 2009. Methodological issues of working memory tasks for L2 processing research. Manuscript submitted for publication.
32. Long, D. and C. Prat. 2002. Working memory and Stroop interference: An individual differences investigation. Memory & Cognition 30: 294-301.
33. Long, M. H. 1980. Input, interaction and second language acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California. Los Angeles.
34. Long, M. H. 1996. The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Handbook of language acquisition (Vol. 2): Second language acquisition, eds. W. Ritchie and T. Bhatia, 413-468. New York, NY: Academic Press.
35. Long, M. H. 2007. Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36. Lyster, R. and K. Saito. 2010. Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A metanalysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32: 265-302.
37. Mackey, A. 2002. Beyond production: Learners’ perceptions about interactional processes. International Journal of Educational Research 37: 379-394.
38. Mackey, A. 2007. Introduction. The role of conversational interaction in second language acquisition. In Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies, ed. A. Mackey, 1-26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39. Mackey, A., R. Adams, C. Stafford and P. Winke. 2010. Exploring the relationship between modified output and working memory capacity. Language Learning 60: 501-533.
40. Mackey, A., S. Gass and K. McDonough. 2000. Learners’ perceptions about feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22: 471-497.
41. Mackey, A. and J. Goo. 2007. Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies, ed. A. Mackey, 407-452. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Mackey, A., J. Philp, T. Egi, A. Fujii and T. Tatsumi. 2002. Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback, and L2 development. In Individual differences and instructed language learning. Vol. 1. Language learning and language teaching. Vol. 2, ed. P. Robinson, 181-209. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
43. Mackey, A. and C. Polio., eds. 2008. Multiple perspectives on interaction: Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass. New York: Routledge.
44. MacLeod, C. 1991. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrated review. Psychological Bulletin 109: 163-203.
45. MacLeod, C. 1992. The Stroop task: The “golden standard” of attentional measures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 121: 12-14.
46. McDonough, K. 2005. Identifying the impact of negative feedback and learners’ responses on ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27: 79-103.
47. Miller, N. and J. Kroll. 2002. Stroop effects in bilingual translation. Memory & Cognition 30: 614-628.
48. Miyake, A. and N. Friedman. 1998. Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. In Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention, eds. A. Healy and L. Bourne, 339-365. London: Lawrence Erlbaum
49. Miyake, A. and P. Shah, eds. 1999. Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50. Nicholas, H., P. Lightbown and N. Spada. 2001. Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning 51: 719.
51. Nobuyoshi, J. and R. Ellis. 1993. Focused communication tasks and second language acquisition. English Language Teaching 47: 203-210.
52. Osaka, M. and N. Osaka. 1992. Language-independent working memory as measured by Japanese and English reading span tests. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 30: 287-289.
53. Papagno, C. and G. Vallar. 1992. Phonological short-term memory and the learning of novel words: The effect of phonological similarity and item length. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 44A: 47-67.
54. Philp, J. 2003. Constraints on noticing the gap: Nonnative speakers’ noticing of recasts in NS-NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25: 99-126.
55. Roberts, L., T. Marinis, C. Felser and H. Clahsen. 2007. Antecedent priming at trace positions in children’s sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 36: 175-188.
56. Robinson, P. 1995. Attention, memory, and the ‘noticing’ hypothesis. Language Learning 45: 283-331.
57. Sagarra, N. 2007a. From CALL to face-to-face interaction: The effect of computer-delivered recasts and working memory on L2 development. In Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies, ed. A. Mackey, 229-248. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58. Sagarra, N. 2007b. Working memory and L2 processing of redundant grammatical forms. In Understanding second language process, ed. Z.-H. Han, 133-147. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
59. Schmidt, R. 2001. Attention. In Cognition and second language instruction, ed. P. Robinson, 3-32. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
60. Schmidt, R. and S. Frota. 1986. Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition, ed. R. Day, 237-326. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
61. Service, E. and F. Craik. 1993. Differences between young and older adults in learning a foreign vocabulary. Journal of Memory and Language 32: 608-623.
62. Service, E. and V. Kohonen. 1995. Is the relation between phonological memory and foreign language learning accounted for by vocabulary acquisition? Applied Psycholinguistics 16: 155-172.
63. Service, E., M. Simola, O. Metsaenheimo and S. Maury. 2002. Bilingual working memory span is affected by language skill. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 14: 383-407.
64. Skehan, P. 2002. Theorising and updating attitude. In Individual differences and instructed language learning, ed. P. Robinson, 69-93. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
65. Spada, N. and Y. Tomita. 2010. Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning 60: 263-308.
66. Stroop, J. 1935. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 12: 643-662.
67. Sumiya, H. and A. Healy. 2004. Phonology in the bilingual Stroop effect. Memory and Cognition 32: 752-758.
68. Swain, M. 1985. Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Input in second language acquisition, eds. S. Gass and C. Madden, 235-253. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
69. Swain, M. 1995. Three functions of output in second language learning. In Principle and practice in applied linguistics. Studies in honor of H. G. Widdowson, eds. G. Cook and B. Seidlhofer, 125-144. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
70. Swain, M. 2005. The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, ed. E. Hinkel, 471-483. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
71. Trofimovich, P., A. Ammar and E. Gatbonton. 2007. How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytical ability. In Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies, ed. A. Mackey, 171-195. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
72. Varonis, E. and S. Gass. 1985. Non–native/non–native conversations: A model for negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics 6: 71-90.
73. Wagner-Gough, K. and E. Hatch. 1975. The importance of input in second language acquisition studies. Language Learning 25: 297-308.
74. Waters, G. S. and D. Caplan. 1996. The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A 49: 51-79.
75. Williams, J. and P. Lovatt. 2003. Phonological memory and rule learning. Language Learning 53: 67-121.
76. Zied, K. M., A. Phillipe, P. Karine, H.-T. Valerie, A. Ghislaine, R. Arnaud and L. G. Didier. 2004. Bilingualism and adult differences in inhibitory mechanisms: Evidence from a bilingual stroop task. Brain and Cognition 54: 254-256.