A probabilistic model of lexical and syntactic access and disambiguation

Cognitive Science

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 137-194

  Jurafsky, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030117215     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0364-0213(99)80005-6     Document Type: Article

References (166)

1. Abney, S.P. (1989). A computational model of human parsing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 129-144.
2. Altmann, G.T.M., & Steedman, M.J. (1988) Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition, 30, 191-238.
3. Baker, J.K. (1979). Trainable grammars for speech recognition. In D.H. Klatt & J.J. Wolf (Eds.), Speech communication papers for the 97th meeting of the Acoustical Society of America (pp. 547-550).
4. Barton, G.E., Jr., Berwick, R.C., & Ristad, E.S. (1987). Computational complexity and natural language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Bever, T.G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J.R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley.
6. Bobrow, S., & Bell, S. (1973). On catching on to idiomatic expression. Memory & Cognition, 1, 343-346.
7. Boland, J.E. (1991). The use of lexical knowledge in sentence processing. Doctoral dissertation, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
8. Boland, J.E., Tanenhaus, M.K., & Garnsey, S.M. (1990). Evidence for the immediate use of verb control information in sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 413-432.
9. Bresnan, J. (Ed.). (1982). The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.
10. Britt, A. (1991). The role of referential uniqueness and argument structure in parsing prepositional phrases. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. (Cited in Britt et al., 1993).
11. Britt, A., Perfetti, C.A., Garrod, S., & Rayner, K. (1992). Parsing in discourse: Context effects and their limits. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 293-314.
12. Britt, A., Gabrys, G., & Perfetti, C.A. (1993). A restricted interactive model of parsing. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 260-265). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Burgess, C., & Lund, K. (1994). Multiple constraints in syntactic ambiguity resolution: A connectionist account of psycholinguistic data. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 90-95). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Cacciari, C., & Tabossi, P. (1988). The comprehension of idioms. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 668-683.
15. Cardie, C., & Lehnen, W. (1991). A cognitively plausible approach to understanding complex syntax. In Proceedings of the Ninth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-9I) (pp. 117-124). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
16. Carlson, G.N., & Tanenhaus, M.K. (1987). Thematic roles and language comprehension. In W. Wilkins (Ed.), Thematic relations. San Diego: Academic.
17. Charniak, E., & Goldman, R. (1988). A logic for semantic interpretation. In Proceedings of the 26th ACL, Buffalo, NY.
18. Church, K., & Patil, R. (1982). Coping with syntactic ambiguity. American Journal of Computational Linguistics, 8, 139-149.
19. Clifton, C., Jr. (1993). The role of thematic roles in sentence processing. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 47, 222-246.
20. Clifton, C., Jr., & Frazier, L. (1989). Comprehending sentences with long-distance dependencies. In G.N. Carlson & M.K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Linguistic structure in language processing (pp. 273-317). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
21. Clifton, C., Jr., Speer, S., & Abney, S. (1991). Parsing arguments: Phrase structure and argument structure as determinants of initial parsing decisions. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 251-271.
22. Connine, C., Ferreira, F., Jones, C., Clifton, C., & Frazier, L. (1984). Verb frame preference: Descriptive norms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 13, 307-319.
23. Cottrell, G.W. (1985). Connectionist parsing. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 201-211). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Crain, S., & Fodor, J.D. (1985). How can grammars help parsers? In D.R. Dowty, L. Karttunen, & A. Zwicky (Eds.), Natural language parsing (pp. 94-128). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Crain, S., & Steedman, M. (1985). On not being led up the garden path: The use of context by the psychological syntax processor. In D.R. Dowty, L. Karttunen, & A. Zwicky (Eds.), Natural language parsing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 113-121.
27. Dalrymple, M. (1992). Categorial semantics for LFG. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (pp. 212-218). Somerset, NJ: ACL.
28. d'Arcais, G.B.F. (1993). The comprehension and semantic interpretation of idioms. In C. Cacciari & P. Tabossi (Eds.), Idioms: Processing, structure, and interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Earley, J. (1970). An efficient context-free parsing algorithm. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 6, 451-455.
