Effectiveness of digital resuscitation training in improving knowledge and skills: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Resuscitation

Volumn 131, Issue , 2018, Pages 14-23

  Lau, Ying ^a   Nyoe, Raphael Song Sue ^b   Wong, Suei Nee ^c   Ab Hamid, Zulkarnain Bin ^d   Leong, Benjamin Sieu Hon ^d   Lau, Siew Tiang ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b SINGAPORE GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^d NATIONAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Digital resuscitation training; Knowledge; Meta analysis; Skills; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CINAHL; COCHRANE LIBRARY; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; EMBASE; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LEARNING THEORY; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; PSYCINFO; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RESUSCITATION; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAMPLE SIZE; SCOPUS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SKILL; SOFTWARE; STATISTICS; STUDENT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VIDEORECORDING; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION; OBSERVER VARIATION;

CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; OBSERVER VARIATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 85050877502     PISSN: 03009572     EISSN: 18731570     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.07.033     Document Type: Review

References (63)

1. Thorne, C.J., Lockey, A.S., Kimani, P.K., Bullock, I., Hampshire, S., Begum-Ali, S., et al. e-Learning in advanced life support-what factors influence assessment outcome?. Resuscitation 114 (2017), 83–91.
2. Thorne, C.J., Lockey, A.S., Bullock, I., Hampshire, S., Begum-Ali, S., Perkins, G.D., E-learning in advanced life support–an evaluation by the Resuscitation Council (UK). Resuscitation 90 (2015), 79–84.
3. Lowyck, J., Bridging learning theories and technology-enhanced environments: a critical appraisal of its history. Spector, J.M., Merrill, M.D., Elen, J., Bishop, M.J., (eds.) Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 2014, Springer New York, New York, NY, 3–20.
4. Blayone, T.J.B., vanOostveen, R., Barber, W., DiGiuseppe, M., Childs, E., Democratizing digital learning: theorizing the fully online learning community model. Int J Educ Technol High Educ, 14, 2017, 13.
5. George, P.P., Ooi, C.K., Leong, E., Jarbrink, K., Car, J., Lockwood, C., Return on investment in blended advanced cardiac life support training compared to face-to-face training in Singapore. Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare, 2018, 3–20.
6. Ertmer, P.A., Newby, T.J., Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Perform Improv Q 26 (2013), 43–71.
7. Reiser, R.A., A history of instructional design and technology: part I: a history of instructional media. Educ Technol Res Dev, 49, 2001, 53.
8. Norman, E., Furnes, B., The relationship between metacognitive experiences and learning: is there a difference between digital and non-digital study media?. Comput Human Behav 54 (2016), 301–309.
9. Truong, H.M., Integrating learning styles and adaptive e-learning system: current developments, problems and opportunities. Comput Human Behav 55 (2016), 1185–1193.
10. Kirkbright, S., Finn, J., Tohira, H., Bremner, A., Jacobs, I., Celenza, A., Audiovisual feedback device use by health care professionals during CPR: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised trials. Resuscitation 85 (2014), 460–471.
11. Cheng, A., Lockey, A., Bhanji, F., Lin, Y., Hunt, E.A., Lang, E., The use of high-fidelity manikins for advanced life support training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation 93 (2015), 142–149.
12. Hsieh, M.-J., Bhanji, F., Chiang, W.-C., Yang, C.-W., Chien, K.-L., MH-M, Ma, Comparing the effect of self-instruction with that of traditional instruction in basic life support courses: a systematic review. Resuscitation 108 (2016), 8–19.
13. Yang, C.W., Yen, Z.S., McGowan, J.E., Chen, H.C., Chiang, W.C., Mancini, M.E., et al. A systematic review of retention of adult advanced life support knowledge and skills in healthcare providers. Resuscitation 83 (2012), 1055–1060.
14. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G., Group, P., Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ, 339, 2009, b2535.
15. Higgins, J.P.T., Green, S., Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration 2011, 2011 Available from www.handbook.cochrane.org.
