Research coordinators' experiences with scientific misconduct and research integrity

Nursing Research

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 51-57

  Habermann, Barbara ^a   Broome, Marion ^a   Pryor, Erica R ^b   Ziner, Kim Wagler ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

Author keywords

Institutional climate; Research coordinators; Scientific misconduct

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH; EDUCATION; ETHICS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; NURSE ATTITUDE; NURSING ASSESSMENT; NURSING ORGANIZATION; NURSING STAFF; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT; PUBLIC RELATIONS; UNITED STATES;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH; ETHICS, NURSING; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; NURSE'S ROLE; NURSING ASSESSMENT; NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT; SOCIETIES, NURSING; UNITED STATES;

EID: 73549106550     PISSN: 00296562     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181c3b9f2     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Breen, K. J. (2003). Misconduct in medical research: Whose responsibility? Internal Medicine Journal, 33(4), 186-191.
2. Broome, M. E., Pryor, E., Habermann, B., Pulley, L., & Kincaid, H. (2005). The Scientific Misconduct Questionnaire-Revised (SMQ-R): Validation and psychometric testing. Accountability in Research, 12(4), 263-280.
3. Committee on Assessing Integrity in Research Environments. (2002). National Research Council, Institutes of Medicine. Integrity in scientific research: Creating an environment that promotes responsible conduct. National Academies Press (p. 34). Washington, DC: Author.
4. Davis, M. S., Riske-Morris, M., & Diaz, S. R. (2007). Causal factors implicated in research misconduct: Evidence from ORI case files. Science and Engineering Ethics, 13(4), 395-414.
5. de Vries, R., Anderson, M. S., & Martinson, B. C. (2006). Normal misbehavior: Scientists talk about the ethics of research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1(1), 43-50.
6. Fedor, C. A.,&Cola, P. A. (2003). Preliminary results of the clinical research coordinators' survey. Clinical Researcher, 3(4), 18-22.
7. Gaddis, B., Helton-Fauth, W., Scott, G., Shaffer, A., Connelly, S., & Mumford, M. (2003). Development of two measures of climate for scientific organizations. Accountability in Research, 10(4), 253-288.
8. Gardner, W., Lidz, C. W., & Hartwig, K. C. (2005). Authors' reports about research integrity problems in clinical trials. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 26(2), 244-251.
9. Glick, L. J., & Shamoo, A. E. (1994). Results of a questionnaire on research practices, completed by attendees at the Third Conference on Research Policies and Quality Assurance. Accountability in Research, 3(4), 275-280.
10. Hals, A., & Jacobsen, G. (1993). Dishonesty in medical research: A questionnaire study among project administrators in Health Region 4. Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening, 113(25), 3149-3152.
11. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. LaFollette, M. (1994). Research misconduct. Society, 31, 6-10.
13. Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., & de Vries, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435(7043), 737-738.
14. Mueller, M. R., & Mamo, L. (2000). Changes in medicine, changes in nursing: Career contingencies and the movement of nurses into clinical trial coordination. Sociological Perspectives, 43(4), S43-S57.
15. Office of Research Integrity. (2006). Annual report 2005. Retrieved January 8, 2008, from http://ori.dhhs.gov/documents/ annual-reports/ori-annual- report-2005.pdf
16. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Pryor, E. R., Habermann, B., & Broome, M. E. (2007). Scientific misconduct from the perspective of research coordinators: A national survey. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33(6), 365-369.
18. Rankin, M., & Esteves, M. D. (1997). Perceptions of scientific misconduct in nursing. Nursing Research, 46(5), 270-276.
19. Reynolds, S. M. (2004). ORI findings of scientific misconduct in clinical trials and publicly funded research, 1992-2002. Clinical Trials, 1(6), 509-516
20. Scott-Lichter, D., & the Editorial Policy Committee, Council of Science Editors. (2006). CSE's white paper on promoting integrity in scientific journal publications. Reston, VA: Council of Science Editors. Retrieved June 24, 2009, from http://www. councilscienceeditors.org/editorial-policies/whitepaper/ entire-whitepaper.pdf
21. Shapiro, M. F. (1993). Data audits in investigational drug trials and their implications for detection of misconduct in science. In S. Lock & F. Wells (Eds.), Fraud and misconduct in medical research (pp. 128-141). London: BMJ Publishers.
22. Swazey, J., Anderson, M., & Lewis, K. (1993). Ethical problems in academic research. American Scientist, 81, 583-553.
23. Tangney, J. P. (1987). Fraud will outVor will it? New Scientist, 115(1572), 62-63.
24. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2005). Public health services policies on research misconduct: Final rule. 42 CFR parts 50 and 93. Federal Register, 70(94), 28370-28400. Retrieved June 24, 2009, from http://ori.dhhs.gov/documents/ 42-cfr-parts-50-and-93-2005.pdf
25. Weed, D. L. (1998). Preventing scientific misconduct. American Journal of Public Health, 88(1), 125-129.
26. Weiss, R. B., Vogelzang, N. J.,&Peterson, B. A. (1993). A successful system of scientific data audits for clinical trials: A report from the Cancer and Leukemia Group B. JAMA, 270(4), 459-464.
27. Wilmhurst, P. (1997). The code of silence. Lancet, 349(9051), 567-569.