Causal factors implicated in research misconduct: Evidence from ORI case files (Science and Engineering Ethics DOI: 10.1007/s11948-007-9045-2);Causal factors implicated in research misconduct: Evidence from ORI case files

Science and Engineering Ethics

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 395-414

  Davis, Mark S ^a   Riske Morris, Michelle ^b   Diaz, Sebastian R ^c  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Justice Research and Advocacy Inc   (United States)

^c WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Research integrity; Research misconduct; Responsible conduct of research

Indexed keywords

EID: 36949012719     PISSN: 13533452     EISSN: 16605454     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-008-9070-9     Document Type: Erratum

References (59)

1. LaFollette, M. C. (1994). Research misconduct. Society, 31(3), 6-10.
2. Davis, M. S. (2003). The role of culture in research misconduct. Accountability in Research, 11(3), 189-201.
3. Dresser, R. (1993). Defining scientific misconduct: The relevance of mental state. JAMA, 269(7), 895-897.
4. Woolf, P. (1981). Fraud in science. The Hastings Center Report, 11(5), 9-14.
5. Berg, A. O. (1990). Misconduct in science: Does family medicine have a problem? Family Medicine, 22(2), 137-142.
6. James, W. (1995). Fraud and hoaxes in science. Nature, 377(6549), 474.
7. Lock, S. (1997). Fraud in medical research. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 31(1), 90-94.
8. Royal College of Physicians (1991). Fraud and misconduct in medical research: causes, investigation and prevention. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 25(2), 89-94.
9. Weed, D. (1998). Preventing scientific misconduct. American Journal of Public Health, 88(1), 125-129.
10. Dyer, O. (2004). Doctor fabricated research while depressed. BMJ Careers, 329(7473), 996.
11. Broad, W., & Wade, N. (1982). Betrayers of the truth. New York: Simon & Schuster.
12. Racker, E. (1989). A view of misconduct in science. Science, 339(6220), 91-93.
13. American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
14. Broome, M. E. (2003). Scientific integrity. Nursing Outlook, 51(5), 197-198.
15. Chop, R. M., & Silva, M. C. (1991). Scientific fraud: definitions, policies and implications for nursing research. Journal of Professional Nursing, 7(3), 166-171.
16. Jay, P. (1999). Research misconduct - have we reached a turning point at last? Science and Engineering Ethics, 5(1), 119-122.
17. Lock, S. (1994). Research misconduct: a brief history and a comparison. Journal of Internal Medicine, 235(2), 123-127.
18. Tangney, J. P. (1987). Fraud will out - or will it? New Scientist, 115(1572), 62.
19. Mumford, M. D., & Helton, W. B. (2002). Organizational influences on scientific integrity. In N. H. Steneck & M. D. Scheetz (Eds.), Investigating research integrity: Proceedings of the first ORI research conference on research integrity. Rockville, MD: Office of Research Integrity.
20. Davis, M. S., Wester, K. L., & King, B. (In press). Ethical compromises in counseling research: A pilot study of prevalence and correlates. Journal of Counseling & Development.
21. Goodstein, D. (2002). Scientific misconduct. Academe, 88(1), 18-21.
22. Fuchs, S., & Westervelt, S. D. (1996). Fraud and trust in science. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 39(2), 248-269.
23. Morrison, R. S. (1990). Disreputable science: Definition and detection. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 15(8), 911-913.
24. Davis, M. S., & Riske, M. L. (2002). Preventing scientific misconduct: Insights from convicted offenders. In N. H. Steneck & M. D. Scheetz (Eds.), Investigating research integrity: Proceedings of the first ORI research conference on research integrity. Rockville, MD: Office of Research Integrity
25. Fox, M. F., & Braxton, J. M. (1994). Misconduct and social control in science: Issues, problems, solution. Journal of Higher Education, 65(3), 373-383.
26. James, N., Burrage, J., & Smith, B. (2003). Scientific integrity: A review of The Institute of Medicine's (IOM) reports. Nursing Outlook, 51(5), 239-241.
27. Hansen, B. C., & Hansen, K. D. (1995). Academic and scientific misconduct: Issues for nursing educators. Journal of Professional Nursing, 11(1), 31-39.
28. Fletcher, S. W., & Fletcher, R. H. (1994). Publish wisely or perish: Quality rather than quantity in medical writing. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 23(6), 799-800.
29. Jefferson, T. (1998). Redundant publication in biomedical sciences: Scientific misconduct or necessity? Science and Engineering Ethics, 4(2), 135-140.
