Processing instruction and dictogloss: A study on object pronouns and word order in spanish

Foreign Language Annals

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 557-575

  VanPatten, Bill ^a   Inclezan, Daniela ^a   Salazar, Hilda ^a   Farley, Andrew P ^a  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dictogloss; First noun principle; Processing instruction; Spanish object pronouns

Indexed keywords

EID: 72349083342     PISSN: 0015718X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2009.01033.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Allen, L. (2000). Form-meaning connections and the French causative: An experiment in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 69-84.
2. Benati, A. (2001). A comparative study of the effects of processing instruction and output-based instruction on the acquisition of the Italian future tense. Language Teaching Research, 95-127.
3. Benati, A. (2004). The effects of structured input activities and explicit information on the acquisition of the Italian future tense. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 207-225).Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Benati, A. (2005). The effects of processing instruction, traditional instruction, and meaning-output instruction on the acquisition of the English past simple tense. Language Teaching Research, 9, 67-93.
5. Cadierno, T. (1995). Formal instruction from a processing perspective: An investigation into the Spanish past tense. Modern Language Journal, 79, 179-193.
6. Carroll, S. (2001). Input and evidence: The raw material of second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
7. Doughty, C. J. (2003). Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp.256-310). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
8. Doughty, C, & Williams, J. (1998). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty &J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197-261). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
10. Farley, A. P. (2004). The relative effects of processing instruction and meaning-based output instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 143-168). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Farley, A. P. (2005). Structured input. New York: McGraw-Hill.
12. Keating, G. D., & Farley, A. P. (2008). Processing instruction, meaning-based output instruction, and meaning-based drills: Impacts on classroom L2 acquisition of Spanish object pronouns. Hispania, 91, 639-650.
13. Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
14. Lee, J. E, & VanPatten, B. (1995). Making communicative language teaching happen. New York: McGraw-Hill.
15. Lee, J. E, & VanPatten, B. (2003). Making communicative language teaching happen (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
16. Long, M. H. (1983). Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of research. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 359-382.
17. Morgan-Short, K., & Wood Bowden, H. (2006). Processing instruction and meaningful output-based instruction: Effects on second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 31-65.
18. Nabei, T. (1996). Dictogloss: Is it an effective language learning task? Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 12, 59-74.
19. Omaggio Hadley, A. (2001). Teaching language in context (3rd ed.). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
20. Pica, T. (1983). Adult acquisition of English as a second language under different conditions of exposure. Language Learning, 33, 465-497.
21. Qin, J. (2008). The effect of processing instruction and dictogloss tasks on acquisition of the English passive voice. Language Teaching Research, 12, 61-82.
22. Sanz, C, & Morgan-Short, K. (2004). Positive evidence vs. explicit rule presentation and explicit negative feedback: A computer assisted study. Language Learning, 54, 35-78.
23. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253).Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
24. Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty &J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64-81). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modem Language Journal, 82, 320-337.
26. Truscott, J. (1998). Noticing in second language acquisition: A critical review. Second Language Research, 14, 103-135.
27. Truscott, J. (2004). The effectiveness of grammar instruction: Analysis of a meta-analysis. English Teaching & Learning, 28, 17-29.
28. VanPatten, B. (1993). Grammar instruction for the acquisition-rich classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 26, 433-450.
29. VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
30. VanPatten, B. (2004). Input processing in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 5-31). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. VanPatten, B. (2007). Input processing in adult second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 115-135). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. VanPatten, B. (2008). Processing matters. In T. Piske & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Input matters (pp. 47-61). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
33. VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225-243.
34. VanPatten, B., Farmer, J. L, & Clardy, C. L. (2009). Processing instruction and meaning-based output instruction: A response to Keating and Farley (2008). Hispania, 92, 124-135.
35. VanPatten, B., & Oikkenon, S. (1996). Explanation versus structured input in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 495-510. .
36. VanPatten, B., & Sanz, C. (1995). From input to output: Processing instruction and communicative tasks. In E R. Eckman, D. Highland, P. W. Lee, J. Milcham, & R. Ruth-kowski Weber (Eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 169-185). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. VanPatten, B., & Wong, W. (2004). Processing instruction and the French causative: Another replication. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 97-118). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Wajnryb, R. (1990). Grammar dictation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
39. Wong, W. (2004). The nature of processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 33-63). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Wong, W. (2005). Input enhancement: From theory and research to classroom practice. New York: McGraw-Hill.