30. Elman, J.L. (1989). Structured representations and connectionist models. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 17-25). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Feldman, J.A., & Ballard, D.H. (1982). Connectionist models and their properties. Cognitive Science, 6, 205-254.
32. Ferreira, F., & Clifton, C., Jr. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 348-368.
33. Fillmore, C.J. (1986). Varieties of conditional sentences. In ESCOL (Eastern States Conference on Linguistics) (pp. 163-182).
34. Fillmore, C.J. (1988). The mechanisms of "Construction Grammar." In S. Axmaker, A. Jaisser, H. Singmaster (Eds.), Proceedings of BLS 14 (pp. 35-55). Berkeley, CA.
35. Fillmore, C.J., Kay, P., & O'Connor, M.C. (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language, 64, 501-538.
36. Fodor, J.D. (1978). Parsing strategies and constraints on transformations. Linguistic Inquiry, 9, 427-473.
37. Ford, M., Bresnan, J., & Kaplan, R.M. (1982). A competence-based theory of syntactic closure. In J. Bresnan (Ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations (pp. 727-796). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Francis, W.N., & Kučera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
39. Fraser, B. (1976). The verb-particle combination in English. New York: Academic.
40. Frazier, L. (1978). On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut. (Dissertation distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club).
41. Frazier, L. (1987). Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Frazier, L., & Fodor, J.D. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition, 6, 291-295.
43. Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1987). Resolution of syntactic category ambiguities: Eye movements in parsing lexically ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 505-526.
44. Fujisaki, T., Jelinek, F., Cocke, J., & Black, E. (1991). A probabilistic parsing method for sentence disambiguation. In M. Tomita (Ed.), Current issues in parsing technology (pp. 139-152). Boston: Kluwer.
45. Garnsey, S.M., Tanenhaus, M.K., & Chapman, R.M. (1989). Evoked potentials and the study of sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 51-60.
46. Garrod, S., & Sanford, A. (1991). On the real-time character of interpretation during reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 43-59.
47. Gibbs, R.W., Jr. (1984). Literal meaning and psychological theory. Cognitive Science, 8, 275-304.
48. Gibbs, R.W., Jr., Nayak, N.P., & Cutting, C. (1989). How to kick the bucket and not decompose: Analyzability and idiom processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 576-593.
49. Gibson, E. (1991). A computational theory of human linguistic processing: Memory limitations and processing breakdown. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
50. Gibson, E., & Pearlmutter, N.J. (1994). A corpus-based analysis of psycholinguistic constraints on preposition-phrase attachment. In C. Clifton, Jr., L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing (pp. 181-198). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Glucksberg, S., Kreuz, R. J., & Rho, S.H. (1986). Context can constrain lexical access: Implications for models of language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition, 12, 323-335.
52. Goldberg, A.E. (1991). A semantic account of resultatives. Linguistic Analysis, 21, 66-96.
53. Goldberg, A.E. (1992). The inherent semantics of argument structure: The case of the English ditransitive construction. Cognitive Linguistics, 3, 37-74.
54. Gorrell, P.G. (1987). Studies of human syntactic processing: Ranked-parallel versus serial models. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
55. Gorrell, P.G. (1989). Establishing the loci of serial and parallel effects in syntactic processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 61-73.
56. Hankamer, J. (1973). Unacceptable ambiguity. Linguistic Inquiry, IV, 17-68.
57. Henderson, J. (1994). Description based parsing in a connectionist network. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
58. Henderson, L. (1989). On mental representation of morphology and its diagnosis by measures of visual access speed. In W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process (pp. 357-391). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
59. Hill, A.A. (1970). Laymen, lexicographers, and linguists. Language, 46, 245-258.
60. Hirst, G. (1986). Semantic interpretation and the resolution of ambiguity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61. Hirst, G., & Charniak, E. (1982). Word sense and case slot disambiguation. In Proceedings of the Second National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 95-98). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
62. Hobbs, J.R., & Bear, J. (1990). Two principles of parse preference. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-90) (pp. 162-167). Somerset, NJ: ACL.
