Between the visible and the invisible in organizations

The Routledge Companion to Visual Organization

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 19-32

  Küpers, Wendelin ^a  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84960530051     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203725610-10     Document Type: Chapter

References (97)

1. Adams, C. (2004) ‘The ethical, social and environmental reporting-performance gap’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 17: 731-757.
2. Al-Saji, A. (2009) ‘A phenomenology of critical-ethical vision: Merleau-Ponty, Bergson, and the question of seeing differently’, Chiasmi International 11: 375-398.
3. Belkaoui, A. (1987) Inquiry and Accounting, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.
4. Belova, O. (2006) ‘The event of seeing: a phenomenological perspective on visual sense-making’, Culture and Organization 12: 93-107.
5. Birchall, C. (2011) ‘Introduction to “secrecy and transparency”: the politics of opacity and openness’, Theory, Culture & Society 28: 7-25.
6. Bloomfield, B. and Vurdubakis, T. (1997) ‘Visions of organisation and organisations of vision: the representational practices of information system’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 22: 639-668.
7. Brighenti, A. (2007) ‘Visibility: a category for the social sciences’, Current Sociology 55: 323-342.
8. Brown, J. (2010) ‘Accounting and visual cultural studies: potentialities, challenges and prospects’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 23: 482-505.
9. Campbell, N. and Schroeder, J.E. (2011) ‘Visual culture’, in D. Southerton (ed.) Encyclopedia of Consumer Culture, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1506-1510.
10. Carman, T. (2008) Merleau-Ponty, London and New York: Routledge.
11. Cataldi, S. (1993) Emotion, Depth, and Flesh: A Study of Sensitive Space Reflections on Merleau-Ponty’s Philosophy of Embodiment, Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
12. Clair, J.A., Beatty, J.E. and MacLean, T.L. (2005) ‘Out of sight but not out of mind: managing invisible social identities in the workplace’, Academy of Management 30: 78-95.
13. Cooper, R. (2006) ‘Making present: autopoiesis as human production’, Organization 13: 59-81.
14. Coulson-Thomas, C. (1992) ‘Strategic vision or strategic con?: Rhetoric or reality?’, Long Range Planning 25: 81-89.
15. Dale, K. (2000) Anatomising Embodiment and Organisation Theory, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
16. Dale, K. and Burrell, G. (2003) ‘An-aesthetics and architecture’, in A. Carr and P. Hancock (eds) Art and Aesthetics at Work, London: Palgrave, 155-173.
17. Daston, L. and Galison, P. (2007) Objectivity, New York: Zone Books.
18. Davison, J. (2011) ‘Barthesian perspectives on accounting communication and visual images of professional accountancy’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 24: 250-283.
19. Davison, J, and Warren, S. (2009) ‘Imag[in]ing accounting and accountability’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 22: 845-857.
20. de Bolla, P. (1996) ‘The visibility of visuality’, in T. Brennan and M. Jay (eds) Vision in Context: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on Sight, New York: Routledge, 63-79.
21. de Bolla, P. (2003) The Education of the Eye: Painting, Landscape and Architecture in Eighteenth-Century Britain, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
22. de Cock, C., Baker, M. and Volkmann, C.R. (2011) ‘Financial phantasmagoria: corporate image-work in times of crisis’, Organization 18: 153-172.
23. De Jaegher, H. and Di Paolo, E. (2007) ‘Participatory sense-making: an enactive approach to social cognition’, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6: 485-507.
24. Dejours, C. (2003) L'évaluation du travail à l'épreuve du reel, Paris: INRA.
25. Deranty, J. (2008) ‘Work and the precarisation of existence’, European Journal of Social Theory 11: 443-463.
26. Dillard-Wright, D.B. (2011) ‘Figurations of the ecstatic: the labor of attention in aesthetic experience’, Janus Head 12: 203-221.
27. Dillon, M. (1988) Merleau-Ponty's Ontology, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
28. Edwards, M.G. (2010) Organizational Transformation for Sustainability: An Integral Metatheory, New York: Routledge.
29. Eikeland, O. and Nicolini, D. (2011) ‘Turning practically: broadening the horizon’, Journal of Organizational Change Management 24: 164-174.
30. Elkins, J. (1996) The Object Stares Back: On the Nature of Seeing, New York: Harvest Books.
31. Eppler, MJ. and Platts, K. (2009) ‘Visual strategizing’, Long Range Planning 42: 42-74.
