The dynamics of gene expression in vertebrate embryogenesis at single-cell resolution

Science

Volumn 360, Issue 6392, 2018, Pages

  Briggs, James A ^a   Weinreb, Caleb ^a   Wagner, Daniel E ^a   Megason, Sean ^a   Peshkin, Leonid ^a   Kirschner, Marc W ^a   Klein, Allon M ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; CELL; CYPRINID; EMBRYO; FROG; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC MARKER; GENOME; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; CELL FATE; CELL LINEAGE; CELL STRUCTURE; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; GENE CLUSTER; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; MOLECULAR IMAGING; NEURAL CREST; NONHUMAN; POPULATION GENETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RNA SEQUENCE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; XENOPUS TROPICALIS; ZEBRA FISH; ANIMAL; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CYTOLOGY; EMBRYOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; NERVOUS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PROCEDURES; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS; XENOPUS; ZYGOTE;

ANURA; DANIO RERIO; VERTEBRATA;

TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTOME;

ANIMALS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GENETIC VARIATION; NEURAL CREST; NEUROGENESIS; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, RNA; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; TRANSCRIPTOME; XENOPUS; ZEBRAFISH; ZYGOTE;

EID: 85046535959     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.aar5780     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. A. M. Klein et al., Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells. Cell 161, 1187–1201 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.044; pmid: 26000487
2. J. Newport, M. Kirschner, A major developmental transition in early Xenopus embryos: I. characterization and timing of cellular changes at the midblastula stage. Cell 30, 675–686 (1982). doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90272-0; pmid: 6183003
3. J. Newport, M. Kirschner, A major developmental transition in early Xenopus embryos: II. Control of the onset of transcription. Cell 30, 687–696 (1982). doi: 10.1016/ 0092-8674(82)90273-2; pmid: 7139712
4. J. Heasman, Patterning the early Xenopus embryo. Development 133, 1205–1217 (2006). doi: 10.1242/dev.02304 pmid: 16527985
5. K. Karimi et al., Xenbase: A genomic, epigenomic and transcriptomic model organism database. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, D861–D868 (2018). pmid: 29059324
6. R. L. Davis, M. W. Kirschner, The fate of cells in the tailbud of Xenopus laevis. Development 127, 255–267 (2000). pmid: 10603344
7. D. E. Wagner et al., Single-cell mapping of gene expression landscapes and lineage in the zebrafish embryo. Science 360, aar4362 (2018).
8. E. Segerdell et al., Enhanced XAO: The ontology of Xenopus anatomy and development underpins more accurate annotation of gene expression and queries on Xenbase. J. Biomed. Semantics 4, 31 (2013). doi: 10.1186/ 2041-1480-4-31; pmid: 24139024
9. E. Segerdell, J. B. Bowes, N. Pollet, P. D. Vize, An ontology Xenopus anatomy and development. BMC Dev. Biol. 8, 92 (2008). doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-8-92; pmid: 18817563
10. C. Trapnell et al., The dynamics and regulators of cell fate decisions are revealed by pseudotemporal ordering of singl cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 381–386 (2014). doi: 10.1038/ nbt.2859; pmid: 24658644
11. C. Weinreb, S. Wolock, B. K. Tusi, M. Socolovsky, A. M. Klei Fundamental limits on dynamic inference from single-cell snapshots. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, E2467–E2476 (2018). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1714723115; pmid: 29463712
12. G. Schiebinger et al., Reconstruction of developmental landscapes by optimal-transport analysis of single-cell gene expression sheds light on cellular reprogramming. bioRxiv 191056 [preprint]. 27 September 2017. doi: 10.1101/191056
13. M. Walmsley, A. Ciau-Uitz, R. Patient, Adult and embryonic blood and endothelium derive from distinct precursor populations which are differentially programmed by BMP in Xenopus. Development 129, 5683–5695 (2002). doi: 10.124 dev.00169; pmid: 12421708
14. F. Liu, M. Walmsley, A. Rodaway, R. Patient, Fli1 acts at the t of the transcriptional network driving blood and endothelial development. Curr. Biol. 18, 1234–1240 (2008). doi: 10.1016 j.cub.2008.07.048; pmid: 18718762
15. T. Nagasawa et al., Evolutionary Changes in the Developmen Origin of Hatching Gland Cells in Basal Ray-Finned Fishes. Zool. Sci. 33, 272–281 (2016). doi: 10.2108/zs150183; pmid: 27268981
16. M. Yasutomi, T. Hama, Electron microscopic study on the xanthophore differentiation in Xenopus laevis, with special reference to their pterinosomes. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 38, 421–432 (1972). doi: 10.1016/0022-5320(72)90080-9; pmid: 4335114
17. J. A. Briggs et al., Mouse embryonic stem cells can differentiate via multiple paths to the same state. eLife 6, e26945 (2017). doi: 10.7554/eLife.26945; pmid: 28990928
18. H. Weber, C. E. Symes, M. E. Walmsley, A. R. Rodaway, R. K. Patient, A role for GATA5 in Xenopus endoderm specification. Development 127, 4345–4360 (2000). pmid: 11003835
