The motor theory of speech perception reviewed

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 361-377

  Galantucci, Bruno ^a,b   Fowler, Carol A ^a,b,c   Turvey, M T ^a,b  

^a HASKINS LABORATORIES   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847124789     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193857     Document Type: Review

References (146)

1. ALEXANDER, R. D. (1962). Evolutionary change in cricket acoustical communication. Evolution, 16, 443-467.
2. BELIN, P., ZATORRE, R. J., LAFAILLE, P., AHAD, P., & PIKE, B. (2000). Voice-selective areas in human auditory cortex. Nature, 403, 309-312.
3. BELL-BERTI, F., RAPHAEL, L. J., PISONI, D. B., & SAWUSCH, J. R. (1979). Some relationships between speech production and perception. Phonetica, 36, 373-383.
4. BERNSTEIN, N. (1967). The coordination and regulation of movements. New York: Pergamon.
5. BERNSTEIN, N. (1996). On dexterity and its development (M. L. Latash, Trans.). In M. L. Latash & M. T. Turvey (Eds.), Dexterity and its development (pp. 1-244). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. BLOWS, M. W. (1999). Evolution of the genetic covariance between male and female components of mate recognition: An experimental test. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 266, 2169-2174.
7. BOAKE, C. R. B. (1991). Coevolution of senders and receivers of sexual signals: Genetic coupling and genetic correlations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 6, 225-227.
8. BOERSMA, P. (1998). Functional phonology. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
9. BROWMAN, C. P., & GOLDSTEIN, L. (1986). Towards an articulatory phonology. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 219-252.
10. BURT, J. M., LENT, K. L., BEECHER, M. D., & BRENOWITZ, E. A. (2000). Lesions of the anterior forebrain song control pathway in female canaries affect song perception in an operant task. Journal of Neurobiology, 42, 1-13.
11. BUTLIN, R. K., & RITCHIE, M. G. (1989). Genetic coupling in mate recognition systems: What is the evidence? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 37, 237-246.
12. CARELLO, C., ANDERSON, K. L., & KUNKLER-PECK, A. J. (1998). Perception of object length by sound. Psychological Science, 9, 211-214.
13. CARELLO, C., WAGMAN, J. B., & TURVEY, M. T. (2005). Acoustic specification of object properties. In J. Anderson & B. Anderson (Eds.), Moving image theory: Ecological considerations (pp. 79-104). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
14. CHAO, L., & MARTIN, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable manmade objects in the dorsal stream. NeuroImage, 12, 478-484.
15. CHOMSKY, N. (1959). A review of B. F. Skinner's Verbal behavior. Language, 35, 26-58.
16. CLARK, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. COOPER, W. (1979). Speech perception and production: Studies in selective adaptation. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
18. CRAIGHERO, L., FADIGA, L., RIZZOLATTI, G., & UMILTÀ, C. (1999). Action for perception: A motor-visual attentional effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1673-1692.
19. DAVE, A. S., YU, A. C., & MARGOLIASH, D. (1998). Behavioral state modulation of auditory activity in a vocal motor system. Science, 282, 2250-2254.
20. DEWEY, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review, 3, 357-370.
21. DIEHL, R. L., LOTTO, A. J., & HOLT, L. L. (2004). Speech perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 149-179.
22. DI PELLEGRINO, G., FADIGA, L., FOGASSI, L., GALLESE, V., & RIZZOLATTI, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91, 176-180.
23. DOHERTY, J. A., & GERHARDT, H. C. (1983). Hybrid tree frogs: Vocalizations of males and selective phonotaxis of females. Science, 220, 1078-1080.
24. EASTON, T. A. (1972). On the normal use of reflexes. American Scientist, 60, 591-599.
25. EIMAS, P. D., & CORBIT, J. D. (1973). Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 99-109.
26. EIMAS, P. D., SIQUELAND, E. R., JUSCZYK, P., & VIGORITO, J. (1971). Speech perception in infants. Science, 171, 303-306.
27. FADIGA, L., CRAIGHERO, L., BUCCINO, G., & RIZZOLATTI, G. (2002). Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: A TMS study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 399-402.
28. FADIGA, L., FOGASSI, L., PAVESI, G., & RIZZOLATTI, G. (1995). Motor facilitation during action observation: A magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 73, 2608-2611.
