Audiovisual feedback device use by health care professionals during CPR: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised trials

Resuscitation

Volumn 85, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 460-471

  Kirkbright, Shelley ^a   Finn, Judith ^a,b,c   Tohira, Hideo ^b   Bremner, Alexandra ^a   Jacobs, Ian ^a,b   Celenza, Antonio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cardiac arrest; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Feedback device

Indexed keywords

AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CINAHL; COMPRESSION; CPR FEEDBACK DEVICE; CPR MANIKIN; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEART ARREST; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RESUSCITATION; REVIEW; SURVIVAL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); DEVICES; META ANALYSIS; MORTALITY; SENSORY FEEDBACK;

CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; HEART ARREST; HUMANS;

EID: 84895923112     PISSN: 03009572     EISSN: 18731570     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.12.012     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Kong M.H., Fonarow G.C., Peterson E.D., et al. Systematic review of the incidence of sudden cardiac death in the United States. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011, 57:794-801.
2. Berdowski J., Berg R.A., Tijssen J.G.P., Koster R.W. Global incidences of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and survival rates: systematic review of 67 prospective studies. Resuscitation 2010, 81:1479-1487.
3. Nichol G., Thomas E., Callaway C.W., et al. Regional variation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence and outcome. JAMA: J Am Med Assoc 2008, 300:1423-1431.
4. Nolan J.P., Hazinski M.F., Billi J.E., et al. Part 1: Executive summary: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Resuscitation 2010, 81:e1-e25.
5. Cummins R.O., Ornato J.P., Thies W.H., Pepe P.E. Improving survival from sudden cardiac arrest: the "chain of survival" concept. A statement for health professionals from the Advanced Cardiac Life Support Subcommittee and the Emergency Cardiac Care Committee, American Heart Association. Circulation 1991, 83:1832-1847.
6. Sayre M.R., Koster R.W., Botha M., et al. Part 5: Adult Basic Life Support. Circulation 2010, 122:S298-S324.
7. Berg R.A., Sanders A.B., Kern K.B., et al. Adverse hemodynamic effects of interrupting chest compressions for rescue breathing during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. Circulation 2001, 104:2465-2470.
8. Kern K.B., Hilwig R.W., Berg R.A., Sanders A.B., Ewy G.A. Importance of continuous chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation 2002, 105:645-649.
9. Eftestøl T., Sunde K., Steen P.A. Effects of interrupting precordial compressions on the calculated probability of defibrillation success during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation 2002, 105:2270-2273.
10. Kramer-Johansen J., Myklebust H., Wik L., et al. Quality of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with real time automated feedback: a prospective interventional study. Resuscitation 2006, 71:283-292.
11. Christenson J., Andrusiek D., Everson-Stewart S., et al. Chest compression fraction determines survival in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation. Circulation 2009, 120:1241-1247.
12. Wik L., Kramer-Johansen J., Myklebust H., et al. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 2005, 293:299-304.
13. Yeung J., Meeks R., Edelson D., Gao F., Soar J., Perkins G.D. The use of CPR feedback/prompt devices during training and CPR performance: a systematic review. Resuscitation 2009, 80:743-751.
14. Bohn A., Weber T.P., Wecker S., et al. The addition of voice prompts to audiovisual feedback and debriefing does not modify CPR quality or outcomes in out of hospital cardiac arrest-a prospective, randomized trial. Resuscitation 2011, 82:257-262.
15. Olasveengen T.M., Tomlinson A.E., Wik L., et al. A failed attempt to improve quality of out-of-hospital CPR through performance evaluation. Prehosp Emerg Care 2007, 11:427-433. [Date of Publication: October 2007].
16. Hostler D., Everson-Stewart S., Rea T.D., et al. Effect of real-time feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation outside hospital: prospective, cluster-randomised trial. BMJ 2011, 2011.
17. Chandra S., Hess E.P., Kolb L., Myers L., White R.D. Effect of real-time automated and delayed summative feedback on CPR quality in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a prospective multicenter controlled clinical trial. Acad Emerg Med 2011, 15:S6-S145.
18. Yeung J., Perkins G. A randomised controlled trial of prompt and feedback devices and its impact on quality of chest compressions in Immediate Life Support (ILS) training. Resuscitation 2011, 82:S11.
19. Fischer H., Gruber J., Neuhold S., et al. Effects and limitations of an AED with audiovisual feedback for cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized manikin study. Resuscitation 2011, 82:902-907.
20. Lyngeraa T.S., Hjortrup P.B., Wulff N.B., Aagaard T., Lippert A. Effect of feedback on delaying deterioration in quality of compressions during 2minutes of continuous chest compressions: a randomized manikin study investigating performance with and without feedback. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2012, 20:16.
21. Pozner C.N., Almozlino A., Elmer J., Poole S., McNamara D., Barash D. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation feedback improves the quality of chest compression provided by hospital health care professionals. Am J Emerg Med 2011, 29:618-625.