19. J. F. Reiter et al., Gata5 is required for the development of the heart and endoderm in zebrafish. Genes Dev. 13, 2983–2995 (1999). doi: 10.1101/gad.13.22.2983; pmid: 10580005
20. H. Weintraub, The MyoD family and myogenesis: Redundancy, networks, and thresholds. Cell 75, 1241–1244 (1993). doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90610-3; pmid: 8269506
21. T. Ravasi et al., An atlas of combinatorial transcriptional regulation in mouse and man. Cell 140, 744–752 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.044; pmid: 20211142
22. J. Monod, F. Jacob, Teleonomic mechanisms in cellular metabolism, growth, and differentiation. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 26, 389–401 (1961). doi: 10.1101/ SQB.1961.026.01.048; pmid: 14475415
23. D. E. Cohen, D. Melton, Turning straw into gold: Directing cell fate for regenerative medicine. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12, 243–252 (2011). doi: 10.1038/nrg2938; pmid: 21386864
24. M. Hu et al., Multilineage gene expression precedes commitment in the hemopoietic system. Genes Dev. 11, 774–785 (1997). doi: 10.1101/gad.11.6.774; pmid: 9087431
25. M. Thomson et al., Pluripotency factors in embryonic stem cells regulate differentiation into germ layers. Cell 145, 875–889 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.05.017; pmid: 21663792
26. L. Velten et al., Human haematopoietic stem cell lineage commitment is a continuous process. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 271–281 (2017). doi: 10.1038/ncb3493; pmid: 28319093
27. J. Shu et al., Induction of pluripotency in mouse somatic cells with lineage specifiers. Cell 153, 963–975 (2013). doi: 10.1016/ j.cell.2013.05.001; pmid: 23706735
28. P. Laslo et al., Multilineage transcriptional priming and determination of alternate hematopoietic cell fates. Cell 126, 755–766 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.052; pmid: 16923394
29. F. C. Wardle, J. C. Smith, Refinement of gene expression patterns in the early Xenopus embryo. Development 131, 4687–4696 (2004). doi: 10.1242/dev.01340; pmid: 15329341
30. E. Buitrago-Delgado, K. Nordin, A. Rao, L. Geary, C. LaBonne, Shared regulatory programs suggest retention of blastula-stage potential in neural crest cells. Science 348, 1332–1335 (2015). doi: 10.1126/science.aaa3655; pmid: 25931449
31. E. Lubeck, A. F. Coskun, T. Zhiyentayev, M. Ahmad, L. Cai, Single-cell in situ RNA profiling by sequential hybridization. Nat. Methods 11, 360–361 (2014). doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2892; pmid: 24681720
32. K. H. Chen, A. N. Boettiger, J. R. Moffitt, S. Wang, X. Zhuang, Spatially resolved, highly multiplexed RNA profiling in single cells. Science 348, aaa6090 (2015). doi: 10.1126/science. aaa6090; pmid: 25858977
33. E. Z. Macosko et al., Highly Parallel Genome-wide Expression Profiling of Individual Cells Using Nanoliter Droplets. Cell 161, 1202–1214 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.002; pmid: 26000488
34. N. Karaiskos et al., The Drosophila embryo at single-cell transcriptome resolution. Science 358, 194–199 (2017). doi: 10.1126/science.aan3235; pmid: 28860209
35. J. Cao et al., Comprehensive single-cell transcriptional profiling of a multicellular organism. Science 357, 661–667 (2017). doi: 10.1126/science.aam8940; pmid: 28818938
36. K. Achim et al., High-throughput spatial mapping of single-cell RNA-seq data to tissue of origin. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 503–509 (2015). doi: 10.1038/nbt.3209; pmid: 25867922
37. R. Satija, J. A. Farrell, D. Gennert, A. F. Schier, A. Regev, Spatial reconstruction of single-cell gene expression data. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 495–502 (2015). doi: 10.1038/nbt.3192; pmid: 25867923
38. D. Forman, J. M. Slack, Determination and cellular commitment in the embryonic amphibian mesoderm. Nature 286, 492–494 (1980). doi: 10.1038/286492a0; pmid: 7402328
39. J. Heasman, C. C. Wylie, P. Hausen, J. C. Smith, Fates and states of determination of single vegetal pole blastomeres of X. laevis. Cell 37, 185–194 (1984). doi: 10.1016/ 0092-8674(84)90314-3; pmid: 6722871
40. S. Hontelez et al., Embryonic transcription is controlled by maternally defined chromatin state. Nat. Commun. 6, 10148 (2015). doi: 10.1038/ncomms10148; pmid: 26679111
41. R. C. Akkers et al., A hierarchy of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 acquisition in spatial gene regulation in Xenopus embryos. Dev. Cell 17, 425–434 (2009). doi: 10.1016/ j.devcel.2009.08.005; pmid: 19758566
42. M. Hemberger, W. Dean, W. Reik, Epigenetic dynamics of stem cells and cell lineage commitment: Digging Waddington’s canal. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 526–537 (2009). doi: 10.1038/nrm2727; pmid: 19603040
43. S. John et al., Chromatin accessibility pre-determines glucocorticoid receptor binding patterns. Nat. Genet. 43, 264–268 (2011). doi: 10.1038/ng.759; pmid: 21258342
44. L. Ho, G. R. Crabtree, Chromatin remodelling during development. Nature 463, 474–484 (2010). doi: 10.1038/ nature08911; pmid: 20110991
45. D. Arendt et al., The origin and evolution of cell types. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17, 744–757 (2016). doi: 10.1038/ nrg.2016.127; pmid: 27818507