COPE's retraction guidelines

The Lancet

Volumn 374, Issue 9705, 2009, Pages 1876-1877

  Kleinert, Sabine ^a  

^a THE LANCET   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ETHICS; LEGAL ASPECT; MISCONDUCT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; WRITING;

EID: 70949097574     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62074-2     Document Type: Note

References (7)

1. COPE. Code of conduct. http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf (accessed Nov 29, 2009).
2. Sox H.C., and Rennie D. Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: lessons from the Poehlman case. Ann Intern Med 144 (2006) 609-613
3. Atlas M.C. Retraction policies of high-impact biomedical journals. J Med Libr Assoc 92 (2004) 242-250
4. Nath S.B., Marcus S.C., and Druss B.G. Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistakes?. Med J Aust 185 (2006) 152-154
5. Corbyn Z. Retractions up tenfold. Times Higher Education (Aug 20, 2009). http://www.timeshighereduction.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=407838 (accessed Nov 25, 2009).
6. Wager E., Barbour V., Yentis S., Kleinert S., and on behalf of COPE Council. Retractions: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics. http://publicationethics.org/guidelines (accessed Dec 1, 2009).
7. The Lancet. The role and responsibilities of coauthors. Lancet 372 (2008) 778