63. Hogaboam, T.W., & Perfetti, C.A. (1975). Lexical ambiguity and sentence comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 265-274.
64. Jelinek, F., & Lafferty, J.D. (1992). Computation of the probability of initial substring generation by stochastic context-free grammars. Computational Linguistics, 17, 315-323.
65. Joos, M. (1958). Review of Eric Hamp's A glossary of American technical linguistic usage. Language, 34, 279-288.
66. Joos, M. (1972). Semantic axiom number one. Language, 48, 257-265
67. Jurafsky, D. (1992). An on-line computational model of human sentence interpretation: A theory of the representation and use of linguistic knowledge. (dissertation/Tech. Rep. No. 92/676). Berkeley, CA: University of California at Berkeley, Computer Science Division.
68. Jurafsky, D., Wooters, C., Tajchman, G., Segal, J., Stolcke, A., Fosler, E., & Morgan, N. (1995). Using a stochastic context-free grammar as a language model for speech recognition. In IEEE ICASSP-95 (pp. 189-192).
69. Kawamoto, A.H. (1993). Nonlinear dynamics in the resolution of lexical ambiguity. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 474-516.
70. Kay, M. (1973). The MIND system. In R. Rustin (Ed.), Natural language processing (pp. 155-188). New York, Algorithmics Press.
71. Kay, P. (1990). Even. Linguistics and Philosophy, 13, 59-216.
72. Kimball, J.P. (1973). Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language. Cognition, 2, 15-47.
73. Koenig, J.-P. (1993). Linking constructions vs. linking rules: Evidence from French. In J. Guenter, B. Kaiser, & C. Zoll (Eds.), Proceedings of BLS 19 (pp. 217-231). Berkeley, CA: BLS.
74. Koenig, J.-P. (1994). Lexical underspecification and the syntax/semantics interface. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
75. Koenig, J.-P., & Jurafsky, D. (1995). Type underspecification and on-line type construction in the lexicon. In R. Aranovich, W. Byrne, S. Preuss (Eds.), Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL-94) (pp. 270-285). Stanford, CA: CSL1.
76. Krieger, H.-U., & Nerbonne, J. (1993). Feature-based inheritance networks for computational lexicons. In T. Briscoe, V. de Paiva, & A. Copestake (Eds.), Inheritance, defaults, and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
77. Kuno, S. (1965). The predictive analyzer and a path elimination technique. Communications of the ACM, 8, 453-462.
78. Kurtzman, H.S. (1985). Studies in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cambridge, MA.
79. Kurtzman, H.S., Crawford, L.F., & Nychis-Florence, C. (1991). Locating WH-traces. In R.C. Berwick, S.P. Abney, & C. Tenny (Eds.), Principle-based parsing: Computation and psycholinguistics (pp. 347-383). Kluwer, Dordrecht.
80. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
81. Lakoff, G. (1993). Cognitive phonology. In J. Goldsmith (Ed.), The last phonological rule (pp. 117-145). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
82. Lambrecht, K. (in press). The pragmatics of case. On the relationship between semantic, grammatical, and pragmatic roles in English and French. In M. Shibatani & S.A. Thompson (Eds.), Essays in semantics.
83. Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
84. Luce, P.A., Pisoni, D.B., & Goldfinger, S.D. (1990). Similarity neighborhoods of spoken words. In. G.T.M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing (pp. 122-147). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
85. Luce, R.D. (1959). Individual choice behavior. New York: Wiley.
86. Lytinen, S.L. (1991). Semantics-first natural language processing. In Proceedings of the Ninth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-92) (pp. 111-116). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
87. MacDonald, M.C. (1993). The interaction of lexical and syntactic ambiguity. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 692-715.
88. MacDonald, M.C., Pearlmutter, N.J., & Seidenberg, M.S. (1994). Syntactic ambiguity resolution as lexical ambiguity resolution. In C. Clifton, Jr., L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
89. Magerman, D.M., & Marcus, M.P. (1991). Pearl: A probabilistic chart parser. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 123-153). Somerset, NJ: ACL.
