How many scientific papers should be retracted? [2]

EMBO Reports

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 422-423

  Cokol, Murat ^a   Iossifov, Ivan ^a   Rodriguez Esteban, Raul ^a   Rzhetsky, Andrey ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERNET; LETTER; MEDLINE; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; QUALITY CONTROL; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SCREENING; STANDARD; STOCHASTIC MODEL;

EDITORIAL POLICIES; PERIODICALS; RETRACTION OF PUBLICATION;

EID: 34247868193     PISSN: 1469221X     EISSN: 14693178     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400970     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Budd JM, Sievert M, Schultz TR (1998) Phenomena of retraction: Reasons for retraction and citations to the publications. JAMA 280: 296-297
2. Martinson BC, Anderson MS, de Vries R (2005) Scientists behaving badly. Nature 435: 737-738
3. Stewart WW, Feder N (1987) The integrity of the scientific literature. Nature 325: 207-214
4. Wohn DY, Normile D (2006) Korean cloning scandal. Science 312 980-981