The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles

Current Sociology

Volumn 65, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 814-845

  Hesselmann, Felicitas ^a   Graf, Verena ^a   Schmidt, Marion ^a   Reinhart, Martin ^a,b  

^a European University of Applied Sciences   (Germany)

^b HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Retractions; scientific misconduct; sociology of deviance; sociology of science; visibility

Indexed keywords

EID: 85029496552     PISSN: 00113921     EISSN: 14617064     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0011392116663807     Document Type: Review

References (150)

1. Abritis A, (2015) An assessment of retractions as a measure of scientific misconduct and impact on public health risks. Graduate Theses and Dissertations, University of South Florida.
2. Adeleye OA, Adebamowo CA, (2012) Factors associated with research wrongdoing in Nigeria. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: An International Journal 7(5): 15–24.
3. Alfredo K, Hart H, (2011) The university and the responsible conduct of research: Who is responsible for what? Science and Engineering Ethics 17(3): 447–457.
4. Almeida RMVR de, Catelani F, Fontes-Pereira AJ. (2015) Retractions in general and internal medicine in a high-profile scientific indexing database. Sao Paulo Medical Journal 134(1): 74–78.
5. Amos KA, (2014) The ethics of scholarly publishing: Exploring differences in plagiarism and duplicate publication across nations. Journal of the Medical Library Association 102(2): 87–91.
6. Atlas MC, (2004) Retraction policies of high-impact biomedical journals. Journal of the Medical Library Association 92(2): 242–250.
7. Azoulay P, Furman JL, Krieger JL. (2012) Retractions. NBER Working Paper Series, National Bureau of Economic Research.
8. Azoulay P, Furman JL, Krieger JL. (2015) Retractions. Review of Economics and Statistics 97(5): 1118–1136.
9. Bilbrey E, O’Dell N, Creamer J, (2014) A novel rubric for rating the quality of retraction notices. Publications 2(1): 14–26.
10. Bonito AJ, Titus SL, Wright DE, (2011) Assessing the preparedness of Research Integrity Officers (RIOs) to appropriately handle possible research misconduct cases. Science and Engineering Ethics 18(4): 605–619.
11. Bornemann-Cimenti H, Szilagyi IS, Sandner-Kiesling A, (2015) Perpetuation of retracted publications using the example of the Scott S. Reuben Case: Incidences, reasons and possible improvements. Science and Engineering Ethics. Epub ahead of print 07 July 2015. DOI:10.1007/s11948-015-9680-y.
12. Bosch X, Hernández C, Pericas JM. (2012) Misconduct policies in high-impact biomedical journals. PLoS ONE 7(12): e51928.
13. Bowker GC, Star SL, (1999) Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences, rev. edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press.
14. Braxton JM, (1991) The influence of graduate department quality on the sanctioning of scientific misconduct. The Journal of Higher Education 62(1): 87–108.
15. Breen KJ, (2003) Misconduct in medical research: Whose responsibility? Internal Medicine Journal 33(4): 186–191.
16. Breyer T, (2015) Social visibility and perceptual normativity. In: Doyon M, Breyer T, (eds) Normativity in Perception. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 140–160.
17. Brighenti A, (2007) Visibility: A category for the social sciences. Current Sociology 55(3): 323–342.
18. Brookes PS, (2014) Internet publicity of data problems in the bioscience literature correlates with enhanced corrective action. PeerJ 2: e313.
19. Budd JM, Sievert ME, Schultz TR, (1998) Phenomena of retraction: Reasons for retraction and citations to the publications. Journal of American Medical Association 280(3): 296–297.
20. Budd JM, Sievert M, Schultz TR. (1999) Effects of article retraction on citation and practice in medicine. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 87(4): 437–443.
21. Casadevall A, Steen RG, Fang FC, (2014) Sources of error in the retracted scientific literature. The FASEB Journal 28(9): 3847–3855.
22. Cavadino M, Dignan J, Mair G, (2013) The Penal System: An Introduction, 5th edn. London: SAGE.
23. Chantler C, Chantler S, (1998) Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. Deception: difficulties and initiatives. British Medical Journal 316(7146): 1731–1732.
24. Claxton L, (2005) Scientific authorship Part 2. History, recurring issues, practices, and guidelines. Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research 589(1): 31–45.
25. Cokol M, Iossifov I, Rodriguez-Esteban R. (2007) How many scientific papers should be retracted? EMBO Reports 8(5): 422–423.
26. Cokol M, Ozbay F, Rodriguez-Esteban R, (2008) Retraction rates are on the rise. EMBO Reports 9(1): 2.