90. Marcus, M.P. (1980). A theory of syntactic recognition for natural language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
91. Marcus, M.P., Santorini, B., & Marcinkiewicz, M.A. (1993). Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19, 313-330.
92. Marslen-Wilson, W. (1975). Sentence perception as an interactive parallel process. Science, 189, 226-228.
93. Marslen-Wilson, W. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. Cognition, 25, 71-102.
94. Marslen-Wilson, W. (1990). Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access. In G.T.M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing (pp. 148-172). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
95. Marslen-Wilson, W., Brown, C.M., & Tyler, L.K. (1988). Lexical representations in spoken language comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes, 3, 1-16.
96. Mathis, D.A., & Mozer, M.C. (1995). On the computational utility of consciousness. In G. Tesauro, D.S. Touretzky, & J. Alspector (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems VII. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
97. McCawley, J.D. (1989). The comparative conditional construction in English, German, and Chinese. In Proceedings of BLS 14 (pp. 176-187). Berkeley, CA: BLS.
98. McClelland, J.L., & Elman, J.L. (1986). Interactive processes in speech perception: The TRACE model. In J.L. McClelland, D.E. Rumelhart, & the PDP Research Group (Eds), Parallel distributed processing volume 2: Psychological and biological models (pp. 58-121). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
99. McClelland, J.L., St. John, M., & Taraban, R. (1989). Sentence comprehension: A parallel distributed processing approach. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 123-154.
100. McRoy, S.W., & Hirst, G. (1990). Race-based parsing and syntactic disambiguation. Cognitive Science, 14, 313-353.
101. Milne, R.W. (1982). Predicting garden path sentences. Cognitive Science, 6, 349-374.
102. Mitchell, D.C. (1989). Verb guidance and other lexical effects in parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 123-154.
103. Ng, N.T., & Mooney, R.J. (1990). On the role of coherence in abductive explanation. In Proceedings of the Eighth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-90) (pp. 337-342). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
104. Norvig, P. (1987). A unified theory of inference for text understanding. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA. (Available as University of California at Berkeley Computer Science Division Tech. Rep. No. 87/339).
105. Norvig, P. (1988). Interpretation under ambiguity. In Proceedings of BLS 14 (pp. 188-201). Berkeley, CA: BLS.
106. Norvig, P., & Wilensky, R. (1990). A critical evaluation of commensurable abduction models for semantic interpretation. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-90) (pp. 225-230). Somerset, NJ: ACL.
107. Orgun, O., Koenig, J.-P., & Jurafsky, D. (1995). Constraint-based morphology. Manuscript submitted to NELS-95.
108. Osterhout, L., & Swinney, D.A. (1989). On the role of the simplicity heuristic in language processing: Evidence from structural and inferential processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 553-562.
109. Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: Networks of plausible inference. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman.
110. Pollard, C., & Sag, I.A. (1987). Information-based syntax and semantics: Volume 1: Fundamentals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
111. Pollard, C., & Sag, I.A. (1994). Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
112. Potter, M.C., & Faulconer, B.A. (1979). Understanding noun phrases. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 509-521.
113. Pritchett, B. (1988). Garden path phenomena and the grammatical basis of language processing. Language, 64, 539-576.
114. Pritchett, B.L. (1993). Grammatical competence and parsing performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
115. Reder, L.M. (1983). What kind of pitcher can a catcher fill? Effects of priming in sentence comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 22, 189-202.
116. Resnik, P. (1992). Probabilistic tree-adjoining grammar as a framework for statistical natural language processing. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (pp. 418-424). Somerset, NJ: ACL.
117. Resnik, P. (1993). Selection and information: A class-based approach to lexical relationships. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania. (Institute for Research in Cognitive Science Rep. No. IRCS-93-42).
118. Riesbeck, C.K., & Schank, R.C. (1978). Comprehension by computer: Expectation-based analysis of sentences in context. In W.J.M. Levelt & G.B.F. d'Arcais (Eds.), Studies in the perception of language (pp. 247-293). London: Wiley.
