The use of high-fidelity manikins for advanced life support training-A systematic review and meta-analysis

Resuscitation

Volumn 93, Issue , 2015, Pages 142-149

  Cheng, Adam ^a   Lockey, Andrew ^b   Bhanji, Farhan ^c   Lin, Yiqun ^a   Hunt, Elizabeth A ^d   Lang, Eddy ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b CALDERDALE AND HUDDERSFIELD NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^c MONTREAL CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^d JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Advanced life support training; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Meta analysis; Simulation; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

CPR MANIKIN; EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES EDUCATION; HEART ARREST; HIGH FIDELITY CPR MANIKIN; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; LEARNING; LOW FIDELITY CPR MANIKIN; META ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RESUSCITATION; REVIEW; SIMULATION; SKILL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS; TEACHING;

CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; HEART ARREST; HUMANS; MANIKINS; TEACHING;

EID: 84937520733     PISSN: 03009572     EISSN: 18731570     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.04.004     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Cheng A., Rodgers D., Van Der Jagt E., Eppich W., O'Donnell J. Evolution of the pediatric advanced life support course: enhanced learning with a new debriefing tool and web-based module for pedaitric advanced life support instructors. Pediatric Crit Care Med 2012, 13:589-595.
2. Settles J., Jeffries P.R., Smith T.M., Meyers J.S. Advanced cardiac life support instruction: do we know tomorrow what we know today?. J Contin Educ Nurs 2011, 42:271-279.
3. Cheng A., Hunt E.A., Donoghue A., et al. Examining pediatric resuscitation education using simulation and scripted debriefing: a multicenter randomized trial. JAMA Pediatr 2013, 167:528-536.
4. Cherry R.A., Williams J., George J., Ali J. The effectiveness of a human patient simulator in the ATLS shock skills station. J Surg Res 2007, 139:229-235.
5. Coolen E.H.A.J., Draaisma J.M.T., Hogeveen M., Antonius T.A.J., Lommen C.M.L., Loeffen J.L. Effectiveness of high fidelity video-assisted real-time simulation: a comparison of three training methods for acute pediatric emergencies. Int J Pediatr 2012, 2012:709569.
6. Curran V., Fleet L., White S., et al. A randomized controlled study of manikin simulator fidelity on neonatal resuscitation program learning outcomes. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2015, 20:205-218.
7. Donoghue A.J., Durbin D.R., Nadel F.M., Stryjewski G.R., Kost S.I., Nadkarni V.M. Effect of high-fidelity simulation on pediatric advanced life support training in pediatric house staff: a randomized trial. Pediatr Emerg Care 2009, 25:139-144.
8. Finan E., Bismilla Z., Whyte H.E., Leblanc V., McNamara P.J. High-fidelity simulator technology may not be superior to traditional low-fidelity equipment for neonatal resuscitation training. J Perinatol 2012, 32:287-292.
9. Hoadley T.A. Learning advanced cardiac life support: a comparison study of the effects of low- and high-fidelity simulation. Nurs Educ Perspect 2009, 30:91-95.
10. Lo B.M., Devine A.S., Evans D.P., et al. Comparison of traditional versus high-fidelity simulation in the retention of ACLS knowledge. Resuscitation 2011, 82:1440-1443.
11. Owen H., Mugford B., Follows V., Plummer J.L. Comparison of three simulation-based training methods for management of medical emergencies. Resuscitation 2006, 71:204-211.
12. Thomas E.J., Williams A.L., Reichman E.F., Lasky R.E., Crandell S., Taggart W.R. Team training in the neonatal resuscitation program for interns: teamwork and quality of resuscitations. Pediatrics 2010, 125:539-546.
13. Rodgers D.L., Securro S., Pauley R.D. The effect of high-fidelity simulation on educational outcomes in an advanced cardiovascular life support course. Simul Healthc 2009, 4:200-206.
14. Campbell D.M., Barozzino T., Farrugia M., Sgro M. High-fidelity simulation in neonatal resuscitation. Paediatr Child Health 2009, 14:19-23.
15. King J.M., Reising D.L. Teaching advanced cardiac life support protocols: the effectiveness of static versus high-fidelity simulation. Nurse Educ 2011, 36:62-65.
16. Cook D.A., Hatala R., Brydges R., et al. Technology enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2011, 3306:978-988.
17. Ilgen J.S., Sherbino J., Cook D.A. Technology-enhanced simulation in emergency medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med 2013, 20:117-127.
18. Cheng A., Lang T., Starr S., Pusic M., Cook D. Technology-enhanced simulation and pediatric education: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2014, 133:e1313-e1323.