27. Davis MS, Riske-Morris M, Diaz SR, (2007) Causal factors implicated in research misconduct: Evidence from ORI case files. Science and Engineering Ethics 13(4): 395–414.
28. Davis PM, (2012) The persistence of error: A study of retracted articles on the internet and in personal libraries. Journal of the Medical Library Association 100(3): 184–189.
29. Decullier E, Huot L, Samson G. (2013) Visibility of retractions: A cross-sectional one-year study. BMC Research Notes 6: Article 238.
30. Decullier E, Huot L, Maisonneuve H, (2014) What time-lag for a retraction search on PubMed? BMC Research Notes 7: Article 395.
31. Deutsch E, (2006) Ombudskommissionen vor neuen Hürden. Medizinrecht 24(1): 39–42.
32. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG (2005) Wissenschaftliches Fehlverhalten – Erfahrungen von Ombudsgremien. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
33. DuBois JM, Anderson EE, Chibnall J. (2013) Understanding research misconduct: A comparative analysis of 120 cases of professional wrongdoing. Accountability in Research 20(5–6): 320–338.
34. Elia N, Wager E, Tramèr MR. (2014) Fate of articles that warranted retraction due to ethical concerns: A descriptive cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE 9(1): e85846.
35. Enders W, Hoover GA, (2004) Whose line is it? Plagiarism in economics. Journal of Economic Literature 42(2): 487–493.
36. Epstein R, (2010) Academic fraud today: Its social causes and institutional responses. Stanford Law and Policy Review 21(1): 135–154.
37. Fanelli D, (2013) Why growing retractions are (mostly) a good sign. PLoS Medicine 10(12): e1001563.
38. Fanelli D, Costas R, Larivière V, (2015) Misconduct policies, academic culture and career stage, not gender or pressures to publish, affect scientific integrity. PLoS ONE 10(6): e0127556.
39. Fang FC, Casadevall A, (2011) Retracted science and the Retraction Index. Infection and Immunity 79(10): 3855–3859.
40. Fang FC, Steen RG, Casadevall A, (2012) Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(42): 17028–17033.
41. Faria R, (2015) Scientific misconduct: How organizational culture plays its part. Tijdschrift over Cultuur & Criminaliteit 5(1): 38–54.
42. Foo JYA, (2011) A retrospective analysis of the trend of retracted publications in the field of biomedical and life sciences. Science and Engineering Ethics 17(3): 459–468.
43. Foucault M, (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Random House.
44. Friedman PJ, (1990) Correcting the literature following fraudulent publication. Journal of the American Medical Association 263(10): 1416–1419.
45. Frow EK, (2012) Drawing a line: Setting guidelines for digital image processing in scientific journal articles. Social Studies of Science 42(3): 369–392.
46. Furman JL, Jensen K, Murray F, (2012) Governing knowledge in the scientific community: Exploring the role of retractions in biomedicine. Research Policy 41(2): 276–290.
47. Garfield E, Welljams-Dorof A, (1990) The impact of fraudulent research on the scientific literature: The Stephen E. Breuning case. Journal of the American Medical Association 263(10): 1424–1426.
48. Garland D, (1996) The limits of the sovereign state: Strategies of crime control in contemporary society. British Journal of Criminology 36(4): 445–471.
49. Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Akazhanov NA. (2014) Self-correction in biomedical publications and the scientific impact. Croatian Medical Journal 55(1): 61–72.
50. Grattet R, (2011) Societal reactions to deviance. Annual Review of Sociology 37: 185–204.
51. Greene PJ, Durch JS, Horwitz W. (1985) Policies for responding to allegations of fraud in research. Minerva 23(2): 203–215.
52. Grieneisen ML, Zhang M, (2012) A comprehensive survey of retracted articles from the scholarly literature. PLoS ONE 7(10): e44118.
53. Groenemeyer A, (2008) Institutionen der Normativität. In: Groenemeyer A, Wieseler S, (eds) Soziologie sozialer Probleme und sozialer Kontrolle. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 70–97.
54. Habermann B, Broome M, Pryor ER. (2010) Research coordinators experiences with scientific misconduct and research integrity. Nursing Research 59(1): 51–57.
55. Hames I, (2013) COPE’s new ethical guidelines for peer reviewers: Background, issues, and evolution. EON 6(4).
56. He T, (2013) Retraction of global scientific publications from 2001 to 2010. Scientometrics 96(2): 555–561.
57. Honneth A, (2003) Unsichtbarkeit. Stationen einer Theorie der Intersubjektivität. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
58. Inciardi JA, (1972) Visibility, societal reaction, and criminal behavior. Criminology 10(2): 217–233.
59. Jin GZ, Jones B, Lu SF. (2013) The reverse Matthew Effect: Catastrophe and consequence in scientific teams. NBER Working Paper Series.
