When conceptual pacts are broken: Partner-specific effects on the comprehension of referring expressions

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 201-213

  Metzing, Charles ^a   Brennan, Susan E ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0043158900     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00028-7     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Altmann, E. M., & Gray, W. D. (2002). Forgetting to remember: The functional relationship of decay and interference. Psychological Science, 13, 27-33.
2. Bard, E. G., Anderson, A. H., Sotillo, C., Aylett, M., Doherty-Sneddon, G., & Newlands, A. (2000). Controlling the intelligibility of referring expressions in dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 1-22.
3. Barr, D., & Keysar, B. (2002). Anchoring and comprehension in linguistic precedents. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 391-418.
4. Brennan, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1996). Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1482-1493.
5. Brown, R. (1958a). Words and things. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
6. Brown, R. (1958b). How shall a thing be called? Psychological Review, 65, 14-21.
7. Carroll, J. M. (1980). Naming and describing in social communication. Language and Speech, 23, 309-322.
8. Clark, E. V. (1987). The principle of contrast: A constraint on language acquisition. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 1-33). Hillsdale, JN: Erlbaum.
9. Clark, E. V. (1993). The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Clark, E. V. (1997). Conceptual perspective and lexical choice in acquisition. Cognition, 64, 1-37.
11. Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1-39.
12. Dahan, D., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Chambers, C. G. (2002). Accent and reference resolution in spoken-language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 47.
13. Fowler, C., & Housum, J. (1987). Talkers' signalling of 'new' and 'old' words produced in various communicative contexts. Language and Speech, 28, 47-56.
14. Garrod, S., & Anderson, A. (1987). Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination. Cognition, 27, 181-218.
15. Gerrig, R. J., & McKoon, G. (1998). The readiness is all: The functionality of memory-based text processing. Discourse Processes, 26, 67-86.
16. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3: Speech acts (pp. 225-242). New York: Seminar Press.
17. Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., Balin, J. A., & Paek, T. S. (1998). Definite reference and mutual knowledge: Process models of common ground in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 1-20.
18. Lieberman, P. (1963). Some effects of semantic and grammatical context on the production and perception of speech. Language and Speech, 6, 172-187.
19. Myers, J. L., & O'Brien, E. J. (1998). Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes, 26, 131-158.
20. Olson, D. R. (1970). Language and thought: Aspects of a cognitive theory of semantics. Psychological Review, 77, 257-273.
21. Samuel, S. G., & Troicki, M. (1998). Articulation quality is inversely related to redundancy when children or adults have verbal control. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 175-194.
22. Schober, M. F., & Clark, H. H, (1989). Understanding by addressees and overhearers. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 211-232.