Gaps in second language sentence processing

Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 53-78

  Marinis, Theodore ^a   Roberts, Leah ^a   Felser, Claudia ^a   Clahsen, Harald ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644517546     PISSN: 02722631     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0272263105050035     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Allen, D. (1992). The Oxford Placement Test. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Baumann, H., Nagengast, J., & Klaas, G. (1993). New Experimental Setup (NESU). Unpublished manuscript, Max-Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
3. Bever, T. G., & McElree, B. (1988). Empty categories access their antecedents during comprehension. Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 35-43.
4. Chomsky, N. (1973). Conditions on transformations. In S. R. Anderson & P. Kiparsky (Eds.), A festschrift for Morris Halle (pp. 232-286). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
5. Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step (pp. 89-155). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Clahsen, H., & Featherston, S. (1999). Antecedent priming at trace positions: Evidence from German scrambling. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 415-437.
8. Clifton, C., & Frazier, L. (1989). Comprehending sentences with long-distance dependencies. In G. M. Carlson & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds. , Linguistic structure in language processing (pp. 273-317). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
9. Crocker, M. (1996). Computational psycholinguistics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
10. Featherston, S. (2001). Empty categories in sentence processing. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
11. Felser, C., Roberts, L., Marinis, T., & Gross, R. (2003). The processing of ambiguous sentences by first and second language learners of English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 453-489.
12. Fiebach, C. J., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2002). Separating syntactic memory costs and syntactic integration costs during parsing: The processing of German wh-questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 250-272.
13. Fodor, J. D. (1978). Parsing strategies and constraints on transformations. Linguistic Inquiry, 9, 427-473.
14. Fodor, J. D. (1995). Comprehending sentence structure. In L. R. Gleitman & M. Liberman (Eds.), An invitation to cognitive science: Vol. 1. Language (2nd ed., pp. 209-246). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. (1989). Successive cyclicity in the grammar and the parser. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 93-126.
16. Frenck-Mestre, C. (2002). An on-line look at sentence processing in the second language. In R. R. Heredia & J. Altarriba (Eds.), Bilingual sentence processing (pp. 217-236). New York: Elsevier.
17. Frenck-Mestre, C., & Pynte, J. (1997). Syntactic ambiguity resolution while reading in second and native languages. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 119-148.
18. Friederici, A. (2002). Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 78-84.
19. Garnsey, S., Pearlmutter, N., Myers, E., & Lotocky, M. (1997). The contribution of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 58-93.
20. Gazdar, G., Klein, E., Pullum, G., & Sag, I. (1985). Generalized phrase structure grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
21. Gibson, E. (1998). Syntactic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68, 1-75.
22. Gibson, E., & Warren, T. (2004). Reading-time evidence for intermediate linguistic structure in long-distance dependencies. Syntax, 7, 55-78.
23. Hahne, A. (2001). What's different in second-language processing? Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 251-266.
24. Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. (2001). Processing a second language: Late learners' comprehension mechanisms as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 123-141.
25. Hawkins, R. (2001). Second language syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.
26. Isel, F. (2002, March). Auditory processing of German sentences by French late bilinguals: Neurodynamics of syntactic and semantic processes. Paper presented at the 24th annual meeting of the German Linguistics Society (DGfS), Mannheim, Germany.
27. Juffs, A. (1998). Main verb versus reduced relative clause ambiguity resolution in second language sentence processing. Language Learning, 48, 107-147.
28. Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (1995). Parsing effects in second language sentence processing: Subject and object asymmetries in wh-extraction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 483-516.
29. Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (1996). Garden path sentences and error data in second language sentence processing. Language Learning, 46, 283-326.
30. Just, M., Carpenter, P., & Woolley, J. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 228-238.
31. King, J. W., & Just, M. A. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 580-602.
32. King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1995). Who did what and when? Using word- and clause-level ERPs to monitor working memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 376-395.
33. Kluender, R., & Kutas, M. (1993). Bridging the gap: Evidence from ERPs on the processing of unbounded dependencies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 196-214.
34. Lee, M.-W. (2004). Another look at the role of empty categories in sentence processing (and grammar). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 33, 51-73.
35. Levine, R., & Hukari, T. (2004). The unity of unbounded dependencies. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
36. Love, T., & Swinney, D. (1996). Coreference processing and levels of analysis in object-relative constructions: Demonstration of antecedent reactivation with the cross-modal priming paradigm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 5-24.
37. Nakano, Y., Felser, C., & Clahsen, H. (2002). Antecedent priming at trace positions in Japanese long-distance scrambling. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31, 531-571.
38. Nicol, J. L. (1993). Reconsidering reactivation. In G. Altmann & R. Shillcock (Eds.), Cognitive models of speech processing: The second Sperlonga meeting (pp. 321-350). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Nicol, J. L., & Swinney, D. (1989). The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 5-20.
40. Papadopoulou, D., & Clahsen, H. (2003). Parsing strategies in L1 and L2 sentence processing: A study of relative clause attachment in Greek. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 501-528.
41. Pickering, M. (1999). Sentence comprehension. In S. Garrod & M. Pickering (Eds.), Language processing (pp. 123-153). Hove, East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
42. Pickering, M., & Barry, G. (1991). Sentence processing without empty categories. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6, 229-259.
43. Pickering, M., Barton, S., & Shillcock, R. (1994). Unbounded dependencies, island constraints, and processing complexity. In C. Clifton, L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing (pp. 199-224). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. Pollard, C., & Sag, I. A. (1994). Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45. Roberts, L. (2003). Syntactic processing in learners of English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom.
46. Sag, I. A., & Fodor, J. D. (1995). Extraction without traces. In R. Aranovich, W. Byrne, S. Preuss, & M. Senturia (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th annual meeting of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 365-384). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
47. Stowe, L. (1986). Parsing wh-constructions: Evidence for on-line gap location. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 227-245.
48. White, L., & Juffs, A. (1998). Constraints on wh-movement in two different contexts of non-native language acquisition: Competence and processing. In S. Flynn, G. Martohardjono, & W. O'Neil (Eds.), The generative study of second language acquisition (pp. 111-130). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Watanabe, A. (2001). Wh-in-situ languages. In M. Baltin & C. Collins (Eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory (pp. 203-225). Oxford: Blackwell.
50. Williams, J., Möbius, P., & Kim, C. (2001). Native and non-native processing of English wh-questions: Parsing strategies and plausibility constraints. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 509-540.