29. FITTS, P. M., & DEININGER, R. L. (1954). S-R compatibility: Correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 483-492.
30. FODOR, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. FOWLER, C. A. (2006). Compensation for coarticulation reflects gesture perception, not spectral contrast. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 178-183.
32. FOWLER, C. A., BROWN, J. M., SABADINI, L., & WEIHING, J. (2003). Rapid access to speech gestures in perception: Evidence from choice and simple response time tasks. Journal of Memory & Language, 49, 396-413.
33. FOWLER, C. A., & DEKLE, D. J. (1991). Listening with eye and hand: Crossmodal contributions to speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 816-828.
34. FOWLER, C. A., & GALANTUCCI, B. (2005). The relation of speech perception and production. In D. B. Pisoni & R. E. Remez (Eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 633-652). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
35. FOWLER, C. A., & ROSENBLUM, L. D. (1990). Duplex perception: A comparison of monosyllables and slamming doors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 742-754.
36. FOWLER, C. A., RUBIN, P. E., REMEZ, R. E., & TURVEY, M. T. (1980). Implications for speech production of a general theory of action. In G. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production (pp. 373-420). New York: Academic Press.
37. GAFOS, A. I. (2002). A grammar of gestural coordination. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 20, 269-337.
38. GIBSON, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
39. GOLDSTEIN, L., & FOWLER, C. A. (2003). Articulatory phonology: A phonology for public language use. In N. O. Schiller & A. Meyer (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities (pp. 159-207). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
40. GRAFTON, S. T., ARBIB, M. A., FADIGA, L., & RIZZOLATTI, G. (1996). Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography: 2. Observation compared with imagination. Experimental Brain Research, 112, 103-111.
41. HAKEN, H., KELSO, J. A. S., & BUNZ, H. (1985). A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements. Biological Cybernetics, 51, 347-356.
42. HALLE, M., & STEVENS, K. (1962). Speech recognition: A model and a program for research. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 8, 155-159.
43. HAYES, B., KIRCHNER, R., & STERIADE, D. (EDS.) (2004). Phonetically based phonology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44. HIETANEN, J. K., & RAMA, P. (1995). Facilitation and interference occur at different stages of processing in the Simon paradigm. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 7, 183-199.
45. HOMMEL, B. (1993). Inverting the Simon effect by intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. Psychological Research, 55, 270-279.
46. HOMMEL, B., MÜSSELER, J., ASCHERSLEBEN, G., & PRINZ, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 849-937.
47. HOY, R. R., HAHN, J., & PAUL, R. C. (1977). Hybrid cricket auditory behavior: Evidence for genetic coupling in animal communication. Science, 195, 82-84.
48. IACOBONI, M., WOODS, R. P., BRASS, M., BEKKERING, H., MAZZIOTTA, J. C., & RIZZOLATTI, G. (1999). Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science, 286, 2526-2528.
49. JAMES, W. (1892). Psychology: The briefer course. New York: Holt.
50. JARVIS, E. D., & NOTTEBOHM, F. (1997). Motor-driven gene expression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94, 4097-4102.
51. KANDEL, S., ORLIAGUET, J. P., & VIVIANI, P. (2000). Perceptual anticipation in handwriting: The role of implicit motor competence. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 706-716.
52. KAWATO, M. (1999). Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 9, 718-727.
53. KELSO, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. KELSO, J. A. S., VATIKIOTIS-BATESON, E., TULLER, B., & FOWLER, C. A. (1984). Functionally specific articulatory cooperation following jaw perturbations during speech: Evidence for coordinative structures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 812-832.
55. KERZEL, D., & BEKKERING, H. (2000). Motor activation from visible speech: Evidence from stimulus response compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 634-647.
56. KNOBLICH, G., & FLACH, R. (2001). Predicting the effects of actions: Interactions of perception and action. Psychological Science, 12, 467-472.
57. KNOBLICH, G., & FLACH, R. (2003). Action identity: Evidence from self-recognition, prediction, and coordination. Consciousness & Cognition, 12, 620-632.
58. KNOBLICH, G., & PRINZ, W. (2001). Recognition of self-generated actions from kinematic displays of drawing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 456-465.
59. KNOBLICH, G., SEIGERSCHMIDT, E., FLACH, R., & PRINZ, W. (2002). Authorship effects in the prediction of handwriting strokes: Evidence for action simulation during action perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 1027-1046.