16. Higgins, J.P., Altman, D.G., Gotzsche, P.C., Juni, P., Moher, D., Oxman, A.D., et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ, 343, 2011, d5928.
17. Reed, D.A., Beckman, T.J., Wright, S.M., Levine, R.B., Kern, D.E., Cook, D.A., Predictive validity evidence for medical education research study quality instrument scores: quality of submissions to JGIM's Medical Education Special Issue. J Gen Intern Med 23 (2008), 903–907.
18. Guyatt, G.H., Oxman, A.D., Schunemann, H.J., Tugwell, P., Knottnerus, A., GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol 64 (2011), 380–382.
19. Fewtrell, M.S., Kennedy, K., Singhal, A., Martin, R.M., Ness, A., Hadders-Algra, M., et al. How much loss to follow-up is acceptable in long-term randomised trials and prospective studies?. Arch Dis Child 93 (2008), 458–461.
20. Gupta, S.K., Intention-to-treat concept: a review. Perspect Clin Res 2 (2011), 109–112.
21. Kang, H., The prevention and handling of the missing data. Korean J Anesthesiol 64 (2013), 402–406.
22. Chan, A.-W., Tetzlaff, J.M., Altman, D.G., Laupacis, A., Gøtzsche, P.C., Krleža-Jerić K., et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med 158 (2013), 200–207.
23. Schulz, K.F., Altman, D.G., Moher, D., CONSORT, Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med, 8, 2010, 18 2010.
24. Sawilowsky, S.S., New effect size rules of thumb. J Mod Appl Stat Methods 8 (2009), 597–599.
25. Sedgwick, P., Marston, L., Meta-analyses: standardised mean differences. BMJ, 2013, 347.
26. Higgins, J.P., Thompson, S.G., Deeks, J.J., Altman, D.G., Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327 (2003), 557–560.
27. Michael, B., HL, V., HJ, P.T., RH, R., A basic introduction to fixed‐effect and random‐effects models for meta‐analysis. Res Synth Methods 1 (2010), 97–111.
28. Sterne, J.A., Sutton, A.J., Ioannidis, J.P., Terrin, N., Jones, D.R., Lau, J., et al. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ, 343, 2011, d4002.
29. Begg, C.B., Mazumdar, M., Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 50 (1994), 1088–1101.
30. Egger, M., Smith, G.D., Schneider, M., Minder, C., Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315 (1997), 629–634.
31. Adams, A.J., Wasson, E.A., Admire, J.R., Pablo Gomez, P., Babayeuski, R.A., Sako, E.Y., et al. A comparison of teaching modalities and fidelity of simulation levels in teaching resuscitation scenarios. J Surg Educ 72 (2015), 778–785 2015.
32. Boada, I., Rodriguez-Benitez, A., Garcia-Gonzalez, J.M., Olivet, J., Carreras, V., Sbert, M., Using a serious game to complement CPR instruction in a nurse faculty. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 122 (2015), 282–291.
33. Bonnetain, E., Boucheix, J., Hamet, M., Freysz, M., Benefits of computer screen-based simulation in learning cardiac arrest procedures. Med Edu 44 (2010), 716–722.
34. Chung, C.H., Siu, A.Y., Po, L.L., Lam, C.Y., Wong, P.C., Comparing the effectiveness of video self-instruction versus traditional classroom instruction targeted at cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills for laypersons: a prospective randomised controlled trial. Hong Kong Med J 16 (2010), 165–170.
35. Delasobera, B.E., Goodwin, T.L., Strehlow, M., Gilbert, G., D'Souza, P., Alok, A., et al. Evaluating the efficacy of simulators and multimedia for refreshing ACLS skills in India. Resuscitation 81 (2010), 217–223.
36. Einspruch, E., Lembach, J., Lynch, B., Lee, W., Harper, R., Fleischman, R., Basic life support instructor training: comparison of instructor-led and self-guided training. J Nurses Staff Dev 27 (2011), E4–9.
37. Iserbyt, P., Charlier, N., Mols, L., Learning basic life support (BLS) with tablet PCs in reciprocal learning at school: are videos superior to pictures? A randomized controlled trial. Resuscitation 85 (2014), 809–813.
38. Kononowicz, A., Krawczyk, P., Cebula, G., Dembkowska, M., Drab, E., Fr?czek, B., et al. Effects of introducing a voluntary virtual patient module to a basic life support with an automated external defibrillator course: a randomised trial. BMC Med Educ, 12, 2012, 41.
39. Krogh, L., Bjørnshave, K., Vestergaard, L., Sharma, M., Rasmussen, S., Nielsen, H., et al. E-learning in pediatric basic life support: a randomized controlled non-inferiority study. Resuscitation 90 (2015), 7–12.
40. Lehmann, R., Thiessen, C., Frick, B., Bosse, H., Nikendei, C., Hoffmann, G., et al. Improving pediatric basic life support performance through blended learning with web-based virtual patients: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res, 17, 2015, e162.
