Building Feedback Literacy: Students’ Perceptions of the Developing Engagement With Feedback Toolkit

Frontiers in Education

Volumn 4, Issue , 2019, Pages

  Winstone, Naomi E ^a   Mathlin, Georgina ^a   Nash, Robert A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

^b ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

feedback literacy; portfolio; self regulation; student; workshop

Indexed keywords

EID: 85075748583     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2504284X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2019.00039     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ajjawi R., Boud D., (2017). Researching feedback dialogue: an interactional analysis approach. Assess. Evalu. High. Educ. 42, 252–265. 10.1080/02602938.2015.1102863
2. Biggs J., Kember D., Leung D. Y., (2001). The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 71, 133–149. 10.1348/00070990115843311307705
3. Boud D., Molloy E., (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 38, 698–712. 10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
4. Braun V., Clarke V., (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Q. Res. Psychol. 3, 77–101.
5. Burke D., (2009). Strategies for using feedback students bring to higher education. Assess. Evalu. High. Educ. 34, 41–50. 10.1080/02602930801895711
6. Carless D., (2015). Excellence in University Assessment: Learning from Award-Winning Practice. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315740621
7. Carless D., Boud D., (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback. Assess. Evalu. High. Educ. 43, 1315–1325. 10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
8. Deeley S. J., Bovill C., (2017). Staff student partnership in assessment: enhancing assessment literacy through democratic practices. Assess. Evalu. High. Educ. 42, 463–477. 10.1080/02602938.2015.1126551
9. Dweck C. S., (2002). The development of ability conceptions, in Development of Achievement Motivation, eds Wigfield A., Eccles J., (New York, NY: Academic Press) 57–88. 10.1016/B978-012750053-9/50005-X
10. Forsythe A., Johnson S., (2017). Thanks, but no-thanks for the feedback. Assess. Evalu. High. Educ. 42, 850–859. 10.1080/02602938.2016.1202190
11. Gibbs G., Simpson C., (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students' learning. Learn. Teach. High. Educ. 1, 3–31. 10.1007/978-3-8348-9837-1
12. Handley K., Price M., Millar J., (2011). Beyond ‘doing time’: investigating the concept of student engagement with feedback. Oxford Rev. Educ. 37, 543–560. 10.1080/03054985.2011.604951
13. Harrison C. J., Könings K. D., Molyneux A., Schuwirth L. W., Wass V., van der Vleuten C. P. M., (2013). Web-based feedback after summative assessment: how do students engage? Med. Educ. 47, 734–744. 10.1111/medu.1220923746163
14. Hattie J., Timperley H., (2007). The power of feedback. Rev. Educ. Res. 77, 81–112. 10.3102/003465430298487
15. Higgins R., Hartley P., Skelton A., (2002). The conscientious consumer: reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Stud. High. Educ. 27, 53–64. 10.1080/03075070120099368
16. Hounsell D., (2007). Towards more sustainable feedback to students, in Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education. Learning for the Longer Term eds Boud D., Falchikov N., (London: Routledge) 101–113.
17. Hughes G., Smith H., Creese B., (2015). Not seeing the wood for the trees: developing a feedback analysis tool to explore feed forward in modularised programmes. Assess. Evalu. High. Educ. 40, 1079–1094. 10.1080/02602938.2014.969193
18. Jessop T., (2017). Inspiring transformation through TESTA's programme approach, in Scaling up Assessment for Learning in Higher Education, eds Carless D., Bridges S. M., Chan C. K. Y., Glofcheski R., (Singapore:Springer), 49–64. 10.1007/978-981-10-3045-1_4
19. Jönsson A., (2013). Facilitating productive use of feedback in higher education. Active Learn. High. Educ. 14, 63–76. 10.1177/1469787412467125
20. Kitzinger J., (1994). The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociol. Health Illn. 16, 103–121. 10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347023
21. Nash R. A., Winstone N. E., (2017). Responsibility-sharing in the giving and receiving of assessment feedback. Front. Psychol. 8:1519. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.0151928932202
22. Pitt E., (2017). Student utilisation of feedback: a cyclical model, in Scaling up Assessment for Learning in Higher Education eds Carless D., Bridges S. M., Chan C. K. Y., Glofcheski R., (Singapore:Springer), pp. 145–158. 10.1007/978-981-10-3045-1_10
23. Pitt E., Norton L., (2017). ‘Now that’s the feedback I want!' Students' reactions to feedback on graded work and what they do with it. Assess. Evalu. High. Educ. 42, 499–516. 10.1080/02602938.2016.1142500
24. Price M., Handley K., Millar J., (2011). Feedback: focusing attention on engagement. Stud. High. Educ. 36, 879–896. 10.1080/03075079.2010.483513
25. Price M., O'Donovan B., Rust C., (2007). Putting a social-constructivist assessment process model into practice: building the feedback loop into the assessment process through peer review. Innovations Educ. Teach. Int. 44, 143–152. 10.1080/14703290701241059
26. Richardson M., Abraham C., Bond R., (2012). Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 138, 353–387. 10.1037/a002683822352812
27. Ryan T., Henderson M., (2018). Feeling feedback: students' emotional responses to educator feedback. Assess. Evalu. High. Educ. 43, 880–892. 10.1080/02602938.2017.1416456
28. Sinclair H. K., Cleland J. A., (2007). Undergraduate medical students: who seeks formative feedback? Med. Educ. 41, 580–582. 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02768.x17518838
29. Sutton P., (2012). Conceptualizing feedback literacy: knowing, being, and acting. Innovations Educ. Teach. Int. 49, 31–40. 10.1080/14703297.2012.647781
30. Weaver M. R., (2006). Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors' written responses. Assess. Evalu. High. Educ. 31, 379–394. 10.1080/02602930500353061
31. Winstone N. E., Nash R. A., (2016). The Developing Engagement with Feedback Toolkit (DEFT). York: Higher Education Academy.
32. Winstone N. E., Nash R. A., Parker M., Rowntree J., (2017a). Supporting learners' agentic engagement with feedback: a systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educ. Psychol. 52, 17–37. 10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538
33. Winstone N. E., Nash R. A., Rowntree J., Menezes R., (2016). What do students want most from written feedback information? Distinguishing necessities from luxuries using a budgeting methodology. Assess. Evalu. High. Educ. 41, 1237–1253. 10.1080/02602938.2015.1075956
34. Winstone N. E., Nash R. A., Rowntree J., Parker M., (2017b). ‘It’d be useful, but I wouldn't use it': barriers to university students' feedback seeking and recipience. Stud. High. Educ. 42, 2026–2041 10.1080/03075079.2015.1130032