60. KOHLER, E., KEYSERS, C., UMILTÀ, M. A., FOGASSI, L., GALLESE, V., & RIZZOLATTI, G. (2002). Hearing sounds, understanding actions: Action representation in mirror neurons. Science, 297, 846-848.
61. KOZHEVNIKOV, V. A., & CHISTOVICH, L. A. (1965). Speech, articulation and perception. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
62. KUGLER, P. N., & TURVEY, M. T. (1987). Information, natural law, and the self-assembly of rhythmic movement. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
63. KUNKLER-PECK, A., & TURVEY, M. T. (2000). Hearing shape. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 279-294.
64. LACQUANITI, F., TERZUOLO, C., & VIVIANI, P. (1983). The law relating the kinematic and figural aspects of drawing movements. Acta Psychologica 54, 115-130.
65. LAWRENCE, D. H. (1949). Acquired distinctiveness of cues: 1. Transfer between discriminations on the basis of familiarity with the stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 770-784.
66. LAWRENCE, D. H. (1950). Acquired distinctiveness of cues: 2. Selective association in a constant stimulus situation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40, 175-188.
67. LIBERMAN, A. M. (1957). Some results of research on speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29, 117-123.
68. LIBERMAN, A. M. (1996). Speech: A special code. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
69. LIBERMAN, A. M., COOPER, F. S., SHANKWEILER, D. P., & STUDDERT-KENNEDY, M. (1967). Perception of speech code. Psychological Review, 74, 431-461.
70. LIBERMAN, A. M., COOPER, F. S., STUDDERT-KENNEDY, M., HARRIS, K. S., & SHANKWEILER, D. P. (1968). On the efficiency of speech sounds. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft & Kommunikationsforschung, 21, 21-32.
71. LIBERMAN, A. M., DELATTRE, P., & COOPER, F. S. (1952). The role of selected stimulus-variables in the perception of the unvoiced stop consonants. American Journal of Psychology, 65, 497-516.
72. LIBERMAN, A. M., DELATTRE, P., COOPER, F. S., & GERSTMAN, L. (1954). The role of consonant-vowel transitions in the perception of the stop and nasal consonants. Psychological Monographs: General & Applied, 68, 1-13.
73. LIBERMAN, A. M., & MATTINGLY, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21, 1-36.
74. LIBERMAN, A. M., & MATTINGLY, I. G. (1989). A specialization for speech perception. Science, 243, 489-494.
75. LIBERMAN, A. M., & WHALEN, D. H. (2000). On the relation of speech to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 187-196.
76. LOTTO, A. J., & KLUENDER, K. R. (1998). General contrast effects in speech perception: Effect of preceding liquid on stop consonant identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 602-619.
77. LUCE, R. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
78. MACNEILAGE, P. F. (1970). Motor control of serial ordering of speech. Psychological Review, 77, 182-196.
79. MANN, V. A., & LIBERMAN, A. M. (1983). Some differences between phonetic and auditory modes of perception. Cognition, 14, 211-235.
80. MANN, V. A., & REPP, B. H. (1980). Influence of vocalic context on perception of the [∫]-[s] distinction. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 213-228.
81. MASSARO, D. W. (1987). Speech perception by ear and eye: A paradigm for psychological inquiry. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
82. MASSARO, D. W. (1990). An information-processing analysis of perception and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships between perception and action (pp. 133-166). Berlin: Springer.
83. MASSARO, D. W. (1998). Perceiving talking faces: From speech perception to a behavioral principle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
84. MATTINGLY, I. G., & LIBERMAN, A. M. (1988). Specialized perceiving systems for speech and other biologically significant sounds. In G. M. G. Edelman, W. E. Gall, & W. M. Cowan (Eds.), Auditory function: Neurological bases of hearing (pp. 775-793). New York: Wiley.
85. MCGURK, H., & MACDONALD, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746-748.
86. MECHSNER, F., KERZEL, D., KNOBLICH, G., & PRINZ, W. (2001). Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination. Nature, 414, 69-73.
