Theoretical and research considerations underlying classroom practice: The fundamental role of input

The Art of Teaching Spanish: Second Language Acquisition from Research to Praxis

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 55-77

  Vanpatten, Bill ^a   Leeser, Michael ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 40149106093     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (86)

1. Alanen, R. 1995. Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition. In Attention and awareness in foreign language acquisition, ed. R. Schmidt, 259-302. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
2. Benati, A. 2005. The effects of processing instruction, traditional instruction and meaningoutput instruction on the acquisition of the English past simple tense. Language Teaching Research 9(1):67-93.
3. Cadierno, T. 1995. Formal instruction in processing perspective: An investigation into the Spanish past tense. Modern Language Journal 79(2):179-94.
4. Carroll, S. 2001. Input and evidence: The raw material of second language acquisition. Amersterdam: John Benjamins.
5. -. 2004. Some comments on input processing and processing instruction. In Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary, ed. B. VanPatten, 293-310. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Corder, S. P. 1969. The significance of learners' errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics 5:161-70.
7. DeKeyser, R. 1998. Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, ed. C. Doughty and J. Williams, 42-63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. DeKeyser, R., R. Salaberry, P. Robinson, and M. Harrington. 2002. What gets processed in processing instruction: A response to Bill VanPatten's "Update." Language Learning 52(4):805-23.
9. Doughty, C. 2001. Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In Cognition and second language instruction, ed. P. Robinson, 206-57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. -. 2003. Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In Handbook of second language acquisition, ed. C. Doughty and M. Long, 256-310. Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
11. Doughty, C., and E. Varela. 1998. Communicative focus on form. In Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, ed. C. Doughty and J. Williams, 114-38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Doughty, C., and J. Williams, eds. 1998. Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Dulay, H., and M. Burt. 1974. Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning 23(2):245-58.
14. Dulay, H., M. Burt, and S. Krashen. 1982. Language two. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Ellis, N. C. 1998. Emergentism, connectionism and language learning. Language Learning 48(4):631-64.
16. -. 2002. Frequency effects in language acquisition: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(2):143-48.
17. -. 2003. Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In Handbook of second language acquisition, ed. C. Doughty and M. Long, 63-103. Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
18. Ellis, R. 1994. The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Elman, J. L., E. A. Bates, M. H. Johnson, A. Karmiloff-Smith, and K. Plunkett. 1996. Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Erlam, R. 2003. Evaluating the relative effectiveness of structured-input and output-based instruction in foreign language learning: Results from an experimental study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25(4):559-82.
21. Farley, A. 2004. The relative effects of processing instruction and meaning-based output instruction. In Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary, ed. B. VanPatten, 143-68. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. -. 2005. Structured input: Grammar instruction for the acquisition oriented classroom. New York: McGraw-Hill.
23. Fernandez, C. A. 2005. The role of explicit information in processing instruction: An on-line experiment. Ph. D. diss., University of Illinois at Chicago.
24. Gass, S. 1997. Input, interaction and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. Harrington, M. 2004. Commentary: Input processing as a theory of processing input. In Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary, ed. B. VanPatten, 79-92. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Hulstijn, J. 1995. Not all grammar rules are equal: Giving grammar instruction its proper place in foreign language teaching. In Attention and awareness in foreign language learning, ed. R. Schmidt, 359-86. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
27. Izumi, S. 2002. Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: An experimental study on ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(4):541-77.
28. Izumi, S., M. Bigelow, M. Fujiwara, and S. Fearnow. 1999. Testing the output hypothesis: Effects of output on noticing and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21(3):421-52.
29. Krashen, S. 1982. Principles and practice in second language acquisition. London: Pergamon.
30. Lafford, B., and R. Salaberry, eds. 2003. Spanish second language acquisition: State of the science. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
31. Lantolf, J. 2000. Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Larsen-Freeman, D., and M. Long. 1991. An introduction to second language acquisition research. New York: Longman.
33. Lee, J. F., and B. VanPatten. 1995. Making communicative language teaching happen. New York: McGraw-Hill.
34. -. 2003. Making communicative language teaching happen. New York: McGraw-Hill.
35. Leeman, J. 2003. Recasts and L2 development: Beyond negative evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25(1):37-63.
36. Leeser, M. J. 2004. Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research 8(1):55-81.
37. Long, M. H., S. Inagaki, and L. Ortega. 1998. The role of implicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. Modern Language Journal 82(3):357-71.
38. Long, M. H., and P. Robinson. 1998. Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, ed. C. Doughty and J. Williams, 15-41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Lyster, R. 2004. Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26(3):399-432.
40. Mackey, A., S. Gass, and K. McDonough. 2000. How do learners perceive implicit negative feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22(3):471-97.
41. Mackey, A., and J. Philp. 1998. Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? Modern Language Journal 82(3):338-56.
42. Morris, F. A., and E. Tarone. 2003. The impact of classroom dynamics on the effectiveness of recasts in second language acquisition. Language Learning 53(2):325-68.
43. O'Grady, W. 2003. The radical middle: Nativism without universal grammar. In Handbook of second language acquisition, ed. C. Doughty and M. Long, 43-62. Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
44. Pfaff, C. W. 1987. Functional approaches to interlanguage. In First and second language acquisition processes, ed. C. W. Pfaff, 81-102. Rowley, MA: Newberry House.
