Systematic analysis of complex genetic interactions

Science

Volumn 360, Issue 6386, 2018, Pages

  Kuzmin, Elena ^a,h   VanderSluis, Benjamin ^b   Wang, Wen ^b   Tan, Guihong ^a   Deshpande, Raamesh ^b   Chen, Yiqun ^a   Usaj, Matej ^a   Balint, Attila ^a,i   Usaj, Mojca Mattiazzi ^a   Van Leeuwen, Jolanda ^a   Koch, Elizabeth N ^b   Pons, Carles ^b   Dagilis, Andrius J ^c   Pryszlak, Michael ^a   Wang, Jason Zi Yang ^a   Hanchard, Julia ^a   Riggi, Margot ^d,e,f   Xu, Kaicong ^b   Heydari, Hamed ^a   Luis, Bryan Joseph San ^a   Shuteriqi, Ermira ^a   Zhu, Hongwei ^a   Van Dyk, Nydia ^a   Sharifpoor, Sara ^a   Costanzo, Michael ^a   Loewith, Robbie ^d,e,f   Caudy, Amy ^a   Bolnick, Daniel ^c   Brown, Grant W ^a   Andrews, Brenda J ^a   Boone, Charles ^a,g   Myers, Chad L ^b   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^e Institute of Genetics and Genomics in Geneva (iGE3)   (Switzerland)

^f Swiss National Centre for Competence in Research Programme Chemical Biology   (Switzerland)

^g RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science   (Japan)

