Processing the content of input-processing and processing instruction research: A response to DeKeyser, Salaberry, Robinson, and Harrington

Language Learning

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 825-831

  VanPatten, Bill ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036896667     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9922.00205     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Allen, L.Q. (2000). Form-meaning connections and the French causative: An experiment in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 69-84.
2. Barcroft, J., & VanPatten, B. (1997). Acoustic salience: Testing location, stress and the boundedness of grammatical form in second language acquisition input processing. In W.R. Glass & A.T. Pérez-Leroux (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the acquisition of Spanish: Vol. 2. Production, processing, and comprehension (pp. 109-121). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
3. Benati, A. (2001). A comparative study of the effects of processing instruction and output-based instruction on the acquisition of the Italian future tense. Language Teaching Research, 5, 95-127.
4. Carroll, S. (2001). Input and evidence: The raw material of second language acquisition. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
5. Clifton, C. Jr., Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1994). Perspectives on sentence processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Crain, S., Ni, W., & Conway, L. (1994). Learning, parsing and modularity. In C. Clifton, Jr., L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing (pp. 443-467). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Cuetos, F., Mitchell, D.C., & Corley, M.M.B. (1996). Parsing in different languages. In M. Carreiras, J.E. García-Albea, & N. Sebastián-Gallés (Eds.), Language processing in Spanish (pp. 145-187). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. DeKeyser, R., and Sokalski, K. (1996). The differential role of comprehension and production practice. Language Learning, 46, 613-642.
9. Hadley, A.O. (2001). Teaching language in context. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
10. Just, M.A., and Carpenter, P.A. (1993). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122-149.
11. Klein, W. (1986). Second language acquisition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
12. Lee, J.F., Cadierno, T., Glass, W.R., & VanPatten, B. (1997). The effects of lexical and grammatical cues on processing tense in second language input. Applied Language Learning, 8, 1-23.
13. Lee, J., & VanPatten, B. (1995). Making communicative language teaching happen. New York: McGraw Hill.
14. Lee, J., & VanPatten, B. (in press). Making communicative language teaching happen (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
15. Musumeci, D. (1989). The ability of second language learners to assign tense at the sentence level: A cross-linguistic study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
16. Norris, J.N., and Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417-528.
17. Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching and learning. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
18. Paulston, C.B. (1976). Teaching English as a second language: Techniques and procedures. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.
19. Rosa, E., & O'Neill, M.O. (1998). Effects of stress and location on acoustic salience at the initial stages of Spanish L2 input processing. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 2, 24-52.
20. Salaberry, M.R. (1997). The role of input and output practice in second language acquisition. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 422-451.
21. Sanz, C., and VanPatten, B. (1998). On input processing, processing instruction, and the nature of replication tasks: A response to M.R. Salaberry. Canadian Modern Language Review, 54, 263-273.
22. Schmidt, R.W. (1992). Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 357-385.
23. Stevick, E. (1996). Memory, meaning and method:A view of language teaching. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
24. VanPatten, B. (1990). Attending to content and form in the input: An experiment in consciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287-301.
25. VanPatten, B. (1994). Evaluating the role of consciousness in second language acquisition: Terms, linguistic features, and methodology. Association Internationale de Linguistique Appliquée Annual Review, 11, 27-36.
26. VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
27. VanPatten, B. (2000). Processing instruction as form-meaning connections: Issues in theory and research. In J.F. Lee & A. Valdman (Eds.), Form and meaning: Multiple perspectives (pp. 43-68). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
28. VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225-243.
29. VanPatten, B., and Oikkenon, S. (1996). Explanation vs. structured input in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 495-510.
30. Wong, W. & VanPatten, B. (2002). The evidence is IN and drills are OUT. Unpublished manuscript.