119. Sag, I.A., Kaplan, R., Karttunen, L., Kay, M., Pollard, C., Shieber, S., & Zaenen, A. (1985). Unification and grammatical theory. In Proceedings of the Fifth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 238-254). Stanford, CA: CSLI.
120. Salasoo, A., & Pisoni, D.B. (1985). Interaction of knowledge sources in spoken word identification. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 210-231.
121. Schubert, L.K. (1984). On parsing preferences. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Computational Linguistics (pp. 247-250). Somerset, NJ: ACL.
122. Schubert, L.K. (1986). Are there preference trade-offs in attachment decisions? In Proceedings of the Fifth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 601-605). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
123. Schvaneveldt, R.W., Meyer, D.E., & Becker, C.A. (1976). Lexical ambiguity, semantic context, and visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 243-256.
124. Selkirk, E. (1982). The syntax of words. Cambridge: MIT Press.
125. Shastri, L., & Ajjanagadde, V. (1993). From simple associations to systematic reasoning: A connectionist representation of rules, variables, and dynamic bindings using temporal synchrony. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 417-494.
126. Shieber, S.M. (1983). Sentence disambiguation by a shift-reduce parsing technique. In Proceedings of the 21st ACL (pp. 113-118). Somerset, NJ: ACL.
127. Shieber, S.M. (1985). Using restriction to extend parsing algorithms for complex-feature-based formalisms. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACL (pp. 145-152). Somerset, NJ: ACL.
128. Simpson, G.B., & Burgess, C. (1985). Activation and selection processes in the recognition words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 28-39.
129. Small, S.L., & Rieger, C. (1982). Parsing and comprehending with Word Experts. In W.G. Lehnert & M.H. Ringle (Eds.), Strategies for natural language processing (pp. 89-147). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
130. Spivey-Knowlton, M. (1994). Quantitative predictions from a constraint-based theory of syntactic ambiguity resolution. In M. Mozer, P. Smolensky, D. Touretzky, J. Elman, & A. Weigend (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1993 Connectionist Models Summer School (pp. 130-137). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
131. Spivey-Knowlton, M., & Sedivy, J. (1995). Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints. Cognition, 55, 227-257.
132. Spivey-Knowlton, M., & Tanenhaus, M. (1995). Discourse context and syntactic ambiguity resolution: Evidence from eye-movements during reading. Manuscript submitted for publication.
133. Spivey-Knowlton, M., Trueswell, J., & Tanenhaus, M. (1993). Context effects in syntactic ambiguity resolution: Discourse and semantic influences in parsing reduced relative clauses. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 276-309.
134. Stevenson, S. (1993). A competition-based explanation of syntactic attachment preferences and garden path phenomena. In Proceedings of the 31th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 266-273). Somerset, NJ: ACL.
135. Stolcke, A. (1994). Bayesian learning of probabilistic language models. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
136. Stolcke, A. (1995). An efficient probabilistic context-free parsing algorithm that computes prefix probabilities. Computational Linguistics, 21, 165-202.
137. Stolcke, A., & Omohundro, S. (1993). Hidden Markov Model induction by Bayesian model merging. In C.L. Giles, S. J. Hanson, & J.D. Cowan (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 5 (pp. 11-18). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman.
138. Stowe, L.A. (1986). Evidence for on-line gap location. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 227-245.
139. Swinney, D.A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 645-659.
140. Swinney, D.A., & Cutler, A. (1979). The access and processing of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 523-534.
141. Swinney, D.A., & Osterhout, L. (1990). Inference generation during auditory language comprehension. In A.C. Graesser & G.H. Bower (Eds.), Inferences and text comprehension. New York, NY: Academic.
142. Tabor, W. (1994). The gradual development of degree modifier sort of and kind of: A corpus proximity model. In K. Beals, G. Cooke, D. Kathman, K.-E. McCullough, S. Kita, & D. Testen (Eds)., Proceedings of CLS 29. University of Chicago.