87. MOHANAN, K. P. (1993). Fields of attraction. In J. Goldsmith (Ed.), The last phonological rule (pp. 61-116). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
88. MURATA, A., FADIGA, L., FOGASSI, L., GALLESE, V., RAOS, V., & RIZZOLATTI, G. (1997). Object representation in the ventral premotor cortex (area F5) of the monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 78, 2226-2230.
89. NIEDENTHAL, P., BRAUER, M., HALBERSTADT, J., & INNES-KER, A. (2001). When did her smile drop? Facial mimicry and the influences of emotional state on the detection of change in emotional expression, Cognition & Emotion, 15, 853-864.
90. NOTTEBOHM, F. (1970). Ontogeny of bird song. Science, 167, 950-956.
91. NOTTEBOHM, F., STOKES, T. M., & LEONARD, C. M. (1976). Central control of song in canary, Serinus canarius. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 165, 457-486.
92. OHALA, J. J. (1996). Speech perception is hearing sounds, not tongues. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 1718-1725.
93. PICKERING, M. J., & GARROD, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 27, 169-226.
94. PIERREHUMBERT, J. (1990). Phonological and phonetic representations. Journal of Phonetics, 18, 375-394.
95. PILLSBURY, W. B. (1911). The place of movement in consciousness. Psychological Review, 18, 83-99.
96. PLUMMER, T. K., & STRIEDTER, G. F. (2000). Auditory responses in the vocal motor system of budgerigars. Journal of Neurobiology, 42, 79-94.
97. PORTER, R. J., JR., & CASTELLANOS, F. X. (1980). Speech-production measures of speech perception: Rapid shadowing of VCV syllables. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67, 1349-1356.
98. PORTER, R. J.[, JR.], & LUBKER, J. F. (1980). Rapid reproduction of vowel-vowel sequences: Evidence for a fast and direct acoustic motoric linkage in speech. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 23, 593-602.
99. POSNER, M. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
100. PRIBRAM, K. H. (1971). Languages of the brain: Experimental paradoxes and principles in neuropsychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
101. PRINZ, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129-154.
102. PRINZ, W., & HOMMEL, B. (EDS.) (2002). Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
103. PULVERMÜLLER, F., HUSS, M., KHERI, F., MOSCOSO DEL PRADO MARTIN, F., HAUK, O., & SHTYROV, Y. (2006). Motor cortex maps articulatory features of speech sounds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 7865-7870.
104. REPP, B. H. (1987). The sound of two hands clapping: An exploratory study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 81, 1100-1109.
105. RIZZOLATTI, G., & ARBIB, M. A. (1998). Language within our grasp. Trends in Neurosciences, 21, 188-194.
106. RIZZOLATTI, G., CAMARDA, R., FOGASSI, L., GENTILUCCI, M., LUPPINO, G., & MATELLI, M. (1988). Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey: II. Area F5 and the control of distal movements. Experimental Brain Research, 71, 491-507.
107. RIZZOLATTI, G., & CRAIGHERO, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169-192.
108. RIZZOLATTI, G., FADIGA, L., FOGASSI, L., & GALLESE, V. (1997). The space around us. Science, 277, 190-191.
109. RIZZOLATTI, G., FADIGA, L., MATELLI, M., BETTINARDI, V., PAULESU, E., PERANI, D., & FAZIO, F. (1996). Localization of grasp representations in humans by PET: 1. Observation versus execution. Experimental Brain Research, 111, 246-252.
110. RIZZOLATTI, G., FOGASSI, L., & GALLESE, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 661-670.
111. RYAN, M. J., & WILCZYNSKI, W. (1988). Coevolution of sender and receiver Effect on local mate preference in cricket frogs. Science, 240, 1786-1788.
112. SALTZMAN, E., & MUNHALL, K. G. (1989). A dynamical approach to gestural patterning in speech production. Ecological Psychology, 1, 333-382.
113. SHAW, K. L. (2000). Interspecific genetics of mate recognition: Inheritance of female acoustic preference in Hawaiian crickets. Evolution, 54, 1303-1312.
114. SHIFFRAR, M., & FREYD, J. (1990). Apparent motion of the human body. Psychological Science, 1, 257-264.
115. SHIFFRAR, M., & FREYD, J. (1993). Timing and apparent motion path choice with human body photographs. Psychological Science, 4, 379-384.
116. SIMON, J. R., HINRICHS, J. V., & CRAFT, J. L. (1970). Auditory S-R compatibility: Reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 91-102.
