Formal Intervention and the Development of Proficiency: The Role of Explicit Formation

Issues in Second Language Proficiency

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 169-188

  Vanpatten, Bill ^a  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85064362543     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. Alenan, R. (1995). Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition. In R. Schmidt (Ed.). Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 259-302). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i at Manoa.
2. Benati, A. (2001). A comparative study of the effects of processing instruction and output-based instruction on the acquisition of the Italian future tense. Language Teaching Research, 5, 95-127.
3. Benati, A. (2004). The effects of structured input activities and explicit information on the acquisition of the Italian future tense. In B. VanPatten (Ed.). Processing instruction:Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 207-25). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Benati, A. (2005). The effects of processing instruction, traditional instruction, and meaning-output instruction on the acquisition of the English past simple tense. Language Teaching Research, 9, 67-93.
5. Cadierno, T. (1995). Formal instruction from a processing perspective: An investigation into the Spanish past tense. The Modern Language Journal, 79, 179-93.
6. Carroll, S. (2001). Input and evidence: The raw material of second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
7. DeKeyser, R. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313-48). Oxford: Blackwell.
8. Farley, A. P. (2004a). Processing instruction and the Spanish subjunctive: Is explicit information needed? In B. VanPatten (Ed.). Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 227-39). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
9. Farley, A. P. (2004b) The relative effects of processing instruction and meaning-based output instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 143-68). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
10. Farley, A. P. (2005). Structured input. New York: McGraw-Hill.
11. Fernandez, C. (2008). Re-examining the role of explicit information in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 277-305.
12. Keating, G. D., & Farley, A. P. (2008). Processing instruction, meaning-based output instruction, and meaning-based drills: Impacts on classroom L2 acquisition of Spanish object pronouns. Hispania, 91, 639-50.
13. Hulstijn, J. (2005). Theoretical and empirical issues in the study of implicit and explicit second-language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 129-40)
14. Lee, J. F., & VanPatten, B. (1995). Making communicative language teaching happen (1st ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
15. Lee, J. F., & VanPatten, B. (2003). Making communicative language teaching happen (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
16. Morgan-Short, K., & Wood Bowden, H. (2006). Processing instruction and meaningful output-based instruction: Effects on second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 31-65.
17. Qin, J. (2008). The effect of processing instruction and dictogloss tasks on acquisition of the English passive voice. Language Teaching Research, 12, 61-82.
18. Robinson, R. (1995). Aptitude, awareness and the fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit second language learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.). Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 303-58). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i at Manoa.
19. Sanz, C., & Morgan-Short, K. (2004). Positive evidence vs. explicit rule presentation and explicit negative feedback: A computer assisted study. Language Learning, 54, 35-78.
20. Scott, V. (1989). An empirical study of explicit and implicit teaching strategies in French. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 14-22.
21. VanPatten, B. (1993). Grammar instruction for the acquisition-rich classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 26, 433-50.
22. VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
23. VanPatten, B. (2004). Input processing in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten (Ed.). Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 5-31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
24. VanPatten, B. (2007a). Some thoughts on the future of research on input enhancement. In C. Gascoigne (Ed.). Assessing the impact of input enhancement in second anguage education: Evolution in theory, research and practice (pp. 169-89).
25. VanPatten, B. (2007b). Input processing in adult second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.). Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 115-35). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. VanPatten, B. (2008). Processing matters. In T. Piske & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.) Input Matters (pp. 47-61). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
27. VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225-43.
28. VanPatten, B., Farmer, J. L., & Clardy, C. L. (2009). Processing Instruction and Meaning-based Output Instruction: A Response to Keating and Farley (2008). Hispania, 92, 124-135.
29. VanPatten, B., Inclezan, D., Salazar, H., & Farley, A. P. (forthcoming). Processing Instruction and Dictogloss: A Response to Qin (2008). Language Teaching Research.
30. VanPatten, B., & Oikkenon, S. (1996). Explanation versus structured input in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 495-510.
31. VanPatten, B., & Wong, W. (2004). Processing instruction and the French causative: another replication. In B. VanPatten (Ed.). Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 97-118). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
32. Wajnryb, R. (1990). Grammar dictation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Wong, W. (2004a). Processing instruction in French: the roles of explicit information and structured input. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 187-205). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. Wong, W. (2004b). The nature of processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.). Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 33-63). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35. Wong, W. (2005). Input enhancement: From theory and research to classroom practice. New York: McGraw-Hill.