Unconfounding common ground

Discourse Processes

Volumn 24, Issue 2-3, 1997, Pages 253-270

  Keysar, Boaz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000980440     PISSN: 0163853X     EISSN: 15326950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01638539709545015     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ackerman, B.P., Szymanski, J., & Silver, D. (1990). Children's use of the common ground in interpreting ambiguous referential utterances. Developmental Psychology, 26, 234-245.
2. Anderson, A., Garrod, S.C., & Sanford, A.J. (1983). The accessibility of pronominal antecedents as a function of episodic shifts in narrative text. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 427-440.
3. Brown, P.M. & Dell, G.S. (1987). Adapting production to comprehension: The explicit mention of instruments. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 441-472.
4. Clark, H.H. (1992). Arenas of language use. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
5. Clark, H.H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Clark, H.H. & Brennan, S.E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington, D.C.: APA.
7. Clark, H.H. & Marshall, C.R. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A.H. Joshe, B. Webber, & I.A. Sag (Eds.), Elements of discourse understanding (pp. 57-63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Clark, H.H., Schreuder, R., & Buttrick, S. (1983). Common ground and the understanding of demonstrative reference. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 245-258.
9. Fussell, S.R. & Krauss, R.M. (1989). The effects of intended audience on message production and comprehension: Reference in a common ground framework. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 203-219.
10. Fussell, S.R. & Krauss, R.M. (1992). Coordination of knowledge in communication: Effect of speakers' assumptions about what others know. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 378-391.
11. Gerrig, R.J. & Littman, M.L. (1990). Disambiguation by community membership. Memory' & Cognition, 18, 331-338.
12. Gibbs, R.W. (1987). Mutual knowledge and the psychology of conversational inference. Journal of Pragmatics, 11, 561-588.
13. Glenberg, A.M., Meyer, M., & Lindem, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 69-83.
14. Goodman, N. (1979). Fact, fiction and forecast. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. Graesser, A.C., Bowers, C, Bayen, U.J., & Hu, X. (in press). Who said what? Who knows what? Tracking speakers and knowledge in narrative. In W. van Peer, E. Andriga, D. Schram, & E. Tan (Eds.), Narrative perspective: Cognition and emotion.
16. Greene, S.B., Gerrig, R.J., McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1994). Unheralded pronouns and management by common ground. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 511-526.
17. Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol.3: Speech acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
18. Harman, G. (1977). Review of Linguistic Behavior by Jonathan Bennett. Language, 53, 417-1124
19. Horton, W.S. & Keysar, B. (1996). When do speakers take into account common ground? Cognition, 59, 91-117.
20. Isaacs, E.A. & Clark, H.H. (1987). References in conversation between experts and novices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 26-37.
21. Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1982). Mutual ignorance: Comments on Clark and Carlson's paper. In N. V. Smith (Ed.), Mutual knowledge (pp. 40-45). London: Academic Press.
22. Kail, M. & Hickmann, M. (1992). French children's ability to introduce referents in narratives as a function of mutual knowledge. First Language, 12, 73-94.
23. Keysar, B. (1995). In defense of common ground. Paper presented at The 36th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles, November.
24. Keysar, B. & Paek, T.S. (1993). Definite reference and mutual ignorance. Paper presented in The 34th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society. Washington, D.C.
25. Krauss, R. (1987). The role of the listener: Addressee influences on message formulation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 6, 81-98.
26. Krauss, R.M. & Fussell, S.R. (1991). Perspective-taking in communication: Representations of others' knowledge in reference. Social Cognition, 9, 2-24.
27. Lesgold, A.M., Roth, S.F. & Curtis, M.E. (1979). Foregrounding effects in discourse comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 291-308.
28. McKoon, G., Gerrig, R.J., & Green, S.B. (1996). Pronoun resolution without pronouns: Some consequences of memory-based text processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 919-932.
29. Newman, D. (1986). The role of mutual knowledge in the development of perspective taking. Developmental Review, 6, 122-145.
30. Schiffer, S.R. (1972). Meaning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
31. Slugoski, B.R., Lalljee, M, Lamb, R., & Ginsburg, G.P. (1993). Attribution in conversational context: Effect of mutual knowledge on explanation giving. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 219-238.
32. Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1982). Mutual knowledge and relevance in theories of comprehension. In N. Smith (Ed.), Mutual knowledge (pp. 61-87). London: Academic Press.
33. Stalnaker, R. C. (1978). Assertion. In P. Cole (Ed.), Syntax and semantics. Vol.9: Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.