Transfer of training and processing instruction: From input to output

System

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 44-53

  VanPatten, Bill ^a   Uludag, Onur ^b  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CUKUROVA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

English passive; Input processing; Processing instruction; Transfer of training

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952813943     PISSN: 0346251X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2011.01.013     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Benati A. A comparative study of the effects of processing instruction and output - based instruction on the acquisition of the Italian future tense. Language Teaching Research 2001, 5:95-127.
2. Benati A. The effects of processing instruction, traditional instruction, and meaning-output instruction on the acquisition of the English past simple tense. Language Teaching Research 2005, 9:67-93.
3. Benati A., Lee J.F. Grammar Acquisition and Processing Instruction: Secondary and Cumulative Effects 2008, Multilingual Matters, Bristol UK.
4. DeKeyser R.M., Sokalski K. The differential role of comprehension and production practice. Language Learning 1996, 46:613-642.
5. Ervin-Tripp S. Is second language learning like the first?. TESOL Quarterly 1974, 8:111-127.
6. Farley A. Structured Input: Grammar Instruction for the Acquisition-oriented Classroom 2005, McGraw-Hill, New York.
7. Fernández C. Reexamining the role of explicit information in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 2008, 30:207-305.
8. Henry N., Culmn H., VanPatten B. More on the effects of explicit information in instructed SLA: a partial replication and a response to Fernandez (2008). Studies in Second Language Acquisition 2009, 31:559-575.
9. Izumi S. Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: an experimental study on ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 2002, 24:541-577.
10. Keating G.D., Farley A.P. Processing instruction, meaning-based output instruction, and meaning-based drills: impacts on L2 classroom acquisition of Spanish object pronouns. Hispania 2008, 91:639-650.
11. Krashen S.D. Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition 1982, Pergamon, New York.
12. Lee, J.F., Leeser, M.L., Wong, W. (Eds.), in press. Advances in Processing Instruction, Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
13. Pienemann M. Language Processing and L2 Development 1998, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
14. Qin J. The effect of processing instruction and dictogloss tasks on the acquisition of English passive voice. Language Teaching Research 2008, 12:61-82.
15. Sanz C., Morgan-Short K. Positive evidence vs. explicit rule presentation and explicit negative feedback: a computer assisted study. Language Learning 2004, 54:35-78.
16. Swain M. Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. Input in Second Language Acquisition 1985, 235-252. Newbury House, Rowley MA. S.M. Gass, C. Madden (Eds.).
17. Swain M. Focus on Form through Conscious Reflection. Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition 1998, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. C. Doughty, J. Williams (Eds.).
18. Truscott J. Noticing in a second language: a critical review. Second Language Research 1998, 14:103-135.
19. Truscott, J. Sharwood Smith, M., 2004. Acquisition by processing: a modular perspective on language development. 7, 1-20.
20. Uludag, O., VanPatten, B., The relative effects of processing instruction and dictogloss on the acquisition of the English passive. forthcoming.
21. VanPatten, B., Borst, S. The roles of explicit information and grammatical sensitivity in the processing of clitic object pronouns and word order in Spanish L2. In: Lee, J.F., Leeser, M. L., Wong, W. (Eds.), Advances in processing instruction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, in press.
22. VanPatten B. Grammar instruction for the acquisition-rich classroom. Foreign Language Annals 1993, 26:433-450.
23. VanPatten B. Input Processing and Grammar Instruction in Second Language Acquisition: Theory and Research 1996, Ablex, Norwood, NJ.
24. VanPatten B. Input and output in establishing form-meaning connections. Form-meaning Connections in Second Language Acquisition 2004, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ. B. VanPatten, J. Williams, S. Rott, M. Overstreet (Eds.).
25. Processing Instruction: Theory, Research, and Commentary 2004, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ. B. VanPatten (Ed.).
26. VanPatten B., Cadierno T. Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 1993, 15:225-243.
27. VanPatten B., Farmer J.L., Clardy C.L. Processing instruction and meaning-based output instruction: a response to Keating and Farley (2008). Hispania 2009, 92:116-126.
28. VanPatten B., Inclezan D., Salazar H., Farley A.P. Processing instruction and dictogloss: a study on object pronouns and word order in Spanish. Foreign Language Annals 2009, 42:557-575.
29. VanPatten B., Wong W. Processing Instruction and the French Causative: Another Replication 2004, B. VanPatten (Ed.).
30. Wong W. The Nature of Processing Instruction 2004, B. VanPatten (Ed.).
31. Wong W. Input Enhancement: From Theory and Research to the Classroom 2005, McGraw-Hill, New York.