Partner-Specific Adaptation in Dialog

Topics in Cognitive Science

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 274-291

  Brennan, Susan E ^a   Hanna, Joy E ^b  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OBERLIN COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Audience design; Collaborative cognition; Entrainment; Joint action; Referential communication

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; KNOWLEDGE; LANGUAGE; REACTION TIME;

COMMUNICATION; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; KNOWLEDGE; LANGUAGE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 67349149263     PISSN: 17568757     EISSN: 17568765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01019.x     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Bard, E. G., Anderson, A. H., Sotillo, C. F., Aylett, M., Doherty-Sneddon, G., & Newlands, A. (2000). Controlling the intelligibility of referring expressions in dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 1-22.
2. Bard, E. G., & Aylett, M. P. (2005). Referential form, word duration, and modeling the listener in spoken dialogue. In J. Trueswell & M. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Bridging the language-as-product and language-action traditions (pp. 173-191). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Barr, D. J., & Keysar, B. (2002). Anchoring comprehension in linguistic precedents. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 391-418.
4. Bortfeld, H., & Brennan, S. E. (1997). Use and acquisition of idiomatic expressions in referring by native and non-native speakers. Discourse Processes, 23, 119-147.
5. Brennan, S. E. (1990). Speaking and providing evidence for mutual understanding. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
6. Brennan, S. E. (1991). Conversation with and through computers. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 1, 67-86.
7. Brennan, S. E. (2005). How conversation is shaped by visual and spoken evidence. In J. Trueswell & M. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Bridging the language-as-product and language-action traditions (pp. 95-129). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Brennan, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1996). Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1482-1493.
9. Brown, P. M., & Dell, G. S. (1987). Adapting production to comprehension: The explicit mention of instruments. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 441-472.
10. Brown-Schmidt, S. (2008). Time-course of processing conceptual pacts in conversation reveals early partner-specific effects. Poster presented at the Twenty-First Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing. Chapel Hill, NC.
11. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 1-62.
13. Clark, H. (1992). Arenas of language use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Clark, H. H. (1997). Dogmas of Understanding. Discourse Processes, 23, 567-598.
15. Clark, H. H., & Marshall, C. R. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A. K. Joshi, B. L. Webber & I. A. Sag (Eds.), Elements of discourse understanding (pp. 10-63). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
16. Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1-39.
17. Dell, G. S., & Brown, P. M. (1991). Mechanisms for listener-adaptations in language production: Limiting the role of the 'Model of the Listener'. In D. Napoli & J. Kegl (Eds.), Bridges between psychology and linguistics: A Swarthmore Festschrift for Lila Gleitman (pp. 105-129). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Ferreira, V. S., & Dell, G. S. (2000). Effect of ambiguity and lexical availability on syntactic and lexical production. Cognitive Psychology, 40, 296-340.
19. Fowler, C., & Housum, J. (1987). Talkers' signaling of "new" and "old" words in speech and listeners' perception and use of the distinction. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 24-40.
20. Fussell, S. E., & Krauss, R. M. (1989). Understanding friends and strangers: The effects of audience design on message comprehension. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 509.
21. Fussell, S. E., & Krauss, R. M. (1991). Accuracy and bias in estimates of others' knowledge. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 445-454.
22. Fussell, S. E., & Krauss, R. M. (1992). Coordination of knowledge in communication: Effects of speakers' assumptions about what others know. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 378-391.
23. Galati, A., & Brennan, S. E. (2006). Given-new attenuation effects in spoken discourse: For the speaker, or for the addressee? Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 47th Annual Meeting (p. 15), Dallas, TX.
24. Garrod, S., & Anderson, A. (1987). Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination. Cognition, 27, 181-218.
25. Gerrig, R. H., Brennan, S. E., & Ohaeri, J. O. (2000). What can we conclude from speakers behaving badly? Discourse Processes, 29, 173-178.
26. Glucksberg, S., Krauss, R., & Weisberg, R. (1966). Referential communication in nursery school children: Method and some preliminary findings. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 3, 333-342.
27. Gregory, M. L., Healy, A. F., & Jurafsky, D. (2001). The role of the hearer in durational shortening. 14th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
28. Gregory, M. L., Healy, A. F., & Jurafsky, D. (2002). Common ground in production: Effects of mutual knowledge on word duration. Unpublished manuscript.
29. Hanna, J. E., & Brennan, S. E. (2007). Speakers' eye gaze disambiguates referring expressions early during face-to-face conversation. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 596-615.
30. Hanna, J. E., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2004). Pragmatic effects on reference resolution in a collaborative task: Evidence from eye movements. Cognitive Science, 28, 105-115.
31. Hanna, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Trueswell, J. C. (2003). The effects of common ground and perspective on domains of referential interpretation. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 43-61.
32. Horton, W. S., & Gerrig, R. J. (2002). Speakers' experiences and audience design: Knowing when and knowing how to adjust utterances to addressees. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 589-606.
33. Horton, W. S., & Gerrig, R. J. (2005a). Conversational common ground and memory processes in language production. Discourse Processes, 40, 1-35.