^h MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPLEXITY; FUNCTIONAL ROLE; GENE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOTYPE; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; TAXONOMY;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY; FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS; FUNGAL GENE; FUNGAL GENETICS; FUNGUS MUTANT; GENE ACTIVITY; GENE INTERACTION; GENE MAPPING; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE PHENOTYPE CORRELATION; INHERITANCE; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NONHUMAN; PENETRANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; DNA MICROARRAY; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETICS; MUTATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; MUTATION; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 85045545118     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.aao1729     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. J. L. Hartman IV, B. Garvik, L. Hartwell, Principles for the buffering of genetic variation. Science 291, 1001-1004 (2001). doi: 10.1126/science.291.5506.1001; pmid: 11232561
2. 1000 Genomes Project Consortium, A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature 526, 68-74 (2015). doi: 10.1038/nature15393; pmid: 26432245
3. O. Zuk, E. Hechter, S. R. Sunyaev, E. S. Lander, The mystery of missing heritability: Genetic interactions create phantom heritability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 1193-1198 (2012). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1119675109; pmid: 22223662
4. J. S. Bloom, I. M. Ehrenreich, W. T. Loo, T. L. Lite, L. Kruglyak, Finding the sources of missing heritability in a yeast cross. Nature 494, 234-237 (2013). doi: 10.1038/nature11867; pmid: 23376951
5. J. S. Bloom et al., Genetic interactions contribute less than additive effects to quantitative trait variation in yeast. Nat. Commun. 6, 8712 (2015). doi: 10.1038/ncomms9712; pmid: 26537231
6. A. H. Tong et al., Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 294, 2364-2368 (2001). doi: 10.1126/science.1065810; pmid: 11743205
7. M. Costanzo et al., A global genetic interaction network maps a wiring diagram of cellular function. Science 353, aaf1420 (2016). doi: 10.1126/science.aaf1420; pmid: 27708008
8. A. Baryshnikova et al., Quantitative analysis of fitness and genetic interactions in yeast on a genome scale. Nat. Methods 7, 1017-1024 (2010). doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1534; pmid: 21076421
9. P. Novick, D. Botstein, Phenotypic analysis of temperature-sensitive yeast actin mutants. Cell 40, 405-416 (1985). doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90154-0; pmid: 3967297
10. A. Bender, J. R. Pringle, Use of a screen for synthetic lethal and multicopy suppressee mutants to identify two new genes involved in morphogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 1295-1305 (1991). doi: 10.1128/MCB.11.3.1295; pmid: 1996092
11. J. van Leeuwen et al., Exploring genetic suppression interactions on a global scale. Science 354, aag0839 (2016). doi: 10.1126/science.aag0839; pmid: 27811238
12. E. A. Winzeler et al., Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Science 285, 901-906 (1999). doi: 10.1126/science.285.5429.901; pmid: 10436161
13. G. Giaever et al., Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 418, 387-391 (2002). doi: 10.1038/nature00935; pmid: 12140549
14. A. H. Tong et al., Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science 303, 808-813 (2004). doi: 10.1126/science.1091317; pmid: 14764870
15. M. Costanzo et al., The genetic landscape of a cell. Science 327, 425-431 (2010). doi: 10.1126/science.1180823; pmid: 20093466 Materials and methods are available as supplementary materials.
16. R. Deshpande, J. Nelson, S. W. Simpkins, M. Costanzo, J. S. Piotrowski, S. C. Li, C. Boone, C. L. Myers, Efficient strategies for screening large-scale genetic interaction networks. bioRxiv 159632 [Preprint]. 5 July 2017. doi: 10.1101/159632
17. J. E. Haber et al., Systematic triple-mutant analysis uncovers functional connectivity between pathways involved in chromosome regulation. Cell Rep. 3, 2168-2178 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.05.007; pmid: 23746449
18. J. Zou et al., Regulation of cell polarity through phosphorylation of Bni4 by Pho85 G1 cyclin-dependent kinases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 20, 3239-3250 (2009). doi: 10.1091/mbc.E08-12-1255; pmid: 19458192
19. M. C. Jonikas et al., Comprehensive characterization of genes required for protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum. Science 323, 1693-1697 (2009). doi: 10.1126/science.1167983; pmid: 19325107
20. Y. Noda, T. Yamagishi, K. Yoda, Specific membrane recruitment of Uso1 protein, the essential endoplasmic reticulum-to-Golgi tethering factor in yeast vesicular transport. J. Cell. Biochem. 101, 686-694 (2007). doi: 10.1002/jcb.21225; pmid: 17192843
21. A. K. Gillingham, A. H. Tong, C. Boone, S. Munro, The GTPase Arf1p and the ER to Golgi cargo receptor Erv14p cooperate to recruit the golgin Rud3p to the cis-Golgi. J. Cell Biol. 167, 281-292 (2004). doi: 10.1083/jcb.200407088; pmid: 15504911
22. A. González, M. N. Hall, Nutrient sensing and TOR signaling in yeast and mammals. EMBO J. 36, 397-408 (2017). doi: 10.15252/embj.201696010; pmid: 28096180
23. A. van der Zand, J. Gent, I. Braakman, H. F. Tabak, Biochemically distinct vesicles from the endoplasmic reticulum fuse to form peroxisomes. Cell 149, 397-409 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.054; pmid: 22500805
24. S. Kira et al., Dynamic relocation of the TORC1-Gtr1/2-Ego1/2/3 complex is regulated by Gtr1 and Gtr2. Mol. Biol. Cell 27, 382-396 (2016). doi: 10.1091/mbc.E15-07-0470; pmid: 26609069
25. M. P. Péli-Gulli, A. Sardu, N. Panchaud, S. Raucci, C. De Virgilio, Amino acids stimulate TORC1 through Lst4-Lst7, a GTPase-activating protein complex for the Rag family GTPase Gtr2. Cell Rep. 13, 1-7 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.08.059; pmid: 26387955
26. M. Usaj et al., TheCellMap.org: A web-accessible database for visualizing and mining the global yeast genetic interaction network. G3 7, 1539-1549 (2017). doi: 10.1534/g3.117.040220; pmid: 28325812
27. Y. Sun, N. T. Leong, T. Wong, D. G. Drubin, A Pan1/End3/Sla1 complex links Arp2/3-mediated actin assembly to sites of clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Mol. Biol. Cell 26, 3841-3856 (2015). doi: 10.1091/mbc.E15-04-0252; pmid: 26337384
28. I. V. Karpichev, G. M. Small, Global regulatory functions of Oaf1p and Pip2p (Oaf2p), transcription factors that regulate genes encoding peroxisomal proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 6560-6570 (1998). doi: 10.1128/MCB.18.11.6560; pmid: 9774671