117. SKINNER, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century- Crofts.
118. SPERRY, R. W. (1952). Neurology and the mind-brain problem. American Scientist, 40, 291-312.
119. STERNBERG, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315.
120. STEVENS, K. N. (1960). Toward a model for speech recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 32, 47-55.
121. STRAFELLA, A. P., & PAUS, T. (2000). Modulation of cortical excitability during action observation: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. NeuroReport, 11, 2289-2292.
122. STÜRMER, B., ASCHERSLEBEN, G., & PRINZ, W. (2000). Correspondence effects with manual gestures and postures: A study of imitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1746-1759.
123. SUMBY, W. H., & POLLACK, I. (1954). Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 212-215.
124. SUSSMAN, H. (1989). Neural coding of relational invariance in speech: Human language analogs to the barn owl. Psychological Review, 96, 631-642.
125. THELEN, E., & SMITH, L. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
126. TREFFNER, P. J., & TURVEY, M. T. (1993). Resonance constraints on rhythmic movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 1221-1237.
127. TURVEY, M. T. (1977). Preliminaries to a theory of action with reference to vision. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 211-263). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
128. TURVEY, M. T., & SHAW, R. E. (1995). Toward an ecological physics and a physical psychology. In R. Solso & D. Massaro (Eds.), The science of the mind: 2001 and beyond (pp. 144-169). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
129. UMILTÀ, C., RUBICHI, S., & NICOLETTI, R. (1999). Facilitation and interference components in the Simon effect. Archives Italiennes de Biologie, 137, 139-149.
130. VIVIANI, P. (2002). Motor competence in the perception of dynamic events: A tutorial. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX (pp. 406-442). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
131. VIVIANI, P., BAUD-BOVY, G., & REDOLFI, M. (1997). Perceiving and tracking kinesthetic stimuli: Further evidence of motor-perceptual interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 1232-1252.
132. VIVIANI, P., CAMPADELLI, P., & MOUNOUD, P. (1987). Visuo-manual pursuit tracking of human two-dimensional movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 13, 62-78.
133. VIVIANI, P., & FLASH, T. (1995). Minimum-jerk, two-thirds power law, and isochrony: Converging approaches to movement planning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 32-53.
134. VIVIANI, P., & MOUNOUD, P. (1990). Perceptuomotor compatibility in pursuit tracking of two-dimensional movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 22, 407-443.
135. VIVIANI, P., & STUCCHI, N. (1989). The effect of movement velocity on form perception: Geometric illusions in dynamic displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 266-274.
136. VIVIANI, P., & STUCCHI, N. (1992a). Biological movements look uniform: Evidence of motor-perceptual interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 603-623.
137. VIVIANI, P., & STUCCHI, N. (1992b). Motor-perceptual interactions. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior: 2. Advances in psychology (Vol. 87, pp. 229-248). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
138. WATKINS, K. E., STRAFELLA, A. P., & PAUS, T. (2003). Seeing and hearing speech excites the motor system involved in speech production. Neuropsychologia, 41, 989-994.
139. WHALEN, D. H. (1984). Subcategorical mismatches slow phonetic judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 49-64.
140. WHALEN, D. H., BENSON, R. R., RICHARDSON, M., SWAINSON, B., CLARK, V. P., LA, S., ET AL. (2006). Differentiation of speech and nonspeech processing within primary auditory cortex. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 575-581.
141. WHALEN, D. H., & LIBERMAN, A. M. (1987). Speech-perception takes precedence over nonspeech perception. Science, 237, 169-171.
142. WHALING, C. S., SOLIS, M. M., DOUPE, A. J., SOHA, J. A., & MARLER, P. (1997). Acoustic and neural bases for innate recognition of song. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94, 12694-12698.
143. WILLIAMS, H., & NOTTEBOHM, F. (1985). Auditory responses in avian vocal motor neurons: A motor theory for song perception in birds. Science, 229, 279-282.
144. WILSON, M. (2001). Perceiving imitatible stimuli: Consequences of isomorphism between input and output. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 543-553.
145. WILSON, M., & KNOBLICH, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 460-473.
146. WILSON, S. M., SAYGIN, A. P., SERENO, M. I., & IACOBONI, M. (2004). Listening to speech activates motor areas involved in speech production. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 701-702.