34. Horton, W. S., & Gerrig, R. J. (2005b). The impact of memory demands on audience design during language production. Cognition, 96, 127-142.
35. Horton, W., & Keysar, B. (1996). When do speakers take into account common ground? Cognition, 59, 91-117.
36. Johnston, W. A., Hawley, K. J., Plewe, S. H., Elliott, J. M. G., & De Witt, M. J. (1990). Attention capture by novel stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 397-411.
37. Jurafsky, D. (1996). A probabilistic model of lexical and syntactic disambiguation. Cognitive Science, 20, 137-194.
38. Keysar, B. (1997). Unconfounding common ground. Discourse Processes, 24, 253-270.
39. Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., Balin, J. A., & Brauner, J. S. (2000). Taking perspective in conversation: The role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychological Science, 11, 32-38.
40. Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., Balin, J. A., & Paek, T. S. (1998a). Definite reference and mutual knowledge: Process models of common ground in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 1-20.
41. Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., & Horton, W. S. (1998b). The egocentric basis of language use: Insights from a processing approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 46-50.
42. Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2008). Evolving intentions for social interaction: From entrainment to joint action. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B, 363, 2021-2031.
43. Kraljic, T., & Brennan, S. E. (2005). Using prosody and optional words to disambiguate utterances: For the speaker or for the addressee? Cognitive Psychology, 50, 194-231.
44. Krauss, R. M. (1987). The role of the listener: Addressee influences on message formulation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 6, 81-98.
45. Kronmüller, E., & Barr, D. J. (2007). Perspective-free pragmatics: Broken precedents and the recovery-from-preemption hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 436-455.
46. Kuhlen, A., & Brennan, S. E. (2008). Addressees shape speaking: When confederates may be hazardous to your data. Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 49th Annual Meeting (p. 6), Chicago, IL.
47. Lieberman, P. (1963). Some effects of semantic and grammatical context on the production and perception of speech. Language and Speech, 6, 172-187.
48. Lockridge, C. B., & Brennan, S. E. (2002). Addressees' needs influence speakers' early syntactic choices. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 550-557.
49. Mac Donald, M. C. (1994). Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 157-201.
50. Mc Allister, J., Potts, A., Mason, K., & Marchant, G. (1994). Word duration in monologue and dialogue speech. Language and Speech, 37, 393-405.
51. Metzing, C., & Brennan, S. E. (2003). When conceptual pacts are broken: Partner-specific effects in the comprehension of referring expressions. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 201-213.
52. Nadig, A. S., & Sedivy, J. C. (2002). Evidence of perspective taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution. Psychological Science, 13, 329-336.
53. Nooteboom, S. G. (1991). Perceptual goals of speech production. Proceedings of the XII International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Vol. 1, (pp. 107-110). Aixes-en-Provence, France, August 19-24.
54. Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169-226.
55. Polichak, J. W., & Gerrig, R. J. (1998). Common ground and everyday language use: Comments on Horton and Keysar (1996). Cognition, 66, 183-189.
56. Samuel, S. G., & Troicki, M. (1998). Articulation quality is inversely related to redundancy when children or adults have verbal control. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 175-194.
57. Schober, M. F., & Brennan, S. E. (2003). Processes of interactive spoken discourse: The role of the partner. In A. C. Graesser, M. A. Gernsbacher & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (pp. 123-164). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
58. Schober, M. F., & Clark, H. H. (1989). Understanding by addressees and overhearers. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 211-232.
59. Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2009). Prediction in joint action: What, when, and where Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 353-367.
60. Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (in press). From mirroring to joint action. In I. Wachsmuth, M. Lenzen, & G. Knoblich (Eds.). Embodied communication. (pp. 129-150). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
61. Sebanz, N., Rebbechi, D., Knoblich, G., Prinz, W., & Frith, C. (2007). Is it really my turn? An event-related f MRI study of task sharing Social Neuroscience, 2, 81-95.
62. Sedivy, J. C. (2005). Evaluating explanations for referential context effects: Evidence for Gricean mechanisms in online language interpretation. In J. Trueswell & M. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Bridging the language-as-product and language-action traditions (pp. 345-364). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
63. Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Trueswell, J. C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1993). Context effects in syntactic ambiguity resolution: Discourse and semantic influences in parsing reduced relative clauses. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37, 276-309.
64. Tanenhaus, M., Spivey-Knowlton, M., Eberhard, K., & Sedivy, J. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632-1634.
65. Tanenhaus, M. K., & Trueswell, J. C. (1995). Sentence comprehension. In J. Miller & P. Eimas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and cognition, Vol. 11: Speech language and communication (pp. 217-262). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
66. Tanenhaus, M., & Trueswell, J. (2005). Eye movements as a tool for bridging the language-as-product and language-as-action traditions. In J. Trueswell & M. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Bridging the language-as-product and language-action traditions (pp. 3-37). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
67. Van Berkum, J. J. A., Van Den Brink, D., Tesink, C. M. J. Y., Kos, M., & Hagoort, P. (2008). The neural integration of speaker and message. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 580-591.
68. Yang, H., & Zelinsky, G. (2006). Evidence for guidance in categorical visual search. Journal of Vision, 6(6), 449a.