29. E. H. Hettema, R. Erdmann, I. van der Klei, M. Veenhuis, Evolving models for peroxisome biogenesis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 29, 25-30 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2014.02.002; pmid: 24681485
30. D. E. Bustard et al., During replication stress, non-SMC element 5 (NSE5) is required for Smc5/6 protein complex functionality at stalled forks. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 11374-11383 (2012). doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.336263; pmid: 22303010
31. R. J. Chi et al., Fission of SNX-BAR-coated endosomal retrograde transport carriers is promoted by the dynamin-related protein Vps1. J. Cell Biol. 204, 793-806 (2014). doi: 10.1083/jcb.201309084; pmid: 24567361
32. J. R. Whyte, S. Munro, A yeast homolog of the mammalian mannose 6-phosphate receptors contributes to the sorting of vacuolar hydrolases. Curr. Biol. 11, 1074-1078 (2001). doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00273-1; pmid: 11470415
33. A. Eugster, G. Frigerio, M. Dale, R. Duden, The a-and b′-COP WD40 domains mediate cargo-selective interactions with distinct di-lysine motifs. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 1011-1023 (2004). doi: 10.1091/mbc.E03-10-0724; pmid: 14699056
34. C. A. Argmann, S. M. Houten, J. Zhu, E. E. Schadt, A next generation multiscale view of inborn errors of metabolism. Cell Metab. 23, 13-26 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.11.012; pmid: 26712461
35. S. Gavrilets, in Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species, S. A. Levin, H. S. Horn, Eds. (Monographs in Population Biology, Princeton Univ. Press, 2004), pp. 149-194.
36. B. R. Foley, C. G. Rose, D. E. Rundle, W. Leong, S. Edmands, Postzygotic isolation involves strong mitochondrial and sex-specific effects in Tigriopus californicus, a species lacking heteromorphic sex chromosomes. Heredity 111, 391-401 (2013). doi: 10.1038/hdy.2013.61; pmid: 23860232
37. H. A. Orr, The population genetics of speciation: The evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. Genetics 139, 1805-1813 (1995). pmid: 7789779
38. J. J. Welch, Accumulating Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities: Reconciling theory and data. Evolution 58, 1145-1156 (2004). doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004tb01695.x; pmid: 15266965
39. L. C. Moyle, T. Nakazato, Hybrid incompatibility "snowballs" between Solanum species. Science 329, 1521-1523 (2010). doi: 10.1126/science.1193063; pmid: 20847271
40. S. Tang, D. C. Presgraves, Evolution of the Drosophila nuclear pore complex results in multiple hybrid incompatibilities. Science 323, 779-782 (2009). doi: 10.1126/science.1169123; pmid: 19197064
41. S. M. Richardson et al., Design of a synthetic yeast genome. Science 355, 1040-1044 (2017). doi: 10.1126/science.aaf4557; pmid: 28280199
42. D. G. Gibson et al., One-step assembly in yeast of 25 overlapping DNA fragments to form a complete synthetic Mycoplasma genitalium genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 20404-20409 (2008). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811011106; pmid: 19073939
43. C. A. Hutchison 3rd et al., Design and synthesis of a minimal bacterial genome. Science 351, aad6253 (2016). doi: 10.1126/science.aad6253; pmid: 27013737
44. D. G. Gibson et al., Creation of a bacterial cell controlled by a chemically synthesized genome. Science 329, 52-56 (2010). doi: 10.1126/science.1190719; pmid: 20488990
45. T. Wang et al., Identification and characterization of essential genes in the human genome. Science 350, 1096-1101 (2015). doi: 10.1126/science.aac7041; pmid: 26472758
46. T. Hart et al., High-resolution CRISPR screens reveal fitness genes and genotype-specific cancer liabilities. Cell 163, 1515-1526 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.015; pmid: 26627737
47. V. A. Blomen et al., Gene essentiality and synthetic lethality in haploid human cells. Science 350, 1092-1096 (2015). doi: 10.1126/science.aac7557; pmid: 26472760
48. R. D. Dowell et al., Genotype to phenotype: A complex problem. Science 328, 469 (2010). doi: 10.1126/science.1189015; pmid: 20413493
49. S. K. Forsberg, J. S. Bloom, M. J. Sadhu, L. Kruglyak, Ö. Carlborg, Accounting for genetic interactions improves modeling of individual quantitative trait phenotypes in yeast. Nat. Genet. 49, 497-503 (2017). doi: 10.1038/ng.3800; pmid: 28250458
50. M. B. Taylor, I. M. Ehrenreich, Genetic interactions involving five or more genes contribute to a complex trait in yeast. PLOS Genet. 10, e1004324 (2014). doi: 10.1371/journal. pgen.1004324; pmid: 24784154
51. M. B. Taylor, I. M. Ehrenreich, Higher-order genetic interactions and their contribution to complex traits. Trends Genet. 31, 34-40 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2014.09.001; pmid: 25284288
52. P. C. Phillips, Epistasis-The essential role of gene interactions in the structure and evolution of genetic systems. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9, 855-867 (2008). doi: 10.1038/nrg2452; pmid: 18852697
53. T. B. Sackton, D. L. Hartl, Genotypic context and epistasis in individuals and populations. Cell 166, 279-287 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.047; pmid: 27419868
54. A. Baryshnikova, Systematic functional annotation and visualization of biological networks. Cell Syst. 2, 412-421 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2016.04.014; pmid: 27237738
55. A. C. Gavin et al., Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature 440, 631-636 (2006). doi: 10.1038/nature04532; pmid: 16429126
56. N. J. Krogan et al., Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 440, 637-643 (2006). doi: 10.1038/nature04670; pmid: 16554755
57. K. Tarassov et al., An in vivo map of the yeast protein interactome. Science 320, 1465-1470 (2008). doi: 10.1126/science.1153878; pmid: 18467557
58. H. Yu et al., High-quality binary protein interaction map of the yeast interactome network. Science 322, 104-110 (2008). doi: 10.1126/science.1158684; pmid: 18719252
59. M. Babu et al., Interaction landscape of membrane-protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 489, 585-589 (2012). doi: 10.1038/nature11354; pmid: 22940862
60. C. Huttenhower, M. Hibbs, C. Myers, O. G. Troyanskaya, A scalable method for integration and functional analysis of multiple microarray datasets. Bioinformatics 22, 2890-2897 (2006). doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl492; pmid: 17005538
61. Y. T. Chong et al., Yeast proteome dynamics from single cell imaging and automated analysis. Cell 161, 1413-1424 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.051; pmid: 26046442
62. P. Shannon et al., Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13, 2498-2504 (2003). doi: 10.1101/gr.1239303; pmid: 14597658