143. Tabossi, P., Spivey-Knowlton, M., McRae, K., & Tanenhaus, M.K. (1994). Semantic effects on syntactic ambiguity resolution: Evidence for a constraint-based resolution process. In Attention and performance XV. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
144. Tajchman, G., Jurafsky, D., & Fosler, E. (1995). Learning phonological rule probabilities from speech corpora with exploratory computational phonology. In Proceedings of ACL-95 (pp. 1-8). Somerset, NJ: ACL.
145. Tanenhaus, M.K., Boland, J.E., Garnsey, S.M., & Carlson, G. (1989). Lexical structures in parsing long-distance dependencies. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 37-50.
146. Tanenhaus, M.K., Leiman, J.M., & Seidenberg, M.S. (1979). Evidence for multiple stages in the processing of ambiguous words in syntactic contexts. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 427-440.
147. Tanenhaus, M.K., & Lucas, M.M. (1987). Context effects in lexical processing. Cognition, 25, 213-234.
148. Tanenhaus, M.K., Stowe, L.A., & Carlson, G. (1985). The interaction of lexical expectation and pragmatics in parsing filler-gap constructions. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 361-365). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
149. Taraban, R., & McClelland, J.L. (1988). Constituent attachment and thematic role assignment in sentence processing: Influences of content-based expectations. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 597-632.
150. Trueswell, J.C., & Tanenhaus, M.K. (1991). Tense, temporal context and syntactic ambiguity resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6, 303-338.
151. Trueswell, J.C., & Tanenhaus, M.K. (1994). Toward a lexicalist framework for constraintbased syntactic ambiguity resolution. In C. Clifton, Jr., L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing (pp. 155-180). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
152. Tyler, L.K. (1984). The structure of the initial cohort: Evidence from gating. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 417-427.
153. Tyler, L.K., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1982). Speech comprehension processes. In J. Mehler, E.C.T. Walker, & M. Garrett (Eds.), Perspectives on mental representation (pp. 169-184). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
154. Ulvestad, B. (1960). On the use of transitional probability estimates in programming for mechanical translation. Statistical Methods in Linguistics, 1, 24-40.
155. van der Linden, E.-J. (1992). Incremental processing and the hierarchical lexicon. Computational Linguistics, 18, 219-238.
156. van der Linden, E.-J., & Kraaij, W. (1990). Ambiguity resolution and the retrieval of idioms: Two approaches. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-90) (pp. 245-250). Somerset, NJ: ACL.
157. van Noord, G. (1991). Head corner parsing for discontinuous constituency. In Proceedings of the 29th ACL (pp. 114-121). Somerset, NJ: ACL.
158. Wanner, E. (1980). The ATN and the Sausage Machine: Which one is baloney. Cognition, 8, 209-226.
159. Whittemore, G., Ferrara, K., & Brunner, H. (1990). Empirical study of predictive powers of simple attachment schemes for post-modifier prepositional phrases. In Proceedings of the 28th ACL (pp. 23-30). Somerset, NJ: ACL.
160. Wilensky, R., & Arens, Y. (1980). PHRAN: A knowledge-based natural language understander. In Proceedings of the 18th ACL. Somerset, NJ: ACL.
161. Wilks, Y. (1975a). An intelligent analyzer and understander of English. Communications of the ACM, 18, 264-274.
162. Wilks, Y. (1975b). Preference semantics. In E.L. Keenan (Ed.), The formal semantics of natural language (pp. 329-348). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
163. Wilks, Y., Huang, X., & Fass, D. (1985). Syntax, preference and right attachment. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 779-784).
164. Wright, B., & Garrett, M. (1984). Lexical decision in sentences: Effects of syntactic structure. Memory & Cognition, 12, 31-45.
165. Zec, D., & Inkelas, S. (1990). Prosodically constrained syntax. In S. Inkelas & D. Zec (Eds.), The phonology-syntax connection (pp. 365-378). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
166. Zwitserlood, P. (1989). The locus of the effects of sentenial-semantic context in spoken-word processing. Cognition, 32, 25-64.