The relationship between metacognitive experiences and learning: Is there a difference between digital and non-digital study media?

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 54, Issue , 2016, Pages 301-309

  Norman, Elisabeth ^a   Furnes, Bjarte ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

Author keywords

Confidence rating; Digital learning; Feeling of knowing; Learning outcome; Metacognition; Metacognitive experiences; Prediction of performance; Reading

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

DIGITAL-LEARNING; FEELING OF KNOWING; LEARNING OUTCOME; METACOGNITION; METACOGNITIVES; PREDICTION OF PERFORMANCE; READING;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 84940399423     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.043     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. R. Ackerman, and M. Goldsmith Metacognitive regulation of text learning: on screen versus on paper Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 17 1 2011 18 32 10.1037/a0022086
2. R. Ackerman, and T. Lauterman Taking reading comprehension exams on screen or on paper? A metacognitive analysis of learning texts under time pressure Computers in Human Behavior 28 5 2012 1816 1828 10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.023
3. ∅. Anmarkrud, and I. Bråten Motivation for reading comprehension Learning and Individual Differences 19 2009 252 256 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.09.002
4. A.S. Benjamin, and M. Diaz Measurement of relative metamnemonic accuracy J. Dunlosky, R.A. Bjork, Handbook of memory and metamemory 2008 Psychology Press New York, NY 73 93
5. N. Buzzetto-More, R. Sweat-Guy, and M. Elobaid Reading in a digital age: e books: are students ready for this learning object? Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects 3 2007 239 250
6. N. Carr The shallows: What the internet is doing to our brains 2010 N. N. Norton & Company New York, NY
7. M.-I. Dascalua, C.-N. Bodea, M. Lytras, P. Ordoñez de Pablos, and A. Burlacua Improving e-learning communities through optimal composition of multidisciplinary learning groups Computers in Human Behaviour 30 2014 362 371 10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.022
8. J. Dunlosky, and J. Metcalfe Metacognition 1st ed. 2009 Sage Publications, Inc. London, UK
9. N. Fischer, S. Smolnik, and D.F. Galletta Examining the potential for tablet use in a higher education context Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, 21 February-1 March, Leipzig, Germany 2013 9 22
10. B. Furnes, and E. Norman Metacognition and reading: Comparing three forms of metacognition in normally developing readers and readers with dyslexia Dyslexia 21 2015 273 284 10.1002/dys.1501
11. H.R. Jamali, D. Nicholas, and I. Rowlands Scholarly e-books: the views of 16,000 academics: results from the JISC national e-book observatory Aslib Proceedings 61 1 2009 33 47
12. A. Koriat How do we know that we know? the accessibility model of the feeling of knowing Psychological Review 100 1993 609 639 10.1037//0033-295X.100.4.609
13. A. Koriat Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: a cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 126 4 1997 349 370 10.1037/0096-3445.126.4.349
14. A. Koriat The feeling of knowing: some metatheoretical implications for consciousness and control Consciousness and Cognition 9 2000 149 171 10.1006/ccog.2000.0433
15. A. Koriat Metacognition and consciousness P.D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, E. Thompson, Cambridge handbook of consciousness 2007 Cambridge University Press New York 289 325
16. T. Lauterman, and R. Ackerman Overcoming screen inferiority in learning and calibration Computers in Human Behavior 35 2014 455 463 10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.046
17. T. Lehmann, I. Hähnlein, and D. Ifenthaler Cognitive, metacognitive and motivational perspectives on preflection in self-regulated online learning Computers in Human Behavior 32 2014 313 323 10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.051
18. Z. Liu Reading behavior in the digital environment: changes in reading behavior over the past ten years Journal of Documentation 61 6 2005 700 712 10.1108/00220410510632040
19. A. Mangen New narrative pleasures? A cognitive-phenomenological study of the experience of reading digital narrative fictions (Unplublished doctoral thesis) 2006 University of Science and Technology [NTNU] Trondheim, Norway Retrieved from http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:no:ntnu:diva-1833
20. A. Mangen, B.R. Waldermo, and K. Brønnick Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: effects on reading comprehension International Journal of Educational Research 58 2013 61 68 10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.002
21. M.E.J. Masson, and C.M. Rotello Sources of bias in the Goodman-Kruskal gamma coefficient measure of association: implications for studies of metacognitive processes Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 35 2009 509 527 10.1037/a0014876
22. J. Metcalfe Metamemory: theory and data E. Tulving, F.I.M. Craik, The Oxford handbook of memory 2000 Oxford University Press London 197 211
23. A.C. Miner, and L.M. Reder A new look at feeling of knowing: its metacognitive role in regulating question answering J. Metcalfe, A.P. Shimamura, Metacognition: Knowing about knowing 1994 MIT Press Cambridge 47 70
24. T. Morineau, C. Blanche, L. Tobin, and N. Guéguen The emergence of the contextual role of the e-book in cognitive processes through an ecological and functional analysis International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 62 3 2005 329 348 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.10.002
25. E. Norman, and M.C. Price Measuring consciousness with confidence ratings M. Overgaard, Behavioural methods in consciousness research 2015 Oxford University Press Oxford, UK 159 180
26. N. Pellas The influence of computer self-efficacy, metacognitive self-regulation and self-esteem on student engagement in online learning programs: evidence from the virtual world of second life Computers in Human Behavior 35 2014 157 170 10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.048
27. A. Piolat, T. Olive, and R.T. Kellogg Cognitive effort during note taking Applied Cognitive Psychology 19 2005 291 312 10.1002/acp.1086
28. A.J. Rockinson-Szapkiw, J. Courduff, K. Carter, and D. Bennett Electronic versus traditional print textbooks: a comparison study on the influence of university students' learning Computers & Education 63 2013 259 266 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.022
29. C. Spencer Research on learners' preferences for reading from a printed text or from a computer screen Journal of Distance Education 21 1 2006 33 50
30. K.W. Thiede, T.D. Griffin, J. Wiley, and M. Anderson Poor metacomprehension accuracy as a result of inappropriate cue use Discourse Processes 47 2010 331 362 10.1080/01638530902959927
31. M. Walsh The "textual shift": examining the reading process with print, visual and multimodal texts Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 29 1 2006 24 37
32. C.E. Weinstein, and R.E. Mayer The teaching of learning strategies Handbook of Research on Teaching 3 1986 315 327
33. W.D. Woody, D.B. Daniel, and C.A. Baker E-books or textbooks: students prefer textbooks Computers & Education 55 3 2010 945 948 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.005
34. J. Zhao, and P. Ordóñez de Pablos Regional knowledge management: the perspective of management theory Behaviour & Information Technology 30 1 2011 39 49 10.1080/0144929X.2010.492240
35. B.J. Zimmerman Becoming a self-regulated learner: which are the key subprocesses? Contemporary Educational Psychology 11 4 1986 307 313 10.1016/0361-476X(86)90027-5