60. Jones PAH, (2003) Can authorship policies help prevent scientific misconduct? What role for scientific societies? Science and Engineering Ethics 9(2): 243–256.
61. Jordan SR, Gray PW, (2013) Research integrity in Greater China: Surveying regulations, perceptions and knowledge of research integrity from a Hong Kong perspective. Developing World Bioethics 13(3): 125–137.
62. Karabag S, Berggren C, (2012) Retraction, dishonesty and plagiarism: Analysis of a crucial issue for academic publishing, and the inadequate responses from leading journals in economics and management disciplines. Journal of Applied Economics and Business Research 2(3): 172–183.
63. Keranen L, (2006) Assessing the seriousness of research misconduct: Considerations for sanction assignment. Accountability in Research 13(2): 179–205.
64. Khajuria A, Agha R, (2014) Fraud in scientific research: Birth of the Concordat to uphold research integrity in the United Kingdom. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 107(2): 61–65.
65. Kim J, Park K, (2013) Ethical modernization: Research misconduct and research ethics reforms in Korea following the Hwang affair. Science and Engineering Ethics 19(2): 355–380.
66. Kleinert S, (2009) COPE’s retraction guidelines. The Lancet 374(9705): 1876–1877.
67. Kochan CA, Budd JM, (1992) The persistence of fraud in the literature: The Darsee case. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 43(7): 488–493.
68. Korpela K, (2010) How long does it take for the scientific literature to purge itself of fraudulent material? The Breuning case revisited. Current Medical Research and Opinion 26(4): 843–847.
69. Küpers W, (2014) Between the visible and the invisible in organizations. In: Bell E, Warren S, Schroeder J, (eds) The Routledge Companion to Visual Organization, New York: Routledge, pp. 19–32.
70. LaFollette MC, (1994) The politics of research misconduct: Congressional oversight, universities, and science. The Journal of Higher Education 65(3): 261–285.
71. Lemert E, (1967) Human Deviance, Social Problems, and Social Control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
72. Lind RA, (2005) Evaluating research misconduct policies at major research universities: A pilot study. Accountability in Research 12(3): 241–262.
73. Lins L, Carvalho FM, (2014) Scientific integrity in Brazil. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 11(3): 283–287.
74. Lu SF, Jin GZ, Uzzi B. (2013) The retraction penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science. Scientific Reports 3: Article 3146.
75. Lytton H, (1996) ‘This is how it’s always been done’: The treatment of academic misconduct in Canada. Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie 21(2): 223–235.
76. McLuhan M, (1964) Understanding Media: The Extension of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill.
77. Madlock-Brown CR, Eichmann D, (2014) The (lack of) impact of retraction on citation networks. Science and Engineering Ethics 21(1): 127–137.
78. Mazur A, (1989) Allegations of dishonesty in research and their treatment by American universities. Minerva 27(2–3): 177–194.
79. Mello MM, Brennan TA, (2003) Due process in investigations of research misconduct. New England Journal of Medicine 349(13): 1280–1286.
80. Merleau-Ponty M, (1968) The Visible and the Invisible: Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
81. Merton RK, (1973) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
82. Molckovsky A, Vickers M, Tang P, (2011) Characterization of published errors in high-impact oncology journals. Current Oncology 18(1): 26–32.
83. Mongeon P, Larivière V, (2013) The collective consequences of scientific fraud: An analysis of biomedical research. In: Gorraiz J, (ed.) Proceedings of ISSI 2013, Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics. Vienna: Austrian Institute of Technology, pp. 1897–1899.
84. Mongeon P, Larivière V, (2016) Costly collaborations: The impact of scientific fraud on co-authors’ careers. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 67(3): 535–542.
85. Nath SB, Marcus SC, Druss BG, (2006) Retractions in the research literature: Misconduct or mistakes? Medical Journal of Australia 185(3): 152–154.
86. Neale AV, Northrup J, Dailey R. (2007) Correction and use of biomedical literature affected by scientific misconduct. Science and Engineering Ethics 13(1): 5–24.
87. Neale AV, Dailey RK, Abrams J, (2010) Analysis of citations to biomedical articles affected by scientific misconduct. Science and Engineering Ethics 16: 251–261.
88. Noonan BM, Parrish DM, (2008) Expressions of concern and their uses. Learned Publishing 3: 209–213.
89. Normile D, (2007) Scientific misconduct: Japan’s universities take action. Science 315(5808): 26.
