Perspective-free pragmatics: Broken precedents and the recovery-from-preemption hypothesis

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 56, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 436-455

  Kronmüller, Edmundo ^a   Barr, Dale J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Common ground; Eye tracking; Language comprehension; Pragmatics; Referential communication

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847155932     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Barr D.J., and Keysar B. Anchoring comprehension in linguistic precedents. Journal of Memory and Language 46 (2002) 391-418
2. Barr D.J., and Keysar B. Making sense of how we make sense: The paradox of egocentrism in language use. In: Colston H.L., and Katz A.N. (Eds). Figurative language comprehension: Social and cultural influences (2005), Erlbaum, Mahwaw, NJ 21-41
3. Brennan S.E., and Clark H.H. Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22 (1996) 1482-1493
4. Carroll J.M. Naming and describing in social communication. Language and Speech 23 (1980) 309-322
5. Clark E.V. On the pragmatics of contrast. Journal of Child Language 17 (1990) 417-431
6. Clark E.V., and Clark H.H. When nouns surface as verbs. Language 55 (1979) 767-811
7. Clark H.H. Words, the world, and their possibilities. In: Lockhead G.R., and Pomerantz J.R. (Eds). The perception of structure (1991), American Psychological Association, Washington, DC
8. Clark H.H., and Carlson T.B. Context for comprehension. In: Long J., and Baddeley A. (Eds). Attention and performance IX (1981), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, USA 313-330
9. Clark H.H., and Marshall C.R. Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In: Joshe A.K., Webber B.L., and Sag I.A. (Eds). Elements of discourse understanding (1981), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 10-63
10. Clark H.H., and Wilkes-Gibbs D. Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition 22 1 (1986) 1-39
11. Cruse D.A. The pragmatics of lexical specificity. Journal of Linguistics 13 (1977) 153-164
12. Garrod S., and Anderson A. Saying what you mean in dialogue: a study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination. Cognition 27 (1987) 181-218
13. Gerrig R.J., and McKoon G. The readiness is all: the functionality of memory-based text processing. Discourse Processes 26 (1998) 67-86
14. Hanna J.E., Tanenhaus M.K., and Trueswell J.C. The effects of common ground and perspective on domains of referential interpretation. Journal of Memory and Language 49 (2003) 43-61
15. Horton W.S., and Gerrig R.J. The impact of memory demands on audience design during language production. Cognition 96 2 (2005) 127-142
16. Horton W.S., and Keysar B. When do speakers take into account common ground?. Cognition 59 1 (1996) 91-117
17. Keysar B., Barr D.J., Balin J.A., and Brauner J.S. Taking perspective in conversation: The role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychological Science 11 1 (2000) 32-38
18. Keysar B., Barr D.J., Balin J.A., and Paek T.S. Definite reference and mutual knowledge: process models of common ground in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 39 1 (1998) 1-20
19. Markman E., and Wachtel G. Children's use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words. Cognitive Psychology 20 (1988) 121-157
20. Matin E., Shao K.C., and Boff K.R. Saccadic overhead: information-processing time with and without saccades. Perception & Psychophysics. 53 4 (1993) 372-380
21. Metzing C., and Brennan S.E. When conceptual pacts are broken: partner-specific effects on the comprehension of referring expressions. Journal of Memory and Language 49 (2003) 201-213
22. Nadig A.S., and Sedivy J.C. Evidence of perspective taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution. Psychological Science 13 (2002) 329-336
23. Rosch E., Mervis C.B., Gray W., Johnson D., and Boyes-Braem P. Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 8 (1976) 382-439
24. Rossnagel C. Cognitive load and perspective taking: applying the automatic-controlled distinction to verbal communication. European Journal of Social Psychology 30 (2000) 429-445