22. Skorning M., Beckers S.K., Brokmann J.C., et al. New visual feedback device improves performance of chest compressions by professionals in simulated cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2010, 81:53-58.
23. Havel C., Schreiber W., Trimmel H., et al. Quality of closed chest compression on a manikin in ambulance vehicles and flying helicopters with a real time automated feedback. Resuscitation 2010, 81:59-64.
24. Kirkbright S., Finn J., Jacobs I., Sprivulis P., Thompson P. The relationship between quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed by healthcare professionals and patient survival following cardiac arrest: a systematic review of randomised and non-randomised trials 2013, PROSPERO: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, CRD42012003064.
25. Vandenbroucke J.P., Von Elm E., Altman D.G., et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Gac Sanit 2009, 23:26.
26. Higgins J.P.T., Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011] 2011, The Cochrane Collaboration.
27. Wells G.A., Shea B., O'Connell D., et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses 2009, Available from: http://wwwohrica/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxfordhtm [cited 2009 October 19].
28. The Nordic Cochrane Centre TCC Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version 5.2 2012, Copenhagen.
29. Liberati A., Altman D.G., Tetzlaff J., et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 2009, 6:e1000100.
30. Higgins J.P., Thompson S.G., Deeks J.J., Altman D.G. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003, 327:557-560.
31. Abella B.S., Edelson D.P., Kim S., et al. CPR quality improvement during in-hospital cardiac arrest using a real-time audiovisual feedback system. Resuscitation 2007, 73:54-61.
32. Beckers S.K., Skorning M.H., Fries M., et al. CPREzy improves performance of external chest compressions in simulated cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2007, 72:100-107.
33. Boyle A.J., Wilson A.M., Connelly K., McGuigan L., Wilson J., Whitbourn R. Improvement in timing and effectiveness of external cardiac compressions with a new non-invasive device: the CPR-Ezy. Resuscitation 2002, 54:63-67.
34. Noordergraaf G.J., Drinkwaard B.W.P.M., van Berkom P.F.J., et al. The quality of chest compressions by trained personnel: the effect of feedback, via the CPREzy, in a randomized controlled trial using a manikin model. Resuscitation 2006, 69:241-252.
35. Perkins G.D., Augré C., Rogers H., Allan M., Thickett D.R. CPREzy™: an evaluation during simulated cardiac arrest on a hospital bed. Resuscitation 2005, 64:103-108.
36. Skorning M., Derwall M., Brokmann J.C., et al. External chest compressions using a mechanical feedback device: cross-over simulation study. Anaesthesist 2011, 60:717-722.
37. Dine C.J., Gersh R.E., Leary M., Riegel B.J., Bellini L.M., Abella B.S. Improving cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and resuscitation training by combining audiovisual feedback and debriefing. Crit Care Med 2008, 36:2817-2822.
38. Elding C., Baskett P., Hughes A. The study of the effectiveness of chest compressions using the CPR-plus. Resuscitation 1998, 36:169-173.
39. Handley A.J., Handley S.A. Improving CPR performance using an audible feedback system suitable for incorporation into an automated external defibrillator. Resuscitation 2003, 57:57-62.
40. Hostler D., Wang H., Parrish K., Platt T.E., Guimond G. The effect of a voice assist manikin (VAM) system on CPR quality among prehospital providers. Prehosp Emerg Care 2005, 9:53-60.
41. Wik L., Thowsen J., Andreas Steen P. An automated voice advisory manikin system for training in basic life support without an instructor. A novel approach to CPR training. Resuscitation 2001, 50:167-172.
42. Havel C., van Tulder R., Schreiber W., et al. Randomized crossover trial comparing physical strain on advanced life support providers during transportation using real-time automated feedback. Acad Emerg Med 2011, 18:860-867.
43. Thomas S.H., Stone C.K., Austin P.E., March J.A., Brinkley S. Utilization of a pressure-sensing monitor to improve in-flight chest compressions. Am J Emerg Med 1995, 13:155-157.
44. Edelson D.P., Litzinger B., Arora V., et al. Improving in-hospital cardiac arrest process and outcomes with performance debriefing. Arch Intern Med 2008, 168:1063-1069.
45. Maier G.W., Tyson G.S., Olsen C.O., et al. The physiology of external cardiac massage: high-impulse cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation 1984, 70:86-101.
46. Kern K.B., Sanders A.B., Raife J., Milander M.M., Otto C.W., Ewy G.A. A study of chest compression rates during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in humans: the importance of rate-directed chest compressions. Arch Intern Med 1992, 152:145-149.
47. Idris A.H., Guffey D., Aufderheide T.P., et al. Relationship between chest compression rates and outcomes from cardiac arrest. Circulation 2012, 125:3004-3012.
48. Perkins G.D., Davies R.P., Quinton S., et al. The effect of real-time CPR feedback and post event debriefing on patient and processes focused outcomes: a cohort study: trial protocol. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2011, 19:58.
49. ®, a first aid application for mobile phones. Resuscitation 2007, 74:487-494.
50. Semeraro F., Frisoli A., Loconsole C., et al. Motion detection technology as a tool for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality training: a randomised crossover mannequin pilot study. Resuscitation 2013, 84:501-507.
51. Chung T.N., Kim S.W., You J.S., et al. The specific effect of metronome guidance on the quality of one-person cardiopulmonary resuscitation and rescuer fatigue. J Emerg Med 2012, 43:1049-1054.