FORM-MEANING CONNECTIONS and the FRENCH CAUSATIVE

Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 69-84

  Allen, Linda Quinn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937330980     PISSN: 02722631     EISSN: 14701545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0272263100001030     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. DeKeyser, R. M., & Sokalski, K. J. (1996). The differential role of comprehension and production practice. Language Learning, 46, 613-642.
2. Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431-469.
3. Eckman, F. R., Highland, D., Lee, P. W., Mileham, J., & Weber, R. R. (Eds.). (1995). Second language theory and pedagogy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Ellis, R. (1993). The structural syllabus and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 91-113.
5. Ervin-Tripp, S. M. (1974). Is second language learning like the first TESOL Quarterly, 8, 111-127.
6. Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction (6th ed.). London: Longman.
7. Heilenman, L. K., & McDonald, J. L. (1993). Processing strategies in L2 learners of French: The role of transfer. Language Learning, 43, 507-557.
8. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. H. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.
9. Lee, J. F., & VanPatten, B. (1995). Making communicative language teaching happen. New York: McGraw-Hill.
10. LoCoco, V. (1987). Learner comprehension of oral and written sentences in German and Spanish: The importance of word order. In B. VanPatten, T. R. Dvorak, & J. F. Lee (Eds.), Foreign language learning: A research perspective (pp. 119-129). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
11. Long, M. H. (1988). Instructed interlanguage development. In L. Beebe (Ed.), Issues in second language acquisition: Multiple perspectives (pp. 115-141). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
12. Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
13. MacWhinney, B., Bates, E., & Kliegl, R. (1984). Clue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German, and Italian. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 127-150.
14. McDonald, J. L., & Heilenman, L. K. (1992). Changes in sentence processing as second language proficiency increases. In R. J. Harris (Ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals (pp. 325-336). New York: Elsevier Science.
15. Moore, D. S., & McCabe, G. P. (1989). Introduction to the practice of statistics. New York: W. H. Freeman Co.
16. Polio, C., & Gass, S. (1997). Replication and reporting: A commentary. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 499-508.
17. Robinson, P. (1996). Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 27-67.
18. Salaberry, M. R. (1997). The role of input and output practice in second language acquisition. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 422-451.
19. Sanz, C. (1994). Task, mode, and the effects of input-based explicit instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
20. Sanz, C., & VanPatten, B. (1998). On input processing, processing instruction, and the nature of replication tasks: A response to Salaberry. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 54, 263-273.
21. Sharwood Smith, M. (1991). Speaking to many minds: On the relevance of different types of language information for the L2 learner. Second Language Research, 7, 118-132.
22. Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 165-179.
23. Swain, M. (1993). The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing arent enough. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 158-164.
24. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371-391.
26. VanPatten, B. (1984). Learners comprehension of clitic pronouns: More evidence for a word order strategy. Hispanic Linguistics, 1, 57-67.
27. VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
28. VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993a). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225-244.
29. VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993b). Input processing and second language acquisition: A role for instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 77, 45-57.