32. Epstein, B. and Mirza, A. (2005) IAS 2005: Interpretation and Application of International Accounting and Financial Reporting Standards, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
33. Falihi, A. and Wason-Ellam, L. (2009) ‘Critical visuality: on the development of critical visual literacy for learners’ empowerment’, The International Journal of Learning 16: 409-418.
34. Foster, H. (1988) Vision and Visuality, Seattle, WA: Bay Press.
35. Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, London: Penguin.
36. Fuery, P. and Fuery, K. (2003) Visual Cultures and Critical Theory, London: Hodder Arnold Publications.
37. Gombrich, E.H. (1996) The Essential Gombrich: Selected Writings on Art and Culture, London: Phaidon.
38. Goodwin, C. (1994) ‘Professional vision’, American Anthropologist 96: 606-33.
39. Goodwin, C. (1995) ‘Seeing in depth’, Social Studies of Science 25: 237-74.
40. Heidegger, M. (1962) Being and Time, New York: Harper & Row.
41. Heidegger, M. (1977 [1938]) ‘The age of the world picture’, in The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, New York: Harper.
42. Hines, R. (1988) ‘Financial accounting: in communicating reality, we construct reality’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 13: 251-261.
43. Ingold, T. (2001) ‘From the transmission of representations to the education of attention’, in H. Whitehouse (ed.) The Debated Mind: Evolutionary Psychology versus Ethnography, Oxford: Berg, 113-153.
44. Jay, M. (1993) Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought, Berkeley: University of California Press.
45. Jay, M. (2002) ‘That visual turn’, Journal of Visual Culture 1: 87-92.
46. Jütte, R. (2005) A History of the Senses: From Antiquity to Cyberspace, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
47. Kavanagh, D. (2004) ‘Ocularcentrism and its others: a framework for metatheoretical analysis’, Organization Studies 25: 445-464.
48. Kelly, O. (2001) Witnessing: Beyond Recognition, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
49. Knowles, J.G., Luciani, T., Cole, A.L. and Neilsen, L. (eds) (2007) The Art of Visual Inquiry, Halifax, Nova Scotia/Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Backalong Books/Centre for Arts-Informed Research.
50. Kristandl, G. and Bontis, N. (2007) ‘Defining intangible assets and intellectual capital’, Management Decision 45: 1510-1524.
51. Kunter, A. and Bell, E. (2006) ‘The promise and potential of visual organizational research’, M@n@gement 9: 177-197.
52. Küpers, W. (2012) ‘Integral response-abilities for organising and managing sustainability’, in G. Eweje and M. Perry (eds) Business and Sustainability, Concepts, Stratergies and Changes, Critical Studies on Corporate Responsibility, Governance and Sustainability, Volume 3, London: Emerald, 25-58.
53. Küpers, W. (2013a) ‘Phenomenology of embodied senses and “sense-making” and the making of sense in organisational culture’, International Journal of Work, Organization and Emotion, Special issue on: ‘Sensually exploring culture and effect at work’, Emotion, Embodiment, Research 6 (forthcoming).
54. Küpers, W. (2013) ‘Inter-passion - embodied affect in organisational life-worlds’, Critical Horizons - A Journal of Philosophy and Social Theory (forthcoming).
55. Küpers, W., Mantere, S. and Statler, M. (2013) ‘Strategy as storytelling: a phenomenological exploration of embodied narrative practice’, Journal for Management Inquiry 22(1): 83-100.
56. Larwood, L., Falbe, C.M., Kriger, M.P. and Miesling, P. (1995) ‘Structure and meaning of organization vision’, Academy of Management Journal 85: 740-769.
57. Leavy, P. (2009) Method Meets Art: Arts-Based Research Practice, New York: Guilford Press.
58. Lehman, C. and Tinker, T. (1987) ‘The “real” cultural significance of accounts’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 12: 503-522.
59. Luhmann, N. (1986) ‘The autopoiesis of social systems’, in F. Geyer and J, van der Zouwen (eds) Sociocybernetic Paradoxes: Observation, Control and Evolution of Self-Steering Systems, Berkeley, CA, Sage, 172-192.
60. Matilal, S. and Höpfl, H. (2009) ‘Accounting for the Bhopal Disaster: footnotes and photographs’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 22(6): 953-972.
61. McKinlay, A. and Starkey, K. (1998) Foucault, Management and Organization Theory: From Panopticon to Technologies of Self, London: Sage.
62. Merchant, S. (2011) ‘The body and the senses: visual methods, videography and the submarine sensorium’, Body & Society 17: 53-72.
63. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962) Phenomenology of Perception, London: Routledge.
64. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964) Eye and Mind, The Primacy of Perception, trans. J ames M. Edie, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
65. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1995) The Visible and the Invisible, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
66. Messaris, P. (1997) Visual Persuasion: The Role of Images in Advertising, London: Sage.
67. Michelis, A. (2002) ‘Art histories and visual culture studies’, The Year’s Work in Critical and Cultural Theory 9: 175-195.
68. Milne, M.J., Kearins, K. and Walton, S. (2006) ‘Creating adventures in wonderland: the journey metaphor and environmental sustainability’, Organization 13: 801-839.
69. Mirzoeff, N. (2000) ‘Introduction: the multiple viewpoint - diasporic visual cultures’, in N. Mirzoeff (ed.) Diaspora and Visual Culture, London: Routledge.
70. Mitchell, WJ.T. (1994) Picture Theory, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
71. Mitchell, WJ.T. (2005a) ‘There are no visual media’, Journal of Visual Culture 4: 257-266.
72. Mitchell, WJ.T. (2005b) What Do Pictures Want? The Lives and Loves of Images, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
73. Oswick, C. (1996) ‘Insights into diagnosis: an exploration using visual metaphors’, in C. Oswick and D. Grant (eds) Organisation Development: Metaphorical Explorations, London: Pitman, 137-153.
74. Panagia, D. (2009) The Political Life of Sensation, Durham and London: Duke University Press.
75. Pattison, S. (2007) Seeing Things, Deepening Relations with Visual Artefacts, Canterbury: SCM Press.
76. Porcello, T., Meintjes, L., Ochoa, A.M. and Samuels, D. (2010) ‘The reorganization of the sensory world’, Annual Review of Anthropology 39: 51-66.
77. Prosser, J. (2011) ‘Visual methodology toward a more seeing research’, in N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, London and New Delhi: Sage.
78. Ranciere, J. (2004) The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible, New York: Continuum.
79. Rose, G. (2007) Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials, 2nd ed., London: Sage.
80. Schoeneborn, D. (2008) Alternatives Considered But Not Disclosed: The Ambiguous Role of PowerPoint in Cross-Project Learning, Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
81. Schoeneborn, D. (2010) ‘PowerPoint and the invisibility of contingency in project organizing’, 17 December 2010, IOU Working Paper No. 124. Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1833943.
82. Schroeder, J. (2005) Visual Consumption, London and New York: Routledge.
83. Sennett, R. (2008) The Craftsman, New Haven: Yale University Press.
84. Shusterman, R. (2008) Body Conciousness: A Philosophy of Mindfulness and Somaesthatics, New York: Cambridge University Press.
85. Simpson, R. and Lewis, P. (2005) ‘An investigation of silence and a scrutiny of transparency: re-examining gender in organization literature through the concepts of voice and visibility’, Human Relations 58: 1253-1275.
86. Soussloff, C.M. (1996) ‘The turn to visual culture: on visual culture and techniques of the observer’, Visual Anthropology Review 12: 77-83.
87. Spoelstra, S. (2009) ‘Organizational brilliance: on blinding visions in organizations’, Journal of Organizational Change Management 22: 373-385.
88. Styhre, A. (2010) Visual Culture in Organizations: Theory and Cases, London: Routledge.
89. Talero, M. (2008) ‘The experiential workspace and the limits of empirical investigation’, International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16: 453-472.
90. Tapscott, D. and Ticoll, D. (2003) The Naked Corporation: How the Age of Transparency Will Revolutionize Business, New York: The Free Press.
91. Verbruecken, M. (2003) ‘Towards a new sensoriality’, in E. Aarts and S. Marzano (eds) The New Everyday: Views on Ambient Intelligence, Rotterdam, The Netherlands: 010 Publishers, 54-59.
92. Warhurst, C., van den Broek, D., Hall, R. and Nickson, D. (2012) ‘Great expectations: gender, looks and lookism at work’, International Journal of Work, Organisation and Emotion 5: 72-90.
93. Warren, S. (2002) ‘Show me how it feels to work here: using photography to research organizational aesthetics’, ephemera: theory & politics in organization 2: 224-245.
94. Warren, S. (2008) ‘Empirical challenges in organizational aesthetics research: towards a sensual methodology’, Organization Studies 19: 559-580.
95. Westley, F.R. (1990) ‘Middle managers and strategy: micro-dynamics of inclusion’, Strategic Management Journal 11: 337-351.
96. Zambon, S. and Marzo, G. (2007) Visualizing Intangibles: Measuring and Reporting in the Knowledge Economy, Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
97. Zyglidopoulos, S. and Fleming, P. (2011) ‘Corporate accountability and the politics of visibility in “late modernity”’, Organization 18: 691-706.