90. Nylenna M, Andersen D, Dahlquist G. (1999) Handling of scientific dishonesty in the Nordic countries. The Lancet 354(9172): 57–61.
91. Ong W, (1977) Interfaces of the Word: Studies in the Evolution of Consciousness and Culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
92. Parrish DM, (1999) Scientific misconduct and correcting the scientific literature. Academic Medicine 74(3): 221–230.
93. Parrish DM, (2004) Scientific misconduct and findings against graduate and medical students. Science and Engineering Ethics 10(3): 483–491.
94. Parrish DM, (2009) Image manipulation as research misconduct. Science and Engineering Ethics 15(2): 161–167.
95. Pascal CB, (1999) The history and future of the office of research integrity: Scientific misconduct and beyond. Science and Engineering Ethics 5(2): 183–198.
96. Pfeifer M, Snodgrass GL, (1990) The continued use of retracted, invalid scientific literature. Journal of the American Medical Association 263(10): 1420–1423.
97. Poworoznek E, (2003) Linking of errata: Current practices in online physical sciences journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54(12): 1153–1159.
98. Price AR, (2013) Research misconduct and its federal regulation: The origin and history of the Office of Research Integrity – with personal views by ORI’s former Associate Director for Investigative Oversight. Accountability in Research 20(5–6): 291–319.
99. Pryor ER, Habermann B, Broome ME, (2007) Scientific misconduct from the perspective of research coordinators: A national survey. Journal of Medical Ethics 33(6): 365–369.
100. Puigdomènech P, (2014) Dealing with scientific integrity issues: The Spanish experience. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis 62(1): 1–6.
101. Rasmussen LM, (2014) The case of Vipul Bhrigu and the federal definition of research misconduct. Science and Engineering Ethics 20(2): 411–421.
102. Redman BK, Merz JF, (2006) Research misconduct policies of high impact biomedical journals. Accountability in Research 13(3): 247–258.
103. Redman BK, Yarandi HN, Merz JF, (2008) Empirical developments in retraction. Journal of Medical Ethics 34(11): 807–809.
104. Ren K, (2012) Fighting against academic corruption: A critique of recent policy developments in China. Higher Education Policy 25(1): 19–38.
105. Rennie D, (1998) Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. British Medical Journal 316(7146): 1726–1733.
106. Resnik DB, (2012) Ethical virtues in scientific research. Accountability in Research 19(6): 329–343.
107. Resnik D, Peddada S, Brunson W, (2009) Research misconduct policies of scientific journals. Accountability in Research 16(5): 254–267.
108. Resnik D, Patrone D, Peddada S, (2010) Research misconduct policies of social science journals and impact factor. Accountability in Research 17(2): 79–84.
109. Resnik DB, Wager E, Kissling GE, (2015) Retraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor. Journal of the Medical Library Association 103(3): 136–139.
110. Reynolds SM, (2004) ORI findings of scientific misconduct in clinical trials and publicly funded research, 1992–2002. Clinical Trials 1(6): 509–516.
111. Rhoades L, (2000) Analysis of institutional policies for responding to allegations of scientific misconduct. Final report. Available at: ori.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/institutional_policies.pdf.
112. Rosenkrantz AB, (2016) Retracted publications within radiology journals. American Journal of Roentgenology 206(2): 231–235.
113. Rossouw TM, Van Zyl C, Pope A, (2014) Responsible conduct of research: Global trends, local opportunities. South African Journal of Science 110(1/2): 1–6.
114. Royle P, Waugh N, (2004) Should systematic reviews include searches for published errata? Health Information and Libraries Journal 21(1): 14–20.
115. Samp JC, Schumock GT, Pickard AS, (2012) Retracted publications in the drug literature. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy 32(7): 586–595.
116. Schiffers N, (2012) Ombudsmann und Kommission zur Aufklärung wissenschaftlichen Fehlverhaltens an staatlichen Hochschulen. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
117. Schoenherr J, William-Jones B, (2011) Research integrity/misconduct policies of Canadian universities. Canadian Journal of Higher Education 41(1): 1–17.
118. Slingsby BT, Kodama S, Akabayashi A, (2006) Scientific misconduct in Japan: The present paucity of oversight policy. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 15(3): 294–297.
119. Snodgrass GL, Pfeifer MP, (1992) The characteristics of medical retraction notices. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 80(4): 328–334.
120. Steen RG, (2010) Retractions in the scientific literature: Is the incidence of research fraud increasing? Journal of Medical Ethics 37(4): 249–253.
