Mentoring and research misconduct: An analysis of research mentoring in closed ORI cases

Science and Engineering Ethics

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 323-336

  Wright, David E ^a   Titus, Sandra L ^b   Cornelison, Jered B ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ORI Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Mentor; Opportunity theory; Research mentoring; Research misconduct; Supervision; Trainee

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ETHICS; HUMAN; MENTAL STRESS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; STANDARD; STATISTICS; TEACHER; UNITED STATES;

HUMANS; MENTORS; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES OFFICE OF RESEARCH INTEGRITY;

EID: 49749101637     PISSN: 13533452     EISSN: 16605454     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-008-9074-5     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Greenberg Daniel, S. (1983). How scientists get away with cheating. Journal of Commerce and Commercial, (357), 4A.
2. Judson, H. F. (2004). The great betrayal (pp. 112-122, 144-146). New York: Harcourt, Inc.
3. Wallis, C. (1983). Fraud in a Harvard Lab. Time, 121(Feb 28), 49.
4. Columbia University, (n.d.). RCR: Research misconduct. 3. John Darsee and Robert Slutsky. http://ccnmtl.Columbia.edu/projects/rcr/rcr_misconduct/ foundation/index.html.#1_B_3. Accessed 15 Apr 2008.
5. Murray, M. (1987). A long-disputed paper goes to press. Science News, 131, 52. doi: 10.2307/3971418.
6. Federal Register notices are posted when a case of misconduct occurs. The following cases are considered major by ORI: Rosner (NIH, 1992), Tracy (University of Southern California, 2002), Muenchen (University of Michigan, 2002), Simmons (University of Texas Southwest Medical Campus, 2000), Lin (Medical University of South Carolina, 2001), and Hajra (University of Michigan, 1997). These can be found at http://ori.dhhs.gov/. Accessed 8 June 2008.
7. National Academy of Sciences. (2002). Scientific research: Creating an environment that promotes responsible conduct. Washington: National Academy Press.
8. Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D., & Sechrest, L. (2000). Unobtrusive measures; revised edition. Sage Publications Inc.
9. Rodbard, D. Survey of research integrity measures utilized in biomedical research laboratories, report prepared for ORI, 2003. http://ori.dhhs.gov/ documents/research/intergity_measures_final_report_11_07_03.pdf. Accessed 8 June 2008.
10. Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., & Devries, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435(7043), 737-738. doi: 10.1038/435737a.
11. Anderson, M. S., Horn, A. S., Risbey, K. R., Ronning, E. A., De Vries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2007). What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists' misbehavior? Findings from a national survey of NIH-funded scientists. Academic Medicine, 82(9), 853-860. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f764c.
12. Adams, D., & Pimple, K. D. (2005). Research misconduct and crime lessons from criminal science on preventing misconduct and promoting integrity. Accountability in Research, 12, 225-240. doi: 10.1080/08989620500217495.
13. National Academy of Sciences. (1989, 1995 2nd ed.). Responsible conduct of research: On being a scientist. Washington: National Academy Press.