Anticipating distracted addressees: How speakers' expectations and addressees' feedback influence storytelling

Discourse Processes

Volumn 47, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 567-587

  Kuhlen, Anna K ^a,b   Brennan, Susan E ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78049316861     PISSN: 0163853X     EISSN: 15326950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01638530903441339     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bavelas, J., Coates, L., & Johnson, T. (2000). Listeners as co-narrators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 941-952.
2. Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13, 145-204.
3. Brennan, S. E. (1991). Conversation with and through computers. User Modeling and User Adapted Interaction, 1, 67-86.
4. Brennan, S. E. (2005). How conversation is shaped by visual and spoken evidence. In J. Trueswell & M. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Approachesto studying world-situated languageuse: Bridging the language as product and language-action traditions (pp. 95-129). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Brennan, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1996). Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 482-493.
6. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
7. Clark, H. H., & Marshall, C. R. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A. K. Joshi, B. L. Webber, & I. A. Sag (Eds.), Elements of discourse understanding (pp. 10-63). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
8. Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1-39.
9. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
10. Fussell, S. R., & Krauss, R. M. (1989). Understanding friends and strangers: The effects of audience design on message comprehension. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 509-525.
11. Fussell, S. R., & Krauss, R. M. (1992). Coordination of knowledge in communication: Effects of speakers' assumptions about others' knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62,378-391.
12. Goodwin, C. (1979). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic.
13. Gumbrecht, M., & Clark, H. H. (2005, November). Is timing everything? Grounding costs in speech and typing. Poster session presented at the 46th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Toronto.
14. Hummert, M. L., & Shaner, J. L. (1994). Patronizing speech to the elderly as a function of stereotyping. Communication Studies, 45, 145-158.
15. Isaacs, E. A., & Clark, H. H. (1987). References in conversation between experts and novices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 26-37.
16. Krauss, R. M., & Fussell, S. R. (1996). Social psychologicalmodels of interpersonal communication. In E. T. Higgins & A. Kruglanski (Ed.), Social psychology: A handbook of basic principles (pp. 655-701). New York: Guilford.
17. Krauss, R. M., Garlock, C. M., Bricker, P. D., & McMahon, L. E. (1977). The role of audible and visible back-channel responses in interpersonal communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 523-529.
18. Krauss, R. M., & Weinheimer, S. (1966). Concurrent feedback, confirmation, and the encoding of referents in verbal communications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 343-346.
19. Kraut, R. E., Lewis, S. H., & Swezey, L. W. (1982). Listener responsiveness and the coordination of conversation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 718-731.
20. Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content Analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
21. Lockridge, C. B., & Brennan, S. E. (2002). Addressees' needs influence speakers' early syntactic choices. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 550-557.
22. Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.
23. Pasupathi, M., Stallworth, L. M., & Murdoch, K. (1998). How what we tell becomes what we know: Listener effects on speakers' long-term memory for events. Discourse Processes, 26, 1-25.
24. Russell, A. W., & Schober, M. F. (1999). How beliefs about a partner's goals affect referring in goal-discrepant conversations. Discourse Processes, 27, 1-33.
25. Schober, M. F., & Brennan, S. E. (2003). Processes of interactive spoken discourse: The role of the partner. In A. C. Graesser, M. A. Gernsbacher, & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (pp. 123-164). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
26. Schober, M. F., & Clark, H. H. (1989). Understanding by addressees and overhearers. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 211-232.
27. Selting, M., Auer, P., Barden, B., Bergmann, J., Couper-Kuhlen, E., Günthner, S., et al. (1998). Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem (GAT) [A system for transcribing talk-in-interaction: GAT]. Linguistische Berichte, 173, 91-121.
28. Shatz, M., & Gelman, R. (1973). The development of communication skills: Modifications in the speech of young children as a function of listener. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38(5), 1-38.
29. Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Individual goals and collaborative actions: Conversations as collective behavior, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.