19. Mundell W.C., Kennedy C.C., Szostek J.H., Cook D.A. Simulation technology for resuscitation training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation 2013, 84:1174-1183.
20. Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D.G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2009, 62:1006-1012. PRISMA Group.
21. Richardson W.S., Wilson M.C., Nishikawa J., Hayward R.S. The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions. ACP J Club 1995, 123:A12-A13.
22. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 5.1.0. 2011. Available at: [accessed 28.02.2013]. http://www.cochrane.org/resources/handbook/index.htm.
23. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1988, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. 2nd ed.
24. Furlan A.D., Pennick V., Bombardier C., van Tulder M. Editorial Board CBRG: 2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane back review group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009, 34:1929-1941.
25. Guyatt G.H., Oxman A.D., Vist G.E., et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008, 336:924-926.
26. Issenberg S.B., McGaghie W.C., Petrusa E.R., Gordon D.L., Scalese R.J. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach 2005, 27:10-28.
27. Cook D.A., Hamstra S.J., Brydges R., et al. Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Teacher 2013, 35:e867-e898.
28. Cheng A, Auerbach M, Chang T, Hunt EA, Pusic M, Nadkarni V, et al. Designing and conducting simulation-based research. Pediatrics. doi:10.1542/peds, p. 2013-3267 [published online 12.05.14].
29. Rudolph J.W., Simon R., Raemer D.B. Which reality matters? Questions on the path to high engagement in healthcare simulation. Simul Healthc 2007, 2:161-163.
30. Hamstra S.J., Brydges R., Hatala R., Zendejas B., Cook D. A fresh look at simulation: reconsidering fidelity. J Grad Med Educ 2012, 4:553.
31. Kurosawa H., Ikeyama T., Achuff P., et al. A randomized, controlled trial of in situ pediatric advanced life support recertification (pediatric advanced life support reconstructed) compared with standard pediatric advanced life support recertification for ICU frontline providers. Crit Care Med 2014, 42:610-618.
32. Patocka C., Khan F., Dubrovsky A.S., Brody D., Bank I., Bhanji F. Pediatric resuscitation training-instruction all at once or spaced out over time?. Resuscitation 2015, 88:6-11.
33. Ericsson K.A. Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: a general overview. Acad Emerg Med Nov 2008, 15:988-994.
34. McGaghie W.C., Issenberg S.B., Cohen E.R., Barsuk J.H., Wayne D.B. Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Acad Med 2011, 86:706-711.
35. Wayne D.B., Butter J., Siddall V.J., et al. Mastery learning of advanced cardiac life support skills by internal medicine residents using simulation technology and deliberate practice. J Gen Intern Med 2006, 21:251-256.
36. Hunt E.A., Duval-Arnould J.M., Nelson-McMillan K.L., et al. Pediatric resident resuscitation skills improve after Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice training. Resuscitation 2014, 85:945-951.
37. Cheng A., Eppich W., Grant V., Sherbino J., Zendejas B., Cook D.A. Debriefing for technology-enhanced simulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Educ 2014, 48:657-666.
38. Mullan P., Kessler D., Cheng A. Educational opportunities with postevent debriefing. JAMA 2014, 312:2333-2334.
39. Kessler D, Mullan P, Cheng A. Debriefing in the emergency department after clinical events: a practical guide. Ann Emerg Med. doi: [published online 15.11.14]. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.10.019.
40. Edelson D.P., Litzinger B., Arora V., et al. Improving in-hospital cardiac arrest process and outcomes with performance debriefing. Arch Intern Med 2008, 168:1063-1069.
41. Wolfe H, Zebuhr C, Topjian AA, et al. Interdisciplinary ICU Cardiac Arrest debriefing improves survival outcomes. Crit Care Med. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000327 [published online 08.04.14].
42. Cheng A, Donoghue A, Bhanji F. Incorporating real-time CPR feedback and quantitative CPR debriefings into advanced life support courses: luxury or necessity? Resuscitation. 2015;90:e3-e4 doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.02.012 [published online 21.02.15].
43. Mancini M.E., Soar J., Bhanji F., et al. 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations Part 12: Education, Implementation, and Teams 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Circulation 2010, 122:S539-S581. Education, Implementation, and Teams Chapter Collaborators.
44. Eppich W., Cheng A. Competency-based simulation education: should competency standards apply to simulation educators?. BMJ STEL 2015, 1-2.