30. Lynch, A. (1994). Ethics in dental research. Publication of research: The ethical dimension. Journal of Dental Research, 73(11), 1778-1782.
31. Smith, M. M. (1992). Chiropractic research: The ethics. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 15(8), 536-541.
32. Whitbeck, C. (1995). Truth and trustworthiness in research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1(4), 403-416.
33. Holaday, M., & Yost, T. E. (1995). A preliminary investigation of ethical problems in publication and research. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10(2), 281-291.
34. Mojon-Azzi, S. M., & Mojon, D. S. (2004). Scientific misconduct: from salami slicing to data fabrication. Ophthalmic Research, 36(1), 1-3.
35. Dale, J. A., Schmitt, C. M., & Crosby, L. A. (1999). Misrepresentation of research criteria by orthopaedic residency applicants. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 81(12), 1679-1681.
36. Frankel, M. S. (1994). Ethics in research: Current issues for dental researchers and their professional society. Journal of Dental Research, 73(11), 1759-1765.
37. Hernon, P., & Altman, E. (1995). Misconduct in academic research: its implications for the service quality provided by university libraries. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 21(1), 27-37.
38. Wocial, L. D. (1995). The role of mentors in promoting integrity and preventing scientific misconduct in nursing research. Journal of Professional Nursing, 11(5), 276-280.
39. Illingworth, R. (2004). Fraud and other misconduct in biomedical research. British Journal of Neurosurgery, 18(4), 325-327.
40. Meyer, III, W. M. & Bernier, Jr., G. M. (2002). Potential cultural factors in scientific misconduct allegations. In N. H. Steneck & M. D. Scheetz (Eds.), Investigating research integrity: Proceedings of the first ORI research conference on research integrity. Rockville, MD: Office of Research Integrity.
41. Jones, A. H. (2003). Can authorship policies help prevent scientific misconduct? What role for scientific societies? Science and Engineering Ethics, 9(2), 243-256.
42. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998a). Part I: Methods of collecting and analyzing empirical materials. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative methods (pp. 35-45). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
43. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
44. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). Strategies of qualitative inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
45. Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: CA: Sage Publications.
46. von Eckartsberg, R. (1996). Existential-phenomenological research. In E. von Eckartsberg (Ed.), Phenomenological inquiry in psychology: Existential and transpersonal dimensions (pp. 3-61). New York: Plenum Press.
47. Webster's II New College Dictionary (1986). New York: Houghton Mifflin Co.
48. Trochim, W. (1989). An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12(1), 87-110.
49. Trochim, W. (1993). Reliability of concept mapping. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association, Dallas, Texas.
50. Trochim, W. (1989). Concept mapping: Soft science or hard art? Evaluation and Program Planning, 12(1), 1-16.
51. Davis, J. E. (1989). Construct validity in measurement: A pattern matching approach. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12(1), 31-36.
52. Marquart, J. M. (1989). A pattern matching approach to assess the construct validity of an evaluation measurement. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12(1), 37-43.
53. Linton, R. (1989). Conceptualizing feminism: Clarifying social concepts. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12(1), 25-30.
54. Shern, D. L., Trochim, W. K., & LaComb, C. A. (1995). The use of concept mapping for assessing fidelity of model transfer: An example from psychiatric rehabilitation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 18(2), 143-153.
55. Mannes, M. (1989). Using concept mapping for planning the implementation of a social technology. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12(1), 67-74.
56. Wenger, N. S., Korenman, S. G., Berk, R., & Berry, S. (1997). The ethics of scientific research: An analysis of focus groups of scientists and institutional representatives. Journal of Investigative Medicine, 45(6), 371-380.
57. SPSS, I. (2004). SPSS 13.0 for windows. http://www.spss.com
58. Sykes, G., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664-670.
59. Heitman, E., & Bulger, R. E. (2005). Assessing the educational literature in the responsible conduct of research for core content. Accountability in Research, 12(3), 207-224.