Research misconduct policies of scientific journals

Accountability in Research

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 254-267

  Resnik, David B ^a   Peddada, Shyamal ^a   Brunson Jr , Winnon ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^b GRINNELL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Definitions; Ethics; Misconduct; Policies; Procedures; Scientific journals

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; ETHICS; HUMAN; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH ETHICS; RISK; STATISTICAL MODEL;

CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; EDITORIAL POLICIES; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMANS; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; LOGISTIC MODELS; ODDS RATIO; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING;

EID: 70349790125     PISSN: 08989621     EISSN: 15455815     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08989620903190299     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Ancker, J. S., and Flanagin, A. (2007). A comparison of conflict of interest policies at peer-reviewed journals in different scientific disciplines. Science and Engineering Ethics, 13:147-157.
2. Committee on Publication Ethics. (2004). A code of conduct for editors of biomedical journals. Available at http://www.publicationethics.org.uk/guidelines/code. Last accessed May 27, 2009.
3. Committee on Publication Ethics. (2009). Home. Available at http://www.publicationethics.org.uk/ Last accessed May 27, 2009.
4. Council of Science Editors. White paper on promoting integrity in scientific journal publications. Available at http://www.councilscienceeditors.org/editorial_policies/white_paper.cfm. Last accessed May 27, 2009.
5. Couzin, J., and Unger, K. (2006). Scientific misconduct: Cleaning up the paper trail. Science, 312: 38-43.
6. Cyranoski, D. (2006). Verdict: Hwang's human stems cell were all fakes. Nature, 439:122-123.
7. ISI Web of Knowledge. (2008). Journal Citation Reports. Available at http://admin-apps.isiknowledge.com/JCR/JCR?SID=4Ec3d5Fi3HhF7JIFbfi. Last accessed October 6, 2008.
8. Kinitisch, E. (2005). Researcher faces prison for fraud in NIH grant applications and papers. Science, 307:1851.
9. Momen, H., and Gollogly, L. (2007). Cross-cultural perspectives of scientific misconduct. Medical Law, 26:409-416.
10. Office of Science and Technology Policy. (2005). Federal Research Misconduct Policy. Federal Register, 65(235):76260-76264.
11. Random.org. (2008). Available at http://random.org/. Last accessed October 6, 2008.
12. Redman, B., and Merz, J. (2006). Research misconduct policies of highest impact biomedical journals. Accountability in Research, 13:247-258.
13. Resnik, D. (2003). From Baltimore to Bell Labs: Reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct. Accountability in Research, 10:123-135.
14. Resnik, D. (2008). Fraud, fabrication, and falsification. In: Emanuel, E., et al. (eds.), Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 787-794.