41. Lippmann, J., Livingston, P., Craike, M.J., Comparison of two modes of delivery of first aid training including basic life support. Health Educ J 2011 70 (2011), 131–140.
42. Magura, S., Miller, M., Michael, T., Bensley, R., Burkhardt, J., Puente, A., et al. Novel electronic refreshers for cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Emerg Med, 12, 2012, 18.
43. Mancini, M.E., Cazzell, M., Kardong-Edgren, S., Cason, C.L., Improving workplace safety training using a self-directed CPR-AED learning program. AAOHN J 57 (2009), 159–167 quiz 68-9.
44. Perkins, G.D., Fullerton, J.N., Davis-Gomez, N., Davies, R.P., Baldock, C., Stevens, H., et al. The effect of pre-course e-learning prior to advanced life support training: a randomised controlled trial. Resuscitation 81 (2010), 877–881.
45. Perkins, G.D., Kimani, P.K., Bullock, I., Clutton-Brock, T., Davies, R.P., Gale, M., et al. Improving the efficiency of advanced life support training: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 157 (2012), 19–28.
46. Rehberg, R.S., Gazzillo Diaz, L., Middlemas, D.A., Classroom versus computer-based cpr training: a comparison of the effectiveness of two instructional methods. Athl Train Educ J 4 (2009), 98–103.
47. Roppolo, L., Heymann, R., Pepe, P., Wagner, J., Miller, R., Allen, E., et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing traditional training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to self-directed CPR learning in first year medical students: the two-person CPR study. Resuscitation 82 (2011), 319–325.
48. Saiboon, I.M., Jaafar, M.J., Ahmad, N.S., Nasarudin, N.M.A., Mohamad, N., Ahmad, M.R., et al. Emergency skills learning on video (ESLOV): a single-blinded randomized control trial of teaching common emergency skills using self-instruction video (SIV) versus traditional face-to-face (FTF) methods. Med Teach 36 (2014), 245–250.
49. Sarac, L., Ok, A., The effects of different instructional methods on students’ acquisition and retention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills. Resuscitation 81 (2010), 555–561.
50. Weiner, G.M., Menghini, K., Zaichkin, J., Caid, A.E., Jacoby, C.J., Simon, W.M., Self-directed versus traditional classroom training for neonatal resuscitation. Pediatrics 127 (2011), 713–719.
51. Schulz, K.F., Chalmers, I., Hayes, R.J., Altman, D.G., Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 273 (1995), 408–412.
52. Te Pas, E., De Nijs, M.J.M., Landman-Van Der Boom, E., Stomilovic, N., Blended learning in training basic life support. Resuscitation, 81, 2010, S94.
53. Berman, N.B., Durning, S.J., Fischer, M.R., Huwendiek, S., Triola, M.M., The role for virtual patients in the future of medical edication. Acad Med 91 (2016), 1217–1222.
54. Sanghavi, P., Jena, A.B., Newhouse, J.P., Zaslavsky, A.M., Outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated by basic vs advanced life support. JAMA Intern Med 175 (2015), 196–204.
55. Trevisanuto, D., Bertuola, F., Lanzoni, P., Cavallin, F., Matediana, E., Manzungu, O.W., et al. Effect of a neonatal resuscitation course on healthcare providers’ performances assessed by video recording in a low-resource setting. PLoS One, 10, 2015, e0144443.
56. Schunk, D.H., Learning theories: an educational prespective. 6th ed, 2012, Pearson, Boston.
57. Hoffmann, T.C., Glasziou, P.P., Boutron, I., Milne, R., Perera, R., Moher, D., et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ, 2014, 348.
58. Belland, B.R., Scaffolding: definition, current debates, and future directions. Spector, J.M., Merrill, M.D., Elen, J., Bishop, M.J., (eds.) Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 2014, Springer New York, New York, NY, 505–518.
59. Lowe, D.J., Dewar, A., Lloyd, A., Edgar, S., Clegg, G.R., Optimising clinical performance during resuscitation using video evaluation. Postgrad Med J 93 (2017), 449–453.
60. Biggs, J., Constructive alignment in university teaching. HERDSA Rev High Educ 1 (2014), 1–22.
61. Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., Aston, R., What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful'digital technology in university teaching and learning. Stud High Educ 42 (2017), 1567–1579.
62. Cooper, H., Patall, E.A., The relative benefits of meta-analysis conducted with individual participant data versus aggregated data. Psychol Methods, 14, 2018, 165.
63. Wagner, C.H., Simpson's paradox in real life. Am Stat 36 (1982), 46–48.