45. Pienemann, M. 1998. Language processing and second language development: Processability theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
46. Pinker, S. 1994. The language instinct. New York: William Morrow.
47. Robinson, P. 1995. Aptitude, awareness, and the fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit second language learning. In Attention and awareness in foreign language learning, ed. R. Schmidt, 303-58. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
48. Salaberry, M. R. 1997. The role of input and output practice in second language acquisition. Canadian Modern Language Review/Revue canadienne des langues vivantes 53(2):422-51.
49. -. 1998. On input processing, true language competence, and pedagogical bandwagons: A reply to Sanz and VanPatten. Canadian Modern Language Review 54(2):274-85.
50. Sanz, C., and K. Morgan-Short. 2004. Positive evidence versus explicit rule presentation and explicit negative feedback: A computer assisted study. Language Learning 54(1):35-78.
51. Sanz, C., and B. VanPatten. 1998. On input processing, processing instruction, and the nature of replication tasks: A response to Salaberry. Canadian Modern Language Review 54(2):263-73.
52. Schmidt, R. 1995. Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In Attention and awareness in foreign language learning, ed. R. Schmidt, 1-63. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
53. Schwartz, B. 1993. On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and "linguistic behavior." Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15(1):147-63.
54. -. 1998. The second language instinct. Lingua 106(1-4):133-60.
55. Sharwood-Smith, M. 1993. Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15(2):165-79.
56. Spada, N., and P. Lightbown. 1999. Instruction, first language influence, and developmental readiness in second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal 83(1):1-22.
57. Swain, M. 1985. Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Input in second language acquisition, ed. S. Gass and C. Madden, 235-53. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
58. -. 1995. Three functions of output in second language learning. In Principles and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson, ed. G. Cook and B. Seidlhofer, 125-44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
59. -. 1998. Focus on form through conscious reflection. In Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, ed. C. Doughty and J. Williams, 64-81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
60. Towell, R., and R. Hawkins. 1994. Approaches to second language acquisition. Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
61. Trahey, M., and L. White. 1993. Positive evidence and preemption in the second language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15(2):181-204.
62. Truscott, J., and M. Sharwood-Smith. 2004. Acquisition by processing: A modular perspective on language development. Bilingualism: Language and Cognitive 1:1-20.
63. VanPatten, B. 1993. Grammar teaching for the acquisition-rich classroom. Foreign Language Annals 26(4):435-50.
64. -. 1996. Input processing and grammar instruction. New York: Ablex.
65. -. 2002a. Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning 52(4):755-803.
66. -. 2002b. Processing the content of input-processing and processing instruction research: A response to DeKeyser, Salaberry, Robinson, and Harrington. Language Learning 52(4):825-31.
67. -. 2003. From input to output: A teacher's guide to second language acquisition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
68. -. 2004a. Input processing in second language acquisition. In Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary, ed. B. VanPatten, 5-31. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
69. -. 2004b. Input and output in establishing form-meaning connections. In Formmeaning connections in second language acquisition, ed. B. VanPatten, J. Williams, S. Rott, and M. Overstreet, 29-47. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
70. -. 2004c. Several reflections on why there is good reason to continue researching the effects of processing instruction. In Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary, ed. B. VanPatten, 325-35. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
71. -. 2006. Input processing in adult SLA. In Theories in second language acquisition, ed. VanPatten and J. Williams. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
72. VanPatten, B., and T. Cadierno. 1993. Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15(2):225-43.
73. VanPatten, B., and C. Fernández. 2004. The long-term effects of processing instruction. In Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary, ed. B. VanPatten, 273-89. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
74. VanPatten, B., and S. Oikkenon. 1996. Explanation versus structured input in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18(4):495-510.
75. VanPatten, B., and J. Williams, eds. 2006. Theories in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
76. VanPatten, B., J. Williams, and S. Rott. 2004. Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition. In Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition, ed. B. VanPatten, J. Williams, S. Rott, and M. Overstreet, 1-26. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
77. VanPatten, B., and W. Wong. 2004. Processing instruction and the French causative: Another replication. In Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary, ed. B. VanPatten, 97-118. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
78. White, J. 1998. Getting the learners' attention: A typographical input enhancement study. In Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, ed. C. Doughty and J. Williams, 85-113. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
79. White, L. 1987. Against comprehensible input: The input hypothesis and the development of L2 competence. Applied Linguistics 8(1):95-110.
80. -. 1989. Universal grammar and second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
81. -. 2003. Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
82. Williams, J., and J. Evans. 1998. What kind of focus and on which forms? In Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, ed. C. Doughty and J. Williams, 139-55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
83. Wong, W. 2004a. The nature of processing instruction. In Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary, ed. B. VanPatten, 33-63. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
84. -. 2004b. Processing instruction in French: The roles of explicit information and structured input. In Processing Instruction: Theory, research, and commentary, ed. B. VanPatten, 187-205.
85. -. 2005. Input enhancement: From theory and research to the classroom. New York: McGraw-Hill.
86. -. In press. Enhancing the learner's attention: A study with textual enhancement, orientation, and sentence- and discourse-level input. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.