121. Steen RG, (2011a) Misinformation in the medical literature: What role do error and fraud play? Journal of Medical Ethics 37(8): 498–503.
122. Steen RG, (2011b) Retractions in the scientific literature: Do authors deliberately commit research fraud? Journal of Medical Ethics 37(2): 113–117.
123. Steen RG, (2011c) Retractions in the scientific literature: Is the incidence of research fraud increasing? Journal of Medical Ethics 37(4): 249–253.
124. Steen RG, Hamer R, (2014) A case-control comparison of retracted and non-retracted clinical trials: Can retraction be predicted? Publications 2(1): 27–37.
125. Steen RG, Casadevall A, Fang FC, (2013) Why has the number of scientific retractions increased? PLoS ONE 8(7): e68397.
126. Steneck NH, (1994) Research universities and scientific misconduct: History, policies, and the future. The Journal of Higher Education 65(3): 310–330.
127. Steneck NH, (1999) Confronting misconduct in science in the 1980s and 1990s: What has and has not been accomplished? Science and Engineering Ethics 5(2): 161–176.
128. Stern AM, Casadevall A, Steen RG. (2014) Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications. Elife 3: e02956.
129. Stretton S, Bramich NJ, Keys JR. (2012) Publication misconduct and plagiarism retractions: A systematic, retrospective study. Current Medical Research and Opinion 28(10): 1575–1583.
130. Stroebe W, Postmes T, Spears R, (2012) Scientific misconduct and the myth of self-correction in science. Association for Psychological Science 7(6): 670–688.
131. Sztompka P, (2015) Visual sociology. In: Wright JD, (ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. New York: Elsevier, pp. 191–196.
132. Thompson JB, (2005) The new visibility. Theory, Culture and Society 22(6): 31–51.
133. Thomsen M, Resnik D, (1995) The effectiveness of the erratum in avoiding error propagation in physics. Science and Engineering Ethics 1(3): 231–240.
134. Trikalinos NA, Evangelou E, Ioannidis JP, (2008) Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 61(5): 464–470.
135. Van Leeuwen T, Luwel M, (2014) An in-depth analysis of papers retracted in the Web of Science. In Noyons E, (ed.) Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden – CWTS, pp. 337–344.
136. von Bargen J, (2013) Wissenschaftliche Redlichkeit und zentrales hochschulinternes Verfahrensrecht. JuristenZeitung 68(14): 714–723.
137. Wager E, (2011) Coping with scientific misconduct. British Medical Journal 343: d6586–d6586.
138. Wager E, Williams P, (2011) Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008. Journal of Medical Ethics 37(9): 567–570.
139. Wager E, Fiack S, Graf C. (2009) Science journal editors’ views on publication ethics: Results of an international survey. Journal of Medical Ethics 35(6): 348–353.
140. White C, (2005) Suspected research fraud: Difficulties of getting at the truth. British Medical Journal 331(7511): 281–288.
141. Whitely W, Rennie D, Hafner A, (1994) The scientific community response to evidence of fraudulent publication – the Robert Slutsky case. Journal of the American Medical Association 272(2): 170–173.
142. Williams P, Wager E, (2013) Exploring why and how journal editors retract articles: Findings from a qualitative study. Science and Engineering Ethics 19(1): 1–11.
143. Wilson K, Schreier A, Griffin A. (2007) Research records and the resolution of misconduct allegations at research universities. Accountability in Research 14(1): 57–71.
144. Wright DE, Schneider PP, (2010) Training the Research Integrity Officers (RIO): The federally funded ‘RIO boot camps’ backward design to train for the future. Journal of Research Administration 41(3): 99–117.
145. Wright DE, Titus SL, Cornelison JB, (2008) Mentoring and research misconduct: An analysis of research mentoring in closed ORI cases. Science and Engineering Ethics 14(3): 323–336.
146. Wright K, McDaid C, (2011) Reporting of article retractions in bibliographic databases and online journals. Journal of the Medical Library Association 99(2): 164–167.
147. Yank V, Barnes D, (2003) Consensus and contention regarding redundant publications in clinical research: Cross-sectional survey of editors and authors. Journal of Medical Ethics 29(2): 109–114.
148. Zeng W, Resnik D, (2010) Research integrity in China: Problems and prospects. Developing World Bioethics 10(3): 164–171.
149. Zhang M, Grieneisen ML, (2013) The impact of misconduct on the published medical and non-medical literature, and the news media. Scientometrics 96(2): 573–587.
150. Zuckerman H, (1977) Deviant behaviour and social control in science. In: Sagarin E, (ed.) Deviance and Social Change. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE, pp. 87–138.